RE: Audi TT MkII (8J): PH Buying Guide

RE: Audi TT MkII (8J): PH Buying Guide

Saturday 30th January 2016

Audi TT MkII (8J): PH Buying Guide

Stylish, affordable and reliable, the Mk2 Audi TT makes a strong case for itself secondhand



While the silhouette of the second generation 8J Audi TT remained very similar to the 1998 original's outline, Audi had big plans to improve the handling and dynamics of the TT. Out went the VW Golf platform and some of the intricate detailing of the first generation car and in came a more bespoke aluminium and steel Audi Space Frame for the 2006 TT based on the VW Group A5 PQ35 platform. Always a very capable all-rounder, the 8J TT offered a much more involving drive, as well as being very easy to live with and use daily.

Roadster followed a few months after coupe
Roadster followed a few months after coupe
The 1.8 turbo petrol engine most commonly used in the Mk1 TT gave way to the VW Group's 2.0-litre TFSI unit, as found in the Golf GTI. This engine offered 200hp for 0-62mph in 6.4 seconds and a top speed of 150mph. For those seeking more performance, the 3.2-litre V6 was carried over from the first TT with 250hp to give 0-62mph in 5.7 seconds and an electronically capped 155mph top speed.

The V6 model always had quattro all-wheel drive, while the 2.0-litre turbo petrol was front-drive as standard. Six-speed manual gearboxes were standard for both or could be swapped for Audi's S tronic dual-clutch transmission.

Search for Audi TT MkIIs here

Eight months after the TT Coupe went on sale in the UK, the Roadster arrived at the tail end of 2006 with the same engine and transmission options as the Coupe. Shortly after that, the all-wheel drive 272hp TTS arrived to give the Coupe version a 155mph top speed and 0-62mph in 5.4 seconds, while the Roadster was only fractionally slower. All TTS models were fitted with Audi's adaptive magnetic damping system.

Mk2 TT celebrates its tenth anniversary this year
Mk2 TT celebrates its tenth anniversary this year
Close on the heels of the TTS was the arrival of the 170hp 2.0-litre turbodiesel to give the TT broader appeal in the company car market. However, the model TT fans had been waiting for broke cover in early 2009 with the RS version, packing a 340hp 2.5-litre turbocharged five-cylinder motor capable of propelling the TT RS from 0-62mph in 4.4 seconds and 174mph if the first owner opted for the raised speed limit.

The e1.8 TFSI engine was only ever available with front-wheel drive and 160hp, while a mild update to the whole TT range in April 2010 introduced LED daytime running lights as standard for S line models, more power for the 2.0 TFSI engine to give 211hp, and the option of a Sport button for all non-RS models. Audi's final flourish with the second generation TT was the RS Plus, which upped engine power to 360hp in early 2012.

With prices for second generation TTs starting from £6,000, they are an affordable way into German coupe or open-top ownership. For the TTS, expect to pay from £12,000, while an RS will command upwards of £19,000.


PHer's view:
"My TTS was the best car I've owned and it was only sold because we needed an estate car when our first child arrived. I'll definitely have another one."
Peter Smith


Buying Guide Contents:
Introduction
Powertrain
Rolling Chassis
Body
Interior
At a glance

Search for Audi TT MkIIs here

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

X5TUU

Original Poster:

11,939 posts

187 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
They aren't as engaging as the mk1 to drive unless you got for the RS which I love and can't see myself moving on, also have a 2007 mk2 2.0t coupe which is the Mrs' and she loves it as her daily hack and for ferrying our toddler around in. It scrubs up well when detailed too and always get admiring glances smile

helix402

7,859 posts

182 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I drove one of these, a 30k miles 2009 2.0tdi 170 convertible the same day as driving a 200k 2004 Skoda Octavia 2.0tdi 140.The Skoda felt faster and I enjoyed driving it more. I'm sure the 5 cylinder is great but the diesel didn't work for me. Re the write up and pad noise, don't use copperslip on pads. It can contaminate abs sensors and looks pants. Use ceratec or plastilube (same thing). Yes I know you've used copperslip for 50 years and it's fine....

ensignia

919 posts

235 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
X5TUU said:
They aren't as engaging as the mk1 to drive unless you got for the RS
rofl

Scho

2,479 posts

203 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
ensignia said:
rofl
Talk about a hard act to follow...

Jam12321

164 posts

110 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
hahaha, you would probably have a more 'engaging' drive playing forza.

X5TUU

Original Poster:

11,939 posts

187 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Great retort as normal for PH ... On form chaps (sheesh!)

Leins

9,467 posts

148 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
X5TUU said:
Great retort as normal for PH ... On form chaps (sheesh!)
Agreed, it's the sort of witty banter that keeps us all entertained on here! Anyway...


Nice choice on the RS. Not driven one, but they do make a great noise and I really like the looks of them

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

218 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Summed up in the headline

'Stylish, affordable and reliable'

You don't buy a TT (RS excluded) for anything else!

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
The S and RS are great. A colleague of mine traded her R8 for a TTRS and I was quite impressed by it. The run of the mill models I'm not so sure about. The looks have dated badly, it certainly doesn't have the visual impact, class or timelessness of the first TT.

fastgerman

1,914 posts

195 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
MK1 TT = MK4 Golf chassis. MK4 GTI considered 'the worst'

MK2 TT = MK5 Golf chassis. MK5 GTI considered 'one of the best'

So saying a MK1 TT is engaging, is of opinion but saying more engaging than the MK2 is just wrong, sorry..

TT RS is a beast!

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
fastgerman said:
MK1 TT = MK4 Golf chassis. MK4 GTI considered 'the worst'

MK2 TT = MK5 Golf chassis. MK5 GTI considered 'one of the best'

So saying a MK1 TT is engaging, is of opinion but saying more engaging than the MK2 is just wrong, sorry..

TT RS is a beast!
The MK1 TT was considerably reworked in the suspension dept vs. the Golf. That said, I don't see how anyone could say it was more involving than the MK2.

James Junior

827 posts

157 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
I test drove a TTS and it was quick, but to me it just felt dull to drive. You could get on the throttle really early coming out of a bend given the grip available, but it didn't feel gratifying. Just kind of point and squirt. All a bit sterile somehow.

I ended up picking up a Z4 Coupe for less than the budget I had set asside and loved every minute of the two years I had it.



James Junior

827 posts

157 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
The S and RS are great. A colleague of mine traded her R8 for a TTRS and I was quite impressed by it. The run of the mill models I'm not so sure about. The looks have dated badly, it certainly doesn't have the visual impact, class or timelessness of the first TT.
Totally agree re the looks and the comparison with the MK1. That design still looks fresh and iconic now 15 years on. I had the 1.8 225bhp for a while and it had a lovely interior too with loads of clever design touches.

The TTS I drove had an incredibly plush and sturdy feeling cabin, but lacked the flair of the MK1 interior.

Sorry to any existing owners, not seeking to offend and just my opinion of course.

TTwiggy

11,537 posts

204 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
James Junior said:
Totally agree re the looks and the comparison with the MK1. That design still looks fresh and iconic now 15 years on. I had the 1.8 225bhp for a while and it had a lovely interior too with loads of clever design touches.

The TTS I drove had an incredibly plush and sturdy feeling cabin, but lacked the flair of the MK1 interior.

Sorry to any existing owners, not seeking to offend and just my opinion of course.
My feelings exactly. The MkII is a much better driver's car but doesn't have the visual impact the MkI had and still has. The MkI is a proper incarnation of a mould-breaking concept car, the MkII is a pretty coupe.

tankplanker

2,479 posts

279 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
I've an early Mk2 TFSI that I use as my daily, a role which it is perfect for as its reliable, pleasant to sit in after a hard day, and easy to drive with enough poke for the road.

I would not consider a TT outside of the RS to be a special car suitable as a weekend or track car, its a more sporty looking and slightly more upmarket Golf GTI.

Perversely I'm swapping my TT for a Golf R in March as I want more of a Q car for visiting customers.

The diesel is particularly horrid as a sports car as the engine feels sluggish compared to the petrol. Buy one as a project car, swap the turbo, intercooler and some other bits and up the power to ~250BHP and its a different animal completely.

SPD14

400 posts

156 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Loved our 2008 2.0 TFSI S-Tronic Coupe, had to get rid once our first child was born (well, managed to last 5 months with her rear-facing seat filling the interior). Looking to get into a Mk3 in Sept now both kids are able to climb into the back seats themselves laugh

RemarkLima

2,374 posts

212 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
The big downside for the MkII for me was the styling, it went from being retro uber cool, silver bullet, driving off to get on my steam powered zeplin, to "an audi coupe" with a squnting resembalnce to the MkI.

For me, the MkI was always be cool, especially before they put the spoiler on - a really great piece of design. Since then, each egenration they've just become blander IMHO.

Ultrafunkula

997 posts

105 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
I must admit I never liked the looks of the mk1 (reminded me too much of the VW Beetle 2.0, also had trouble telling the front from the back until they put the spoiler on it) and the mk2 looks sleeker to me BUT only with the TTS/sportline kit on it. It does look a bit boring without the bodykit, kind of unfinished.

Emeye

9,773 posts

223 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
To me the Mk2 was just an A3 Coupe - the Mk1 had concept car looks and a bespoke interior. What the hell is the obsession with having to have the same corporate grill on every model?

I've owned 2 Mk1 TTs and loved them - they may not had handled as well as a Mk2 (I've never wanted to drive one, but I owned 2 MK5 Golf Gtis either side of my first Mk1 TT) but the Mk1 just feels a special and original in a way the Mk2 never will.

X5TUU

Original Poster:

11,939 posts

187 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
I genuinely do prefer the drive in the mk1 over the non-RS mk2 ... having had a mk1 225 cab and 2x QS's and have covered some 100k miles across them as they were mostly dailies.

Ive had Golf GTIs as company cars (mk5 and mk6) foisted upon me that I left in the garage and chose to the use TT's as the drive wasnt comparable IMHO - to each there own in all fairness