What telescope?

Author
Discussion

danhutton

Original Poster:

290 posts

251 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
Hi, looking to buy a fairly inexpensive telescope.
Any recommendations?
Thanks in advance

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

249 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
How inexpensive?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
And what for. Scopes come in various types, if serious, get the best you can afford. Buying cheap will nit really be bringing in the light in a good way.

And don't overlook binoculars as an alternative.

danhutton

Original Poster:

290 posts

251 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
Oops! Upto £200? ......

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

249 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
£200 will just about get you into GoTo style scopes where the scope points itself at celestial objects, but half the fun is finding objects yourself. For that I would suggest a dobsonian mounted reflector as you get the most bang for your buck that way and just point and look. A six inch dobsonian should be within your budget and should give you some great views of most common objects if you have a good viewing site. Downside of the dob is that it won't track objects so is useless for photos and you will constantly have to adjust aim on higher magnification viewing.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
A friend recently bought one of these (slightly over budget):

http://www.firstlightoptics.com/dobsonians/skywatc...

(hope the link works)

It's great. You do have to keep "chasing" the object, but it's addictive. I've seen Saturn and the rings through it, Venus, and last week Jupiter, the bands, and about 6 moons.

Looking at our moon, you almost think you'd see a little green man waving at you! Brilliant images.

Then you'll need one of these to track things, and it all gets a bit £££

http://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-mounts/...

It's damn good though. I can't wait til the summer to go and use all of his equipment!

vladcjelli

2,970 posts

159 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
On a similar theme, what's the cheapest but best option for lunar photography?

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

249 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
Cheapest but best?

Depends what you hope to do but a bird watching scope with camera attachment probably works best if you want a single whole of the moon image or if you want to make a patchwork composite a long tube reflector with a modified webcam would give you most bang for your buck.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
I deliberately went for as much of a light gatherer I could and this meant not buying a goto. The option I can add. But also the other big factor was a stable platform and the cost was a good tube and mirror and a good set of legs.

All the fancy dohickeys I could add at a later date. But the base setup is good. As for taking pictures or film, I have managed to stop at my DSLR mounted on the scope but the itch is there for the other goodies, it looks a money pit if you want to get that far involved.

vladcjelli

2,970 posts

159 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
IanMorewood said:
Cheapest but best?

Depends what you hope to do but a bird watching scope with camera attachment probably works best if you want a single whole of the moon image or if you want to make a patchwork composite a long tube reflector with a modified webcam would give you most bang for your buck.
Sorry, I didn't give a lot of detail.

I have a dslr I'd like to be able to hook up to something and take some photos of the moon from which I'd be able to pick out a bit of crater detail.

So when I said cheapest but best, I was meaning the best compromise between spending a tiny amount of money, but still getting reasonable amateur results.

Will go and google bird scopes now.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
I use a DSLR for the moon and get quite reasonable results however focus is a pain with mine. I have no rear screen, just the usual eye piece and usually get it a tad out.

Weather means I have not been at mine for some time now.

But here is one I made earlier

Put a Barlow on

As you can see, it aint perfect and needs attention. And just given my laptop away that was going to be part of the solution.


Edited by jmorgan on Thursday 13th February 14:25

vladcjelli

2,970 posts

159 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
I use a DSLR for the moon and get quite reasonable results however focus is a pain with mine. I have no rear screen, just the usual eye piece and usually get it a tad out.

Weather means I have not been at mine for some time now.

But here is one I made earlier

Put a Barlow on

As you can see, it aint perfect and needs attention. And just given my laptop away that was going to be part of the solution.


Edited by jmorgan on Thursday 13th February 14:25
So is that with a t mount thingy? Or some Heath Robinson contraption holding the camera to the eyepiece?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
T piece. Pulling what hair I had out when I first got it. Take the lens off the camera and fit the ring, then that ring will either attach to an extension tube or directly to the scope eye piece holder. I dumped the extension tube and it works. Have to balance up of course.

You lose autofocus but the light meter still work. Must use remote release and shutter lock up or those movements are transmitted through.

andygo

6,804 posts

256 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
What telescope? It's a subject that needs looking into. smile

parabolica

6,724 posts

185 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
Here's my thread from a few months ago smile

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
Anyone seen the £40 ones in Aldi? they look tempting as an occasional toy.

Mr Noble

6,535 posts

234 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
Not meaning to destroy the OP's dream of owning a telescope and seeing wonderful things, but I'd suggest, having owned a number of cheaper telescopes and a couple of very expensive ones, that the best thing to do, is look at celestial images in books or online.

Unless you've got kids who are keen to try out a bit of star spotting, I think many people are ultimately disappointed by what they see through a scope. The 'argos'' telescopes are all going to produce a poorer view of the sky than a decent pair of binoculars will.

If you've got the room, a good dobsonian may be the best bet bang for buck.


IanMorewood

4,309 posts

249 months

Friday 14th February 2014
quotequote all
As said before a six inch dobsonian is within budget new, you could perhaps find an eight second hand, with that and a dark spot to sky is full of fun things to see. Much bigger than an eight and you really need to think about a permanent base at the very least or perhaps a shed with a flip out roof.

A fourty quid special from aldi is likely to be disappointing.

Zad

12,704 posts

237 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
A dobsonian isn't capable of being adapted to tracking though, which is essential if you want to take SLR photos. I would probably forget the telescope part altogether and buy a motor driven equatorial mount to sit the camera on, and look into getting an oldschool manual focus 300mm lens.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
How do you mount a 300mm lens then? Mine (lens) is not so good but I thought that the idea of putting a lens (with all its glass and coatings) in the way of the scope was a step backwards if it can be avoided? I also assume that the assembly has to take the weight comfortably of the combined DSLR and lens.

I am still learning so just asking.