Diesel decats to fail MOT

Diesel decats to fail MOT

Author
Discussion

r44flyer

Original Poster:

460 posts

217 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Can't remember reading this anywhere before until it was posted on another forum today. If it's a repost I apologise.

From 16th Feb diesel powered vehicles will be subject to a check for the presence of catalysts AND particulate filters and will fail if either are not present where one was fitted as standard.


Toaster Pilot

14,621 posts

159 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
People made a big fuss about DPFs but nobody mentioned cats - useful to know.

r44flyer

Original Poster:

460 posts

217 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Toaster Pilot said:
People made a big fuss about DPFs but nobody mentioned cats - useful to know.
Indeed. So far no one has been worried as diesels have not been subject to an emissions test, only a smoke test, which they can easily pass despite having no cat. As a popular performance modification for diesels I can see a lot of people getting caught out by this come MOT time.

Toaster Pilot

14,621 posts

159 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
I imagine it's a common way to avoid paying for a replacement cat too - I'd have thought about that if the one on my crusty old Felicia had given up!

C.A.R.

3,967 posts

189 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Buggeration.

I fitted a decat pipe for the performance benefit and the old one had a hole in. It seemed pointless spending £100+ on a 13 year old car for a pattern cat.

I'll have to see if someone can just weld a cat housing over the top of the pipe. They only check for the presence - not whether it's actually functioning!

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Interestingly (and I am sure this has been mentioned elsewhere) it does not say that the cat/DPF has to be functioning, so presumably the previous emission standards are all that apply as far as this is concerned.

So, if an evacuated or non/malfunctioning cat/DPF cannister is present as per the strict interpretation of the regulation the car still passes this requirement.

Mikeyplum

1,646 posts

170 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Great news frown

Literally ordered a SS Decat yesterday banghead

Ahh well, got a year to sort something out.

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
r11co said:
Interestingly (and I am sure this has been mentioned elsewhere) it does not say that the cat/DPF has to be functioning, so presumably the previous emission standards are all that apply as far as this is concerned.

So, if an evacuated or non/malfunctioning cat/DPF cannister is present as per the strict interpretation of the regulation the car still passes this requirement.
It depends on exactly how you word the question - modification of a car in such a way that it would fail the emissions part of the type approval test that it was put through when originally released has always been illegal; so a nun-functional cat or particulate filter has almost certainly always been illegal (as, I suspect, are many remaps). The new testing, however, will probably still not entirely enforce the regulations so you'd probably get away with a cat body with no internals.