RE: Jaguar XFR-S: Review

RE: Jaguar XFR-S: Review

Monday 12th August 2013

Jaguar XFR-S: Review

Less string-back driving mitts and more a pair of boxing gloves, there's nothing subtle about the XFR-S



14 and a half large ones. Even if you're in an envious position of not having to worry every time you open your bank statement each month, £14,500 is hardly small change.

Wind tunnel dictates rear wing, honest guv
Wind tunnel dictates rear wing, honest guv
That however is how much that extra letter S will set you back on the rump of a brand new Jaguar XFR. According to Jaguar, where its R models mean high-performance luxury, the R-S moniker denotes ultimate road performance.

Certainly its brief for this XFR-S, to produce the fastest, most powerful and agile Jaguar sports saloon, doesn't pull many punches. Nor do its on-paper bragging rights. There's the same 5.0-litre supercharged V8 as in the standard XFR but further tuned to provide 550hp (the same as in the new XJR) giving it a 0 to 62mph time of 4.64 seconds and an artificially capped 186mph top speed. Average fuel economy and emissions levels are unchanged.

It's a stiffy
Under the skin are a host of changes too including revised front suspension, new spring rates (that are 100 per cent stiffer than the standard XF) as well as corner recognition and intelligent torque management for the eight-speed ZF automatic gearbox to avoid it changing gear mid-corner.

V8 gets 550hp and a fancy carbon cover
V8 gets 550hp and a fancy carbon cover
Added to that is a further 100 hours of wind tunnel time resulting in a deeper chin spoiler with vertical vanes and 'that' rear wing. Which is a delete option it should be noted, with a small lip spoiler available instead. If you like that standard wing, that's fine, but be warned it seriously hinders what is already a limited rear view.

Not that anything behind you will be visible for very long mind you. The XFR-S is noticeably more responsive than the plain XFR, which is hardly a slouch let's face it.

21-gun salute
As ever with the XF, the steering feel is good and it imbues confidence on the road with masses of grip and powerful brakes. All the while too you're accompanied by that gorgeous V8 that doesn't just sound superb on hard throttle but also pops and bangs on the over-run like the F-Type. It's not quite machine-gun loud like the two-seater, but it's noticeably more aggressive than the M5 or E63 AMG.

Lovely on smooth tarmac, less so elsewhere
Lovely on smooth tarmac, less so elsewhere
If we were to leave it there, you'd be asking where to sign on the dotted line, but unfortunately that's not the whole story. Nobody reading here or any potential buyer is pretending that this is a luxury saloon, but we have some reservations over the XFR-S's refinement.

As on the XJR we drove on the same launch (full story soon), the bespoke Pirelli P Zeros are very sensitive to road surface changes in terms of noise. Also, if you were being polite you'd say the ride was fidgety and if you weren't at times it's verging on unbearable. Cat's eyes crash through the cabin and you feel every expansion strip. Make no mistake, it's so firm it sometimes makes an Audi feel compliant. Whether related or simply because the tyres were going off after a long day of abuse, our car was getting a serious wiggle on under hard braking on track too.

We'll reserve our final judgment until we've driven it on UK roads, but you'll need to be committed to drive it on a daily basis without it wearing you down. It's no wonder that Jaguar only expects to sell around 120 of them.

You'll not miss that in your mirrors
You'll not miss that in your mirrors
On home turf
There are other issues too. Don't get us wrong, we love it and it works well, but there's no question that some elements of the XF's interior are beginning to look and feel a bit dated in terms of the controls and layout. Most notably, the sat-nav urgently needs updating.

All of which sounds very negative, but we're glad that the XFR-S exists and that we've driven it. If nothing else, as with the limited edition XKR-S GT, it shows Jaguar's commitment to pushing the boundaries, particularly when it comes to even more driver-orientated and enthusiast-led cars. That all bodes well for the future too.

Is this XFR-S a push too far though? We certainly wouldn't criticise anyone for buying one but it would require a degree of understanding (from your other half and your osteopath) to drive every day. We never thought we'd say this, but with £14,500 left in your pocket, a standard XFR is probably the better all-rounder. We must be getting old...


JAGUAR XFR-S
Engine:
5,000cc, V8, supercharged
Transmission: 8-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 502@2,500-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.6sec
Top speed: 186mph (limited)
MPG: 24.4 (Combined)
CO2: 270g/km
Price: £79,995 (before options)









   
Author
Discussion

AdvocatusD

Original Poster:

2,277 posts

231 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Is it just me, or is Jaguar the most exciting main stream car company at the moment?

The CX-75 and the F-type, etc. It really has risen well since the TATA takeover.




MyCC

337 posts

157 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Love the XF but that interior along with the telematics really needs a lift and a boost in quality too.

Regards,

MyCC.

0a

23,900 posts

194 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Looks more like a VXR than a Jaguar, a bit too far for me though I'm sure it's fast.

rob1234

854 posts

197 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Looks a bit like an Octavia vRS at first glance...?!





Edited by rob1234 on Monday 12th August 15:09

Krikkit

26,515 posts

181 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
I think in a more subtle shade, and without the huge wing, it'll be a lot less showy. Sounds like the ride would be a deal-breaker to me. Lovely thing to exist though, well done Jaguar!

ETA: Much nicer.



Edited by Krikkit on Monday 12th August 15:07

Itsallicanafford

2,764 posts

159 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
...weight saving?

rtz62

3,360 posts

155 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
A poor choice of colour with which to display your wares; looks like VXR meets Halfords.
This need to be stealthy, colour-wise not in your face.
As it is, my money would definately go elsewhere.

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
AdvocatusD said:
Is it just me, or is Jaguar the most exciting main stream car company at the moment?

The CX-75 and the F-type, etc. It really has risen well since the TATA takeover.



They would raise even further if they they would make that thing above....

rj1986

1,107 posts

168 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
I think in a more subtle shade, and without the huge wing, it'll be a lot less showy. Sounds like the ride would be a deal-breaker to me. Lovely thing to exist though, well done Jaguar!

ETA: Much nicer.



Edited by Krikkit on Monday 12th August 15:07
Saw one like this the other day on the M4.
Without the shopping-trolley rear spoiler, it looked almost subtle. Almost.
And IMO much nicer.

Charlie Michael

2,750 posts

184 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
PascalBuyens said:
AdvocatusD said:
Is it just me, or is Jaguar the most exciting main stream car company at the moment?

The CX-75 and the F-type, etc. It really has risen well since the TATA takeover.



They would raise even further if they they would make that thing above....
That car is absolutely stunning - please make that Jaguar.

EngageSportMode

41 posts

138 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
The rear wing makes it look almost like a Aussie V8 Supercar, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Perhaps Jag is thinking of heading Down Under like Mercedes and Nissan already have?!

Reavenger

129 posts

133 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
rob1234 said:
Looks a bit like an Octavia vRS at first glance...?!





Edited by rob1234 on Monday 12th August 15:09
Ha ha exactly what I thought! wink

New Octavia vRS body kit anyone?

Charlie Michael

2,750 posts

184 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
That CX-75 sounds pretty amazing too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CspcnZ1IBs8

DISASTRA 5 0

56 posts

140 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
0a said:
Looks more like a VXR than a Jaguar, a bit too far for me though I'm sure it's fast.
+1

Benbay001

5,794 posts

157 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
I think the bright blue and the table on the back will help it appeal to the people who seem to be lapping up all the brand new supercars. Wealthy young Arabs.

e21Mark

16,205 posts

173 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
I like the blue personally. Also liked it on the Aston Martin.

They must be doing something right if we're finding fault with the colour. smile

Garlick

40,601 posts

240 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
I think in a more subtle shade, and without the huge wing, it'll be a lot less showy. Sounds like the ride would be a deal-breaker to me. Lovely thing to exist though, well done Jaguar!

ETA: Much nicer.

Phwooar!

Blown2CV

28,786 posts

203 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Jaguar can't get away with charging that kind of money for a car with the fit, finish, quality of the XF. Cool it may be, but it just doesn't quite stack.

Zad

12,698 posts

236 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
I wonder if that engine/transmission will be available with R suspension? With such a small production run, I strongly suspect that this one isn't aimed at UK audiences anyway. Although having said that, imagine what that suspension would do on New York City roads!

Delete the Mitsubishi Evo spoiler on mine please. Ta.

AdamLoewy

176 posts

194 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Those wheels are awful.