RE: Driven: Audi R8 V10 S-Tronic

RE: Driven: Audi R8 V10 S-Tronic

Tuesday 12th February 2013

Driven: Audi R8 V10 S Tronic

Rejuvenated R8 fights back with new dual-clutch S Tronic gearbox



“Here are the keys, and off you go.” So runs the normal introduction to a new press car. Usually, it’s accompanied by a frisson of excitement, but this time, there was more than a touch of apprehension. You see, I was at St Pancras International, and the keys were to Audi’s new £115,575 R8 V10 S Tronic. My task was to drive it out of central London in rush-hour traffic. Preferrably without glancing an errant taxi or nudging up against a lane-hogging bus. And, just to complicate matters, snow was forecast. Good.

R8 is as docile as ever, when you want it to be
R8 is as docile as ever, when you want it to be
I needn’t have worried. Through the traffic, the V10 is utterly content to dawdle, and then out through the Millennium Falcon snowstorm on an ever-whitening motorway, the easy-going throttle and four-wheel drive meant I was no less relaxed than the chap in the rep-spec A4 next to me.

Of course, this was par for the course. The R8 has gained a reputation as one of the most usable supercars around, and it’s for that reason that it’s been such a hit. Over 20,000 have been sold worldwide since it was launched. But even a car as successful as this can’t get away without a mid-life spruce up, so Audi’s thrown a few shiny bits at the R8 to keep it fresh. And while we’ve driven the top-of-the-range V10 Plus model out on a track, the real test of a facelifted R8 was always going to be on the road.

S-Tronic box is the biggest change
S-Tronic box is the biggest change
It isn’t just a cosmetic makeover, this. The biggest change is under the skin, where the new dual-clutch S Tronic gearbox replaces the R Tronic robotised manual. And this is one of those cars where a dual-clutch system works. The new gearbox fits with the R8’s character perfectly, offering relaxed and easy-to-handle cruising ability when you need it. Hit the kickdown switch, though, and all hell breaks loose.

The ’box thunks down two gears so quickly that, even with the traction control activated, the back end squirms (like the old car, there’s a 15:85 F:R torque split as standard, extending to 30:70 when the going gets slithery). Once grip returns, you’re catapulted up the road accompanied by a V10 yowl that never stops, thanks to the rapidity and savagery with which the gearbox rams home the next ratios. Flick a paddle to enter manual mode and there’s more of the same, only this time you’re controlling things – quite literally. In sport mode, the car really won’t change up until you tell it to, which is gratifying, and on the downshifts there’s a truly delectable blip of the throttle. It’s one of the most convincing applications of a dual-clutch box that we’ve seen, and streets ahead of the old R Tronic. If you can stretch to the £2,900 it adds to the base price, it’s worth it. So equipped, the V10 will now hit 62 in 3.6 seconds, and top out at 195mph; in manual form, those figures are 3.9 seconds and 197mph respectively.

V10 sits in the middle of the R8 range
V10 sits in the middle of the R8 range
Of course, if you're looking for more, there's always the new V10 Plus. This comes with an extra 25hp, for which you'll have to pay £124,675. 0-62mph drops to 3.8 seconds and top speed goes up to 198mph; add the S Tronic box for the same £2,900 and you'll get a 0-62mph of 3.5 seconds and a 197mph top speed. And if you can't quite stretch to either V10 model, never fear; the V8 is still available. It, too, gets the new gearbox as an option - again costing £2,900 over the standard car's on-the-road price of £91,575. You'll do without a few toys and you'll swap a V10 wail for a V8 warble, but you'll still get a pretty rapid 0-62 time of 4.3 seconds and a top speed of 187mph (4.6 seconds and 188mph with the manual gearbox).

So, what else is new? Well, not much of substance, it must be said. The most obvious differences are in the headlights, which are now LED units front and rear. The rears, meanwhile, now feature directional indicators, which ‘flow’ out toward the side of the car as they flash. Sounds gimmicky; is. But also rather cool. There have also been a handful of detail cosmetic changes, including new exterior colours (the matt finish is striking), some fiddling with the grille vanes, and optional diamond-quilted leather inside.

OK, so a Porsche is more pointy, a Ferrari more finessed and a Lambo a touch more lunatic, but the R8 is very nearly as good as all of those cars at all of those things, while also being eye-poppingly beautiful, addictively dramatic and just as usable as it always has been. And now it’s available with the S Tronic ’box, it’s better than ever.


AUDI R8 V10 S-TRONIC
Engine:
5,204cc V10 direct injection
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic
Power (hp): 525@8,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 391@6,500
0-62mph: 3.6sec
Top speed: 195mph
Weight: 1,645kg
MPG: 21.6 (combined)
CO2: 305g/km
Price: £115,575 OTR (manual £112,675)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photography: Prime Exposures

Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,295 posts

223 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I know there will be a lot of bashing of this car on here at some point but, trying to view it as objectively as possible, I believe this to be a great car for day-to-day "real world" living with.

kambites

67,563 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I think problem my favourite of the current crop of "junior supercars", but if someone wants to give me one I'll have a manual, please. smile

stuckmojo

2,979 posts

188 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
the R8 leaves me very cold and indifferent.





(I am joking and very annoyed at the stupidly-high second-hand prices since I want one/V8)

kambites

67,563 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
There is a lot of choice at this price point and I don't know if I could ever pull the trigger to that level for an Audi.

I think they're lovely though and just when I think they're a bit tired and dated, I see one on the road and am reminded as to the presence they have.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Is it just me or is that V10 badge everso slightly on the p*ss?


aka_kerrly

12,418 posts

210 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
I think problem my favourite of the current crop of "junior supercars", but if someone wants to give me one I'll have a manual, please. smile
Junior supercar @ £115k , thought that +£100k was supercar territory.

I appreciate things like the Zonda, Veyron, Aston Ones-77 and Koenigsegg are all significantly more expensive at >£1million but aren't these "hyper cars" or something along those lines.

Either way, it is still good that cars like the R8 exist!

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,295 posts

223 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
Junior supercar @ £115k , thought that +£100k was supercar territory.

I appreciate things like the Zonda, Veyron, Aston Ones-77 and Koenigsegg are all significantly more expensive at >£1million but aren't these "hyper cars" or something along those lines.

Either way, it is still good that cars like the R8 exist!
I always thought the cars were graded in terms of their performance envelope, not price. At least, that would seem obvious, because there is a considerable gulf between the performance of an R8 and the real cutting edge supercars of this generation (I find 'hypercar' such an ungainly term).

RivieraBlue

119 posts

134 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Love the r8, comfiest sports car i have ever driven.

garypotter

1,502 posts

150 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
The R8 is a very likable car but i do not think it could justify the new purchase price. I also think IMHO that the up down carbon plastic stripe behind the doors have dated the car badly and have never loved that look.

No not for me, i would go for the prettier sister the lambo gallardo.

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

A3tdi

268 posts

183 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Yep - that rules out quite a few options for the aptly named 'smartypants':
Ferrari, Maserati , Alfa - all Fiats
Porsche, Audi, Lamborghini, Bugatti, Bentley - all VW's
Jaguar, Aston - both Tata's
Rolls - BMW

Doesn't leave him much to get excited about.



PunterCam

1,070 posts

195 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

goron59

397 posts

171 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
garypotter said:
The R8 is a very likable car but i do not think it could justify the new purchase price. I also think IMHO that the up down carbon plastic stripe behind the doors have dated the car badly and have never loved that look.

No not for me, i would go for the prettier sister the lambo gallardo.
I bought my R8 (3 years old) at about half its new purchase price. That made it very affordable to me.

I too am not too keen on the side blades, but as mine are black with black bodywork, it's not too overt.

But when parked next to Gallardo? I think the Lambo looks nice, especially if it was specced with transparent engine cover, and sounds nice, but mine was a hell of a lot easier to park, cheaper to buy, insure, run, etc.

All nice cars though - just find the one you can afford/enjoy/live with.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

248 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I knowit's subjective and all that... but 'eye poppingly beautiful'.... nah.
Fantastically competent.
Rapid
Quality
well built
dramatic even...

but not beautiful. (IMO)

rtz62

3,369 posts

155 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I've always had doubts about the proportions, particularly from straight ahead or from about 10 / 2 o'clock; it looks somehow heavy and squashed, too broad across the plan.
But.
I would consider one; for some reason I perceive (and feel free to correct me here) that running costs would be vaguely manageable, and parts replacement costs (eg clutch, brake discs etc) wouldn't be too punitive, compared definately to a Ferrari, but possibly an equivalent price-spectrum Porsche or Maserati?

Ashley1987

699 posts

139 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
mrclav said:
h? How'd you work that out?

Let's see, the fact they have a long and distinguished racing history (both on the racetrack and in rallying) and the fact that out of the gate made one of the most well-rounded, easy to live with supercars with their first attempt means nothing? Really?
Spot on

A3tdi

268 posts

183 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]