RE: Subaru WRX STI: PH Fleet

RE: Subaru WRX STI: PH Fleet

Thursday 18th December 2014

Subaru WRX STI: PH Fleet

Repeat after me: it's not an Impreza, it's not an Impreza...



Already christened The NotImpreza in the PH office I know the WRX STI has long-since ditched that iconic name. But, like the M3 coupe we're supposed to call an M4, reflexes are hard to unlearn.

Not much changed under here - good
Not much changed under here - good
Look at the evidence too. Scoop'n'wing combo? Check. Slightly flaky interior? Check. Burbly exhaust? Check. Official 'B-road' weapon demeanour? Check. Of course it's an Impreza, in all but name. And what about the familiar extreme thirst? Get back to you on that.

Why a NotImpreza when the rest of the world has opened up and said R? The 300hp Mega Golf has, after all, effectively gentrified Subaru's home turf with socially acceptable packaging and, cough, tempting finance packages. Well, as a former Impreza owner and instinctive champion of the underdog I wanted to see if the WRX STI is still relevant. After all, the fundamental package hasn't really changed much in almost two decades. Yet the performance, technology, capability and ambition of similarly priced hot hatches has undergone little short of revolution. In the Mitsubishi Evo the Impreza had the perfect nemesis. Against the likes of the Audi S3, Golf R, A45 AMG and others it's all of a sudden got a very different fight on its hands, even with more favourable exchange rates.

Same old same old in here too
Same old same old in here too
From the launch you'll recall readiness to administer the coup de grace. Especially after the chosen venue of a small handling track in Sweden showed off little more than darty steering, stubborn understeer and performance around 100hp down on what the looks promised. And then some Swedish B-roads happened.

It's going to be hard to talk about the Subaru without mentioning that ruddy Golf as a counterpoint so I'll attempt to park my thoughts on that matter until ... our long-term Golf R turns up in March. Running both side-by-side will be really interesting, especially given I seem to be the only person in the world not yet won over by the VW. I'm already stockpiling my ammo...

For now I'll concentrate on the first impressions. And much like the launch drive the immediate one is quite how pointy the front end has become. I never remember this being a Subaru trait back in the day but much of the work that's gone into this 'new' WRX STI has seemingly targeted steering response, be that the 140 per cent increase in body stiffness to the super quick 12.7:1 steering rack - 15 per cent quicker than the 14.8:1 of the old one. Lower hardpoints for the rear suspension have increased rear toe-in too, further heightening the steering response to almost hyperactive levels. It is, at least, hydraulically assisted and the feel is a reminder of what we're missing with most electric set-ups.

Repeat after me, it's not an Impreza...
Repeat after me, it's not an Impreza...
But on first acquaintance the front end is so eager it makes finding that familiar B-road flow rather tricky - the damned thing responds so fast to steering inputs you end up jinking this way and that. I'm adapting to it but it's a real shocker at first.

Other things are more familiar. The bobbing nose, the tightly gated and very mechanical feeling shift action, short gearing, the brilliantly placed pedals and need to get the revs and boost off the floor before anything meaningful happens are all very traditional Impr- ... Subaru traits. Likewise the default to understeer that the unadventurous will think is all that happens when you gas it on a wet corner. It's not of course, a lift and tuck opening up a whole load more options, especially with the centre diff set to Auto minus.

Split the difference - tweakability that works
Split the difference - tweakability that works
This 'open' setting is less assertive about sending power to the front wheels, freeing them up to concentrate on steering and allowing the rear axle more influence in cornering attitude. I'd swear the steering feels nicer in this setting as a result. Winter roads were always going to show the WRX STI in its best light but already my stock test slip road on the evening commute has seen a couple of delightful four-wheel drifts, steering dead ahead and throttle holding just a little bit of yaw. Lovely stuff.

The apparent size of the thing is a shock though. The wing doesn't help but the back end looks huge, especially parked alongside my Eunos. And I'm still flinching every time I close the boot - as it swings down it feels like the wing is going to chin you. It does look properly outrageous though, the way it frames the view in the mirror constantly reminding you of its presence. File under guilty pleasure.

Won't win any beauty contests - t'was ever thus
Won't win any beauty contests - t'was ever thus
Moans? Well, the Pioneer touchscreen system is one example of where Subaru can't match fully integrated VW/Audi/Merc style infotainment systems. Looking at the spec sheet Subaru has amusingly added 'four-cylinder Boxer engine burble' in the 'Entertainment' section but the reality is this unit is a £1,012 plus fitting (c. £75, depending on dealership) option. The only added to our car, for what it's worth.

And the thirst? I had to scrape my jaw off the floor when I arrived at the office with a trip computer mpg figure starting with a three. The Germans have mastered nailing the official numbers to their benefit but if this real-world figure is true out on the road the Subaru might not actually be as far off the pace as first thought, especially if previous experience of surprisingly thirsty hot Golfs is carried over to the incoming R.


FACT SHEET
Car:
2014 Subaru WRX STI
Run by: Dan
On fleet since: December 2014
Mileage: 2,636
List price new: £28,995 (£30,007 as tested including £1,012 for Pioneer touchscreen navigation unit; c. £75 fitting charge applicable but varies according to dealership)
Last month at a glance: Time travel Subaru takes us straight back to the late 90s

Photos: Anthony Fraser

Author
Discussion

Zammy

Original Poster:

557 posts

163 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Want to like it, hope it looks better in the flesh.

muppet42

329 posts

205 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
I can't really decide if I like the way this thing looks. It's aggressive that's for sure and of course, Subarus of old have never been a thing of beauty but I liked the functional shape of the Classics straight through to the most recent iteration of the now defunct Impreza (though the latter ones really did benefit from the STi's pumped up aesthetics). This though is a bit...erm...pointy. I'm sure they produce a more discrete version - I know they have with previous Impr-Subarus tongue out

In terms of competitors, I guess the article touches upon this versus the current high-powered hot hatch league. It's perhaps more of an old school outlook and more dynamic proposition for those that think refinement is an option rather than a prerequisite in modern motoring.

I for one have been looking at the older generation of Imprezas right up to but not including when they brought in the 2.5 in the UK. My other half thinks they're a bit on the naff side but I've always wanted one and she has her own car so yeah wink Plus, I'm used to the petrol economics having spent a year with my shed-priced Coupe smile

NelsonP

240 posts

139 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Like it. And I admire Subaru UK for bringing it here.

But the competition have raised the bar too high.

Performance = not much in it?
Looks = subjective (I still love a good old blue Impreza thanks to McRae, Burns etc), but the Golf is just classier
Interior = golf r wins
Driving = no idea, but reviews seem to give the nod to the Golf
On paper, the economy is the worse for the Not Impreza, particularly the emissions.

I think it has its work cut out.

PS is it just me or is it a dead ringer for a civic type r saloon?



Edited by NelsonP on Thursday 18th December 12:12

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

218 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Must be me, I don't think it looks 'that' bad outside, but inside its looks like its 15 years old.............

Dave Hedgehog

14,545 posts

204 months

Welshwonder

303 posts

188 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Just up to 850 miles in mine and I think it's great. Haven't got used to the handling yet but a drift day in January should sort that!

I regret choosing black though. I forgot how difficult it is to keep clean!

X5TUU

11,936 posts

187 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
MPG, double digits, begins with 3, that's pretty decent for this genre in my book for real world hoonage

dapearson

4,288 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
I want another scoob but can't right now, and this isn't helping!

For the record my wife got 34 mpg out of a tank on my standard 02 WRX...

matbat

772 posts

245 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
It's definitely growing on me.

Feels like the (Not)impreza has just grown up a bit, thrown away the baggy jeans and hoodie and now has to wear sensible clothes in the office but still enjoys a bit of PS4, a joint and a beer with the lads.

telecat

8,528 posts

241 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Drove one back in June/July but couldn't quite make the costs work. Was very impressed. Bolt action Gearbox. Good response to the throttle roomy enough, comfortable but with enough "edge" to make you smile. Interior may not be BMW but it's still a nice place to be. One woman on returning to the dealer was very impressed by the looks and it is so different to the VW. On my list for the next car.

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
If only they offered a delete on that rear wing I might have bought one. Just too OTT for a 44 year old! And that EJ25 really has to go. The new engine can't come fast enough. Wouldn't want another EJ25 after my previous experiences with ring land failure and getting Subaru to admit liability and replace the short engine!

sleeky

112 posts

117 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
I really like these, I know a golf R is probably a 'better' car, but I just see this being more fun smile

telecat

8,528 posts

241 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
If only they offered a delete on that rear wing I might have bought one. Just too OTT for a 44 year old! And that EJ25 really has to go. The new engine can't come fast enough. Wouldn't want another EJ25 after my previous experiences with ring land failure and getting Subaru to admit liability and replace the short engine!
52 and it does not bother me at all!!

wal 45

658 posts

180 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
There was one of these in WR Blue at the Goodwood Sunday Service and got to say it was the first Impreza since the classic I thought looked really good.

My only reservation is the front wheelarches are totally flat and look as if someone had driven the car through too tight a gap and thought I'll just get it sprayed rather than reshape the damage.

Other than that a real return to form and would have dreamed of fuel consumption in the 30's with my old car.

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
I'll admit to being as surprised as anyone seeing a number like that on the trip. Fair to say more 'familiar' numbers appear after a B-road drive... wink

And, yes, that is a Golf R in shot too, by pure fluke!

Cheers,

Dan


NailedOn

3,114 posts

235 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
sleeky said:
I really like these, I know a golf R is probably a 'better' car, but I just see this being more fun smile
The Scooby will set pulses racing unlike a Vee-dub!
Also wings and age - I'm mid 50s and drive an Evo X. I love it and so does SWMBO.

Dave Hedgehog

14,545 posts

204 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Dan Trent said:
I'll admit to being as surprised as anyone seeing a number like that on the trip. Fair to say more 'familiar' numbers appear after a B-road drive... wink

And, yes, that is a Golf R in shot too, by pure fluke!

Cheers,

Dan

2003 rang, they want their digital display back lol

m1dg3

128 posts

154 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
dapearson said:
For the record my wife got 34 mpg out of a tank on my standard 02 WRX...
Mine would struggle to get that if you towed it!

22mpg last tank through and 24mpg is my best effort in two years.

TEKNOPUG

18,912 posts

205 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Dan Trent said:
I'll admit to being as surprised as anyone seeing a number like that on the trip. Fair to say more 'familiar' numbers appear after a B-road drive... wink

And, yes, that is a Golf R in shot too, by pure fluke!

Cheers,

Dan

Run a real fuel test - brim to brim and compare that against mileage/litres. Always found the trip comps to over-read. Still, I have an 02 WRX PPP and that regularly returns 28+mpg with mixed driving (on an 120k+ engine), so a new engine, modern ignition system, map plus better aeros... can't see why 32mpg isn't achievable.

DanielSan

18,771 posts

167 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Couldn't resist parking next to a new one at the Neil Howard Stages at Oulton Park a few weeks back. It needs gold wheels though hehe