RE: Driven: Jaguar XKR-S Convertible

RE: Driven: Jaguar XKR-S Convertible

Thursday 17th November 2011

Driven: Jaguar XKR-S Convertible

PH goes round the block ... and round the block again in Jag's XKR-S Convertible Nurburgring mule



The best view you can usually expect of a motor show debut car is, if you're lucky, a glimpse from over the shoulders of fellow hacks scrumming around the car and poor unfortunate lovely who's been plonked beside it. So to find oneself being led down corridors and most definitely behind the scenes of the show floor and into an underground car park to drive the car you've just seen unveiled is something of an honour.

Hardly a show car, but the mule look works
Hardly a show car, but the mule look works
I've been given opportunity for a quick run around the block in the new Jaguar XKR-S Convertible.So new it's only had its official world premiere a couple of hours before. And yet here, in LA, is a matt black development mule complete with the full roll cage and race seats required for 'Ring shakedown sessions. It's a bit of a contrast to the glitzy white example on the showstand but the real deal and I'm being allowed to drive it.

Ah yes, those Nurburgring lap times. One of the biggest shocks of the LA show is the new-found American fixation with that notorious/infamous/legendary (pick the cliché of your choosing) slice of German tarmac out there in the Eifel forests. The Yanks have gone mad for it, to the extent that you almost expect a stars and stripes to be flying from the flagpole of the iconic hilltop castle beside the track.

Even hard-working test mules need a holiday
Even hard-working test mules need a holiday
Jaguar brand manager Adrian Hallmark made a big point about bigging up the XKR-S's Nordschleife credibility in his presentation for the car and he's not the only one. Ford's SVT performance division chief did the same for the Shelby GT500 also debuting here and with Camaro and, of course, the Viper all busy setting 'Ring lap times it's clear this is now as important a performance barometer here as the traditional quarter-mile burn-up.

And it seems chopping the roof off the XKR-S hasn't slowed it down much, the recently recorded 7:51 for the coupe just seven seconds faster than the soft-top. Chatting with Jaguar chassis and development man David Pook it's clear why too - the Convertible only weighs another 42kg and was designed from the outset as a cabrio with the sills already stiff enough for the required structural rigidity with or without a roof. Which is how the Convertible can run the same spring rates and suspension settings as the coupe without shuddering itself to pieces.

Cage and race seats but definitely not stripped
Cage and race seats but definitely not stripped
And this is perhaps more relevant for our strictly time-limited run around the block outside the LA show hall. Affable chaperone Travis agrees that the matt black paintwork lends a certain menace and confirms that this and the roll cage mean few arguments out on the busy LA streets.

A distinct lack of corners and purely urban test route presents few opportunities for really getting under the skin of what the XKR-S is capable of, but a conveniently placed tunnel just half a mile into the route provides a chance to test one important attribute, namely how good it sounds.

It takes some V8 to stand out in the US but, suffice to say, the XKR-S cabrio is Jag enough for the job. Chopping the roof off may have neutered the lines somewhat, but as I drop to first and permit myself a generous flex of my foot as we enter the underpass the reflected sound is, quite simply, gorgeous. It's loud, properly loud, and the crackle on the overrun brings a big grin to my face. Travis, who's probably had to endure this a dozen times already today, is probably rolling his eyes behind his big Cali-spec shades but I don't care.

No corners? A tunnel run it is then...
No corners? A tunnel run it is then...
The only other real test available to us in these surroundings is the compulsory stoplight getaway. Here the XKR-S displays impressive traction with barely a chirrup of tyres and another guttural explosion of V8 goodness. The supercharged V8 has never lacked grunt, the power delivery not unlike that of the old-school supercharged AMG V8 used in the SL55 and others. Several hundred kilos lighter than the old SL and with 550hp and 502lb ft of torque that 4.2-second 0-62mph time feels, from the seat of the pants, entirely believable.

It's fair to say that the test route isn't exactly ideal for exploring much at all about the XKR-S's abilities, but it's nice to get out of the show and Travis and I chat cars as we rumble around the block. He's a man of sophisticated tastes, an Austin Healey 100/6 among his fleet. The tactic works a treat and he suddenly breaks off the conversation, swears under his breath and looks over his shoulder. "Damn, I got distracted, we were meant to turn way back there," he says. "Looks like you're going to get a longer drive than anyone else!"

Hmm, somebody got to play on some corners
Hmm, somebody got to play on some corners
It's a small victory, but any extra time in the car is welcome. One impressive attribute for such a focused car is the ride quality. It shouldn't come as a huge surprise given Jaguar's track record in this field but even on LA's lumpy, pock-marked streets the XKR-S rides comfortably, underlining David Pook's earlier assertion that it's still a proper GT car no matter how lairy the bodykit might be.

A full assessment of the car's talents will have to wait for another time but the hot Jag impresses with its usability. Indeed, if they hadn't made such a fuss about those 'Ring laps you could easily write it off as another pose-y cab built exactly for the kind of straight-line showing off in which we've just been indulging.

A hundred grand is fierce money for a Jaguar XK, but there's a real sense of confidence around Jaguar and, out here, there's no embarrassment in such extravagance. Emotionally the coupe will always be the more purist choice but, by the numbers at least, there's very little in it and for the ability to enjoy a more intimate relationship with the fabulous noise it makes the XKR-S Convertible makes a case for itself. And, yes, we'll have it in matt black with a roll cage please.

 

 

 



Author
Discussion

MrCarCoach

Original Poster:

337 posts

157 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Never thought I'd like a Jaguar in matt black, but in XKR-S spec it looks fantastic! Nice to see it on British plates too!

adz13091982

185 posts

168 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Nice looking but maybe just me but 7 seconds seems a lot to loose performance wise...

Vilhelm

406 posts

149 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Nice motor, but a matte black wrap just doesn't suit it at all. It needs painting in a deep solid colour.

Tin Hat

1,371 posts

209 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
I'm a bit worried about the bits of yellow tape keeping the carbon wrap secured......

MrTappets

881 posts

191 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Surely if you're that fussed about the performance you don't want the added weight and wobble of a convertible? Seems a bit self-defeating, like a vegan going to a steak house.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Strange mix of design goals really - harcore big GT car with an automatic gearbox and a soft top.

That new front bumper with it's catfish look is really not pretty either.

Japcarnut

190 posts

177 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
perhaps being overly suspicious but wouldn't the roll cage add rigidity vs a standard convertible? Also are the yellow marks on the body there to spot any body panel motion or something else?

Catfish is the right description for the front bumper - too fussy on what is otherwise a stunning car (especially in coupe form)

Kazlet

278 posts

171 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Looks nasty in the matt black. Interesting that preproduction cars are typically painted matt black with black wheels to look as dull, uninteresting and insignificant as possible on the road. Then some clown orders one in the same spec!! Unbelievable.

Verde

506 posts

188 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
That is a painfully unattractive car.

Hellbound

2,500 posts

176 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Hmmm...it's got a roll cage.


Roll it.

Deeply Mad

2 posts

149 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
I like it, but would prefer British Racing Green though. And I'll keep the roll cage too......

Hairspray

6,225 posts

207 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
Looked terrible in white, but oh god, that looks gorgeous.

Do want.

AngryPartsBloke

1,436 posts

151 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
Kazlet said:
Looks nasty in the matt black. Interesting that preproduction cars are typically painted matt black with black wheels to look as dull, uninteresting and insignificant as possible on the road. Then some clown orders one in the same spec!! Unbelievable.
Yeh, how dare somebody buy a car that you arent going to buy and then spec it to thier own tastes, im outraged.

BuzzLightyear

1,426 posts

182 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
Looks better than the white show car IMO but the C-X16 is M I L E S better!

j_s14a

863 posts

178 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
Jaguar can do no wrong at the moment smile

nonuts

15,855 posts

229 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
adz13091982 said:
Nice looking but maybe just me but 7 seconds seems a lot to loose performance wise...
Did you actually write that?

7 seconds, count them out loud. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. Over 13 miles, or in other words loosing less than a second a minute driving flat out. In the real world there is no performance difference between those cars.

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

Friday 18th November 2011
quotequote all
BuzzLightyear said:
Looks better than the white show car IMO but the C-X16 is M I L E S better!
Couldn't agree more, that C-X16 is one sexy MF..

Tim16V

419 posts

182 months

Saturday 19th November 2011
quotequote all
A very 'fragmented' look about it - very fussy - lots of lines and angles seemingly at odds with each other. The rear spoiler certainly doesn't help - looks like a dodgy aftermarket add on.

The Jag saloons - without exception - look fantastic though...I wonder what's gone on here.

will261058

1,115 posts

192 months

Sunday 20th November 2011
quotequote all
Vilhelm said:
Nice motor, but a matte black wrap just doesn't suit it at all. It needs painting in a deep solid colour.
I agree, dont like matt at all, and the spoiler on the boot needs losing too!

ZesPak

24,427 posts

196 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
Can live with the matt black, although not a real fan.

Hate the spoiler though.