RE: BMW M6: Catch It While You Can

RE: BMW M6: Catch It While You Can

Thursday 14th May 2015

BMW M6: Catch It While You Can

BMW's M6 is rarer, better built and more of driver's car than the M5 - get one before anyone notices!



Here's a funny thing. The pecking order for body styles is usually pretty clear-cut: coupes have more appeal more than saloons, which in turn are more desirable than estates. In BMW M land, however, that order is turned on its head.

So it's the M5 Touring estate that's the coolest member of the E60/E61/E63/E64 family, followed by the M5 saloon. The poor old M6 coupe suffers from a malaise of perceived naffness. I'm convinced that's about to change.

M5s were always much more popular new than M6s. Being the first of the new generation of M cars, it was the M5 that grabbed all the headlines initially. When the M6 debuted in the UK in November 2005 (with the Convertible following in September 2006), its thunder had been kind of stolen.

Does the M6 have an image problem?
Does the M6 have an image problem?
And very few people were prepared to pay the £20,000 premium needed to buy an E63 M6 Coupe when it was new (or the £25k add-on for an E64 M6 Convertible). It's estimated that as few as 650 M6s were sold in the UK between 2005 and 2010 - a tiny fraction of the number of M5s sold.

Today, the M6 is often derided as ugly, brash and generally not as desirable as the M5. But I think it's time the balance was redressed in the M6's favour.

First off, it's actually a better driver's car. It's stiffer, lighter and more compact than the M5, as well as having a pretty cool party piece in the shape of a funky CSL-style carbon-fibre roof. Obviously the Convertible doesn't get this but its ragtop is pretty neat in itself, folding away in less than 20 seconds. The '6' also has a superior interior to the M5.

Mechanically it's all but identical to the M5, which is no bad thing. I fell in love with the fabulously exotic 5.0-litre, naturally aspirated, 100hp-per-litre V10 engine as soon as I sampled it and heard its soaring soundtrack. It's good for 0-62mph in 4.4 seconds (0.3 quicker than the M5) and has proven itself capable of a sub-eight time around the Nurburgring.

True, not everyone likes the SMG sequential gearbox, but you have paddles to ease the frustration that we never got a manual-box M6 in the UK (as they did in the USA, weirdly). And the DSC stability control system can be switched in three settings from 'safe' to 'sorry' to allow you various degrees of tail-out terror.

Big miles, small price - yours for just £12,990
Big miles, small price - yours for just £12,990

It's also true that you don't have anywhere like the rear seat space you get in an M5, but space is generous up front and the boot is a very usable size (even in the convertible, whose closed roof doesn't impact on space).

So here's the steal: M6s are really no more expensive than M5s. The cheapest M6 in the classifieds is an astonishingly low £12,990, but then it does have an interstellar 169,000 miles on the clock (and given the typical 10-15mpg averages, I've worked out that its former owners must have spent over £80K in fuel alone in that time - absolutely terrifying). On the plus side, it does have a full BMW history.

A rather mean-looking all-black private-sale example with only 49K miles looks to be decent value at £14,999. Perhaps the best colour combo is Interlagos Blue with light Merino leather, which is what this 64K mile example has. It also benefits from having just had a new clutch and throttle actuator.


Around £18K is where most M6s are pitched. If you value peace of mind, this silver M6 comes with a full BMW warranty and looks very tidy. Convertibles definitely pack a premium, with thecheapest up for £26K, and the priciest still at £33,950.

For that money, can you think of another coupe or convertible that offers such raw pace and such a sense of occasion?

Author
Discussion

WCZ

Original Poster:

10,526 posts

194 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
what a car for the money, has everything imo

would prefer one of these + £12,000 for servicing/fuel than a GTD golf

X5TUU

11,939 posts

187 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Yeah I totally agree ... and they are a steal for c.20-30k

I do however knew one guy that bought one on chucky, and couldnt afford to run it when petrol prices spiked so it sat completely unused as he couldnt sell it due to the extortionate interest rate and the settlement being greater than the car value!

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Advertorial!

A hugely heavy wallowathon, according to the proper reviews. Never driven one, mind, and certainly now a lot of car for the money.

J4CKO

41,560 posts

200 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
I think the 650i is enough car for most people that does pretty much the same job, bit of a cruiser for older folk who like golf and dont need a saloon/estate, why would they want to make it even less ecomomical, noisier, harder riding and pay a huge premium for the privilege ? the M5 tended to sell to younger people who have families and stuff to cart round whilst still doing the arse on fire thing.

I fancy a six series next, but at this age (the car, not me) though it is lovely it just looks like a money pit, you can replace the brakes for a few hundred on a normal six, on these its huge money, it isnt like a bit worse, its more akin to an exotic where the cooking versions are nearer to a normal five series, same applies to the M5.






parabolica

6,718 posts

184 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I think the 650i is enough car for most people that does pretty much the same job, bit of a cruiser for older folk who like golf and dont need a saloon/estate, why would they want to make it even less ecomomical, noisier, harder riding and pay a huge premium for the privilege ? the M5 tended to sell to younger people who have families and stuff to cart round whilst still doing the arse on fire thing.

I fancy a six series next, but at this age (the car, not me) though it is lovely it just looks like a money pit, you can replace the brakes for a few hundred on a normal six, on these its huge money, it isnt like a bit worse, its more akin to an exotic where the cooking versions are nearer to a normal five series, same applies to the M5.
I've got a 2004 645 and was prepared for some hefty parts costs but I've been pleasantly surprised on the whole. However as you say, M-part will always be much more expensive.

pidsy

7,989 posts

157 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
i'd love one of these - stick a stainless exhaust on and i'd be happy.

keep it for 6 months then get rid because of the potential for a scary bill. my M3 was at Technosport a while ago and there was an stunning M6 in for an engine rebuild. the owner was looking at over £10k in cost.

soad

32,895 posts

176 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
The glorious 5-litre V10! smokin

TurboHatchback

4,160 posts

153 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
I'd much rather have a 650i, I also can't see the point in a heavier, much thirstier, less comfortable version with an annoying gearbox. A 6-series will never be used on track and the 650i is more than fast enough so all the extra cost of an M6 will just make the car less enjoyable to use as a road car.

joe1145

198 posts

121 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
I think these have aged quite well when released i thought they were very ugly, now though im not so sure, the boot area is a bit fussy but the rest of the car is very nice. The Interlagos Blue one linked to in the article looks fantastic

Edited by joe1145 on Thursday 14th May 12:27

soad

32,895 posts

176 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Were these nicknamed the Bangle Butt? hehe

MitchT

15,867 posts

209 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Wouldn't touch one with a bargeopole based on what numerous owners have written on here about reliability and repair costs.

9mm

3,128 posts

210 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Way more depreciation to come yet.


Davey S2

13,096 posts

254 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Usual story of a now relatively affordable car to buy but it's still an £80K+ car to run.

0836whimper

975 posts

198 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Think M5 = cool and M6 = naff still applies no matter how cheap M6's get.

LayZ

1,629 posts

242 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Epic engine but cheap for a reason.

Challenging looks, huge running costs and not a great rep.

Theophany

1,069 posts

130 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
Advertorial!

A hugely heavy wallowathon, according to the proper reviews. Never driven one, mind, and certainly now a lot of car for the money.
Which makes your 'wallowathon' comment even more absurd. It's a premium grand tourer, it's never going ride like a 911 and nor should it. Anybody (the 'proper reviewers') who thinks it should be has probably missed the point of the car by such a margin that I would question just how 'proper' these nameless reviewers are.

Now I never owned one, but had one on the driveway for a fortnight.

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

151 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Surprising to find them so relatively cheap. But on the other hand, those who can afford to run one as a daily have a lot of choice with that type of budget. Those who don't -- would you want one as a weekend car? That S85 engine though... Only got a passenger ride once, but wow!

Phateuk

751 posts

137 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
WCZ said:
what a car for the money, has everything imo

would prefer one of these + £12,000 for servicing/fuel than a GTD golf
Not sure how long that £12k would last running one of these wobble

PaulsM3

62 posts

128 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Cracking car. Had one as a demo when I worked for BMW- yes they're a heavy car but they don't wallow. At all.
Body control is excellent for its size and lets not forget, this is a fast GT car, not a sports car.
Easily one of the fastest point to point cars out there- especially in this current price range. Acceleration is savage- 150mph comes up before you know it.
If you're not doing many miles fuel doesn't matter a jot but I would worry about servicing- brakes, clutch and all manner or electrical maladies are expensive items when needed.
To my eye its also a very good looking car. I think BMW's designed in the bangle era have aged much better than anything else of that time and almost become better looking with age.

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
0836whimper said:
Think M5 = cool and M6 = naff still applies no matter how cheap M6's get.
For me the M6 has always been far cooler than the M5.