RE: Shed Of The Week: Toyota Celica

RE: Shed Of The Week: Toyota Celica

Friday 13th February 2015

Shed Of The Week: Toyota Celica

Ignore the sensible pants comments, this Celica could be the perfect Sheddist's coupe



Everyone has their own idea of the perfect shed - but what are the key requirements? Shiplap, or tongue and groove? Dip or pressure treated? Air rifle or shotgun? These are the crucial questions that must be answered.

Regular waxing proves its worth here
Regular waxing proves its worth here
It's just the same when choosing one's ideal motoring Shed. Our end of year popularity round up always shows the rich and varied taste of PHers. Most of us like the idea of a big horsepower beast, a poky 4WD estate, or maybe a screaming hot hatch.

But at a grand or less, the bigger the performance appeal, the bigger the risk. When it comes to actually laying out your hard-earned wonga on a car that you wouldn't be frightened to get out of the garage, different factors come into play. Boring things like running costs and reliability. If you can combine that sort of stuff with a pinch of style and some on-demand excitement every now and then, you've arguably found at least one kind of Perfect Shed and you may well be a man my son.

This week's contender, a '94 Celica GT, might just be the ultimate in terms of everyday usability, style and fun. Since October 2012 we've had three Celicas pass through our Shed doors, including a rare fourth-gen T160 from the late 80s, but none of them have been sixth-gen four-lamp T200s like this one. Running from '93 to '99, the 1,150kg T200 liftback married accessible performance with affordability and more than a little of the Supra's swoopy styling.

Well it will all still work at least
Well it will all still work at least
Look at what you get. Coupe looks that are maturing nicely with age. Unburstable 175hp 7,000rpm twin-cam engine. High seven/low eight 0-60. Four-seat practicality and a usable boot. On this one we have no apparent rust, meticulous service history, and the option of a five-minute return to standard spec. Overlay that lot with a touch of investability, some WRC motorsports rub off from the GT-Four and low classic car insurance premiums and it's hard to find a reason not to steam in with your wedge.

This one's a 2.0-litre, not a 1.8 passing itself off as a two. The gear ratios can feel a bit odd, and gen 5 owners will tell you that their cars handle better, but anyone from 2015 getting into a vaguely sporting car from this era for the first time will feel like the mists have been lifted from their eyes.

What can go wrong? Not much. This is a Toyota, remember, and the Celica is the world's best-selling historical sports marque for a reason. There were no recalls on the car that we can find. Keep an eye on the oil level and try and treat it to the decent stuff: it will reward you in the long run. Cambelt replacement every five years or 63,000 miles is cheap and easy. The rest of it is normal age-related wear and tear on consumables, body panels, suspension and brakes.

And apparently it does nearly 40mpg too
And apparently it does nearly 40mpg too
Other than that they'll keep going for ever. American owners have reported 300,000 miles up with no significant problems. One chap had incurred the princely sum of $258 worth of repairs in 14 years' ownership of his 257,000-miler, and that was on replacing a rusted-out exhaust manifold. If you want more reassurance there's a good owners' club here. Nobody seems to have a bad word to say about the car.

Sure, it's FWD and it won't blow your socks off or set your trousers on fire, but nor will it make your wallet explode or inflate your head with angst. Sometimes, in the real world, it's nice to wear cool pants.

Here's the ad.

This is my beloved Celica GT. Unfortunately, moving house and a long commute means I've had to change car. Mechanics and general public often remark on the superb condition of this car and I have been meticulous in caring for it since gaining ownership almost 2 years ago - it is regularly waxed and detailed, kept under cover and I can produce a detailed itemised list of all work done since the first owner in 1994. I intended to keep this car for a long time so spent a lot of time and money to restore engine and suspension performance to original factory performance. This really is a brilliant all-rounder car: after using it for a couple of months initially for my commute, I can give recorded proof that 39 mpg is attainable, but at the same time it is more than happy to go like a rocket if you hold onto gears a bit longer, with remarkable handling. I'll be very sad to see it go, so I hope it goes to a good home where it will continue to be loved as I have!
The only modifications from stock are as follows:
- Previous owner swapped to alloy wheels
- Orange side indicators replaced with clear covers (EU/CE stamp approved)
- Sony head unit with USB/aux in
- Focal two-way speakers in driver and passenger doors
- K&N cold air induction kit
I have retained the original air box and panel filter (almost new filter) should you wish to reverse the modifications and return the car to completely stock.

Author
Discussion

LotusEspritTurbo

Original Poster:

754 posts

255 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Not for me. Preferred the T160 and T180, much nicer looking cars.

ttthilvester

99 posts

150 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
I agree - looks like a nicely kept example, and Toyotas are generally reliable things, but just find these dull to look at.

Look good from head-on, but after that it looks like the designers lost interest.

only1ian

689 posts

194 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
A yawn worthy but dependable shed. That said the 1990's where a golden age for toyota... WRC success 3 sports cars on the books in the form of MR2, Celica and Supra and some worthy hot (warm) hatches in for form of the Corrola G6R (a forgotten gem).

Gorbyrev

1,160 posts

154 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Just been looking at these for my lad. As a real world cheap sports car these are hard to beat. What's wrong with FWD anyway?! Many of us have cut our teeth on front tyre scamper, trail braking and dragging through the apex with a boot full of throttle. So long as the rear end is prepared to shimmy then there is fun to be had.

J4CKO

41,562 posts

200 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Bit of a timewarp car that and refreshingly un-barried, should be reasonably quick as well.

Preferable to last weeks Honda for me.

s m

23,226 posts

203 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Bit of a timewarp car that and refreshingly un-barried, should be reasonably quick as well.

Preferable to last weeks Honda for me.
Timed at 7.1 to 60 in an Autocar test

Only weighs 1180kg so the 173bhp goes a long way

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
I can appreciate this as a good example of it's kind, especially at shed money, but they do nothing for me.

Once inside, any attraction is lost and they aren't the most accommodating car to be a rear seat passenger in; at least if you're an adult over 5'.

The faster, rally-esque models I can see the appeal of. Everything else is style over substance - and not-ageing-very-well-styling at that.


Steamer

13,857 posts

213 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
LotusEspritTurbo said:
Not for me. Preferred the T160 and T180, much nicer looking cars.
My first thoughts.

Great cars but the shape just didnt do anything for me.

However - where did all the T160s go!?!

Roger Irrelevant

2,932 posts

113 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Funnily enough I'm thinking of getting one of these (or a gen 7) as a more interesting cheapo work hack. If anyone could confirm whether or not I could get a road bike in it without taking the wheels off that would be very helpful - reckon it might be possible with the front passenger seat forward? I don't think I'd buy this one though, I'd feel bad getting it dirty!

ianwayne

6,293 posts

268 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
I considered one of these a couple of years ago when I got the nod that you could cover them on 'classic' insurance if you limited the mileage. The previous versions (pre 1994) are fetching nearly £2k for a good one. No guarantee that they will go up in value though, cue all the buyers of Mk3 / 4 Escorts hoping for a boom that isn't going to happen, I hope??

I agree that the 2.0 litre version is the only one worth considering as this is, forget the 1.8, only 114 bhp. Essex is a long way for a look for me though. Shame.

Smitters

4,003 posts

157 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Focal speakers would be worth about 1/5th of the car's value. Always liked the look of these, as long as it's not horribly faded.

Itsallicanafford

2,770 posts

159 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
...Great Shed, what more could you want for the money...

northpennine123

3 posts

157 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
A pal used to have the gt4 version and I loved that. And this one must have a good handbrake on those hills....

TurboHatchback

4,160 posts

153 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Good cars these, can be a bit tight on headroom for taller chaps though. I think the styling is great, the best of all the FWD Celica models.

MarJay

2,173 posts

175 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
I think this is a really really good shed! Of course it's FWD, and it's not 200bhp+ but it's still amazing fun and unburstable.

If I were having to downsize, this would definitely be on the list as an option.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

183 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
That would make an excellent daily driver IMHO.

Decent looking, ultra reliable (surely no.1 priority for a daily hack), easy to work on, economical, etc etc.

And looks to have been extremely well kept.

Limeymk1

43 posts

177 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Roger Irrelevant said:
Funnily enough I'm thinking of getting one of these (or a gen 7) as a more interesting cheapo work hack. If anyone could confirm whether or not I could get a road bike in it without taking the wheels off that would be very helpful - reckon it might be possible with the front passenger seat forward? I don't think I'd buy this one though, I'd feel bad getting it dirty!
With the seats down they have a pretty big boot, I reckon you wouldn't have a problem chucking a bike in there. You can easily fit a set of 4 wheels in.

They're not the most inspiring cars to look at but mine has really grown on me. Bought as an everyday shed, I've had it for nearly 3 years now. It is the import super strut so handling is significantly better than the UK model. Puts a smile on my face every time I take it for a drive.

I like the interior personally, the layout is very good from an erganomic perspective. It's typically Japanese in it's total plastic fantasticness, but hey I'm not in there to admire the decor. laugh Seats are comfortable and supportive, pedals in a nice place (unlike some Mazdas) and it'll fit a 6'4" lump like me.

shalmaneser

5,934 posts

195 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
Roger Irrelevant said:
Funnily enough I'm thinking of getting one of these (or a gen 7) as a more interesting cheapo work hack. If anyone could confirm whether or not I could get a road bike in it without taking the wheels off that would be very helpful - reckon it might be possible with the front passenger seat forward? I don't think I'd buy this one though, I'd feel bad getting it dirty!
Taking the front wheel off a road bike is the least demanding mechanical thing out there isn't it?

I'm sure it would fit if you did that!

dbdb

4,326 posts

173 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
It looks to be in decent order.

I don't particularly like it though. Most of this year's Shed choices have held little interest for me.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

148 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
s m said:
J4CKO said:
Bit of a timewarp car that and refreshingly un-barried, should be reasonably quick as well.

Preferable to last weeks Honda for me.
Timed at 7.1 to 60 in an Autocar test

Only weighs 1180kg so the 173bhp goes a long way
Found the Megane coupe with 150bhp was quicker in a straight line......Always thought the numbers on the Celica would mean a faster car. Maybe the gearing is at fault as the megane coupe wasn't that much lighter.

Edited by dukebox9reg on Friday 13th February 10:34