Lovely little car.....

Lovely little car.....

Author
Discussion

bridey0

Original Poster:

2,961 posts

185 months

rob.kellock

2,213 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
Very nice. Born in December 1970, just like me.

dibblecorse

6,875 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
rob.kellock said:
Very nice. Born in December 1970, just like me.
Me too smile

Pretty little thing that is ....

erics

2,663 posts

211 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
what's the difference betwee T, E and S?
(obviously the price!)

uktrailmonster

4,827 posts

200 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
erics said:
what's the difference betwee T, E and S?
(obviously the price!)
Engine spec and power, suspension spec, plus quite a few interior details and notably the lovely Recaro seats usually standard on S, but optional on others (This particular T does have Recaro seats or more likely replicas). Externally not a lot really, just a few minor details. A well sorted T upgraded close to S spec is what I would go for today with original E and S prices heading through the roof. All variants are great cars if well sorted.

minimalist

1,492 posts

205 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
uktrailmonster said:
erics said:
what's the difference betwee T, E and S?
(obviously the price!)
Engine spec and power, suspension spec, plus quite a few interior details and notably the lovely Recaro seats usually standard on S, but optional on others (This particular T does have Recaro seats or more likely replicas). Externally not a lot really, just a few minor details. A well sorted T upgraded close to S spec is what I would go for today with original E and S prices heading through the roof. All variants are great cars if well sorted.
From memory I think the 2.2 put out the following figures (or close enough)
T: 125bhp / E: 150bhp / S: 180bhp.

uktrailmonster

4,827 posts

200 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
minimalist said:
From memory I think the 2.2 put out the following figures (or close enough)
T: 125bhp / E: 150bhp / S: 180bhp.
Pretty good memory, correct except E was 155 bhp. Increased power on E and S models came from higher compression ratios and higher rpm. The 2.2S was a peaky little motor with bags of character.

mez3

356 posts

219 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
Stunning car.


The dash look's just like the 993 I sat in last week laugh

minimalist

1,492 posts

205 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
uktrailmonster said:
minimalist said:
From memory I think the 2.2 put out the following figures (or close enough)
T: 125bhp / E: 150bhp / S: 180bhp.
Pretty good memory, correct except E was 155 bhp. Increased power on E and S models came from higher compression ratios and higher rpm. The 2.2S was a peaky little motor with bags of character.
hehe

Geek memory - Not actual memory from when they were new. I'm waaay too young.

drmark

4,840 posts

186 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
uktrailmonster said:
Pretty good memory, correct except E was 155 bhp. Increased power on E and S models came from higher compression ratios and higher rpm. The 2.2S was a peaky little motor with bags of character.
Well put - last of the high compression engines before emissions got in the way. You have to wring their necks to get the most out of them but I think the 2.2 range is among the best of all the Porsche engines - at least sound wise (and I speak as an ex GT3 owner). And unlike the later cars the early ones feel light and agile - a well set up S is as close to a RS to drive as you can get (at least in standard form).

Edited to add; and Ts the comparitive bargain of the bunch. The E is a dark horse and quicker than people think. The S a cracker but VERY expensive nowadays.

Edited by drmark on Wednesday 28th November 17:19

Chrisp5782

630 posts

138 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
erics said:
what's the difference betwee T, E and S?
(obviously the price!)
T - Touring, entry level car with cast iron cylinders.

E - Injection engine with aluminium and steel engine build.

S - Sport.

I'm not sure on BHP for each but other will know.

SlowlnFastOut

430 posts

209 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
Finding myself liking the older 911s more and more of late. What are the rough prices for the 2.2 and 2.4 litre variants? Is there much difference in LHD versus RHD values

uktrailmonster

4,827 posts

200 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
SlowlnFastOut said:
Finding myself liking the older 911s more and more of late. What are the rough prices for the 2.2 and 2.4 litre variants? Is there much difference in LHD versus RHD values
Prices all over the place, just like the condition of the cars. Last time I looked T values were around £30K and S values £60K ish, with E somewhere in the middle. Beware that most examples are complete dogs. Better to ask this question on the DDK forum.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
mez3 said:
Stunning car.


The dash look's just like the 993 I sat in last week laugh
Er, thats because it is basically same. You say it like its a bad thing? I think its rather wonderful.

drmark

4,840 posts

186 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
SlowlnFastOut said:
Finding myself liking the older 911s more and more of late. What are the rough prices for the 2.2 and 2.4 litre variants? Is there much difference in LHD versus RHD values
Phil Raby has a restored T with bills for 60k up at £35,000 ish. A good E is at least 50k. And a nut and bolt restored S by margue expert likely to be around £100k. A restoration wreck S can be 20k and you can spend 100k doing a top notch job to get it back together. My body restoration took nearly 600 hours and that did not include dissembly, sprying or assembly. Beware shiny cars riddled with rust - all UK cars have rust if original, it's just a matter of how much.

gibbon

2,182 posts

207 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
drmark said:
Phil Raby has a restored T with bills for 60k up at £35,000 ish. A good E is at least 50k. And a nut and bolt restored S by margue expert likely to be around £100k. A restoration wreck S can be 20k and you can spend 100k doing a top notch job to get it back together. My body restoration took nearly 600 hours and that did not include dissembly, sprying or assembly. Beware shiny cars riddled with rust - all UK cars have rust if original, it's just a matter of how much.
Hmmm, the Phil Raby car looks nice indeed, but its a bit of a custom now really, a little bit of a 'bitsa' car, matching numbers and originality now are what drives the prices of these cars.

Not knocking the Phil Raby car, just commenting.

stevod

449 posts

140 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
bridey0 said:
Ah I had a look at that car on Monday. First time I've actually had a sit inside one like that. Coming from a 981 it was quite something, and quite wonderful. Bit different to the Ps of today.

S


bridey0

Original Poster:

2,961 posts

185 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
stevod said:
Ah I had a look at that car on Monday. First time I've actually had a sit inside one like that. Coming from a 981 it was quite something, and quite wonderful. Bit different to the Ps of today.

S
Did it look like it had been nicely restored? Dont suppose you had a drive?

Steve Devaney

714 posts

202 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
dibblecorse said:
rob.kellock said:
Very nice. Born in December 1970, just like me.
Me too smile

Pretty little thing that is ....
That makes three of us!

However nice that car is, it is 930/965 money and that is where my pennies would go........

bridey0

Original Poster:

2,961 posts

185 months

Wednesday 28th November 2012
quotequote all
Steve Devaney said:
That makes three of us!

However nice that car is, it is 930/965 money and that is where my pennies would go........
Different car for different reasons