RE: MG TF: You Know You Want To

RE: MG TF: You Know You Want To

Tuesday 15th March 2016

MG TF: You Know You Want To

TF not really of interest? It should be with a supercharged VTEC in it!



Both when new and used, the MG TF appears to have been rather overlooked. Take a look at used values for evidence of that. Of course the MX-5 has been largely responsible for this, plus the Toyota MR2 to some extent, but has it been overlooked unfairly?

The TF gets a stance!
The TF gets a stance!
Now they are only being considered as a used purchase, perhaps some of the TF's flaws can be overlooked. As a weekend car the everyday concerns are less, well, concerning. Looking back over the Autocar road test of the relaunched MG TF, it's heaped with praise for the dynamics. It was described as having "an excellent mid-engined chassis and decent steering", concluding with "if only more cars handled as sweetly as this". See, not so bad after all.

Of course engine reliability was a concern with the TF, but this car avoids that with a whole new engine altogether. A Japanese engine. A supercharged VTEC in fact...

Yes, for those who aren't nerdy enough to have picked up on the numberplate cue, this MG TF has the same K20 engine as a Civic Type R. With the supercharger, power is claimed at 355hp and torque at 241lb ft. Top speed is said to be 165mph, and we'd hazard a guess at 0-62mph in less than six seconds.

Moreover, this car has all sorts of high quality brake, suspension and tyre upgrades to make the most of the huge increase in power too. There's an Exedy clutch for the six-speed manual, a limited-slip diff, big AP Racing brakes, custom Nitron dampers and springs as well as uprated cooling, a different exhaust and seam welded subframes. Tyres are said to be Yokohama AO48 in the ad but are Avon ZZRs in the pics; either way they should help you keep on top of the power reasonably well.

See the video for the flames...
See the video for the flames...
With a decent base, all that power and some useful dynamic tweaks, this TF would surely be brilliant fun on a track, or indeed the road. It still looks relatively standard, making the shock of 300hp per tonne or all the more dramatic.

So what's the catch? It's the price. This TF is, er, £25,000. Even allowing for the considerable work and the parts that have gone into it, that looks rather on the steep side. It would no doubt be tremendous fun, but you don't need us to tell you how much fun is available elsewhere for £25,000. After all, if you want British and mid-engined and Honda powered, you could get an Atom...

Ignoring the price for just a second - easier said than done, granted - this TF does look a right giggle. More than that it's rare, which will always have its own appeal. Caterhams will be 10 a penny compared to this at a track day! If an ardent fan has the funds (or negotiating power) to make this purchase feasible, then all the best to them. And just keep a look out for 'K20 TF' the next time you're on track, it's faster than it looks!


MG TF
Price: £24,995
Why you should: 350hp per tonne, useful other upgrades, not likely to see another!
Why you shouldn't: See the price...

See the original advert here.

Watch the dyno run (with flames!) here.

 

 

 

 

[Source: Autocar]

 

Author
Discussion

QuattroDave

Original Poster:

1,462 posts

128 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I don't know what the appeal is of these but I've long since suspected I'll end up with one of these on my drive one day as a cheap track hack. WOuldn't get this one with the price being asked though. Part of the appeal of these are they're incredibly cheap and a hoot to drive so I've been told.

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I think I'd struggle to buy that over an Elise with the same engine swap which would cost about the same.

AH33

2,066 posts

135 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I don't want.

steve1386

57 posts

172 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
+1 for the Elise comment - why would you buy this when you could have an S2 Elise for a lot less!

I've been in one with the same conversion, albeit N/A with a few breathing mods and Hondata ECU. Was producing around 230 BHP and was a rapid little thing! Much better than the equivalent VVT-LI Toyota engines they put in them!

SpudLink

5,743 posts

192 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
I think I'd struggle to buy that over an Elise with the same engine swap which would cost about the same.
Exactly this.

I suppose there's an element of 'sleeper', because no one will an MGF to that fast, either on road or track. After all, who in their right mind would have chosen this rather than the Elise as the basis for their project.

GTEYE

2,094 posts

210 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I had a new one back in 2002, and it was a fundamentally good car let down by some shoddy cheapskate BL engineering, and poor quality.

When the reborn Chinese MG ones went back on sale, I looked at one in a dealer, and if anything the quality had got even worse, so not surprising they didn't sell many.

For this one, wow £25k, that shows commitment, but an Elise would be a far better car.

Truckosaurus

11,249 posts

284 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
Such a project would make sense over starting with an Elise (or indeed VX220) if you could do all the work yourself, and could find an otherwise worthless MGF.

Huskyman

653 posts

127 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
Wow £25k is a big ask for a car that has been almost fully re-engineered.. There is a lot of desirable metal(or fibreglass!) out there for that sort of outlay. Hats off to the person that built it though, I bet that has embarassed some other cars...

Kemlo

61 posts

140 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
...After all, who in their right mind would have chosen this rather than the Elise as the basis for their project.
A hero that's who.

I love this kind pf thing. Totally bonkers.

Well done sir!

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
That price is so ridiculous it has to be a "I *am* trying to sell it Love, it'll be gone soon" type advert, surely.

rallycross

12,786 posts

237 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
Nice conversion but these cars are awful, just not worth doing all that good work to one of these.

I've only had one, it was a vvc 160 with some nice mods and low mileage, but it was a horrible thing to drive quickly, and horrible to be in - these cars are not worth looking at when you could buy something good like an MR2 mk3 roadster for peanuts.

Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
Kemlo said:
I love this kind pf thing. Totally bonkers.
Well done sir!
I agree with this sentiment - if everyone went down the sensible route we'd all be driving golf-r's, or golf diesels more likely.

However, the TF for me really never did it for me - the overriding feeling when ever I've been in one (not for a few years, this was when they were new) is that it *really* suffered from "cheapy car syndrome" - the things just rattled and generally felt a bit st.

So, I doff my hat to the person who did this, but realistically my money goes elsewhere.

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

205 months

PH Reportery Lad

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
Fetchez la vache said:
Kemlo said:
I love this kind pf thing. Totally bonkers.
Well done sir!
I agree with this sentiment - if everyone went down the sensible route we'd all be driving golf-r's, or golf diesels more likely.

However, the TF for me really never did it for me - the overriding feeling when ever I've been in one (not for a few years, this was when they were new) is that it *really* suffered from "cheapy car syndrome" - the things just rattled and generally felt a bit st.

So, I doff my hat to the person who did this, but realistically my money goes elsewhere.
Glad a couple of people agree! It certainly wasn't pitched as the most sensible option, but it did look entertaining.

BeirutTaxi

6,630 posts

214 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I almost bought a TF last year, for a cheap run around you can get a mint example for sub £3k. On some new hatchbacks you'll pay that amount in interest alone on finance payments.

Head gasket doesn't have to be an issue if you upgrade the cooling system and keep an eye on the coolant level. Even then some places will change the gasket for £300.

Shame the K Series is slated as it's a very good bit of engineering. Excellent power to weight ratio. I know some people who do Autocross type stuff and apparently K Series powered cars are normally at the top of their class.

Ultimately decided against a TF though, although tempting I just couldn't somehow.

Edited by BeirutTaxi on Tuesday 15th March 12:47

Matt UK

17,687 posts

200 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I totally get it as a personal project - the owner is a hero in my eyes to set out and execute something totally bespoke.
Blood, sweat, tears, one-of-kind, you know every nut and bolt, like one of the children, keep it forever and bury me in it - yes, I fully understand. yes

But when it's for sale it's just someone else's highly modified car. £25k? You'd have to be mad to even half consider it.

IMHO.

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
rallycross said:
Nice conversion but these cars are awful, just not worth doing all that good work to one of these.

I've only had one, it was a vvc 160 with some nice mods and low mileage, but it was a horrible thing to drive quickly, and horrible to be in - these cars are not worth looking at when you could buy something good like an MR2 mk3 roadster for peanuts.
Till the MR2 also munches it's engine and/or gearbox, these are not the most reliable cars either, check the web there are plenty of horror stories.

200Plus Club

10,734 posts

278 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
the later facelift mr2 roadster engines are better. and you can pick cars up for peanuts. theres a full track prepped mr2 on pistonheads right now at 8k that has had 20 spent on it

C.A.R.

3,967 posts

188 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Till the MR2 also munches it's engine and/or gearbox, these are not the most reliable cars either, check the web there are plenty of horror stories.
Throwing the 'reliability' card at a Toyota when considering an MG TF is a bit of a non-competition though!

These things are plusher than an MX5 but not as fun, poorly built cabins but cheap. Take the cheap part out of the equation and they don't really make much sense.

Used to work with a guy who had a 160vvc and whilst it was nippy, it wasn't desirable - I had an import MX5 at the time which was worth considerably more money despite being much, much older. The MG had flaking paint, interior was falling apart, seats had sagged, all the paint on the bright red calipers was coming off, the wheels had started losing their lacquer...

But, according to him, it was faster than a BMW M3 he raced on the A10 because "they're limited to 155 aren't they, but my MG is a 160 model, so it will go 160...."

Har, har.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
That's a lot of money for what it is. I'm all for transplants but they don't always make for a great ownership prospect!

suffolk009

5,373 posts

165 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
I admire the spirit of the fella who did this.

There's a couple of Elise K20 cars on Seloc at the moment. £22,000 for an s1, £28,000 for an s2.
There's also a MG TF 135 for £1,795.

Realistically, I'd pass on all four of them.