RE: Subaru WRX STI: PH Fleet

RE: Subaru WRX STI: PH Fleet

Wednesday 26th August 2015

Subaru WRX STI: PH Fleet

After nine months and nine thousand miles the Subaru is heading home - will it be missed?



So my tenure with the Subaru WRX STI NotImpreza has come to a close, just shy of 9,000 miles and nine months after it started. And I'm going to be sorry to see it go.

Still pretty damn good on the right road
Still pretty damn good on the right road
Fair to say it's not a car that's won everybody over in its time on the PH Fleet, or in the wider world either. Actually, that's putting it too mildly. A good number of people seem think this car is an unwelcome relic of a bygone era, compromised, outdated and irrelevant in the age of 300hp-plus four-wheel drive mega hatches. As one colleague correctly identified, all the money went on the engineering. Leaving nothing in the budget for, you know, stuff like the interior. Or a decent infotainment system.

But that's what I love about this car. As evidenced by the bewildering array of graphs and data earnestly thrown at us at the launch event, the WRX STI has been built with total honesty and absolutely zero cynicism. It hasn't been relentlessly benchmarked or subjected to customer clinics. No attempt has been made to appeal to an audience beyond those who like Subarus with big wings. This, ladies and gentlemen, is basically the anti Golf R. For that reason alone I'm glad exchange rates make it viable for Subaru to sell it here again, the (just) sub-£30K price actually looking like decent value for what you get.

Still not that pretty in here as well
Still not that pretty in here as well
Enough flag waving. What's it actually been like to live with? The looks will be a Marmite thing but the sheer aggression still stands out in the currently conservative climate. I like the fact the Japanese seem to have regained their bonkers edge, this and the Civic Type R totally bucking the prevailing trend for underplayed looks. It's a turbo nutter car and it looks like one. Bravo.

But under all that it's proved decently practical, the boot has taken bikes and furniture and remains usefully big even when the back seats are filled with a couple of baby seats. The grown-up ones don't have every-which way adjustment but - get this - just feel good and it's a comfortable if predictably cut-price cabin. Touch points are OK but you don't need to dig deep to find exposed this or Tupperware that you simply wouldn't get in a German rival. Likewise the Pioneer head unit, which ticks all the functional boxes of nav, phone connectivity and the rest but adds a grand to the price and feels about 15 years out of date. Spotting a theme here?

More on this coming very soon!
More on this coming very soon!
Someone had a sense of humour putting a touchscreen operated system in a car with suspension this stiff too... Ah yes, the ride. It's not shy, let's put it that way. But once up to pace the spring and dampers are perfectly matched and, in character, it does at least match the snappy clutch, twitchy steering and hyper aggressive throttle response. You can at least dial the latter back with the mapping switch and I spent most of my time in the more mellow Intelligent setting, enjoying its less aggressive initial phase and then the sense of the turbo spooling up.

No, it's not a relaxing car to drive by any stretch. Tiresome even, if you're not in the mood. Because this is a car always on the attack and one that gets better the harder you drive it. What it lacks in electronically contrived driving modes it more than makes up for in 'proper' mechanical adjustability too. You know, the type derived from steering and throttle inputs. Or an adjustable centre diff, the 'open' minus setting offering a nice neutral to rear balance with less understeer and minimal drive influence on the front axle and (still hydraulically assisted) steering. Examples of where being outdated can be a positive.

Tyre debacle a notable low point
Tyre debacle a notable low point
Did anything go wrong? Well the puncture over Christmas and subsequent diff warning light were a pain but that was no fault of the car. More annoying was the disappearance of the USB/aux-in interface into the centre binnacle. A bit of DIY and skinned knuckles retrieved and replaced it was an unfortunate confirmation of the cabin's flimsier elements.

That won't stick in the memory as much as the four-wheel drifts round slip roads, the inescapable bassy soundtrack of the exhaust or the all-round character of the car, especially at full chat. There are now more socially respectable ways of taking apart a greasy British B-road but it's nice to know Subaru still sets the standard. In a small nod to the modern age I even saw mpg figures starting with a '3' when tickling along, something I'd have considered pure fantasy when I was running my old MY95 WRX back in the day.

And while it's departing the PH Fleet I have a feeling a turbocharged flat-four may be returning to my personal one in the not too distant. For both Subaru and its fans old habits die hard it seems.


FACT SHEET
Car:
 2014 Subaru WRX STI
Run by: Dan
On fleet since: December 2014
Mileage: 11,589
List price new: £28,995 (£30,007 as tested including £1,012 for Pioneer touchscreen navigation unit; c. £75 fitting charge applicable but varies according to dealership)
Last month at a glance: Warts and all the NotImpreza will be missed!

Previous updates:
New arrival - the NotImpreza has landed!
Rusty nail plays Scrooge over a white Christmas
Four wheels back on his wagon, Dan's having fun
To the circuit for a real test of the NotImpreza
STI vs. S3 in sports saloon shootout!
Back from Le Mans and ready for the Golf!

[Photos: Stuart Price, Anthony Fraser, Terry Oborne and Dan]







Author
Discussion

griffsomething

Original Poster:

235 posts

161 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
The Golf is impressive but a little dull. Life is too short for dull cars, I'd have this over the R. Far more exotic/interesting engine too, rather than just another inline four turbo. And I actually prefer the interior design...

JerryF

282 posts

174 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
What a great review. I have looked at this car, driven this car, but still can't take the plunge. The only negative for me is the rear spoiler.

I've a C63 coming up to the end of lease with low miles and its a case of do I jeep it or buy a car in this class? And my criteria is I don't want a Golf R.

I like the Civic Type R too - but could I live with it on a day to day basis when I'm driving around suburbia and not the race track? I don't think I could take the laughs and negative comments pointed at a guy approaching his bus pass. Need to see it in their grey, not red.

I think the Focus RS, will tick all the right boxes, if I could wait that long. Awfully tempted to buy the Scoob with a proper engineered 4wd system.


Guvernator

13,143 posts

165 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Great review and sums up what is great about these cars, i.e. you drive them for the brilliant driving experience, not for electronic toys or soft touch plastics.

HOWEVER Subaru's of old have always had decent suspension travel and a very supple ride. They are supposed to be based on rally cars which spend most of there time hammering down horribly surfaced roads after-all and the ability of the road cars to mimic the ability to soak up any such punishment was one of the great things I admired about them.

I am therefore very disappointed to hear that they seem to have abandoned this so it seems even the old skool Subaru isn't totally immune to the march of fashion where a horrible harsh ride seems to be de rigueur for any car with sporting pretensions these days. rolleyes

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
"As one colleague correctly identified, all the money went on the engineering"

Yet it still uses the same FF econo-layout that all the hyper hatches use. Maybe you should ask for your money back.

moribund

4,031 posts

214 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
"As one colleague correctly identified, all the money went on the engineering"

Yet it still uses the same FF econo-layout that all the hyper hatches use. Maybe you should ask for your money back.
Huh? The WRX is longitudinal front engine, with full-time all wheel drive. The opposite of all other hatches?

budgie smuggler

5,374 posts

159 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
"As one colleague correctly identified, all the money went on the engineering"

Yet it still uses the same FF econo-layout that all the hyper hatches use. Maybe you should ask for your money back.
confused

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
moribund said:
Huh? The WRX is longitudinal front engine, with full-time all wheel drive. The opposite of all other hatches?
It is longitudinal, but that brings no major benefits in terms of engine position, so it's all the same really. Very nose heavy 60/40ish like an FF, and the AWD system has traditionally been only marginally better than an on-demand system on dry tarmac. The early versions were exciting because they were so much more powerful than anything else. Now that everyone has 300 hp or more, it doesn't have much else to offer. Has the budget really gone completely into the engineering? Not IMO.

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
And as usual the elephant in the room isn't mentioned. Unless I'm mistaken, this 2.5 engine is unchanged from that in the previous gen cars - you know, the one made of chocolate that regularly fails. Tell me if I'm wrong as I'd otherwise consider one of these for sure.

cbrown7

118 posts

249 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Can't wait unitl this makes it into my fun car budget!

leedsutd1

770 posts

186 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
I have owned 5 wrx saloons ,all silver, but for £30k it would have to be the new Focus RS ,even if its a couple of grand more

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
It is longitudinal, but that brings no major benefits in terms of engine position, so it's all the same really. Very nose heavy 60/40ish like an FF, and the AWD system has traditionally been only marginally better than an on-demand system on dry tarmac. The early versions were exciting because they were so much more powerful than anything else. Now that everyone has 300 hp or more, it doesn't have much else to offer. Has the budget really gone completely into the engineering? Not IMO.
But it's a flat four so the CoG is much lower. Everything's a trade off, at the end of the day.

The 2017/18 model should rectify the power issues. A little bird, to be taken with much salt, claims it'll use the new 2.0 but with twin turbos and over 400bhp.

Guvernator

13,143 posts

165 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
The 2017/18 model should rectify the power issues. A little bird, to be taken with much salt, claims it'll use the new 2.0 but with twin turbos and over 400bhp.
If true, that sounds exciting! Hopefully it will still retain the distinctive sound and the ability to rev too.

rb5er

11,657 posts

172 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Great looking car. So much more interesting than any Vag. With the 340R kit these are really fast and I'm not sure which hot hatch is meant to match it that is of any interest.

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Is the 340R kit still sold? I had a 330S and that was blooming rapid. Have to say, I suspect it was putting out a lot more than 330bhp. Felt a good 30 more. My Evo X FQ330 didn't feel anything like as quick.

BlackPrince

1,271 posts

169 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
I just bought one and I love it. The spec available in N.America is a bit better than whats available in the UK (here STIs use the same Starlink ICE used in other Subarus). I didn't drive the A45 AMG or the S3 so don't know what they're like. However, I was considering a prev-gen E63 but decided to go with the Scoob because of the manual transmission and because it was more engaging to drive, similar reasons why I didn't even consider the 45AMG and S3 (plus they cost 10%-15% more than the STI - not a dealbreaker but significant to me anyway).

I have no regrets thus far (other than perhaps speccing the Subaru STI Performance exhaust, which can get a bit boomy at times) and I'd happily buy another when I replace this one. There are concessions though, that one doesn't have to make with its more luxurious competitors: only the driver's side window is one-touch, and the passenger seat is manually adjusted. Not a big deal, but someone who is cross-shopping an S3 or 45AMG will notice the difference.

Reactions to the rear wing have so far been positive. Friends and family seem to think of it as a "sports car" rather than thinking I bought a chav car (though the chavs over here, as in the UK I've heard, now buy 10yr old Audis rather than Subarus and Evos). I think its because most owners of more recent STIs are actually enthusiasts who are in their 30s and 40s. It may not be the best car to ferry clients around in, but I'd say that about some of the harder-riding Audis as well. I think someone could turn up anywhere in this car and it would be fine. I see older men in business suits driving to work in the morning in orange GT3 RS' so this isn't much different (albeit lacking the badge kudos of the Porsche, though I suspect much of that prestige is removed by the lairy colour and rear wing as far as the public's concerned).

Anyway, for those who are thinking about taking the plunge, I'd say to wholeheartedly do it. I was worried (and still am) about the "chocolate engine" also, but as long as one does regular oil changes (I do mine every 4000 miles) and maintenance the engine will live longer than we will.

nickfrog

21,083 posts

217 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
moribund said:
Huh? The WRX is longitudinal front engine, with full-time all wheel drive. The opposite of all other hatches?
It is longitudinal, but that brings no major benefits in terms of engine position, so it's all the same really. Very nose heavy 60/40ish like an FF, and the AWD system has traditionally been only marginally better than an on-demand system on dry tarmac. The early versions were exciting because they were so much more powerful than anything else. Now that everyone has 300 hp or more, it doesn't have much else to offer. Has the budget really gone completely into the engineering? Not IMO.
Yeah !!! He is back ! I find that a longitudinal engine allows for more of the mass being behind the front axle, even when it's a flat four.

Spa + Ring 17/18/19 October: can you make it ? I didn't see you last time despite promises ?

Gecko1978

9,680 posts

157 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
macky17 said:
And as usual the elephant in the room isn't mentioned. Unless I'm mistaken, this 2.5 engine is unchanged from that in the previous gen cars - you know, the one made of chocolate that regularly fails. Tell me if I'm wrong as I'd otherwise consider one of these for sure.
Errr my 07 wrx 2.5 was fine 300bhp never missed a beat in 7 years. Trips to the ring too.

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
On standard mapping, which was rubbish, ringland failure is all too common.

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
On standard mapping, which was rubbish, ringland failure is all too common.
Finally someone from the real world.

Yes, I'm sure some people have been lucky, even for 7 years, but the failures are documented and numerous. How Subaru can continue to employ the same engine unrevised I don't know. Unless it is revised somehow. Does anyone know one way or the other?

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
griffsomething said:
The Golf is impressive but a little dull. Life is too short for dull cars, I'd have this over the R. Far more exotic/interesting engine too, rather than just another inline four turbo. And I actually prefer the interior design...
Agreed, I really do like these, but once again I have been too chicken to buy another car - my Clio is serving me well and I'm spending cash left right and centre on doing the house us.

Worst petrol head ever frown