RE: Range Rover Sport SVR: Review

RE: Range Rover Sport SVR: Review

Wednesday 18th March 2015

2015 Range Rover Sport SVR | UK Review

Whisper it, but the faster and fiercer Range Rover Sport is far nicer than you may expect



Hold your fire! The Range Rover Sport SVR may be anathema to every purist ideal we hold dear but, judged purely objectively, it's a mighty achievement. Sorry. It just is.

It's best to begin with what the SVR represents and what future Jaguar Land Rover products badged as such will be. They will sit at the very top of their respective model ranges, above where R and R-S currently reside (there is still some doubt as to whether R-S models will continue) and engineered by the Special Vehicle Operations team. Important to note too that all SVRs will be four-wheel drive, including the Jaguars. That isn't to say SVO won't do rear-wheel drive stuff (see the Project 7) but they will be in much smaller numbers and not carry the SVR badge.

And what is an SVR? They were described to us in layman's terms as more akin to a Porsche Turbo than a GT3 RS. A key development aim is to ensure the fundamental strengths of the core car remain, so think of how a GT3 RS ditches the 911's quite useful rear seats but a Turbo doesn't. SVR products won't be hardcore but SVO are certainly open to those sort of projects in future with a more limited production run. Expect further clarification of the brand positioning as it expands.


So then, the first SVR. The numbers will inevitably come up in discussion very swiftly so where better to begin? They are all extremely burly, barring the 4.7-second sprint to 62mph and eight minutes flippin 14 seconds round the Nordschleife. Power? 550hp. Torque? 501lb ft. Weight? 'From 2,335kg'. Wheels? Optional 22-inch items, on 295/35 section tyres all round. Price? £106,050 as tested. Yikes.

In Fuji White (natch) with those gargantuan rims, the SVR certainly isn't shy. Functional vents in the bumper make the front even more purposeful, four exhausts protrude menacingly from the rear and the abiding impression is one of manifest aggression. To these eyes it's just, just on the right side of SUV excess and it at least has the potency to match the brazen appearance. Whether that makes the looks more acceptable is probably a matter of personal taste...

Anyone who enjoys cars and driving though will love how this car goes down a road. Resistance is futile. Cynicism will be confounded. The SVR achieves things a car of its size has no right to do and, even more frustratingly, makes the whole process rather fun too. Damn.


The engine remains as impressive here as in other installations. Fundamentally the 5.0-litre supercharged V8 is identical to that in the Jaguar F-Type R, only with different calibration for altered torque characteristics. It remains a superb V8, blessed with great response, huge power plus a real appetite for revs. And the noise. Oh, the noise. When everything is electric and all the V8 noises have to be streamed to your smartwatch this will be one to remember. A lot of work has gone into the exhaust acoustics and it's really paid off: a bassy and mellow low range is replaced by a more aggressive rumble at around 3,500rpm, itself superseded by the full V8 supercar for the last 1,500rpm or so. The SVR is one of those cars where gears are dropped just to hear the thunder one more time. It's absolutely glorious. Frustratingly the sports exhaust has fallen foul of the recent trend for gratuitous overrun crackles that becomes annoying rather quickly. It may sound perverse having praised the noise so highly, but the SVR actually sounds more pleasant and authentic with the exhaust in normal mode.

No car on such a ridiculous wheel/tyre combo and with the SVR's sporting intentions should ride as well as it does. Sure, it's quite tough at low speeds but above about 30mph the problem has disappeared and the ride is easily comparable to a standard Sport. It is always on the firm side but the way such big, heavy wheels are controlled with such calm maintained inside is incredible. A bespoke Continental ContiSportContact has been developed for the 22-inch wheel (the 21s come with a more conventional Mud&Snow tyre) and are said to contribute significantly to the compliance. All the launch cars were on the larger wheel but we're assured (of course) that the differences between the two are minimal both on and off-road.

So although it may not be the most conventionally enjoyable way of tackling a B-road, there's undeniably fun to be had driving an SVR. Assuming the road is big enough, that is. That engine punches really, really hard out of bends, the suspension absorbs the very worst imperfections while keeping the car flat and the brakes inspire great confidence. That this huge old tank retains such composure is most amazing; although it always feels very big, the way that mass is contained through corners, over bumps and under brakes is fantastic. There will be a smile creeping onto your lips, however much you try to fight it.


With the Terrain Response in Auto and the gearbox likewise, progress in the SVR is swift and relatively undramatic. Dynamic sharpens the response further across the usual parameters (damping, steering, throttle response) without totally transforming (or indeed ruining) the car. It also turns the active exhaust on but that can be switched off independently of Dynamic mode. Apologies for any confusion but the SVR is arguably at its best for the road with the Terrain Response in Auto but the gearbox in Sport. The shifts are just that bit quicker and the changes are usually right on for a spirited dash across the countryside. Not quite cricket for a Range Rover perhaps, but jolly good entertainment nonetheless.

And off-road? The SVR will be easily capable enough for all owners. A brief run in the mud and ruts at the Batsford Estate was not only survived without damage to the 22s but also proved that it can run further off-road than it will ever be asked to. Lifting off to let the Hill Descent Control do its thing with the sports exhaust crackling behind is certainly one of the stranger automotive experiences.


Obviously the SVR isn't flawless. The trouble with attempting to create a car that covers every single base all of the time is that there are inevitably compromises. Those tyres that help it ride and corner so well are quite noisy on the motorway. Think how muchrubber is rolling along the road! That monstrous engine that hurls two and half tonnes along so disdainfully needs a lot of fuel (as in 15mpg) to do so. And if you're uber SUV really is about numbers then a Cayenne Turbo S is even more ballistic still; imagine seeing the two of them outside the Pistenklause...

Having said that, it's impossible to conclude negatively on the SVR. Look beyond the flamboyance and you'll discover an incredibly well engineered, extremely capable and thoroughly enjoyable vehicle, one that will worm its way into your affections as well. Regardless of loyalties and prejudices they are attributes we can all appreciate. Just don't expect everyone else to be quite so understanding of those hidden qualities if you buy one.


SPECIFICATION | 2015 RANGE ROVER SPORT SVR
Engine:
5,000cc supercharged V8
Transmission: 8-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,000-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 501@2,500-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.7 seconds
Top speed: 162mph (limited)
Weight: 'From 2,335kg'
MPG: 22.1 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 298g/km
Price: £93,450 (basic OTR price. As tested £106,050 including £800 for onboard television, £600 for Dual View touchscreen, £5,000 for Meridian Signature Audio System 1700w with 23 speakers, £900 for Perpendicular Park Assist, £750 for privacy glass with solar attenuating windscreen, £700 for surround camera system, £750 for 'Wade Sensing' plus blind spot monitor with closing vehicle sensing and reverse traffic detection, £600 for traffic sign recognition, £1,500 for SVR engine cover (!) and £1,000 for head-up display.)






Author
Discussion

arkenphel

Original Poster:

484 posts

205 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Oooh, that looks nice! Maybe in a red and black theme though. Not white.

I need a lottery win...

Boulders

25 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
My brother in laws had his for a week and loves it to bits! The noise is definitely an abiding memory!! How something that big can drive so well, without ruining the ride, is beyond me! 15mpg is on the slightly pessimistic side but his last one didn't venture too much past 20. If you have the means it's a serious piece of kit!

Boulders

25 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Couple more pics!

cuda

464 posts

240 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Hate seats that have harness holes that will never be used. Just saying...

Otherwise love it!

Boulders

25 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

130 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
It's so good to see LR still putting a massive v8 with a supercharger in their cars. And what a noise it makes. Il take one in British racing green and Ivory learher please

jamespink

1,218 posts

204 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
It's so good to see LR still putting a massive v8 with a supercharger in their cars. And what a noise it makes. Il take one in British racing green and Ivory learher please
Me to please, no need to wrap it... What a beast!

drpep

1,758 posts

168 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
NO no no no no no no no no. No.

2500Kg of lardy luxobarge depreciation magnet hunk of st.

One hundred fking grand too!!!

Soon to be seen driving too close to everything around it in Cheshire, Essex, Central London.

That thing has but an ounce of class. And the interior!

J4CKO

41,561 posts

200 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
drpep said:
NO no no no no no no no no. No.

2500Kg of lardy luxobarge depreciation magnet hunk of st.

One hundred fking grand too!!!

Soon to be seen driving too close to everything around it in Cheshire, Essex, Central London.

That thing has but an ounce of class. And the interior!
Dont think there will be many SVR's about, for every petrol RRS there must be 20 or more diesel ones, the diesel one makes the owner look like they may be fairly wealthy, when you see a Petrol V8 one, you kind of know they are.

I think most of those that scoff at this kind of car, like me to a certain extent would probably enjoy owning one, ok it isn't the zenith of Petrolhead nirvana but it bet it is pretty bloody compelling to drive and you may just forgive it the fact it weighs as much as two normal cars

soad

32,896 posts

176 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
It's so good to see LR still putting a massive v8 with a supercharger in their cars. And what a noise it makes. Il take one in British racing green and Ivory learher please
Could say, that's amazing and inspirational. That someone has the guts to put a supercharged 5 litre v8 during an era of eco brainwashing and mental downsizing.

Having said that, it looks dull from the front, and almost chavvy (styling) from the back. Not hating it, simply doesn't appeal to me.

uremaw

300 posts

197 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
All kinds of awesome. Love it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
drpep said:
NO no no no no no no no no. No.

2500Kg of lardy luxobarge depreciation magnet hunk of st.

One hundred fking grand too!!!

Soon to be seen driving too close to everything around it in Cheshire, Essex, Central London.

That thing has but an ounce of class. And the interior!
Agree.

Fantastic marketing though - £100k for what is in essence a (facelifted) Discovery...

SPD14

401 posts

156 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
What a machine!

Numeric

1,396 posts

151 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
I am for no particular reason in love with the Range Rover Sport. I just think it looks fabulous. Oddly the last generation standard Range Rover was the same for me (I loathed the rebodied Explorer Sport version with a passion!!)

So I know I should be howling abuse at this as I have a real thing about weight and efficiency etc. but if I wasn't dirt poor I'd be at the front of the queue and to heck with my own moral stance!


Numeric

1,396 posts

151 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
Agree.

Fantastic marketing though - £100k for what is in essence a (facelifted) Discovery...
I'm not sure it is - the old one yes but this is surely based off the new Range Rover platform? (I apologise if I'm completely out of touch here!!)

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
Agree.

Fantastic marketing though - £100k for what is in essence a (facelifted) Discovery...
This is based on the FF Rangerover and nothing to do with the outgoing Discovery, but dont get the facts get in the way!

ajhmini

133 posts

170 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
Agree.

Fantastic marketing though - £100k for what is in essence a (facelifted) Discovery...
Wrong - the current RRS shares the same underpinnings as the FFRR. You're referring to the old RRS which shared it's platform with Discovery

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
MonkeyMatt said:
OpulentBob said:
Agree.

Fantastic marketing though - £100k for what is in essence a (facelifted) Discovery...
This is based on the FF Rangerover and nothing to do with the outgoing Discovery, but dont get the facts get in the way!
I could have sworn the PH article a few weeks ago essentially identified the new RRS as a re-frocked Disco. Apologies if they didn't...

aspirated

2,539 posts

146 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
If I had to have one car for the rest of my life to do everything this would be it, plus a set of sensible sized wheels with winter tyres

J4CKO

41,561 posts

200 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
aspirated said:
If I had to have one car for the rest of my life to do everything this would be it, plus a set of sensible sized wheels with winter tyres
I think you are spot on there, I think a lot of wealthy people buy all sorts of nice cars, supercars, classics etc but generally a lot of cars are not that usable, ok, people love using supercars in central London but apart from showing off, what a pain that must be, classics are generally for investment or sunny days unless you are a masochist.

So, the RR ends up as the go to vehicle for most eventualities and the other stuff unused.