RE: PH Blog: meeting the XJ220

RE: PH Blog: meeting the XJ220

Wednesday 1st February 2012

PH Blog: meeting the XJ220

Riggers's bedroom wall poster comes to life, 20 years down the line


Car looks good...
Car looks good...

Never meet your heroes, the hoary old saying goes. It's a tired cliche, but the point that reality rarely lives up to your dreams is a fair one to make.

...Riggers looks nervous...
...Riggers looks nervous...
And yet last week I had the chance for a brief ride - and an even briefer drive - in a very special pair of Jaguar XJ220s to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the car's launch. 'You'll be disappointed' warned colleagues (who shall remain nameless), when I told them what I was doing.

They then recited the litany of the anti-XJ220 catechism: 'It's got a metro V6, not the V12 it should have had; it was supposed to be four-wheel drive; the McLaren F1 and a recession made it obsolete more or less immediately; it drives like a truck.'

Blah, blah, ruddy-blah, as far as I was concerned. Because for - ooh - a good five years, a poster of a silver XJ220 took pride of place on my teenage bedroom wall. And the chance to get a go in something that stunning and which was, for however brief a time, the fastest production car in the world, was not something I was going to pass up.

Wallace and Law. Not at 180mph
Wallace and Law. Not at 180mph
You'll be able to read more about my experience with the silver car - chassis number 004 - in a full PH Heroes feature soon, so I shan't go into too much detail about it except to say that yes, it is a somewhat agricultural experience and no, I don't care. Because the overall sense of occasion and explosive twin-turbo rush from that 550hp V6 is genuinely awesome.

In my case the experience was more than enhanced by the presence in the passenger seat of one Andy Wallace, Le Mans winner with Jaguar in the 80s and a development driver on the original XJ220 programme.

He had been scaring passengers silly on Jaguar's Gaydon test track and kindly played temporary cameraman for us (you'll see the results in the full feature - please don't expect Chris Harris levels of videography). And he was more than happy to chat about everything from the development of the XJ220 to how bloody scary Le Mans was before they put the chicanes in. A true gent.

XJ220S is pretty special...
XJ220S is pretty special...
But the highlight of the day was the ride in a bright yellow XJ220S. The numbers speak for themselves with this car, of which only a handful were made: 700hp and only 1,080kg - 400kg less than the standard car.

This one was also the very first XJ220S, built by TWR using spare parts from Le Mans XJs - which means single-piece front and rear clamshells made from carbon fibre, Kevlar seats and some serious suspension - along with that small matter of the extra power.

And it felt as outrageous as it looked. With a smiling Justin Law at the wheel (a man who can take a V12 XJR-9 Le Mans car up the Goodwood Hill in just 44.1secs), the XJ220S simply exploded onto Jaguar's high-speed test track. He really didn't hang about, getting hard on the power along some of the long sweepers to counter mild understeer. At about 225km/h. At the fastest point we reached 285km/h, which I worked out to be around 177mph.

...But then so is the 'standard' car
...But then so is the 'standard' car
It certainly wasn't sophisticated in the way it achieved it - the engine groans, the wind roar is deafening, and the wipers lift away from the windscreen - but it was brilliant. And the amazing thing was that this car - and the silver one driven by Andy Wallace had been doing this all day without missing a beat. And driven hard. "Andy and I have been trying not to race," grinned Justin. "But, you know... it gets a bit difficult..."

Never meet your heroes, eh? On the basis of my first encounters with an XJ220, an XJ220S, and Messrs Wallace and Law, I don't think the cliche applies. Though perhaps given another chance I wouldn't make one of them play impromptu cameraman...

Riggers

Author
Discussion

Bolognese

Original Poster:

1,500 posts

224 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Nice! This was my favourite car as a kid cool

Krikkit

26,513 posts

181 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
This was my favourite childhood supercar. The original XJ220, in silver. Brilliant.

F1GTRUeno

6,353 posts

218 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Love the XJ220, perhaps even more so due to the criticism it gets.

Stunning looking things and would still destroy most things from a standing start, especially the S model.

Chicane-UK

3,861 posts

185 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
Love the XJ220, perhaps even more so due to the criticism it gets.

Stunning looking things and would still destroy most things from a standing start, especially the S model.
I think that's a good point. The more snobbery levelled at it, the more mythical it somehow becomes. I think it's absolutely amazing.. and who cares if it was never the car that was promised. It still did 220MPH (more than most supercars today) and it still looks fabulous.. nothing more needs to be said IMHO.

M666 EVO

1,124 posts

162 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
I love the fact Jaguar have always used the name XJ. XJ6, XJ8, XJR, XJ220, XJS.

Xtra Jagtastic!

Awesome car and one of my all time favourites from when I was a child, the others being F40 and 959. Natch.

monthefish

20,441 posts

231 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Still is my favourite supercar from that era.

I'd have one over an F40 or an Mac F1 any day of the week.

jagnet

4,100 posts

202 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
An XJ220, an XJ220S, and Messrs Wallace and Law - dammit Riggers, you can go off people really quickly. A touch of envy? Me? Nah... ok well maybe a little. smile

BelfastBoy

779 posts

160 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
XJ220 is still one of the cleanest and most beautiful car designs ever made, and even with 'only' 542bhp it's still faster off the line than many modern supercars. Rather than complaining about a supposed agricultural and difficult driving experience, should this not be celebrated if journos complain that the likes of the 458 Italia, McLaren MP412C and even Lambo Aventador are too technological and 'easy to drive'? If the McLaren F1 and Ferrari F40 are feted and prized for being demanding drivers cars, why not the XJ220 as well?

(Just as an aside, something that shows how much things have changed since the early 90s. When the XJ220 appeared I imagine it was the most powerful production car in the world, but now it's probably beatable in 0-100mph sprints by the likes of the 911 Turbo S and Nissan GTR.)

j_s14a

863 posts

178 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
BelfastBoy said:
(Just as an aside, something that shows how much things have changed since the early 90s. When the XJ220 appeared I imagine it was the most powerful production car in the world, but now it's probably beatable in 0-100mph sprints by the likes of the 911 Turbo S and Nissan GTR.)
I think it would be close, the XJ220 has a massive weight advantage over the GTR. On a dry day I reckon the jag would still take it. The XJ220S would slaughter either.

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
BelfastBoy said:
(Just as an aside, something that shows how much things have changed since the early 90s. When the XJ220 appeared I imagine it was the most powerful production car in the world, but now it's probably beatable in 0-100mph sprints by the likes of the 911 Turbo S and Nissan GTR.)
McLarens F1 was released at a similar time, and was a good 60bhp up on the Jag.

But the XJ220 is a beautiful design - bit long (longer than my Audi A6!), but still gorgeous.

fatboy69

9,371 posts

187 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
The 220 is a great car & is, in my humble opinion, a greatly under-appreciated supercar.

Many many years ago i was lucky enough to blag a ride in the original V12 engined monster - what a beast & a truly great pity that the car didnt end up with the V12 sitting in the back.

Also drove a standard production car on many occasions & i loved it. A big car, but a quick car which turned heads simply because not many people knew what it was at the time.



anything fast

983 posts

164 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
j_s14a said:
BelfastBoy said:
(Just as an aside, something that shows how much things have changed since the early 90s. When the XJ220 appeared I imagine it was the most powerful production car in the world, but now it's probably beatable in 0-100mph sprints by the likes of the 911 Turbo S and Nissan GTR.)
I think it would be close, the XJ220 has a massive weight advantage over the GTR. On a dry day I reckon the jag would still take it. The XJ220S would slaughter either.
very little in it.. all three cars are quoted from as quick as 7.3 to as slow as 7.9 sec's. My money would be on a GTR as its probably much easier to get off the line. But considering the age of the Jag its an astounding car and would have kicked the arse of every other supercar bar the Mclaren f1...

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Hmm... that S does look better in yellow than the battleship grey one that appeared a few weeks ago...

Looks wise I'd still choose the standard car though... with the 700hp power upgrade please smile

fingersprice

51 posts

154 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
BelfastBoy said:
(Just as an aside, something that shows how much things have changed since the early 90s. When the XJ220 appeared I imagine it was the most powerful production car in the world, but now it's probably beatable in 0-100mph sprints by the likes of the 911 Turbo S and Nissan GTR.)
I'm not so sure, a few years ago Top Gear raced one against a Pagani Zonda and the XJ220 comfortably beat the Zonda IIRC

KP

190 posts

201 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
BelfastBoy said:
XJ220 is still one of the cleanest and most beautiful car designs ever made, and even with 'only' 542bhp it's still faster off the line than many modern supercars. Rather than complaining about a supposed agricultural and difficult driving experience, should this not be celebrated if journos complain that the likes of the 458 Italia, McLaren MP412C and even Lambo Aventador are too technological and 'easy to drive'? If the McLaren F1 and Ferrari F40 are feted and prized for being demanding drivers cars, why not the XJ220 as well?

(Just as an aside, something that shows how much things have changed since the early 90s. When the XJ220 appeared I imagine it was the most powerful production car in the world, but now it's probably beatable in 0-100mph sprints by the likes of the 911 Turbo S and Nissan GTR.)
Very good point....

Absolutely love this car.

KP

Gruber

6,313 posts

214 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Justin Law: great bloke and a fantastic racing driver. thumbup

uncle tez

529 posts

151 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
I never really liked these as a child. It certainly wasnt a bedroom all pin up car for me. But 15 years later i saw one in the flesh drive past me and i instantly fell in love. What a car. I do prefer the standard one to the s though

swifthobo

869 posts

170 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Its such a shame that the xj220 never got the same recognition as the f1, f50, f40 great car however.

BelfastBoy

779 posts

160 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
fingersprice said:
I'm not so sure, a few years ago Top Gear raced one against a Pagani Zonda and the XJ220 comfortably beat the Zonda IIRC
I know, I've seen that. Problem is that there was no timing done and the distance wasn't clear either, so it's hard to know how 'scientific' it was - Jag totally destroyed the Zonda though! I was especially surprised because I believe that even a Zonda S is faster 0-100mph than the XJ220. But, over a longer distance like a mile, the Jag's aerodynamics are bound to come into play and so it could probably beat a lot of cars.

Way back in the mid-90s Autocar did an interesting terminal speed test with some of the premier vehicles around then. The distance was 1 mile; from a standing start the F40 managed 177mph and the XJ220 either 180mph or 182mph. The observation was that the F40 absolutely flew up to around 170mph and then acceleration tailed off dramatically; the Jag's superior aerodynamics allowed it to just win because it didn't hit the same 'brick wall' as the Ferrari. (Autocar didn't have an F1 that day, but calculated that it could hit 197mph over a standing mile; on the airfield they used, it probably wouldn't have had enough space to stop though!)

I'm really putting my memory to the test now, because I remember reading in Performance Car (again, way back in the 90s) that the Jag's 542bhp official output was measured somewhere hot; in cooler temperatures the engine actually packs something closer to 600bhp even in standard form. It's certainly an amazing car in terms of straight line speed; for many years it was the only other car I was aware of that could do 0-100mph in less than 8 seconds (7.9?), and although I've never seen a video of it drag-racing against an F1 (is there such a thing?!), I imagine it could at least keep the McLaren F1 honest. For example (and again from memory), Autocar's road test of the F1 was at Bruntingthorpe, where they took the car up to 211mph; on the same airfield, I think Top Gear magazine got the XJ220 to 203mph - not bad over a longer distance.

garypotter

1,495 posts

150 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
swifthobo said:
Its such a shame that the xj220 never got the same recognition as the f1, f50, f40 great car however.
+1, I alway have been a fan of the XJ220, remember about 10/12 years ago I saw a yellow one in the car park at Goodwood on one of their open track days and it had a magazine open in the window of that same car in yellow driven by Tiff (if my memory serves me well) and he had set a new speed record around a very famous round testing track at 220+ MPH.