Very childish of me certainly, but since the mid 80s as a kid, I have continually identified minor/ trivial parts of cars to classify these as 'superior' vehicles to those without.

Back in the 80s vehicles with rear headrests and rear belts were always better than those without.

Then it was body coloured bumpers and door handles - clearly a car wearing these would be better than the same vehicle with the plastic equivalent.

More recently indicator repeaters on the door mirrors and daytime running lights are another silly way for me to rate cars.

Do you have any silly ways to rate some cars as superior to others?

DRLs don't work either, unless you want to be classed among the "newer=better" brigade.

Wheel arch liners, that's a big thing for me.

An 'i' always won me over.

Tilt and slide sunroof, electric of course. Also dual-zone aircon or whatever it's called - my Audi doesn't have it

"16v" badges, twin exhaust pipes and later on clear indicators when most cars still had gingers.

Bigger wheels!

Oh wait, that isn't a silly thing anymore.

When I was growing up in the 90's my mates and I always looked at what the speedo went up too. My dad was driving a BMW 328i at the time that went to 160mph. This instantly made it better than my friends dads Passat at about 130mph and other mates at 150mph as in our opinion having the highest speedo ment it was faster and better.

Electric windows for me.

I remember the first car I got with them, deliberately putting a window down just before I arrived at a mates house so I could put them back up in front of him.

A 16v badge.

Or the ABS badge- carried on by certain korean manufacturers for far too long