RE: PH meets Porsche's Wolfgang Hatz - Detroit 2015

RE: PH meets Porsche's Wolfgang Hatz - Detroit 2015

Friday 16th January 2015

PH meets Porsche's Wolfgang Hatz - Detroit 2015

911 range to go fully turbo, GT3 RS will be "extreme", Sports Series rivalling supercar seemingly confirmed



There’s a certain type of car industry executive journalists hate having to interview. The sort that speaks in platitudes and refuses to tell you anything beyond what you’ve already read in a press release. The kind, quite frankly, capable of boring the spikes off a hedgehog.

Wolfgang Hatz is definitely not one of them. Porsche’s head of R&D is a man who tells it like it is, frequently letting slip the sort of details you suspect that PR managers would far rather he kept under wraps. And a half-hour round table interview in Detroit gave us more juicy details than spending a week in the presence of one of the yes-men would…

RS will be a bigger step over GT3 than before
RS will be a bigger step over GT3 than before
GT3 RS “will be extreme”
Despite internet rumours, we didn’t see the 911 GT3 RS in Detroit – anticipate it making its official debut at the Geneva show in March. Hatz promises that the new car will be a bigger step over the 991 GT3 than the 997 GT3 RS was over its equivalent GT3, and also that it will be the first outing for a new engine. This sticks with natural aspiration (in contrast to the rest of the 911 range, see below), and although Hatz wouldn’t be drawn on power figures it’s a fair assumption that it will make at least as much as the 500hp of the last RS 4.0.

“Customers love the GT3, but the RS has to be more to the peak,” Hatz said. “The 991 GT3 was very much a surprise for everybody because it’s really usable for everyday, the GT3 RS will be more extreme.”

He also confirmed that – as expected - the car would be launched with a PDK gearbox, but also dropped the welcome news that offering a manual ‘box as a later option is still under active consideration. And although Nordschleife times aren’t being talked about yet, Hatz promises the new car will substantially quicker than the last one, which posted a 7min 24sec.  “It will be above seven minutes, but it will be a big [improvement].”

Second-gen 991 update to get turbos
Second-gen 991 update to get turbos
911 range goes turbo
Hatz said this RS’s engine is an “intermediate step” on the way to the launch of all-new engines for lesser 911s later this year, and he all-but confirmed that the facelifted 991 range will switch to turbocharged induction for all but the GT3. “We have to respect the legal requirements [for CO2 numbers],” he explained, “but don’t worry, if you have a turbocharged engine it will rev, it will deliver.”

Although Porsche is part of Volkswagen Group for CO2 figures, it has committed to reducing emissions on like-for-like models by at least 15 per cent, meaning a move to forced induction. However, Hatz confirmed that the 911 will be powered by flat-six engines for the foreseeable future, and that the new turbocharged four-cylinder that’s being developed for the Cayman and Boxster won’t be used to create a latter-day 912.

“We don’t have a problem with a four-cylinder sports car, but never on the 911. The 911 has to remain flat-six.”

GT2 next? Maybe not…
There’s still no official green light for a 911 GT2. On one hand it would seem odd for Porsche to abandon a previously successful niche model; yet on the other Hatz suggests the more extreme (and presumably more expensive) GT3 RS will do much the same job. “We are in a situation where we have so many variants already, at a certain moment we have to decide if we’re going to do it, yes. But not yet.”

Cayman GT4 will be a proper 'GT' car
Cayman GT4 will be a proper 'GT' car
Cayman gets hotter
Ahead of the mid-term refresh and the arrival of flat-four turbo engines, we’re going to see a hotter GT4 version of the Cayman. This has been developed by Andreas Preuinger’s team and is therefore a proper ‘GT’ car in Porsche’s brand hierarchy, with Hatz assuring us that it’s “moved a little bit up from the Cayman R, it will be more sporting.” Spy shots have confirmed the car is carrying some serious aero – and Hatz confirms it will be the fastest Cayman or Boxster yet, with an engine delivering around 400hp. Oh, and will also spin off a racing variant…

Handbags with Bentley
Porsche’s unveiling of the Cayenne Turbo S – and the announcement that it had posted a sub-eight minute Nordschleife lap – was seen as many as a dig at Bentley’s stated aim that its new Bentayga is going to be the fastest SUV in the world. Something that Hatz didn’t confirm, but did nothing to deny. “Our Cayenne is always very, very quick. It is still doing 300km/h. I think if he [Bentley boss Wolfgang Durheimer] is doing 2-3km/h more then why not – he’s doing that with a 12-cylinder. But our car will be much quicker on the road.”

Cayenne Turbo S - cash cow keeps on giving
Cayenne Turbo S - cash cow keeps on giving
Other stuff
And a few more tantalising details. The next-generation 911 – i.e., the one we won’t see until 2019 or 2020 – looks set to switch to part-electric power as the only way to make sufficient cuts to its emissions levels.

Despite that, Porsche is engineering an all-new V8 for the next generation Cayenne and Panamera.

And as for plans for a dedicated sports car above the 911, but below the megabucks 918? “I think in the medium term we need such a car,” says Hatz. Which we’ll take as a yes.

 

 

Cayman GT4 pic: S. Baldauf/SB-Medien

Author
Discussion

TheAnimal

Original Poster:

3,472 posts

193 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for this PH.

Looking forward to the 991 Unicorn RS - this is the second interview where Herr Hatz suggests a NEW engine for the RS. Perhaps due to the September deadline they could not use the GT3 engine because it is only Euro 5 compliant, so they have gone with the Euro 6 block.

Exciting times...

MyCC

337 posts

157 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
New 991 GT3 RS will probably be the finest of its type ever especially if you spec it with the hopeful manual box, not likely to get another NA high-performance 911 again.

Regards,

MyCC.


willisit

2,142 posts

231 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Nice to see the 911 staying with 6 pots for now. Turbos? Sure, if anyone can do it right, it's Porsche.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
991.2 GT3 anyone?

RedTrident

8,290 posts

235 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Really looking forward to the cayman gt4.

Ex Boy Racer

1,151 posts

192 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
I hate this move to turbos, caused by completely spurious testing criteria. Turbos are simply easier to tune to get through the tests; they don't save petrol or reduce emissions in the real world. Yet still we're being forced into them.
It reminds me of pre-war British cars which were taxed according to HP rating, which was calculated in a way that favoured low-revving, long stroke engines. So of course that's what we made, while the rest of Europe moved forward with oversquare, high-revving, overhead cam engines. Crippled us for years.
I'll keep my 458 I think!

EricE

1,945 posts

129 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Ex Boy Racer said:
I hate this move to turbos, caused by completely spurious testing criteria. Turbos are simply easier to tune to get through the tests; they don't save petrol or reduce emissions in the real world. Yet still we're being forced into them.
It reminds me of pre-war British cars which were taxed according to HP rating, which was calculated in a way that favoured low-revving, long stroke engines. So of course that's what we made, while the rest of Europe moved forward with oversquare, high-revving, overhead cam engines. Crippled us for years.
I'll keep my 458 I think!
I find it shocking that the NEDC/MVEC cycle directs most of the drivetrain development at this point. One only has to look at the 918 to see how deeply flawed it is. I work in Austria at the moment and the one-time tax to register a 918, the 800.000€ car that probably gets less than 16 mpg over any meaningful distance, is 0€ (zero) due to its official 91 mpg rating.

On the other hand the tax for something like a new Cayenne Turbo with lower fuel consumption is north of 45% of the price of the car (!). For the V6 Diesel it's around 16%. For a Cayenne S Hybrid? 0%.
All because the NEDC seems to fall apart when it comes to testing hybrid systems.

IMO It's only a matter of time until Porsche announces a Cayenne Turbo Hybrid with the same exact same engine as the regular Turbo but a small electric system to cheat the test and get a consumption rating low enough to bypass these taxes entirely. And then they'll do it with the rest of the lineup.
Will it actually help the environment? No, not at all.

jayxx83

504 posts

196 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
EricE said:
I find it shocking that the NEDC/MVEC cycle directs most of the drivetrain development at this point. One only has to look at the 918 to see how deeply flawed it is. I work in Austria at the moment and the one-time tax to register a 918, the 800.000€ car that probably gets less than 16 mpg over any meaningful distance, is 0€ (zero) due to its official 91 mpg rating.

On the other hand the tax for something like a new Cayenne Turbo with lower fuel consumption is north of 45% of the price of the car (!). For the V6 Diesel it's around 16%. For a Cayenne S Hybrid? 0%.
All because the NEDC seems to fall apart when it comes to testing hybrid systems.

IMO It's only a matter of time until Porsche announces a Cayenne Turbo Hybrid with the same exact same engine as the regular Turbo but a small electric system to cheat the test and get a consumption rating low enough to bypass these taxes entirely. And then they'll do it with the rest of the lineup.
Will it actually help the environment? No, not at all.
Either that or only a matter of time before the regulators move the goal posts.

speedjockey

131 posts

136 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Curious to see what becomes of the "Turbo" name once the non-GT model cars adapt FI. Will the Turbo as we know it become the GT2 of the future lineup? Would make sense, at least in my mind..

Sampaio

377 posts

138 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
jayxx83 said:
EricE said:
I find it shocking that the NEDC/MVEC cycle directs most of the drivetrain development at this point. One only has to look at the 918 to see how deeply flawed it is. I work in Austria at the moment and the one-time tax to register a 918, the 800.000€ car that probably gets less than 16 mpg over any meaningful distance, is 0€ (zero) due to its official 91 mpg rating.

On the other hand the tax for something like a new Cayenne Turbo with lower fuel consumption is north of 45% of the price of the car (!). For the V6 Diesel it's around 16%. For a Cayenne S Hybrid? 0%.
All because the NEDC seems to fall apart when it comes to testing hybrid systems.

IMO It's only a matter of time until Porsche announces a Cayenne Turbo Hybrid with the same exact same engine as the regular Turbo but a small electric system to cheat the test and get a consumption rating low enough to bypass these taxes entirely. And then they'll do it with the rest of the lineup.
Will it actually help the environment? No, not at all.
Either that or only a matter of time before the regulators move the goal posts.
Which they should have done years ago... People know I like cars and read about them, so they come to me asking about "this new hybrid that has incredibly low fuel consumption!!!" that they saw on TV. When I explain them why these cars have such incredible official ratings and that they actually have real-world mpg like the other cars, they seem shocked and don't understand how the criteria to evaluate these cars hasn't changed yet.

Claudia Skies

1,098 posts

116 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
So very clearly the new 4-pot engine isn't just for a "cheaper entry-level Boxster/Cayman", it's for the whole Boxster/Cayman range!

Ex Boy Racer

1,151 posts

192 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Sampaio said:
jayxx83 said:
EricE said:
I find it shocking that the NEDC/MVEC cycle directs most of the drivetrain development at this point. One only has to look at the 918 to see how deeply flawed it is. I work in Austria at the moment and the one-time tax to register a 918, the 800.000€ car that probably gets less than 16 mpg over any meaningful distance, is 0€ (zero) due to its official 91 mpg rating.

On the other hand the tax for something like a new Cayenne Turbo with lower fuel consumption is north of 45% of the price of the car (!). For the V6 Diesel it's around 16%. For a Cayenne S Hybrid? 0%.
All because the NEDC seems to fall apart when it comes to testing hybrid systems.

IMO It's only a matter of time until Porsche announces a Cayenne Turbo Hybrid with the same exact same engine as the regular Turbo but a small electric system to cheat the test and get a consumption rating low enough to bypass these taxes entirely. And then they'll do it with the rest of the lineup.
Will it actually help the environment? No, not at all.
Either that or only a matter of time before the regulators move the goal posts.
Which they should have done years ago... People know I like cars and read about them, so they come to me asking about "this new hybrid that has incredibly low fuel consumption!!!" that they saw on TV. When I explain them why these cars have such incredible official ratings and that they actually have real-world mpg like the other cars, they seem shocked and don't understand how the criteria to evaluate these cars hasn't changed yet.
Exactly what I meant. Turbo engines, hybrid engines. So many changes that we don't really want because it helps results on a totally meaningless test.
The thought of turbocharged standard 911's makes my heart sink.


39H

113 posts

156 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
The GT4 will have absolutely nailed it for Porsche in the cayman variant....a long time coming....cant wait!
RedTrident said:
Really looking forward to the cayman gt4.

Goofnik

216 posts

140 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
The GT4 may end up being one of the best Porsches ever produced. 400HP, and presumably a target weight around 1250 - 1275kg, with a manual transmission as an option for the purists. Yes, older GT3s are more powerful, but they're nowhere near that light, and the engine noise in the cabin isn't as pronounced as it'll be with one behind your head. if they stay with 3.4L of displacement (that's the rumor) you're looking at an engine that'll rev to at least 8500rpm, whereas the GTS's 3.4 cuts out around 7900rpm.

As a Cayman GTS owner, and someone who put a deposit on his GTS 6 months before it was even announced, it's certainly of interest to me. I said I wouldn't eat depreciation on my Cayman, but it really does make me think.

stuckmojo

2,979 posts

188 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
I'm excited about the RS, I am sure it will be a beast.

Same for the GT4.

As for the entire 911 range going turbo, no thanks. I think a 997 GTS Manual would probably be the peak of all 991s for my taste.

OlberJ

14,101 posts

233 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
So 6 pot turbos in all but the gt3 911s and 4 pot turbos in all but the gt4 Caymans.

Sad and expensive times indeed frown

Think that makes the 981 the best future (5 years?) buy in terms of engine and box.

Hope they don't do a Boxster Spyder!

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
OlberJ said:
Hope they don't do a Boxster Spyder!
Supposedly there will be a Boxster above the GTS but below the GT4 which will be launched around the time of the GT4.

PunterCam

1,070 posts

195 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
st engines all round then.

I'm sick of this bullst move towards turbocharging. It's mindless, it's pointless, and it's ruining sports cars. I don't want a fking turbo. The don't rev (unless artificially programmed to) they sound rubbish (hey, we'll program that in too) and they're less responsive. Couple that to the fact that they're no cleaner, no more efficient, more complex and more difficult to maintain.

It's a fking shambles.

r1ch

2,871 posts

196 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
PunterCam said:
st engines all round then.

I'm sick of this bullst move towards turbocharging. It's mindless, it's pointless, and it's ruining sports cars. I don't want a fking turbo. The don't rev (unless artificially programmed to) they sound rubbish (hey, we'll program that in too) and they're less responsive. Couple that to the fact that they're no cleaner, no more efficient, more complex and more difficult to maintain.

It's a fking shambles.
Yeah i agree.

Claudia Skies

1,098 posts

116 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
PunterCam said:
They don't rev (unless artificially programmed to)...
I have to say that sounds like hogwash to me.