RE: BMW M3 and M4: Review

RE: BMW M3 and M4: Review

Monday 12th May 2014

2014 BMW M3 and M4 (F80/F82) | Review

Finally, we get behind the wheel of the M4 and M3



The speaker-enhanced induction noise is a bit irritating at times. And the electrically-assisted, progressive rack steering isn’t the last word in feel or feedback. So that’s the bad news out of the way.

Looking in the rear view mirror whilst making progress in an M3 probably isn’t the most sensible. But the sight of a freshly painted stripe of Michelin’s finest on shimmering Portuguese tarmac is an irresistible distraction. That this came from the outside rear wheel, yet tracks perfectly the arc of the central road markings, tells as much about the dynamic characteristics of this fifth-generation M3 as any spec sheet.

Still not up to speed on the data and tech? We’ve got you covered in our preview story here.


Out where it matters, frankly, we’re having a ball. PH has bagged one of just a couple of manual M4s among a launch fleet dominated by M DCT equipped Yas Marina Blue M3s and Austin Yellow M4s. Which is probably a neat analogy for the likely sales split. On E46 the manual/SMG split was about 50/50. When the dual-clutch M DCT came in on the E9X range it settled to about one in four buyers sticking with a manual, globally at least. Our UK PR man reckons it’ll be 85 per cent DCT in the UK for the new F80 M3 and F82 M4 range.

But we’re die-hards, right? Hence the PH beachtowel going down on the sinister black coupe. Rowing a stick shift around on a car as tech-laden as this does seem a little anachronistic truth be told. And though it’s better than many it’s still a very BMW manual shift, which is to say a bit rubbery and somewhat off the pace of the rest of the car.


You don’t flick up and down the ’box as you do with the paddle-shifted M DCT, rather you plan ahead, make your gear choices deliberate and considered and hold the ratio longer than you might otherwise. Downshifts get auto blipping, heel'n'toe purists able to do their own thing with the engine in Sport Plus mode.

Which is good, because it means the engine gets to show off how broad and expansive its power band really is. Unrelated to any other BMW straight-six turbo, the M3’s new twin-turbo feels like an authentic M engine, with a hint of classic RB26 Skyline motor on the side. Listen hard and you might catch the odd chuff from the small, low inertia turbos but the aim has clearly been to disguise the forced induction as much as possible. Peak torque of 406lb ft is there from 1,850rpm and your full 431hp is there until 7,300rpm, the curves’ peaks intersecting at 5,500rpm. Basically the whole span of the rev counter is your playground but it’s very happy in the upper reaches. It was never going to match the searing howl of the old V8 and it's 8,000rpm-plus hedonism but for a new-school forced induction engine it's mighty impressive and with a character of its own.


And the way it interacts with that fully active diff is proper witchcraft. Exit a corner with a hoof on the throttle and there’s no destabilising wodge of torque like you’d get in a M135i or other ‘regular’ BMW turbo six. Just an increasingly more involving interaction between the engine and rear axle.

With the DSC on you’ll get a lot of orange flashing lights and tugging of leashes, even on a dry road. You need at least M Dynamic Mode to get a sense of the diff locking and unlocking, sending power this way and that. Traction is impressive, DSC, diff and dampers all working together to deploy as much power as possible even when hitting mid-corner lumps and bumps. In all three modes the damping is sublime; fast, slick and always managing weight transfers with casual disdain. And when you start pushing the limits and those black lines start appearing on the tarmac it’s wonderfully progressive and readable.


And that’s the magic of this new M. Everything works in harmony. True, that steering doesn’t give you a huge amount of feedback. But it is trustworthy and front-end bite is immense. At pace you’ll hear chirrups indicating how hard the front tyres are working but understeer just isn’t on the menu and rotations from neat and tidy to properly lairy simply a matter of how bold and early you want to be on the throttle.

In an age of dumbed down performance cars this single-minded focus is hugely refreshing. Put simply? It’s proper. If we’re being picky a faster rack would give something more convincing to lean against than three-mode artificial weighting. And that's about the only real gripe.


On a track you try and drive it in a neat and tidy fashion. But it’ll take all of a couple of corners before thoughts of the racing line disappear, turn-in points get earlier and power applications more aggressive. MDM will cleverly juggle diff and stability control to let you hold a respectable amount of angle; switch it all off and it’s even more transparent and predictable, the angles even more outrageous. In the dry you’re going to be getting through a lot of tyres. In the wet things might well be somewhat lively.

If you drive the manual deliberately and proactively the M DCT car is all about instinct and being able drive it just slightly out of your comfort zone. Need to shift on corner entry? Just flick the paddle. Upshift mid drift? Likewise. The harshest of the shift speed settings will still chirrup the tyres on full bore upshifts for a sense of the old SMG thump in the back but it’s in a different league of sophistication. Hand on (heavy) heart it’s the cherry on the top of the cake and while it’s great there’s still a manual option the M3/M4 is all about the complete package. And the DCT makes it that. Oh, and you might want to scrape together another 6,300 for the ceramic brakes which are both grab- and fade-free. And have natty gold calipers for additional bling.


M3 saloon or M4 coupe then? Thus far the comparisons have been interchangeable, as much for convenience as anything. And on the road they’re functionally pretty much identical, with all the settings, functions and measurements as close as dammit to identical. 47mm lower, the M4 is a slightly favourable centre of gravity but really the choice is going to be one of image and practical needs.

Ironically the grafting of M4 rear track onto the saloon body has resulted in a more dramatic transformation than with the coupe. And though M3 coupes have traditionally far outsold saloon equivalents as the sole recipient of the celebrated badge and blessed with those more aggressive looks the saloon deserves to stand on its own.

As usable day to day as a well-equipped 320d, a proper mentalist when you want it to be and packed with delightfully geeky engineering details to set it apart from the BMW crowd the M3 and M4 are a stirring return to form for an M division we’d feared had lost the plot a little. You get the sense the engineers have really dug deep on this one and gone all out to deliver a good’n. The happy news is it seems they truly have.  


SPECIFICATION | 2014 BMW M3 F80
Engine:
 2,979cc 6-cyl twin-turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual/7-speed dual-clutch auto (M DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 431@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 406@1,850-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.3 sec/4.1 sec M DCT
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,595kg/1,635kg M DCT (EU, with driver)
MPG: 32.1mpg/34mpg M DCT (NEDC combined)
CO2: 204g/km/194g/km M DCT
Price: 56,175 (Basic OTR)

SPECIFICATION | 2014 BMW M4 F82
Engine:
 2,979cc 6-cyl twin-turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual/7-speed dual-clutch auto (M DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 431@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 406@1,850-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.3 sec/4.1 sec M DCT
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,572kg/1,612kg M DCT (EU, with driver)
MPG: 32.1mpg/34mpg M DCT (NEDC combined)
CO2: 204g/km/194g/km M DCT
Price: 56,635 (Basic OTR)













Author
Discussion

Olf

Original Poster:

11,974 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
So it doesn't make you smile when you drive it then...

robsa

2,260 posts

184 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Fatter arches on the M3? The pics make it look the other way round. I'd have either though!

NelsonR32

1,685 posts

171 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Sounds like an improvement on the E9* then. It's the first car I've truly "wanted" in a long time.

The M3 saloon in my eyes has far better road presence...

Shane330

33 posts

119 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Just out of interest, did the E92 M3 out sell the E46?

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Shane330 said:
Just out of interest, did the E92 M3 out sell the E46?
I don't think it did, will try and look for the numbers, 60k and 80k comes to mind.

lewisf182

2,089 posts

188 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Have to say I think the previous E90 M3 saloon is the better looking car. These don't look that much different from M sport equipped cars bar the 4 exhaust? are BMW starting to head down the AMG route where their AMG body kitted lower level cars look like the real deal AMG's? I Hope not.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
BMW do it again a superb next generation.

Boy does it look good in the pics

Only issue ££ but no doubt will be a great used but in 4 years time at £20k.

Brett748

919 posts

166 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
It sounds really good but just lacks the last 1000 rpm of the V8 for me. I'd definitely still own one though!

E65Ross

35,080 posts

212 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Big levels of want. Not far off high-end sports car performance with easy day-to-day levels of practicality.

They'll be people on here moaning it's too heavy, doesn't have as much steering feel as an elise and the brake pedal won't feel as nice as a caterham or something but as an all-round package which you can use daily, take the family in, go to business meetings, do the boring commute in yet still have fun when you want, it'll take some beating.

I still will somewhat miss the peachy NA engines of the old M3 and M5, the new M5/6 engine doesn't quite excite me as much as it should but it sounds like this engine is at least an improvement.

E65Ross

35,080 posts

212 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
Have to say I think the previous E90 M3 saloon is the better looking car. These don't look that much different from M sport equipped cars bar the 4 exhaust? are BMW starting to head down the AMG route where their AMG body kitted lower level cars look like the real deal AMG's? I Hope not.
No different to the past. Look at an E36 M3 compared to an E36 328i sport. Or an E34 M5 compared to an E34 525i sport.....the newer cars have a much bigger difference in styling compared to their equivalent models when compared to the older generations, IMO.

E30M3SE

8,467 posts

196 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Shane330 said:
Just out of interest, did the E92 M3 out sell the E46?
I don't think it did, will try and look for the numbers, 60k and 80k comes to mind.
Total E46 M3 production, across all models and markets inc CSL's was 85766 units, of which 40095 had SMGII g'boxes.

Total E9X production was 65985 units (all markets all models), again this includes GTS & CRT models.

Edited by E30M3SE on Saturday 10th May 20:02

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
As the M3 pushes closer and closer to super car performance it does raise the question of how fast can you actually go?

It will no doubt start to come down to sound looks and then interior plus pedigree.






Just noticed the combined MPG..... That's not far off 60% improvement for a quicker car brilliant engineering. wink

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
Mermaid said:
Shane330 said:
Just out of interest, did the E92 M3 out sell the E46?
I don't think it did, will try and look for the numbers, 60k and 80k comes to mind.
Total E46 M3 production, across all models and markets inc CSL's was 85766 units, of which 40095 had SMGII g'boxes.

Total E9X production was 65985 units (all markets all models), again this includes GTS & CRT models.
Cheers E30M3SE thumbup

Shane330

33 posts

119 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
Total E46 M3 production, across all models and markets inc CSL's was 85766 units, of which 40095 had SMGII g'boxes.

Total E9X production was 65985 units (all markets all models), again this includes GTS & CRT models.

Edited by E30M3SE on Saturday 10th May 20:02
Cheers, I pretty much thought so as the E9X was never as popular around where I live as the E46 once was. Interesting to see if this new model will reclaim some market share for BMW.

Patrick Bateman

12,183 posts

174 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
No different to the past. Look at an E36 M3 compared to an E36 328i sport. Or an E34 M5 compared to an E34 525i sport.....the newer cars have a much bigger difference in styling compared to their equivalent models when compared to the older generations, IMO.
I'd say the F10 M5 is an exception, the mirrors and even wheels aren't so different from an M-Sport as to stand out (relatively speaking) like the e39 or e60. I find it quite hard to spot anyway.

E65Ross

35,080 posts

212 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
E65Ross said:
No different to the past. Look at an E36 M3 compared to an E36 328i sport. Or an E34 M5 compared to an E34 525i sport.....the newer cars have a much bigger difference in styling compared to their equivalent models when compared to the older generations, IMO.
I'd say the F10 M5 is an exception, the mirrors and even wheels aren't so different from an M-Sport as to stand out (relatively speaking) like the e39 or e60. I find it quite hard to spot anyway.
An E39 M5 is no less subtle than an F10 M5! it has no side "vents" like the F10, the front splitter is also the same minus the T-bar and, like the F10, has no fog lights. I would say the F10 is more more subtle than the E39 or E60 to be honest....the E28 and E34 being the most subtle.

Either way, I view that as a good thing. Subtle enough that most don't bat an eyelid, those in the know still know what it is....just how it should be.

Oh - and you can't get F10 M5 wheels on a normal 5.

ManOpener

12,467 posts

169 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
The saloon, in particular, looks splendid. I note that so far, none of the nay-sayers who threw barbed insults in my direction for daring to claim that saloon M3s tend to be better proportioned than the coupé have found this thread. It's also nice to see plenty of people agreeing with that mentality, makes me feel a bit less insane.

If I was buying a new every car tomorrow that I had to live with, come what may, for the next 5 years, I can scarcely think of anything better.

Wills2

22,832 posts

175 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Shane330 said:
Cheers, I pretty much thought so as the E9X was never as popular around where I live as the E46 once was. Interesting to see if this new model will reclaim some market share for BMW.
Not sure it lost market share, more the fact that the sector suffered as a whole as people migrated to SUVs or performance diesels etc...

We also have to remember the e92 m3 was launched just before the biggest global down turn in nearly a century, whereas the e46 M3 was launched in the good times.



toniestark

25 posts

143 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
BMW do it again a superb next generation.

Boy does it look good in the pics

Only issue ££ but no doubt will be a great used but in 4 years time at £20k.
£20k in 4 years time, eh i dont think so...

Patrick Bateman

12,183 posts

174 months

Saturday 10th May 2014
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
An E39 M5 is no less subtle than an F10 M5! it has no side "vents" like the F10, the front splitter is also the same minus the T-bar and, like the F10, has no fog lights. I would say the F10 is more more subtle than the E39 or E60 to be honest....the E28 and E34 being the most subtle.

Either way, I view that as a good thing. Subtle enough that most don't bat an eyelid, those in the know still know what it is....just how it should be.

Oh - and you can't get F10 M5 wheels on a normal 5.
e39 has front fogs. wink I knew there were those differences but they don't tend to catch the eye like totally different wheels or mirrors. Quad exhausts used to stand out a lot more too.