RE: PH2 Tested: Suzuki V-Strom 650

RE: PH2 Tested: Suzuki V-Strom 650

Monday 8th August 2011

PH2 Tested: Suzuki V-Strom 650

Updated 'tall-rounder' proves size isn't everything



Against the odds the Suzuki V-Strom 650 has been one of the success stories of the last decade. It arrived to a muted welcome in 2003 with worries that its little 645cc V-twin would have trouble making the V-Strom 1000 chassis go along the road, but instead of fading away, gradually the baby V-Strom strengthened its place in the middleweight all-rounder sector.


By 2006, with the arrival of an ABS option to satisfy the German market in particular, it had become the best selling bike in the class. The price was keen, which always helps, but there was much more to the V-Strom than that. It had very good fuel economy and a good sized tank, lending it a 200 mile plus range to reserve, comfort was exceptionally good, it was agile enough to make sinuous roads worth hunting down, and the engine had character...

Trouble is, the little V-Strom was beginning to show its age. Kawasaki has recently updated the Versys, a bike that matches the V-Strom almost to a pound in price (the Suzuki costs £7,023) and has virtually the same size engine. So Suzuki has given the V-Strom a revamp, too. It's been a simple job because the new 2011 V-Strom comprised little more than the old one with a Gladius engine and some new clothes.


Suzuki might well have been constrained by recession-tightened development budgets but it's tweaked the V-Strom in exactly the right places while leaving the good alone, and it's all worked a treat. Letting the chassis be for example, means you get an aluminium twin spar frame instead of the steel used in many rivals, and with a 6kg (13lb) overall weight loss, the handling has perked up very usefully.

Small adjustments have been made to the damping, and the result is a deletion of the swaying sensation you could get when asking the old version to switch direction rapidly and a useful increase in front end tactility that improves confidence in corners, especially when braking into a turn. Stability is better, the bike steers more precisely and the suspension has less of a budget, choppy feel. All for shedding a few pounds and dialling in some firmness.


It's still more touring biased than the Versys so you get a plusher ride and a little less agility, but the V-Strom compromise between the two seems better suited to this class anyway. Part of its great stability comes from a longer wheelbase, and in turn that provides more room for a passenger, where a Versys pillion is pressed a little too close to the rider.

While the engine is simply a Gladius motor with revised cam profiles designed to boost lower rev torque at the expense of a few high rev horsepower, compared with V-Strom mark one there's a host of changes. 2011 V-Strom gets twin plug heads, different fuel injectors, pistons, throttle bodies, crankshaft, valve springs, internal gas flow enhancements to reduce pumping losses, and as one happy result, a claimed 10 per cent improvement in fuel consumption. That last factor is significant as the old model was always thrifty with its demand for unleaded, and sure enough on an admittedly fairly gentle section of our ride the bike rewarded me with 55mpg according to the bike's computer (something else you didn't get with the old model) confirmed by a true 55.3mpg at the pump.


That means a 240 mile range despite the fuel tank losing one litre compared with last year's bike, another confirmation of the V-Strom's touring prowess. They'll be pleasant miles too as the V-Strom seat is a comfortable place to be. Your backside is well looked after (although if the height was marginal before, note the new one is 0.6in (15mm) higher, partly because it's better padded, partly because the bike sits slightly higher on its suspension. The bars meanwhile are in much the same place as before, which means the relaxed, upright and welcoming riding position is unchanged.

Actually, the seat deserves more of a mention than that as it's one of the most comfortable you'll park your cheeks on, your passenger will find the same and with its red stitching and V-Strom logo it looks really good too.


The screen and fairing deflect a little less of the wind blast than before, but what hits you is smoother and quieter, and as this means fatigue is reduced, it's still an improvement. You can adjust the screen in fact, although only in your garage and the correct Allen key to do it isn't included in the toolkit, unforgivably, so it's a set and forget, and taller riders will find even the highest setting could be a touch higher still. But really, this is niggling, you can sit here for hours at high speed and not be bothered by buffeting or noise.

The engine is equally relaxing when it needs to be, offering enough low and mid-range thrust to make the bike a genuine top gear machine. You can leave it in sixth much of the time, which is quite a surprise given its middleweight capacity, but across the rev range it impresses with its delicious, liquid power delivery. The offbeat exhaust just about battles past the EU noise jobsworths enough to please, while none of the vibration is bothersome at any point of contact with the rider. But there's still enough zest to be exciting, even if a claim of 68bhp might not raise your blood pressure. Suzuki is good at giving you power where it matters, making for example the 97bhp GSX1250FA feel as quick on everyday roads as Honda's 170bhp VFR1200, and the Strommer is no different, punching and pulling when you most need it to.


Which leaves the looks, and while these will always be subjective, I reckon you don't need to leave them at all. In fact it's as sharp to the eyes as it is to the other senses (whichever ones detect acceleration and handing...). Given the inherent gawkiness of all the tall-rounders, its bigger visual masses are well disguised and there's a better overall balance that at its very worst is inoffensive. But I think it's pretty good looking, the only shame is the dull colour choice of white, black or a '70s orange.



Author
Discussion

jp-speed-triple

Original Poster:

1,504 posts

187 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
great review. thanks.

not a bike for me, but I can see the uses being wide and varied and a great step into touring without the 'encased in plastic' fairing look.


shouldbworking

4,769 posts

212 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
I'd rather have a tenere. The V-Strom is fugly smile

Biker's Nemesis

38,637 posts

208 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
Oh no. It has ABS.

Fleegle

16,689 posts

176 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Oh no. It has ABS.
Good. That will stop us killing ourselves

jp-speed-triple

Original Poster:

1,504 posts

187 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
shouldbworking said:
I'd rather have a tenere. The V-Strom is fugly smile
660 Tenere? Not anywhere near as smooth as a V and its not exactly a 'roady' set up with a 21 inch front and long travel fork. (VOE)

The 1200 is a different class/category of bike surely?

MarJay

2,173 posts

175 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Oh no. It has ABS.
It has ABS as an option. The ideal solution.

J B L

4,199 posts

215 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
jp-speed-triple said:
shouldbworking said:
I'd rather have a tenere. The V-Strom is fugly smile
660 Tenere? Not anywhere near as smooth as a V and its not exactly a 'roady' set up with a 21 inch front and long travel fork. (VOE)

The 1200 is a different class/category of bike surely?
Isn't it £13k though... no toys either IIRC.

AndyCzech

39 posts

158 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
First time I have seen the Stig on two wheels.

ellisd82

685 posts

208 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
My Uncle has one of these. Decent bike but a little too vibey, making it not so good for long distance. The V-Strom 1000 however is less vibey and has more grunt for touring.

RemaL

24,973 posts

234 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
Another great review but I personally find it fugly

y2blade

56,097 posts

215 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
shouldbworking said:
I'd rather have a tenere. The V-Strom is fugly smile
I love the irony...you not seen the Tenere?

hehe

jp-speed-triple

Original Poster:

1,504 posts

187 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
oh, I dunno.



looks right at home I recon.

shouldbworking

4,769 posts

212 months

Tuesday 9th August 2011
quotequote all
Indeed smile the 660 can be had for 5 grand at the moment as well.

I found the tenere more comfortable, and it seemed like it might actually survive a bit of rugged use..

No doubt the v strom would be perfectly fine, but just my personal preference

Fats25

6,260 posts

229 months

Tuesday 9th August 2011
quotequote all
I rode one of these bikes as a loaner whilst mine was getting serviced the other week. I was actually very impressed - when my Bandit finally gives up the ghost, this is one that will be near the top of the list as my next commuter.

The clocks feel quite dated, but I enjoyed the ride of it.

jp-speed-triple

Original Poster:

1,504 posts

187 months

Tuesday 9th August 2011
quotequote all
Fats25 said:
I rode one of these bikes as a loaner whilst mine was getting serviced the other week. I was actually very impressed - when my Bandit finally gives up the ghost, this is one that will be near the top of the list as my next commuter.

The clocks feel quite dated, but I enjoyed the ride of it.
we have a 660 XT in the stable, its a hoot on the green lanes, could use a nicer front end and more travel, but I'm being picky, for the money they are great bikes.

Fats25

6,260 posts

229 months

Tuesday 9th August 2011
quotequote all
jp-speed-triple said:
we have a 660 XT in the stable, its a hoot on the green lanes, could use a nicer front end and more travel, but I'm being picky, for the money they are great bikes.
I meant the DL could be next commuter!

jacjac

137 posts

224 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
I have had my V-Strom for just over a year now, having had two Honda Transalp's over the past 12 years. it was just 3 years old with 6k on the clock with full Givi top box and panniers and lots of other extras. It was 'as new' and I paid £3,500 for it. Since then I have done short commutes, long commutes and toured on it. It gets left on the street overnight and is definitly not a pampered pet, but a bike that get ridden all year whatever the weather. I accept it's not the prettiest, but it is a great all rounder and has never missed a beat, the engine is a peach and it does a genuine 220 miles on a tank.

Playsatan

567 posts

227 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
^^^^^ 220 miles to a tank?

I must be as slow as hell then. I filled up last night with 275 showing, do it regular and once saw 300 (although I was pushing it a bit).

Mine is in daily use too and thrives on neglect.

metbandit1

430 posts

153 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
I might get rid of the gsxr for this bike. Trade in the gsxr, get myself some awesome finance (thanks to knowing the lady which does the finance for the suzuki dealer)


argh 19y/o looking at these..
I just want to do long trips!!

getmecoat



fwaggie

1,644 posts

200 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
I liked my VStrom thou, it was a lot better than the Africa Twin it replaced. (and the 1200GS I had for a brief time)

I never loved it, didn't have much soul but it did do everything well, inspired confidence, very comfy, reliable.

I'd have this 650 as a daily ride if I had the money to afford two bikes.