PH Blog: back from the magistrates
Is Harris insured? A computer somewhere says no and our man has his day in court
I had been summoned to answer an accusation of driving whilst uninsured. I went in person because I knew this not to be the case and wanted the chance to present documents that proved as much. In the event, the case was dropped and I walked away with a slightly better understanding of the way the DVLA monitors vehicle insurance.
Sometime last year I received a note in the post saying that a car registered in my name was uninsured. I assumed at the time that a surveillance vehicle had taken a photograph of the car, cross-checked the license plate against the DVLA database and, for whatever reason, found no record of insurance cover. The car was listed on a larger fleet policy.
It turns out no photograph was taken, instead the DVLA now cross-references licensed vehicles on the road and checks the insurance details. I'm assuming it's an automated process.
It turns out that my car wasn't on the database, nor was it a second time when the DVLA checked forcing a summons, but it was there last week when they made one final check, so all's good with the world.
Am I stroppy at being hauled to Swansea? Not at all.
I view this in just the same way I do inconveniently lengthy conversations at border controls. Yes, they take time, but the rigour proves that people are doing their job. And we shouldn't like people who drive uninsured.
So any process that proactively searches for uninsured vehicles is a good thing. If there is a problem, and sadly this will always be the case with these automated processes, it's that there is zero tolerance for anomalous circumstances. It is entirely possible to end up in court having done nothing illegal, purely because of a clerical error. This does seem slightly harsh.
The system also seems heavily weighted towards individual, private owners too. Just as it now appears impossible to tax a car without a cover note that bears the same address as the V5 document, so drivers with valid insurance through fleet schemes and such like could find themselves, like I did, in a spot of bother.
It is also a problem for those who like to SORN classics in winter and aren't too handy with paperwork. You can quickly find yourself receiving lots of threatening letters.
Most at risk is the honest motor trader. Blurring the lines between stock and personal transportation now looks like a risky business, which is a shame because I've always suspected that half the supercars you enjoy seeing in public are actually driven by traders forgoing a bit of profit margin for their love of exotics.
If you want to check whether your car is listed on the Motor Insurance Database, head here.
Chris
If there was any bloody sense to the system somewhere along the way they'd have some cretin in a cubicle making phone calls or sending letters to ensure that the database is correct and they don't end up wasting tax payer money on pointless court cases.
You might not be pissed off Chris, but some of us aren't fortunate enough that we can just pop off to Swansea as a result of a clerical error.
"I was told I guilty of fraud last week and told that I would fined thousands of pounds if I didn't turn up in court some several hundred miles away. It's OK though, because it shows they're doing their job properly.".... No it doesn't Chris, it shows they're utter bureaucratic a
holes. Certainly I would be looking to recover all associated costs with losing a days earnings and the travel involved. Personally, as I'm paid by the day, I'd have lost a significant sum. Your average joe would have lost a days holiday at the very least (or had an unexpected doctors appointment <cough!>) so should be recompensed.
I wonder how much these compensation costs ammount to over the year which, of course, come out of the government coffers, and how much good that money could do elsewhere if the DVLA could iron out these flaws in their system?
They could have saved some postage, but writing back AFTER they'd contacted my insurers to confirm that I am indeed insured.
I agree that we need to clamp down on uninsured drivers, but as always, I bet this hits legitimate people more than it catches hardened law breakers.
And clearly they need to improve the database to avoid wasting a lot of people's time and the DVLA's money.
I'm a trader who used to frequently "blur the lines between personal transportation and stock" and as such had to carry my trade policy certificate with me everywhere. As of last year though, the company who supplies my trade policy starting asking "is this vehicle for stock, personal use or both" and when you say both they actually update the DVLA database so that I doesn't trip off every ANPR I pass and (touch wood + every other stupid superstitious ritual i can think off) I've not been pulled over once since they started doing it (watch this I'll get pulled ever night for the rest of the month now).
Good point well made though, if those of us who do pay huge amounts for insurance aren't prepared to live with the odd Police/DVLA slip-up in order to catch the barstewards who drive round uninsured and carefree then they'd be no point in any of us having insurance.
I'm not sure if that was a congratulations, mini soap box moment or what............
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff