RE: Audi RS6 Avant: Driven

RE: Audi RS6 Avant: Driven

Wednesday 10th April 2013

Audi RS6 Avant: Driven

The flagship of the Audi RS range gets a downsized engine but upsized performance



So, all-new Audi RS6, your great chance to prove our doubts in fast Audis wrong and demonstrate fancy new technology like 'inside out' turbo installations and the rest really can deliver more than just impressive stats.

RS6 longer & wider but lighter than rivals
RS6 longer & wider but lighter than rivals
You can swot up on some of the technology in the new car in our earlier story on the new RS6 but the big news for this third-gen uber Audi is, of course, downsizing. Now, all things are relative and when your starting point is a 580hp, 5.0-litre twin-turbo V10 that does give you more headroom than most to both maintain the all essential power advantage while paying token heed to fuel efficiency and CO2.

Until the RS7 Sportback arrives later this year the RS6 will be the most expensive Audi RS that money can buy; £76,985, to be precise. Rather a lot of dough for a big estate car, even one of the RS6's supercar-humbling abilities.

Loudmouth
This new RS6 is the fastest yet and cracks the four-seconds to 62mph mark with a faintly astonishing 3.9 seconds. Though the refreshed E63 AMG S - in some markets now four-wheel drive too of course - can do it in 3.6. And, yes, that's a bit daft.

V8 soundtrack is monumental
V8 soundtrack is monumental
Setting that aside for now the RS6's increase in pace over the previous V10 version comes despite the drop in size and cylinders, the new car now coming with a twin-turbocharged 4.0-litre V8 with 560hp and 516lb ft. Top speed is governed at 155mph, though like the M5 and E63 AMG, you can spec your RS6 with optional packs that raise top speed to 174mph or 189mph. If you really, really need those pub bragging rights, that is.

Shouting about your new RS6 is something you probably won't need to do, mind, as it's quite happy to do so itself. A sports exhaust option is available, but the standard system is plenty vociferous enough; hit the power and the flaps open, unleashing a gnarly V8 warble, overlaid with the turbos' jet-like whoosh. Drop the eight-speed ZF gearbox down a cog and it woofles and farts happily to itself, too.

Gripping yarn
Changing down is just fine, as the ZF 'box works well in the RS6. Shifts are swift but at the same time doesn't seem as keen to change down as it does in some other applications, allowing you to surf on the whopping torque of the V8. There's perhaps a whisker of turbo lag, but you don't really suffer, such is the brawn of the engine beneath. And when the boost kicks in ... devastating. Keep your foot planted, pull the paddle - gratifyingly, it won't change up for you in manual mode - and the surge just continues into silly numbers.

Rear bias makes RS6 feel lively
Rear bias makes RS6 feel lively
You'd expect monumental grip in a fast Audi and, duly, the RS6 delivers. The good news is that the RS6 is fun with it, too. There's a 60 per cent rear bias, which can automatically rise to 85 per cent if needs be. The result of this, and the lighter engine, is that the new car loses the nose-heavy tendency of the old car. In fact, in most circumstances, the RS6 moves like a rear-driver under power, giving it a feeling of liveliness that belies its size.

The proviso to this is that the launch cars were all equipped with the optional steel-sprung Sport Suspension Plus, based on the familiar diagonally linked DRC system. As standard, the RS6 gets adaptive air suspension, and it's the first-ever RS model to be so equipped. Unfortunately, this lack of any air-sprung cars at the launch means we can't tell you whether it's actually any good. What we can tell you is that the optional setup is a touch more supple than the RS4's, making it comfortable enough to live with day-to-day in comfort mode, though the dynamic mode may prove a little on the firm side for UK roads.

Steering could be better. Interior's nice, though.
Steering could be better. Interior's nice, though.
Overpower steering
While the ride quality is acceptable, the RS6's steering is a problem. It's fast, but it doesn't give much feedback, even by the standards of other electric steering systems. Add to that a dollop too much assistance, and the result is a nervous yet remote sensation that's too artificial. You can drive around it - just - but you shouldn't really have to.

So, costs a bomb, goes hard, grips like hell, makes a good noise, iffy steering. An RS Audi then and third time round it would appear to be business as usual. We'll need to drive an air-sprung car on UK roads to make a full appraisal and, though UK cars will still be rear-drive, the comparison with the 4Matic versions of the facelifted E63 will be fascinating.

To be continued.


AUDI RS6 AVANT
Engine:
3,993cc V8 twin-turbo
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel-drive
Power (hp): 560 @ 5,700-6,700rpm
Torque (lb ft): 516 @ 1,750-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 3.9 sec
Top speed: 155mph (174/189mph upgrades available)
Weight: 1,935kg
MPG: 28.8 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 229g/km
Price: £76,985 (base price)



Author
Discussion

Carl M

Original Poster:

5 posts

208 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
It's just sooooooo heavy!!!! Downsizing the powerplant to meet emissions etc... does not mean a downsize in overall mass. Would love one tho' LOL

JordanTurbo

937 posts

141 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all

lewisf182

2,089 posts

188 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Cant stand the new rears of these audis, the straight line across the back just doesnt suit them at all.
Oh and the infotainment system/sat nav looks like a monumental after thought!

P.s. I dont understand the bit at the bottom, how is it rear drive if its 4 wheel drive? is there a RWD Option :S?

Edited by lewisf182 on Wednesday 10th April 12:30

zeduffman

4,055 posts

151 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
I'll take one in Sepang Blue with the sports exhaust, please.

JordanTurbo

937 posts

141 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
....
Oh and the infotainment system/sat nav looks like a monumental after thought!
It's sat on top like that because it folds away into the dash when not in use. Unlike the one in the new A-class which defiantly IS an afterthought.


ar 145

275 posts

196 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Prefer the sqaurer wheel arches on the previous model tbh.

MrTickle

1,825 posts

239 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
P.s. I dont understand the bit at the bottom, how is it rear drive if its 4 wheel drive? is there a RWD Option :S?

Edited by lewisf182 on Wednesday 10th April 12:30
That was in reference to the E63

Hammerhead

2,701 posts

254 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
That's one interstella load lugger!

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
P.s. I dont understand the bit at the bottom, how is it rear drive if its 4 wheel drive? is there a RWD Option :S?

Edited by lewisf182 on Wednesday 10th April 12:30
It means the UK version of the E63AMG will be RWD-only, so a direct comparison between the 4-matic E63 and the RS6 here is less relevant, but still interesting for the dedicated.

IlkleyTyke

4 posts

135 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
Cant stand the new rears of these audis, the straight line across the back just doesnt suit them at all.
ar 145 said:
Prefer the sqaurer wheel arches on the previous model tbh.
I think the square arches would have worked well with the straight line on the boot, just like there have done with the B8 RS4. Bring back the square arches!!

Digger

14,664 posts

191 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
JordanTurbo said:
lewisf182 said:
....
Oh and the infotainment system/sat nav looks like a monumental after thought!
It's sat on top like that because it folds away into the dash when not in use. Unlike the one in the new A-class which defiantly IS an afterthought.

Whoever designed the M135i's screen needs a hard slap too!!

StottyZr

6,860 posts

163 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
I get the impression this will be good news for the owners of the previous RS6, it doesn't seem to be a big step.

What will they remap like?

PHers remapped RS6

Due to the difference in displacement I wonder/doubt if the gains will be as dramatic as the previous RS6 cloud9

gdelargy

73 posts

195 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Digger said:
JordanTurbo said:
lewisf182 said:
....
Oh and the infotainment system/sat nav looks like a monumental after thought!
It's sat on top like that because it folds away into the dash when not in use. Unlike the one in the new A-class which defiantly IS an afterthought.

Whoever designed the M135i's screen needs a hard slap too!!
I have a funny feeling it's been deliberately designed to ape an iPad/tablet; they could integrate it, but they chose to bling it up intead.

Looks awful though, IMHO, and will date badly too compared to a more integrated design.

Remagel2507

1,456 posts

192 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
zeduffman said:
I'll take one in Sepang Blue with the sports exhaust, please.
+1 was just going to say I like the look of it in any other colour.

The thing I really want to know though is how it sounds, Merc seemed to have kept their amazing engine notes even after switching to turbos, but all the other new turbocharged engines don't sound that good IMO

SRi Slim R

294 posts

138 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
JordanTurbo said:
+1

If I ever won the lottery, ill but all 3 models of it! They are astonishing cars!

lewisf182

2,089 posts

188 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
It means the UK version of the E63AMG will be RWD-only, so a direct comparison between the 4-matic E63 and the RS6 here is less relevant, but still interesting for the dedicated.
Ahh, now i've re read I see what you mean, big face palm by me.

Still think the C6 (i think? circa 2007) RS6 is the best looking of them all!

Silverbullet767

10,702 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Pretty much all the car you'd ever need.

I'll have one in black, anthracite grey wheels, tints in the rear and chrome+badge delete please.

mgmt585

6 posts

133 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
I don't get why they don't just turn down the wick a tiny bit, to get it to reach the magical 30.0mpg/225g CO2 which would be a USP vs the E63 and M5, and aid sales as prospective buyers wouldn't have as much depreciation to worry about if the road tax was half the price. Doubt 20bhp less would have made a massive difference. Planned obsolescence so a facelifted one that hits emissions targets has a big jump in sales for a then ageing model?

Edited by mgmt585 on Wednesday 10th April 14:59

The Vambo

6,643 posts

141 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
ar 145 said:
Prefer the sqaurer wheel arches on the previous model tbh.
Yep, box arches rule. Name an uncool car with box arches, see you can't.

Novas don't count.

lewisf182

2,089 posts

188 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
mgmt585 said:
I don't get why they don't just turn down the wick a tiny bit, to get it to reach the magical 30.0mpg/225g CO2 which would be a USP vs the E63 and M5, and aid sales as prospective buyers wouldn't have as much depreciation to worry about if the road tax was half the price. Doubt 20bhp less would have made a massive difference. Planned obsolescence so a facelifted one that hits emissions targets has a big jump in sales for a then ageing model?

Edited by mgmt585 on Wednesday 10th April 14:59
Would that really matter to somebody spending near a £100k on an Audi estate though? I doubt a couple hundred pound saving a year will help shift any