New DB10 Pictures Released

[woodsypedia]

Thought you might like these. I think I just had a gentleman accident....

http://www.businessinsider.com/pictures-of-aston-m...

Chris

[ds2000]

Wooo there's some good ones there. The front is still a bit ming but the side profile is fantastic... kinda the opposite of me

[Beefmeister]

You'll like this then...

https://youtu.be/qC2D2hUuZ1U

[tonyhall38]

Front is ugly....

[RichB]

Been seeing this for the last 18 months and that nose doesn't get any better. Perhaps it's the lack of number plate, driving lamps, indicators etc that makes it look unfinished but it doesn't do it for me.

[Jon39]

RichB said:

... and that nose doesn't get any better.
... it doesn't do it for me.

If our opinion is shared by a percentage of prospective buyers, then AML might have regrets, if they do put fish faces on future models.

I know it is only the front appearance, but think how unpopular the Scorpio was. That was ditched fairly quickly, but Ford had the finances to cope with their blunder.

[DB9VolanteDriver]

RichB said:

Been seeing this for the last 18 months and that nose doesn't get any better. Perhaps it's the lack of number plate, driving lamps, indicators etc that makes it look unfinished but it doesn't do it for me.

Yup. Front has no detailing; the stuff that gives character to a face. Kinda' reminds what people do with kit cars; avoid the complicated details to ease the job.

[Phil74891]

Here's a quick comparison.

[Jon39]

I hope they always include a digital speedometer on road cars.
With a 220mph dial, you need more then quick glance, to be able to check for 30 mph etc.

[Quarterly]

Its not really a 'new car' at all, its the same old Vantage with a slightly less distinctive body shape, a fish at one end and a monkeys arse at the other. Is this what they do now, make a dozen cars to see what people think before they hit the manufacture button? Makes me pleased I've got the old shape Vantage, still the prettiest car in the world!


edit: Phil, your car looks fantastic!

Edited by Quarterly on Friday 9th October 20:47

[RichB]

Phil74891 said:

Here's a quick comparison.

Indeed, if Reichman is looking have a serious word with yourself and tell us which is the better, and most aggressive looking

[Murph7355]

Rear is too F-type, front is too unfinished. One or two angles it looks OK. I suspect it will look better in the metal.

Interior has some interesting bits, but as mentioned above it's great to see them continue with making dials just the wrong side of readable. Small rev counter is a mistake - get that front and centre. Signal your intent.

The Jag CX75 absolutely blows it away IMO.

[JohnG1]

Jon39 said:

I hope they always include a digital speedometer on road cars.
With a 220mph dial, you need more then quick glance, to be able to check for 30 mph etc.

That dashboard looks very resolved - oil and water temperature gauges. Is DB10 a test bed for an entirely new binnacle layout?

[AndyV8V]

Saw it in the flesh last night at Grange in Welwyn (#2/10)

Pretty much what you guys already said, F-type at the back, unfinished front, and overall big picture ... a vantage.
Nevertheless, awesome looking car

oh, there were few scuffs, and stonechips in front of the rear arches