RE: Range Rover SVR on track

RE: Range Rover SVR on track

Wednesday 10th June 2015

Range Rover SVR on track

Range Rover on a race circuit? Go on then, let's see if this actually works...



Regardless of whether you like what the Range Rover Sport SVR represents or not, there is no denying it's a very accomplished and capable car. The UK road test has already evidenced its range of abilities both on and off-road, meaning there was only one challenge left: the track. Just how good is an SUV supposedly capable of 8min 14sec at you-know-where when faced with apices and braking points?

Not quite cricket, but it is quite fun
Not quite cricket, but it is quite fun
Some off-roading first, just to ram the point home a little more. The course at Monticello was actually more demanding than the fairly tame affair in the UK, with large sections submerged and a couple of significant descents. Not exactly Baja, granted, but the SVR is certainly more than good enough off-road.

Tyres washed, low-range disengaged and Dynamic mode selected, the SVR is ready for a track. We're not typically fans of endless configurability on PH but it's difficult not to be impressed by the ability to pack so much under one (panoramic) roof. Of course dedicated 4x4s will have achieved more in the mud and a Caterham would be a more thrilling track prospect, but an SVR's range of talents is undeniably massive. Or so Land Rover says...

Step up to it
Alright, so there isn't some great unravelling of the SVR facade on track; it is a Range Rover that's enjoyable on a circuit. Not amazing, and of course it's hard to be definitive without having tried its rivals. But probably a lot more fun that you would give it credit for.

Perhaps predictably, it's the speed that's most noticeable straight off. The Monticello South Circuit comprises just two miles of tarmac so the straights aren't long but, even so, the big blue Sport feels like it's in braking zones before the previous corner has even finished. Any concerns that a track would dull the SVR's sense of boundless acceleration on the road are allayed in about 30 seconds. It's monstrously fast, the 550hp and 502lb ft chomping through gear ratios and tarmac probably as fast as litres of petrol.

Keeping the mass in check is key
Keeping the mass in check is key
But if the speed is inescapable, then there's another key attribute of the SVR's dynamics that can not be hidden either: the weight. With two adults onboard it must be a 2.5-tonne car and no amount of bespoke rubber, suspension upgrades or Nordschleife testing can entirely disguise that. The LR instructors stress throughout the need to be smooth and measured with inputs, not to rush the car and unsettle the mass. A few missed braking points - a genuine mistake, honest - reveal the SVR doesn't respond well to brutal treatment, lurching towards the apex as you desperately attempt to get the car turned in. That's only reasonable to expect, but it would be intriguing to see how its rivals compare.

Play by the rules
Stick to instruction, keep the SVR within its (admirably high) limits and there is fun to be had. Get greedy with the throttle round one of Monticello's longer corners and it will push, but a lift will tuck the nose back on to line with a surprising level of agility. It rides kerbs brilliantly, grip levels are high and even the brakes stand up to rigorous punishment The middle pedal begins to feel like a stress ball beneath your foot rather quickly which does nothing for confidence but the car continues to haul itself up speedily. How long that would continue beyond the half a dozen or so laps permitted is another question of course...

Oh dammit, it's actually rather enjoyable
Oh dammit, it's actually rather enjoyable
On this experience though there's absolutely no reason why an SVR couldn't be used for proper off-roading and a track session in the same day, with an enjoyable road drive between them. The cost of consumables would surely be frightening but, dare it be said, the whole adventure would be rather good fun. That the same endeavour could be undertaken in rivals from BMW, Porsche and Mercedes shouldn't be overlooked, especially given that phenomenal lap time from the Cayenne.

We can't definitively state the SVR is the best of this freakish breed - what a group test that would be - but the track foray simply emphasised the Sport's incredible depth of talent and breadth of ability even further. The world won't like you in a SVR, on the motorway or up a hill or in the paddock. But you'll probably be having too much fun to care.


RANGE ROVER SPORT SVR
Engine:
 5,000cc supercharged V8
Transmission: 8-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,000-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 501@2,500-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.7 seconds
Top speed: 162mph (limited)
Weight: 'From 2,335kg'
MPG: 22.1 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 298g/km
Price: £93,450





Author
Discussion

Reavenger

Original Poster:

129 posts

134 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
I'd actually be interested to see a video clip of this.

Were you using the OEM all weather tyres? Can you even buy 888's in a scary 22" size? wobble

I should imagine if you were feeling cheeky and depending on the circuit, you'd be riding those kerbs and cutting the corners as much as you could get away with laugh

I bet the brakes take a massive hammering though. Ceramics as an option? idea

Burnham

3,668 posts

260 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
Straight to the top of my wish list

alexpa

644 posts

173 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
Make it 300bhp and 300 lbft / kerb ton at least.

Meanwhile a proper day at the track in something so heavy equals major work to keep it safe.

haggishunter

1,315 posts

244 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
There's a video of Steve Sutcliff driving one on /drive, I'm on the phone so can't link it.

fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
Such a good lookng car when lined up alongside a Cayenne.

Quhet

2,428 posts

147 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
Shouldn't have washed it. Would be brilliant to see a mud splattered 4x4 charging round on the track driving

DPSFleet

192 posts

162 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
Awesome! Shows some so called performance cars the way to go. Shame about the RRS image but hey, I want one!

Crankie Shaft

71 posts

155 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
I learned to drive in a 1990 RR Vogue SE V8 and have had a soft for them ever since. At the time, a friend of my dad's had an Overfinch 570 and I can't help thinking the SVR is the natural successor to it.

I think I would, you know.

sealtt

3,091 posts

159 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
Who would want to buy a Range Rover to blast about in anyway? What's the point? Just buy the Vogue to have the best luxury 4x4 and get a sports car for when you want to go fast surely?

It's like Ferragamo making formal loafers that double up as a running shoe, it's just a huge compromise with the end result being a product that is not the best at anything.

Crankie Shaft

71 posts

155 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
sealtt said:
Who would want to buy a Range Rover to blast about in anyway? What's the point? Just buy the Vogue to have the best luxury 4x4 and get a sports car for when you want to go fast surely?

It's like Ferragamo making formal loafers that double up as a running shoe, it's just a huge compromise with the end result being a product that is not the best at anything.
By all accounts, it seems to waft as well as a standard RRS; just you can also drive the doorhandles off it, and enjoy it, when you want to. So really, in typical Range Rover terms there isn't really a compromise.


V8LM

5,174 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
Sounds like nothing else too. Still makes me laugh every time I drive it.

k-ink

9,070 posts

180 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
An over stressed, overly complicated £93k Range Rover. What can possibly go wrong? hehe


Matt Bird

1,450 posts

206 months

PH Reportery Lad

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
Quhet said:
Shouldn't have washed it. Would be brilliant to see a mud splattered 4x4 charging round on the track driving
I would have loved to but it was throwing mud from the tyres they were concerned about. While they were hosing those down they did the rest of the car. Should have told them to leave it!


Matt

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

206 months

PH Reportery Lad

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
Reavenger said:
I'd actually be interested to see a video clip of this.

Were you using the OEM all weather tyres? Can you even buy 888's in a scary 22" size? wobble

I should imagine if you were feeling cheeky and depending on the circuit, you'd be riding those kerbs and cutting the corners as much as you could get away with laugh

I bet the brakes take a massive hammering though. Ceramics as an option? idea
Annoyingly we had a camera in and it didn't record. Agh. Damn GoPros...

They were the standard Continentals on 22s. As mentioned, everything felt good for the allotted laps but you do worry about prolonged track time, especially the brakes!

samvia

1,635 posts

171 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
Saw the test mule smashing round the Nurburgring last summer, it looked like it was taking it very well. Sounded ridiculous too. cloud9


RoverP6B

4,338 posts

129 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
Spectacularly pointless but hats off to JLR for making such a polished, accomplished answer to the question no-one asked. I think one could make a good excuse for this if one only had space for one or two cars but had plenty of dosh.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
alexpa said:
Make it 300bhp and 300 lbft / kerb ton at least.

Meanwhile a proper day at the track in something so heavy equals major work to keep it safe.
It'd need 700bhp / 700lbft to achieve that with this weight, since it has a kerb weight of 2335kg.

Quite a step up from 550bhp / 502lbft.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
Spectacularly pointless but hats off to JLR for making such a polished, accomplished answer to the question no-one asked. I think one could make a good excuse for this if one only had space for one or two cars but had plenty of dosh.
It'll make them a fortune, and is consequently not pointless.

V8LM

5,174 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
Matt Bird said:
Reavenger said:
I'd actually be interested to see a video clip of this.

Were you using the OEM all weather tyres? Can you even buy 888's in a scary 22" size? wobble

I should imagine if you were feeling cheeky and depending on the circuit, you'd be riding those kerbs and cutting the corners as much as you could get away with laugh

I bet the brakes take a massive hammering though. Ceramics as an option? idea
Annoyingly we had a camera in and it didn't record. Agh. Damn GoPros...

They were the standard Continentals on 22s. As mentioned, everything felt good for the allotted laps but you do worry about prolonged track time, especially the brakes!
Was it the car in the photos? That's on the 21s, not the unique 22s.