RE: SOTW: MG ZS 180

Friday 17th August 2012

SOTW: MG ZS 180

An unlikely collision of pipe'n'slippers Rover and V6-powered BTCC hooliganism ... for £750



Six miles south of Banbury lies a small Cotswold village called Clifton. Despite its very modest population of 250 residents, it's home to no fewer than three MG ZS 180s. Per capita, Clifton surely boasts more of these V6 curios than any other British town or village. Either Clifton rests upon a ley line that originates in the skunk works at Longbridge, or - more likely - the ZS 180 simply worms itself into a person's affections given enough exposure and the unwavering acclaim of an owner. Like influenza, enthusiasm for the ZS 180 spreads through intimate contact.

Interior dated but suitably sporty
Interior dated but suitably sporty
This most intriguing of modern MGs traces it roots back to 1995 when Rover launched the 400, a car with as little apparent athletic potential as the septuagenarians who would inevitably covet it. The 400 (which later became the 45) was co-developed with Honda, however, and it boasted double-wishbone front and independent rear suspension.

One can imagine a rogue engineer offering up the 2.5-litre KV6 to a 45's engine bay after-hours, barely suppressing his squeal of excitement when he realised that it would fit. Although the KV6 had until that point served duty in automatic Rover 800s, its potential was plain to see. 180hp at 6,500rpm and 177lb ft at 4,000rpm. Combining the KV6 with an overhauled 45 chassis might just produce something interesting...

The quaint and the furious
The quaint and the furious
The metamorphosis from retrospectively-styled 45 to racy ZS is as comprehensive as any that amphibious nature has to offer. The placenta red of the car in this advertisement doesn't show the ZS off in its most thrusting light, but in bright blue or yellow it was a world away from the Rover 45. Against a sea of four-cylinder rivals, the ZS 180 also offered something nothing else in the class could; a genuinely captivating engine. That was enough to win over many admirers, although just as many were put off by the dated cabin.

The ZS was facelifted in 2004 with a more modern aesthetic, but some may prefer the pleasing incongruity between Jaguar-pastiche styling and boy racer wings and wheels - one that can only come about organically and without cynical forward planning - of the original ZS.

This car looks really rather clean for its bargainous price of £750 and with only 74,000 miles beneath it there's plenty more driving pleasure to come; one of the three Clifton examples has covered precisely twice the distance.

180hp for £750 - that's proper shed maths!
180hp for £750 - that's proper shed maths!
MG knew that the ZS would need a motorsport programme to help buck the Rover image. In partnership with West Surrey Racing, MG embarked upon a British Touring Car Championship programme with drivers Anthony Reid and Warren Hughes. Reid registered MG's first BTCC win on just its third outing (albeit because of a brave tyre choice, as depicted in the accompanying video).

MG would rack up many race wins over the following few seasons, but it was the striking grey and bright green livery that most appealed to a misguidedly patriotic teenager rather than any meaningful sporting success.

The MG ZS 180 is a spectacularly unlikely device given its origins. Who would have believed that with an interesting engine, an agile chassis and a mean-looking racing version the Rover 400 could become a budget performance icon?

Advert is reproduced below.

2002 52-plate MG ZS MGZS 180 2.5 V6
This is my 2002 52-reg MG ZS 180. This is the 2.5 quad cam V6 version - the quick one! 0-60 in 7.3 seconds.
Car has 74k miles on it with part service history (which indicates that the cambelt is next due for change at 90k) and has just had a major service this month with a new MOT (no advisories).
The half-leather interior of the car is spot on, as per the pics. The exterior is very good also. No rust, no dull paint, generally the car cleans up very well.
New exhaust system fitted in last 2,000 miles.
Car comes with 2 sets of keys, owners handbook, Haynes manual, part service history and some MOT's etc. It has no known faults, and I welcome any inspections or test drives. I've also had the aircon re-gassed recently so it blows ice cold. Car is standard except for aftermarket air filter / cold air intake but comes with original airbox if you prefer.
Car is in Sandridge, near St Albans (AL4 9UZ).
Any questions please ask. Open to reasonable offers.

Author
Discussion

philkermeen

Original Poster:

28 posts

147 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Like!!

fatboy69

9,371 posts

187 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Seriously tempted by that. Wonder how easy it would be to shift my 318is?

Steamer

13,856 posts

213 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Sounds like a great car for the money.

No my cup of tea though. I'd live in constant fear of 'mates' adorning it with National Trust stickers and chrome fish as soon as my back was turned.

Frimley111R

15,623 posts

234 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Great shed for the money! I think the belts are £2-300 to do (I stand to be corrected here!) but even so, this is possibly one of the best SOTWs ever.

Dave Hedgehog

14,549 posts

204 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
you would have to pay me more than £750 to drive that

YesItsAVW

2,721 posts

165 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Seriously good cars for the money!

PatrickOUFC

179 posts

153 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Decent looking motor - at £750, can't really go wrong can you?

shaun442k

262 posts

196 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Good choice for SOTW! I liked mine when I had it. The engine made a great noise with a cold air induction fitted. Freed up a few horses too.
Went well on track. I swapped it for a Clio 182, and there is very little in it performance wise.


Frimley111R said:
Great shed for the money! I think the belts are £2-300 to do (I stand to be corrected here!) but even so, this is possibly one of the best SOTWs ever.
Double that and you'd be closer.

Actus Reus

4,234 posts

155 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Quicker than a GT86.

Just sayin'...

IAJO

231 posts

158 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
probably worth more if they broke it.

off_again

12,285 posts

234 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
I got invited to drive one at launch - not sure why.

Great drive, fantastic chassis and a characterful engine and great value for money. A less is more car if you see what I mean. BUT, driving position sucks and the interior is from a Honda - from the '70's.... which isnt so good. But for less than a grand? Bloody bargain!

LuS1fer

41,130 posts

245 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Why are these cheap cars never available round here in Wales? I would have bitten his arm off 3 weeks ago for that.

PatrickOUFC

179 posts

153 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
What sort of MPG are we looking at for one of these?

Triumph Man

8,687 posts

168 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Quite like these, would prefer the saloon though. Only problem for me is that the interior does look horrifically dated.

carinaman

21,287 posts

172 months

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
I've always had a soft spot for these, just because they took something so unlikely and managed to make a genuinely decent driver's car out of it.

Shame about the fuel economy and assembly quality control, though. hehe

Leptons

5,113 posts

176 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Want! (Well for £750)

StottyZr

6,860 posts

163 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
A friend of mine is asking for £600 for his ZS 180. He paid £650, 6months ago and it came with a vibe sub and amp that he sold for £150 hehe Great little cars, the v6 sounds brilliant with an aftermarket exhaust.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
A very good and capable car. I personally prefer the saloon version visually over the hatch though.

Bit of a shame the article is slightly in accurate about the Rover 400 though. As there was the earlier 420 and 420 turbo variants long before the V6. Also I think Rover produced a 2.0 V6 version slightly before the 2.5 one (although that I'd need to check on).

I also find it rather ironic that the Honda version of the same platform doesn't seem to be tarnished with the pipe and slipper tag that PH proclaims about the Rover. Ho hum... whistle

Nice write up otherwise though. smile

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
you would have to pay me more than £750 to drive that
Yes, but then you are hugely unrealistic about somethings... wink