RE: Nissan cancels IDx

Wednesday 17th June 2015

Nissan cancels IDx

That quirky RWD coupe is too expensive to develop, says Nissan. What might have been, eh?



Even as part of a motor show that contained the phenomenal GT-R NISMO, the brilliant little Honda S660 and a GT86 cabriolet, the Nissan IDx concepts stood out as something special. Small, light, rear-wheel drive sports cars with an interesting personalisation aspect too, they were exactly the kind of concepts PH gets excited by.

Small, funky, RWD turbo - promised so much!
Small, funky, RWD turbo - promised so much!
The standard IDx was cool but the NISMO was the car we really wanted. It previewed an affordable, interesting Jap performance car, the kind of which we hadn't seen for a while. Of course the Toyobaru pair are around but the retro nature of the IDx and the compact dimensions really appealed as something different.

So it's rather disappointing to see widespread reports covering the car's demise. As Toyota and Subaru discovered, creating a bespoke rear-wheel drive platform is very expensive and the numbers couldn't be made to work. Shame.

There aren't a great deal of positives to take from this decision either. There may be a retro-inspired front-wheel drive sports car but that will of course be something very different. The GT-R and 370Z remain great cars but it would have been great to see Nissan's performance line up receive some rejuvenation. More's the pity. But hang on, there's another fast Juke coming at Goodwood...



 

[Source: TheTruthAboutCars]

Author
Discussion

bagseye

Original Poster:

111 posts

178 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
What a shame, and just as we were hoping Japan had got it's "mad" back.

JB!

5,254 posts

181 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Gutted frown

LukeR94

2,218 posts

142 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Small, Lightweight, back to basics sportscar is to expensive to make.

How did Mazda manage it with the new MX5 then rolleyes sounds like an excuse because they jumped the gun and told everyone they were going to make it before they actually did the sums.

Poor show.


Reavenger

129 posts

134 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Loved the shape of this. Such a shame it won't happen.

bagseye

Original Poster:

111 posts

178 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
And another fast Juke? The car that just keeps on giving, by continually getting worse.

Edited by bagseye on Wednesday 17th June 10:08

Jam12321

164 posts

111 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
such a shame, really liked the look of that. Way more than the GT86/brz if im honest.

Mezzanine

9,233 posts

220 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
What a shame, loved the concept, looked very promising.

Probably reviewed the sales of the BRZ and seen, xdespite people asking for this type of thing, this doesn't translate to people buying them.


Big Fat Fatty

3,303 posts

157 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
I'm actually kind of glad about this although I hoped to see another RWD coupe built instead. The current trend for rehashing 70s shapes in a fresh, new thinking and modern way is just boring, manufacturers these days are as bad as Hollywood for coming up with unoriginal ideas and reboots of stuff that didn't need rebooting.

Toyota did it right with the GT86, Ford perfected it with the new GT, this 510 remake is just a mess.

w0o0dy

20 posts

149 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
I don't get it....confused
USE THE ALPINE CHASSIS! Redevelop the look to a midengine layout and off you go. 2 really cool RWD midengine fun-cars to keep/make petrolheads like everyone here enthousiastic about Renault (alpine) and Nissans affordably sportscoupes.
It would be a huge hit in Japan and maybe even the US this time if developed properly.

Fetchez la vache

5,575 posts

215 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Jam12321 said:
such a shame, really liked the look of that. Way more than the GT86/brz if im honest.
This.
Mezzanine said:
Probably reviewed the sales of the BRZ and seen, xdespite people asking for this type of thing, this doesn't translate to people buying them.
and this. frown

Some Gump

12,712 posts

187 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Not suprised. That thing looks minging!

If toyota can't sell the GT86, what hope for a car with far more divisive looks?

redroadster

1,753 posts

233 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
It's got limited appeal unlike mx5 it's got a lid so it's going to compete against hot hatches it's too butch looking to be looked at as a coupe .

DB9VolanteDriver

2,612 posts

177 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Too expensive to develop?

More like too ugly to develop. Jeezus, how could anyone with any self respect drive anything as remotely ugly as this POS.

sean ie3

2,058 posts

137 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
the rear end on that is cherry!

wolves_wanderer

12,390 posts

238 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
Not powerful enough, too expensive, I'd rather buy a secondhand Boxster/Golf/M135i



Just a small prediction of how the thread would have gone if they'd made it

is1

188 posts

149 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
I think what PHs are really after is a coupe weighing in about 11-1200KGs, 200 odd HP, rear wheel drive, good seating position and control weights with sensible power train and running costs.
If a company made one of those, they couldn't sell enough of them and we'd all change our A3 TDIs for one of them ;-)

TB Rich

349 posts

220 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
is1 said:
I think what PHs are really after is a coupe weighing in about 11-1200KGs, 200 odd HP, rear wheel drive, good seating position and control weights with sensible power train and running costs.
If a company made one of those, they couldn't sell enough of them and we'd all change our A3 TDIs for one of them ;-)
Yes quite! You say that (flippantly of course) but.... if the "11-1200KGs. 200 odd HP" could have resulted in 200bhp per tonne (or the very best part of), then I think it would have sold much better. I would have bought a white BRZ without doubt.
However I'm in that GT86 / used E92 M3 limbo, with the E92 M3 costing too much to buy and run, and the GT86 simply not offering enough performance frown
To put the GT86 perfomance/cost in to context it is exactly the same as my (when stock) Clio 200 with 197bhp and 1240KG. Now as much as I really want rwd - it just doesn't move the game on enough and would have really just been a sideways move.

danp

1,603 posts

263 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
TB Rich said:
Yes quite! You say that (flippantly of course) but.... if the "11-1200KGs. 200 odd HP" could have resulted in 200bhp per tonne (or the very best part of), then I think it would have sold much better. I would have bought a white BRZ without doubt.
However I'm in that GT86 / used E92 M3 limbo, with the E92 M3 costing too much to buy and run, and the GT86 simply not offering enough performance frown
To put the GT86 perfomance/cost in to context it is exactly the same as my (when stock) Clio 200 with 197bhp and 1240KG. Now as much as I really want rwd - it just doesn't move the game on enough and would have really just been a sideways move.
What about a 125i/130i/330i?

I just bought the latter, it's heavier than I'd like but has a lovely NA 258bhp 6 pot, hydraulic steering, 6 speed manual box and of course RWD.

Or a used M135i - must be about new GT86/used E92 M3 money. Or an E46 M3 with plenty in the kitty!

TB Rich

349 posts

220 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
danp said:
TB Rich said:
Yes quite! You say that (flippantly of course) but.... if the "11-1200KGs. 200 odd HP" could have resulted in 200bhp per tonne (or the very best part of), then I think it would have sold much better. I would have bought a white BRZ without doubt.
However I'm in that GT86 / used E92 M3 limbo, with the E92 M3 costing too much to buy and run, and the GT86 simply not offering enough performance frown
To put the GT86 perfomance/cost in to context it is exactly the same as my (when stock) Clio 200 with 197bhp and 1240KG. Now as much as I really want rwd - it just doesn't move the game on enough and would have really just been a sideways move.
What about a 125i/130i/330i?

I just bought the latter, it's heavier than I'd like but has a lovely NA 258bhp 6 pot, hydraulic steering, 6 speed manual box and of course RWD.

Or a used M135i - must be about new GT86/used E92 M3 money. Or an E46 M3 with plenty in the kitty!
Considered a 130i, I've looked at those on and off a bit over the last couple of years. But finding a 3dr I would actually buy just became tiring.

I think I've missed the boat on E46's. I'm sure it's possible to get a nice one still, but it's more work than I can be arsed to put into it with so many leggy thrashed examples out there. Older than I'd want too.

125i, I hadn't realised until very recently the the UK version can be remapped to 130i spec. So I wouldn't have minded one actually, but it's not really focussed enough for track days. I'd spend a lot on tuning with M3 and 1M bits I can tell.

M135i has a turbo so has no place on my drive wink

This is all largely irrelevant now though as I've sunk many thousdands into a full forged rebuilt engine and next month a couple more k going on a rebuilt diff'd & short ratio box - hindsight shows I had nothing to worry about running costs on an E92 M3!
Somewhat short of the necessary capital now frown ah well, all part of the fun isn't it (keep telling myself enough times I might believe it)

Terminator X

15,129 posts

205 months

Wednesday 17th June 2015
quotequote all
bds! It looked amazing frown

TX.