RE: Renault Twingo: UK Review

RE: Renault Twingo: UK Review

Tuesday 7th July 2015

Renault Twingo: UK Review

It's the rear-engined, rear-wheel drive city car - obviously we had to have a drive



In the interests of fairness and accuracy, it's only right to state from the off that the Renault Twingo is not a mini-911 to drive. Obviously that was everyone's first thought when the layout was announced, right? But Renault is too wise for that; roundabouts littered with cars that have lift-off oversteered into the bushes would be awful for PR. So cast away any ideas of trail braking to shift the weight forwards and using that great traction to fire you from the apex. Front end bob on a bumpy road? Don't be daft. Was a nice idea...

Cool looks serve a purpose as well
Cool looks serve a purpose as well
Having said that, when clutch slip, throttle and turbo all come together for a sprightly launch from the lights, it's hard not to imagine yourself in a shrink wrapped Carrera. Or indeed something silly from the Renault back catalogue. There's a noise with a hint of six emanating from the rear seats, a real surge of acceleration with the weight over the rear wheels (and 205-section tyres!) plus a seating position right at the front of the action. All jolly good fun, especially if surprising a 320d or something similar.

Fundamentally though the Twingo is a very safe and secure city car. Of course it is. But in a world of fiercely aggressive damping, absolute grip and clever differentials, to drive something fairly, well, roly-poly is genuinely pleasant. The steering won't tell you much, obviously, so grip can be gauged by just how much lean is being generated - long live the French city car! Crucially too it's soft enough to be comfy without being wallowy or languid, even if it's occasionally disturbed by bumps around town.

While there are no great handling vices, that hasn't prevented a fairly draconian traction control system being fitted. Bumpy roundabout exits can occasionally see the orange light flashing angrily and, most worryingly, even in crosswinds at motorway speeds. Not the time you want power cut... Some YouTube research has shown that, even with the TC fuse pulled out, the mapping just won't allow any recklessness. Shame.

Don't mock at 900cc - it's faster than you think!
Don't mock at 900cc - it's faster than you think!
To more pressing concerns for the city car buyer. When the urban special stage is rudely disturbed by traffic, the Twingo's other attributes begin to shine through. The interior is funky; colourful, interesting and user friendly too. The speedo is large and clear, as is the R-Link display, with simple and stylish ventilation controls as well. The screen could do with a few more buttons, and the seating position is compromised for taller drivers, but overall the Twingo's is a great interior.

But nothing will impress about the Twingo more than its manoeuvrability. Yes, really. Much was made of the turning circle at launch and it's genuinely extraordinary. Three-point turns in the road or car parks suddenly become twirls of the wheel and the car seems to pivot as its stands. Parking is a doddle, and leaving cramped spaces is a cinch with brilliant visibility. For battling the urban playground, or whatever marketing types call town centres these days, there can't be many better cars.

When was the last time you drove a car without a rev counter? The Twingo is tacholess, leaving your ears as the judge of best change up moment. The 900cc turbo is a little laggy, compounded by a fairly torpid throttle response, but there's a solid chunk of torque in the mid-range before it eventually runs out of puff. Keep it spinning in that sweet spot - and stay away from the slothful 'Eco' mode - via a very French (i.e. very long) gearchange and you'll be carrying more than enough momentum. Nobody ever thinks the 'slow' cars are going fast after all...

A very good city car, but so are the rivals
A very good city car, but so are the rivals
Indeed, even out of city centres the Twingo doesn't feel overwhelmed. Right up to that bizarre traction control intervention it felt comfortable, very stable and easily fast enough, providing you're willing to use more throttle than in larger-engined cars. Annoyingly the clutch rest has been jettisoned in the transition from left- to right-hand drive, which would surely become deeply irritating on a longer journey.

It's hard to conclude on a downer with the Twingo though. The style is backed up with real ability and talent, all while proving deeply likeable and interesting. Problem is, it would appear the city car market is crammed with stylish, capable, likeable cars. The VW Up/SEAT Mii/Skoda Citigo trio is of course hard to avoid, and there's the Aygo/C1/108 triumvirate moreover. That's before the Kia Picanto is mentioned, or the Hyundai i10, or the Fiat Panda... Without having tested them all it's hard to draw definitive conclusions but in isolation the Twingo makes a very strong case for itself. Naturally as PistonHeads we're inclined to discuss Renaultsport but that must be a way off; approach this car as a junior hot hatch and it will fall short but as a cheery and competent city car there's much to enjoy.


RENAULT TWINGO TCE 90 DYNAMIQUE
Engine:
898cc 3-cyl turbo
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 90@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 100@2,500rpm
0-62mph: 10.8 sec
Top speed: 103mph (limited)
Weight: 943kg
MPG: 65.7 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 99g/km
Price: £12,545 (As tested £13,165 comprising of £20 for storage area under rear seats & net and £600 for Techno pack: R-Link (connected multimedia tablet: 7" capacitive touchscreen, voice control, 2x35W speakers,AM/FM/DAB tuner, TomTom® navigation, Bluetooth® audio streaming and hands-free calls, USB and jack sockets,vehicle & web connection, 3D sound by Arkamys), reverse parking camera)







Author
Discussion

markrtw

Original Poster:

62 posts

171 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
No clutch footrest - good!
Saves having to remove the irritating thing like in most cars.

richyd

285 posts

227 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
I'd be seriously interested in a RenaultSport version, IF they build one. In the meantime, my specced-up Up! with lowered springs and subtle spacers handles brilliantly, refusing to understeer unless driven like a total pillock - as a station car it's hard to beat. A RS Twingo could be more fun though!!

danlowe42

52 posts

126 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
I wonder how hot that boot gets and therefore the cabin? Looks like a very good use of space and a nice fun car though. Just don't go buying ice cream at the supermarket!

Richair

1,021 posts

197 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
You know what to do RS and please don't disappoint us!.. There really has to be a market for a hotted up version and it would potentially make a great Class 1a (sub 1400cc) Speed event roadgoing racer; there's been nothing much cop available to use in this class since the s1 106 Rallye. This is merely an observation though as I know Renault will have zero interest in the suitability (or not) of the car in motorsport, but it would be nice.

Quickmoose

4,489 posts

123 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Richair said:
You know what to do RS and please don't disappoint us!.. There really has to be a market for a hotted up version and it would potentially make a great Class 1a (sub 1400cc) Speed event roadgoing racer; there's been nothing much cop available to use in this class since the s1 106 Rallye. This is merely an observation though as I know Renault will have zero interest in the suitability (or not) of the car in motorsport, but it would be nice.
The Fiat Panda 100HP was much loved....
but yes, bring on the affordable-and-fun-within-legal-limits-practical-city-car!

shake n bake

2,221 posts

207 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Try driving one at 70 with a bit of a side wind blowing. Actually a little scary, they just aren't stable at motorway speeds.

Lgfst

391 posts

109 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
My sisters after a new car, this sounds perfect for her. Great review thanks smile

culpz

4,882 posts

112 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
I think it looks brilliant and the whole idea of it is a good call from Renault. I'd deffo have this over it's rivals.

Thing for me is the only reason why i would get one is because it's rear-engined and rear-wheel drive. However, does it actually feel like that? It doesn't have much power to play with nor much weight at the back for it to swing around and be playful. So what's the point?

Renaultsport really need to get their hands on it and work their magic and revive the brand name after the pretty unsuccessful new Clio RS. Could be an absolute winner!

Richair

1,021 posts

197 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Quickmoose said:
Richair said:
You know what to do RS and please don't disappoint us!.. There really has to be a market for a hotted up version and it would potentially make a great Class 1a (sub 1400cc) Speed event roadgoing racer; there's been nothing much cop available to use in this class since the s1 106 Rallye. This is merely an observation though as I know Renault will have zero interest in the suitability (or not) of the car in motorsport, but it would be nice.
The Fiat Panda 100HP was much loved....
but yes, bring on the affordable-and-fun-within-legal-limits-practical-city-car!
Loved it was (is), but unfortunately it's too heavy to be competitive against the quickest cars in that class on the hill... A Twingo probably isn't much lighter (no way near as light as a quick BL mini or 106) but the torque from a turbocharged motor could bring it up to a competitive level. Fingers crossed, time will tell on that one.

DaveL485

2,758 posts

197 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Fantastic. Now where did I leave the spare Hayabusa?


corcoran

535 posts

274 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Does stuff in the boot not get hot above that engine?!

RichardR

2,892 posts

268 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
It's quite impressive how they've managed to squeeze that i3 engine under the boot floor!

markrtw said:
No clutch footrest - good!
Saves having to remove the irritating thing like in most cars.
What's the problem with the clutch footrest? I don't understand the benefit of having to lift your foot onto the pedal rather than simply moving it sideways... scratchchin

LotusOmega375D

7,601 posts

153 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
RS could pop a second engine in the front. They could call it the...

...Twingo

getmecoat

renaultgeek

473 posts

148 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
even a gt version would be nice like the last one.

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

205 months

PH Reportery Lad

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
danlowe42 said:
I wonder how hot that boot gets and therefore the cabin? Looks like a very good use of space and a nice fun car though. Just don't go buying ice cream at the supermarket!
It does get pretty toasty! Ice cream can go on the back seat, right?

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

205 months

PH Reportery Lad

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
culpz said:
I think it looks brilliant and the whole idea of it is a good call from Renault. I'd deffo have this over it's rivals.

Thing for me is the only reason why i would get one is because it's rear-engined and rear-wheel drive. However, does it actually feel like that? It doesn't have much power to play with nor much weight at the back for it to swing around and be playful. So what's the point?

Renaultsport really need to get their hands on it and work their magic and revive the brand name after the pretty unsuccessful new Clio RS. Could be an absolute winner!
It was for space and practicality benefits from what I've heard. Pack more into a smaller space. But it's definitely been engineered to drive like any other city car. Perhaps a shame but better safe than sorry is probably the logic!

matsoc

853 posts

132 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
It is not important for a city car but anybody knows why the top speed is limited to 103 mph?
With 90 hp could reach 115 mph...

jackpe

502 posts

164 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Am I missing something here? not one sigle mention of the Fiat Cinquencento? that is surely the biggest rival. Renault all but copied the design and it is the most successful car in this sector. I'm sure it is off the pace dynamically but a new one must be out soon and crap dynamics have not hampered the Cinquecento so far..

Quickmoose

4,489 posts

123 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
jackpe said:
Am I missing something here? not one single mention of the Fiat Cinquencento? that is surely the biggest rival. Renault all but copied the design and it is the most successful car in this sector. I'm sure it is off the pace dynamically but a new one must be out soon and crap dynamics have not hampered the Cinquecento so far..
Glasses. You need'em

JimbobVFR

2,682 posts

144 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Quickmoose said:
Glasses. You need'em
It does look pretty similar to the 500 to me too, its more faithful in principle to the original cinq and the 126 as well by being rear engined.