RE: BMW M4 AC Schnitzer ACS4: Review

RE: BMW M4 AC Schnitzer ACS4: Review

Monday 21st December 2015

BMW M4 AC Schnitzer ACS4: Review

Are 510hp, bigger wheels and slammed ride height the making or breaking of BMW's occasionally unhinged M4?



The difference a set of dampers makes is revealed on the first corner out of the village where AC Schnitzer's UK operation is based. An uphill left hander leading up to the gate of the Sandringham Estate, it's got a nasty washboard ripple just as the chassis loads up and a fresh coating of December rain on its surface. I've already done several runs for the camera in the Schnitzer-tuned M4 so have a good sense for how it deals with it; waving farewell and tackling the same corner in the stock PH Fleet M4 I instantly get a blaze of yellow flashing lights on the dash and a violent intervention from the stability control.

Stanced like this shouldn't work - it does!
Stanced like this shouldn't work - it does!
DSC is on top of it. But it's exactly the sort of thing that happens all the time in the standard M4 on roads like this, shaking your confidence and more often than not causing you to back off and leave the real talents of the rest of the car untapped. Which, let's face it, is something of a waste.

Earlier in the day in the Schnitzer car it's a completely different story. The apparently stanced ride height, bigger 20-inch wheels, wafer thin sidewalls and boosted 510hp engine all suggest a car that's basically an M4 but more so. In other words the last thing you want for exploring unfamiliar B-roads in the middle of winter. Backwards through a hedge would be embarrassing. Backwards through the walls surrounding her majesty's winter residence possibly treasonous, with the added concern the local constabulary are likely better armed than your typical village bobbies.

Bumpy, wet roads really show this car at its best
Bumpy, wet roads really show this car at its best
Man up
A real man would probably be more interested in the fact the Schnitzer ECU unleashes yet more power from the BMW's S55 twin-turbo straight six. 431hp becomes 510hp, 406lb ft now 475lb ft. As a piggyback unit the original ECU is left untouched, meaning Schnitzer can warranty both its own components and the original engine and transmission against tuning related faults for up to three years. Where graphs climb steeply, plateau suddenly and remain flat until the cutout on the stock car they now continue to expand into a more fulsome and expansive range. Fine if you want it but never in the five months I've enjoyed with the M4 have I thought 'what this car REALLY needs is more power'.

Noise, on the other hand, has been a more controversial issue. Schnitzer's demo car has the Active Sound Design still intact but, frankly, it's drowned out by the export only cat-back exhaust system. This retains the variable flaps of the standard one but amplifies the 'real' noise considerably, to the point you can pretty much play tunes by messing about with loading the engine in a high gear and suddenly back off to create characterful ripples and crackles. The demo also gets some expensive carbon trim elements which you could probably take or leave, especially the plank-like rear wing offered but not fitted to this car.

Faster, louder and quite a bit better too
Faster, louder and quite a bit better too
Wetter the better
What I'm really here to try out is the AC Schnitzer RS suspension kit, based around a KWVariant 3 passive spring/damper set-up tuned to the firm's own settings. The ride height drop looks pretty old-school tuner, the forged Schnitzer wheels packing out the already muscular arches even more than the standard car's beautifully dished 19s. The approach, dictated by Schnitzer's set-up guru Manfred Wollgarten, is also pleasingly old-school, hismantra apparently "better fast than hard" when it comes to tuning springs and dampers.

And for all the slammed looks the Schnitzer M4 lives up to this promise. The regular M4 is very good on smooth, dry surfaces, where the sublime calibration between DSC, M diff and DCT gearbox are more than up to the job of containing the more rampant side of its initial power delivery. When the going gets choppier though you can't escape the sense there's more spring than there is damping, the staccato variation in tyre contact pressure over bumps meaning on wet, bumpy B-roads you get a lot of very early DSC intervention. It's not always as destabilising as you might imagine. But you have to think carefully about which suspension mode you're in - you might want Comfort to take the sting off the bumps but that can leave the rear axle dangerously underdamped if you hit a bump with any vigour. And yet in Sport or Sport Plus it's just too damned stiff, the result being the same heart in mouth flashes of DSC as the black boxes do their best to tame what feels at times like a wildly bucking bronco.

Schnitzer shows M4 can be improved
Schnitzer shows M4 can be improved
Pitter patter
No such insecurities with the passive Schnitzer set-up - there's only one setting and it's the right one. At low speeds it feels generally similar to the stock car, which is to say pretty fierce and with plenty of secondary pitter-patter. As the speeds increase though it calms down considerably, harsh vertical impacts successfully damped, keeping the rear tyres' contact with the road more constant and predictable. As a result there's less need for DSC intervention, you can fully enjoy the engine's huge reach and the car feels calmer and more settled throughout. You get the odd skerff of tyre rub through really violent dips - Schnitzer UK's Chris Rossiter admits they're considering winding on a little more compression damping to counter it - but where the standard car gets flung about by the undulations the Schnitzer car glides, wheels tracking the surface imperfections with fluidity and confidence.

All of which means you can enjoy more of that engine, more of the time. Conditions and a sense of social responsibility limit exactly how deeply you can explore 510hp on a wet country road but even at sensible speeds you sense the increased flexibility and muscularity. With the room to fully explore the extra performance there's little doubt this M4 would be a pretty mighty car. Interestingly this is the first M4 we've driven on the standard steel brakes too and they both look and feel well up to the job, with just a little more feel to the initial pedal bite. They lack the bling factor of the PH Fleet car's ceramics but if you're weighing up your options you could pretty much have the Schnitzer engine upgrade and suspension kit for the £6,250 BMW charges for them.

Such is the beauty of aftermarket updates like this - you can tune the car according to need, taste and budget. And were the PH Fleet M4 mine I'd happily take the suspension kit alone and drive home a very happy man.


BMW M4 AC SCHNITZER ACS4
Engine:
2,979cc 6-cyl twin-turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual/7-speed dual-clutch auto (M DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 510@6,800rpm* (431@5,500rpm)
Torque (lb ft): 475@4,000rpm* (406@1,850-5,500rpm)
0-62mph: 4.0sec (4.1 sec, both with M DCT)
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,612kg M DCT (EU, with driver)
MPG: 34 M DCT (NEDC combined)
CO2: 194g/km M DCT
Price: £59,950 (Basic OTR for standard M4 M DCT; AC Schnitzer AC4S £80,871 inc. VAT as tested, inc. 510hp engine package £3,545.04; third-year warranty £1,082.02; RS Suspension kit £2,503.97; export cat-back exhaust system £3,185; Type V 20-inch forged wheels with Michelin Pilot Sport tyres £5,607.73; standalone prices inc. VAT but plus labour, where applicable)

Figures in brackets for standard M DCT BMW M4 where different
*On 98ron fuel only

[Sources: AC SchnitzerAC Schnitzer UK, KW]
 

 













Photos: Max Earey

Author
Discussion

competizone

Original Poster:

745 posts

102 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
excellent.

GTRmad

248 posts

171 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Rip off for the upgrades,Better can be had for a fraction of the cost,Like the JB4 for upping the power.

Tankslider

833 posts

223 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
ACS power upgrades also maintain the manufacturer's warranty. That's some development work, and where the money goes. You get what you pay for - and if I had a new M4, I know where I'd be happier spending my money.

bubney72

1,102 posts

153 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
A damn fine looking car that M4. Well done BMW, and Schnitzer

Sam All

3,101 posts

101 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
M4 GTS or this?

Dan, back to back with the GTS would be awesome.

Bencolem

1,017 posts

239 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Save for the winglets it does look rather excellent!

Patrick Bateman

12,181 posts

174 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Could this be the first decent thing AC Schnitzer have ever done?

gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Thought I recognized the car. Well at least you kinda know where it's been!

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/b...

Leins

9,468 posts

148 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
Could this be the first decent thing AC Schnitzer have ever done?
I'd quite like an E36 CLSII

LukeDM

467 posts

123 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
I will take the suspension, power upgrade, exhaust and warranty on a manual M3 thanks.

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
There was a time, not very long ago, when the M-division got their own suspension tuning right. What happened to them?

samoht

5,713 posts

146 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Dan Trent said:
The difference a set of dampers makes
Indeed, good dampers like this is exactly the kind of aftermarket upgrade that we want PH to test on real British B-roads :up:

kambites said:
There was a time, not very long ago, when the M-division got their own suspension tuning right. What happened to them?
Good question. I had an impression that over at Audi, the division responsible for the S/RS cars basically has two teams who work on different products, due to the need for overlapping development cycles with the vast range of S/RS/SQ cars they now offer. I wonder if the manifold expansion of BMW's M range has resulted in a similar arrangement of engineers, such that like at Audi it is now pot luck which models are great, and which are unresolved?

Whereas in the old days, I imagine the same team of engineers would work on one M-car, sign it off, and then move on to the next, resulting in consistency and a family feel to the cars.

Just a wild-ass guess, until anyone knows better.

dypeterc

2 posts

100 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
But the car w ceramics and slap on the AC suspension and wheels. Car has plenty of power and you won't have to shell out for 98Ron petrol each fill up.

These tweaks would make a killer M3 sedan.

Patrick Bateman

12,181 posts

174 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
samoht said:
Dan Trent said:
The difference a set of dampers makes
Indeed, good dampers like this is exactly the kind of aftermarket upgrade that we want PH to test on real British B-roads :up:

kambites said:
There was a time, not very long ago, when the M-division got their own suspension tuning right. What happened to them?
Good question. I had an impression that over at Audi, the division responsible for the S/RS cars basically has two teams who work on different products, due to the need for overlapping development cycles with the vast range of S/RS/SQ cars they now offer. I wonder if the manifold expansion of BMW's M range has resulted in a similar arrangement of engineers, such that like at Audi it is now pot luck which models are great, and which are unresolved?

Whereas in the old days, I imagine the same team of engineers would work on one M-car, sign it off, and then move on to the next, resulting in consistency and a family feel to the cars.

Just a wild-ass guess, until anyone knows better.
Was the Z4M one of the first to have widespread criticism for this? I can't recall hearing many before it. Firm maybe, but not unresolved.

Adam Ansel

695 posts

106 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Alpina every day. Far more old money and far less chav.
Also much better motor vehicles.

Liamst

165 posts

115 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Id probably wager money that BMS do more tuning and development with JB4 than ACS given that they release updates non stop, even now they still developing n54 platform. And you can send them data logs at any time of the day and they reply quickly with individual settings to perfect the experience.
And a good set of coilovers corner weghted for your needs will be just as good.
However this over gts! But why do both this and gts have such horrible wheels!

Wills2

22,819 posts

175 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
I'm glad you liked it Dan, as I said before a it's a cracking car the ACS M4.


Wills2

22,819 posts

175 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
Could this be the first decent thing AC Schnitzer have ever done?
Eh?

Patrick Bateman

12,181 posts

174 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
Eh?
Usually it's just chav tat when a car gets the Schnitzer cosmetics.

Wills2

22,819 posts

175 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
Wills2 said:
Eh?
Usually it's just chav tat when a car gets the Schnitzer cosmetics.
The article is about how the car drives...