Skoda Octavia vRS: Market Watch
Not exactly sexy, but all three generations of Octavia vRS have real appeal for the PHer with nothing to prove
Developing a serious anti-establishment cult following in the early 2000s, the 1.8-litre turbo Mk1 vRS was ideal for those unable to afford the insurance premiums and prices of more illustrious rivals. And through two subsequent generations, the Octavia vRS has continued to prove extremely popular, accounting for more than 15 per cent of all UK Octavia sales.
With the first Octavia vRS 230s being delivered to UK right now and the four-wheel drive car just announced, it seemed the ideal time to revisit all three generations and discover which vRS Octavia models make the best buys.
Introduction
Skoda Octavia vRS Mk1 (2001-2005)
Skoda Octavia vRS Mk2 (2005-2013)
Skoda Octavia vRS Mk3 (2013-on)
Many thanks to Topcats Racing UK Ltd, Westcott Venture Park, Briskoda, RevoTechnik, Diesel Performance and Glass's Guide for their help with this feature
vRS Mk3 Photos: Tom Begley
Great cars. Hard to beat at the obscenely low prices they're at now.
The stats after a simple stage 1 remap (no hardware changes) are pretty solid for a 13.5yr old car that's worth £1100 according to Autotrader. 205bhp & 354Nm (it's been on a rolling road recently), 36mpg (average), absolutely enormous boot, great reliability and a body that doesn't rust.
Shed of the year?!
I actually preferred it when the Skoda name was still a bit of a joke. Always felt fun overtaking expensive BMW's and Audi's in a turbocharged skip!
But if you pushed it hard into a corner it would understeer forever the steering was a bit vague despite having enough feedback. The brakes were good enough with big rotor's and probably mapped it certainly went well enough. Huge boot could swallow two mountain bikes with the seats up and parcel shelf still in But mine developed an engine problem and was worryingly tappety at cold starts but it quickly vanished when the cold cycle had finished and it burnt no oil. Front antiroll bar bolt snapped when replacing bushes resulting in the subframe needing dropping for it to be drilled out and replaced. No alarm was a bit of concern at times too.
Got a good price at trade in though and for the price it was an alright car.
The only things that are a bit niggling are the gear shifter can occasionally become a bit stuck, particularly going from first to reverse and vice-versa, the driving position is a little high up, even with the seat at a sensible position and 5th gear really could be longer for motorway journeys. In fact, a 6th gear would be beneficial but besides that it's done me proud and I can't see myself selling it any time soon.
Isn't the Mk2 listed in the post here, actually the Mk3? And the Mk3 actually the Mk4.
I thought this was the Mk2
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/s...
I'm sure there is reason for this. Can anyone elaborate?
Isn't the Mk2 listed in the post here, actually the Mk3? And the Mk3 actually the Mk4.
I thought this was the Mk2
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/s...
I'm sure there is reason for this. Can anyone elaborate?
And in fairness, I did drive fairly quick in it. Something about hooning a big wagon thats just satisfying... never dangerous or anything mind you! And even on the 'Ring I was a bit cautious!
Some day, hopefully soon, new ones are lovely, but one like below would do me fine.
The snootiness about Skodas remains even in this post...
"people who couldn't afford the insurance premiums or price of more illustrious..." - I was looking for a sporty saloon and expected to get a company car (a 325i, X-Type, S3/A4, MG-ZT), but when I drove the vRS, after reading the glowing Autocar reviewing (and, I'll admit, seeing the ten grand saving on the 'competition', I couldn't see why I'd spend the extra money.
Sure the others were a fraction more comfy, but none were significantly better to drive. I got my wife to come along and have a drive because I thought maybe I was fooling myself, but she agreed and the Octavias remains her favourite car that I've owned.
We did a trip to Austria in it one summer, 4 up, with the boot full of luggage and two crates of Weissbier we saw 145 MPH on the speedo (a bit disappointed not to get an indicated 150, but it was a lot of weight onboard!).
It was comfy (ride maybe a little harsher than some like), economic (always 30+ and I saw 40+ on some 80MPH motorway trips), well made and always a pleasure to drive. The CD player was tinny (but then saw were Audis and VWs of the era) and the rear seat was thin (to allow more legroom, apparently), but that's about all I'd say were negatives (unless you count the stupid comments from people - I had a Jaguar S-Type before this and got plenty of 'heated rear window' jokes, but honestly the Skoda was so much better to drive, I just smiled at their ignorance.
I didn't like the styling of the Mk2 that much, but I'm tempted to consider the latest model again, now I need something a bit more practical than my RX8, to lug dive gear around in.
M
Edit to add: I really liked all the ones I drove based on their own merits (otherwise I wouldn't have had two Mk1's!) and I do keep looking at them in the classifieds!
I'd also question the motives of a man who sells tuning boxes trying to scare people off remaps
The mk3 looks much smarter, and bigger, if slightly dull. Seems to hold its value better though.
Jimbo
It goes well enough in a straight line that you don't have to worry about overtaking and there's nothing wrong with the chassis - basically it does nothing badly but it doesn't really do anything particularly well either except for carry more stuff than it's competition. It's just a moderately quick family hatch which happens to have a bigger boot than most.
Isn't the Mk2 listed in the post here, actually the Mk3? And the Mk3 actually the Mk4.
I thought this was the Mk2
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/s...
I'm sure there is reason for this. Can anyone elaborate?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff