RE: Shed of the Week: Audi A6

RE: Shed of the Week: Audi A6

Friday 22nd January 2016

Shed of the Week: Audi A6

Why a bare bones Audi A6 could be more interesting than it looks at first glance



Got your holidays booked yet? That Donald Trump is a character isn't he? Nice weather for the time of year though. How's your auntie? Eeh, my back's killing me.

Bored yet? Good. Because that will make this week's Shed seem interesting.

Medium Audi saloon
Medium Audi saloon
It's an Audi. Here's the ad.

No, no, that won't do. There needs to be a bit more than that.

Oh all right then, it's an Audi A6. Here's the ad.

No, still no good.

We're actually doing this car a huge disservice. This is not just any old Audi A6. The fact that it is an old Audi A6 means that it isn't any old Audi A6.

It may seem from the last paragraph that Shed has finally succumbed to the effects of long-term carbon monoxide build up, but please stick with him on this one.

Though you might not believe it now, given the low profile position the A6 currently occupies in the market, there was a lot of excitement here when the A6 came out in 1994. The C4-designated A6 turned up in the UK before anywhere else because we'd run out of RHD versions of the excellent 100 it was replacing, and our Shed is interesting precisely because it is not interesting.

Simple, unglamorous, gets the job done
Simple, unglamorous, gets the job done
As a mid-size German exec, the new A6 was hungrily seized upon by midsized British execs. Most of those sweaty motorway-meanderers would have demanded a spec level befitting their perceived importance, so at least halfway through the brochure. Most fleet managers would have gone along with that too, not because they liked the jumped-up scrotes they were supplying cars to, but because reasonably equipped cars had higher resale values than bare-bones ones.

Unusual, then, to see a basement spec A6. Going off on a totally unsubstantiated tangent, that could mean it was purchased from new by a private individual, some steel-specs wearing grey-haired aesthete unmoved by the temptations of advertising or air-con and looking instead for the purest A6 experience.

Well, it's a theory isn't it? Under the relentlessly stern bonnet we have the 1.8-litre 20V four, a workmanlike unit with nothing to offer other than an ample sufficiency of get-you-there competence. One of a few five-valve-head engines Audi was playing around with at the time (you could also get an A6 with a 2.8 30V V6), the 1.8 gave you all you needed and nothing you didn't. Also used in the Passat, it did gain a bit of a name for snapping its (plastic) inlet manifold flap operating rod and (plastic) water pump impeller. Early owners also needed to keep a close eye on the cambelt, and drainage issues could sabotage ECUs, but none of this should be news to VW group owners and you'd like to think that all the offending parts will have been replaced by more enduring ones by now.

Audi interiors have come a little way...
Audi interiors have come a little way...
On the good side there's rather less of that complicated electronickery and absolutely none of that turbo tomfoolery to worry about. And just look at those wonderfully well-ordered spec figures: 123hp, 124lb ft, 124mph.

See that rust in the engine compartment? No, neither can Shed. It's a cliche that bears repeating: modern cars may be built more efficiently and more accurately, but older cars from premium marques were built to last.

This one has all the papers including a far from stale MOT. It's got the air of a car that you'd buy for a laugh and keep for a lifetime. As an ironic but at the same time immediately useable barge for the Le Mans/Goodwood season you could do a hell of a lot worse.

Here, finally, is the ad.

Audi A6 1.8, 1996, C4 100 shape

Purchased in 2012 and hasn't missed a beat from day one, comes with;
Service history, papers, receipts, etc
Two keys, owners manuals, etc
Michelin tyres all round
Everything works as it should

Clean car for its age(in/out/underneath), has been touched up below the filler flap(light scuff/scrape). Has a couple of marks on the rear bumper also. General age related marks. Four previous owners, done 114000 miles, does the airport run with ease.

MOT October 2016


 

   
   


Author
Discussion

kellyt

Original Poster:

158 posts

119 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
"Wheels maketh the car." And if they do, they're certainly not making that one. Spoils it so much I just couldn't want it.

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
kellyt said:
"Wheels maketh the car." And if they do, they're certainly not making that one. Spoils it so much I just couldn't want it.
I like the fact its on steel wheels with what appear to be original plastic trims - it makes the car look honest ie cared for in a shed kind of way and when it could have been chav'd up to the 9s and ruined.

bigvanfan

378 posts

132 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
It suits its plastic wheel trims, I love it!

forzaminardi

2,290 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Boring but strangely appealing shed.

BigMacDaddy

963 posts

181 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
As dull as dishwater, and yet I would imagine a very comfortable way to get around on the cheap. Neither interesting nor offensive. Not bad, Shed, not bad clap

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
bigvanfan said:
It suits its plastic wheel trims, I love it!
yes Big blingy alloys would ruin it. If I was after a cheap motorway mile-muncher I'd happily drive that. smile

SlimRick

2,258 posts

165 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
I paid £164 for a 1995 Avant, kept it for 3 years and as far as I know it's still going strong.

court

1,487 posts

216 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
I love this! I suggest the original user of this was someone would should have had a high spec Mondeo but convinced the fleet manager he could have this for the same price.

R400TVR

543 posts

162 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Have the interiors really come a long way? This is smart, functional and well built. No screen to divert the eyes from the road, no 'modes' to confuse, simple climate controls and easy to read dials. Just what people actually need!

80quattro

1,725 posts

195 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
A friend of mine has 5 or 6 of these, petrol and diesel, Saloon and Avant. I think at least one is a quattro. One of his 2.5TDi 140's is upto 330k miles now, on its original running gear. The build quality of them is superb.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
R400TVR said:
Have the interiors really come a long way? This is smart, functional and well built. No screen to divert the eyes from the road, no 'modes' to confuse, simple climate controls and easy to read dials. Just what people actually need!
That, and decent ride quality. Not designed for a lap of the Nurburgring, just a lap of Surrey.

LayZ

1,627 posts

242 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Points for C4 A6, minus points for dull engine. If it was 2.5TDI or even a UrS4 then points++.

Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
For a less than a grand shed with "reliability" written all over it, it would have to be a punt.
If it was an estate I'd have bought it before typing this for an ideal dog / mtb bike wagon.

Nors

1,291 posts

155 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
For getting around on the cheap in something rattle and rust free with space (if a bit boring), top shedding!

Scottie - NW

1,288 posts

233 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Thought a shed needed some desirability or PH worthy reason to own it, so this week's choice is a fail for me.

At least pick something interesting for your grand, you are buying for PH not a minicab.

MadDog1962

890 posts

162 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Looks like mini-cab material to me.

s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Scottie - NW said:
Thought a shed needed some desirability or PH worthy reason to own it, so this week's choice is a fail for me.

At least pick something interesting for your grand, you are buying for PH not a minicab.
If I was going to spend a grand on cheap transport I'd go for last week's Shed in preference to this too

r.g.

601 posts

212 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Scottie - NW said:
Thought a shed needed some desirability or PH worthy reason to own it, so this week's choice is a fail for me.

At least pick something interesting for your grand, you are buying for PH not a minicab.
It does have desirability. Just depends what your needs are. This is a perfect car for driving around unassumingly on company business or leave anywhere and not worry about.

Why am I liking these low spec cars now. Hated them when they were new, but as said earlier, they have a certain "looked after" appeal to them.

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
MadDog1962 said:
Looks like mini-cab material to me.
It sounds like a mini cab, with the advert stating its really good for the airport run (which has never been a consideration high on my list when buying a car)

BFleming

3,603 posts

143 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
I had one of these many years ago; same colour, same number of doors, but mine was the 2.6 V6 (manual box). It moved well, silky smooth engine, massive boot, superbly built. The only things it ever needed was a water pump (did the cambelt at the same time, very easy job on the longitudinal engine) and some front shocks (made a huge difference to the handling). Wasn't bad on fuel either.
Even when new the 1.8 engine was allegedly very underpowered for this car. Also the base spec cars are very basic - no climate control (probably just as well as they all went wrong), no alloys (and even through they're 'correct' the hubcaps look cheap imo).
I like it, but it's a garden shed & not a beach hut.

Edit: Now that I think about it, I probably sold that Audi about 15 years ago & this is the first time I've thought of it since.

Edited by BFleming on Friday 22 January 09:50