RE: Mercedes SLS AMG: You Know You Want To

RE: Mercedes SLS AMG: You Know You Want To

Thursday 17th March 2016

Mercedes SLS AMG: You Know You Want To

20,000 miles a year in an SLS? Someone already has, now's your chance to continue it!



It's easy to get lost in the current Mercedes AMG line up, what with the latest range of '43' models recently added too. So here's an SLS AMG, a model that was and remains far simpler to understand: it was launched with a big V8, then came the Roadster, then there was the really fast one and, finally, the run-out special.

Spotless outside...
Spotless outside...
The SLS seems to have slipped off the radar with the GT's arrival, and it's easy to forget that this was AMG's first ground-up car. Anticipation was running very high prior to launch and, by and large, it delivered on expectation.

This one looks rather nice, doesn't it? Black is quite a rare colour for the SLS as most are silver or white, and it contrasts nicely with the cream leather. The wheels are unkerbed and the interior looks very clean, albeit a little old compared with the latest Mercedes cabins.

Amazingly though, the car you see here as covered more than 100,000 miles. 108,254 according to the trip computer. Really. Even if this car is six years old already - it was first registered in 2010 - then that's an average of 18,000 miles a year. In an SLS!

But it would be hard to tell, as alluded to above; there's nothing in the images to suggest it has done more miles in six years than most of these cars will do in a lifetime. This implies not just a high level of care from the owner, but hopefully a return to really solid Mercedes build quality too.

... and looking good in here too. Who would know?
... and looking good in here too. Who would know?
Interestingly the price is an almost identical number to the mileage, this SLS for sale at £109,850. The days of the £80K SLS have disappeared, values clearly having strengthened over recent years. Have they become rarer? More desirable perhaps? All insight welcome!

While it may look more than you were expecting, that's £30,000 less than the next SLS in the value ranks, with 50,000 recorded miles. Is that enough of a saving? Now we're into a debate...

The engine is of course used elsewhere in the Mercedes AMG range, but even amongst those it's hard to find one with a six-figure mileage. There aren't many known issues with the engine (check the C63 Buying Guide) or the seven-speed dual-clutch, so the area probably of most concern is the electrics. Check everything works, as there's a lot in there. It's probably worth budgeting for the replacement of some consumable too if they haven't been done recently. Or they could be used as a negotiating tool...

Here's the proof
Here's the proof
Surely any potential buyer of this SLS would have to continue using it extensively, set some kind of record and have a lot of fun in the process. You never know, Mercedes might buy it back one day for the museum, like Otto the G-Wagen. At the current rate a quarter of a million miles is only a few years away. Fuel costs? Well, we all have our vices. Next question!

It's a fascinating car, the PH office divided between taking a punt on what must be a one-of-a-kind SLS, or striving to find the additional cash for a car with fewer miles. What would you do? We'd love to know!


MERCEDES-BENZ SLS AMG
Price
: £109,850
Why you should: Well it's a talking point, isn't it?
Why you shouldn't: Still a six-figure sum for a car with a six-figure mileage

See the original advert here.

 


 


Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,295 posts

223 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
A car that I'm still confused over, having run one for a little while.

The engine/drivetrain - utterly, utterly addictive, never got tired of the engine note. People would ask me to rev it in traffic...

The interior - nice enough but I found the seats extremely uncomfortable (surely one of the most important things in owning such a car is how comfortable the seats are?). Slight claustrophobic too. The engine noise meant that stereo was all but useless.

Visibility - diabolically bad. That thick B-pillar means that certain manoeuvres (say, changing lanes on a large roundabout) were literally done hoping there wasn't anyone in your blind spot! The width is also a pain - it's wider than a full-size Transit van.

Oh, and the boot got super hot as the exhaust manifolds were directly underneath it meaning putting your food shopping in there was a definite no-no.

That being said, it garnered respect on the road like no other car I've ever experienced.

Did enjoy it? Yes. Do I miss it? no.

epom

11,513 posts

161 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Firstly, hats off to the previous owner. Putting that mileage up is seriously impressive.
Secondly, is it not very dear for a car with that mileage ?

A10

633 posts

99 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Six figure price for six figure mileage?

GTFO.



Edited by A10 on Thursday 17th March 17:03

Ruffy94

229 posts

136 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Surely it's not really desirable at more than £70-80k with that mileage? Wouldn't want to be the next owner that tries to shift it.....

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
I always thought the looks of this were slightly odd, I'd probably plump for a roadster if the magical money fairies gave me the choice. biggrin

Interesting car here though, I'd agree that it's a bit strongly priced, but how do you price something like this? As said in the article it's 20% less than the next-nearest mileage car available...

BRR

1,846 posts

172 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
This looks stupidly overpriced to me, but then i think all the ones with lower miles are too. I like the SLS but i just can't see how they command the prices that they do

donkamio

83 posts

145 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Lovely car but crazy price. Possibly an ex-hire car?

JockySteer

1,407 posts

116 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
On Bramley's site it's showing as Under Offer, so maybe they've accepted something less. I'd take it.

Mafffew

2,149 posts

111 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
As mentioned, the price is a bit silly for such a high mileage car. But, wow, fantastic that is has done that much work. I can't really stomach the idea of garage queens, supercars like this should be driven, seen and heard. Sod the residuals and resale.

Alex_225

6,261 posts

201 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
epom said:
Firstly, hats off to the previous owner. Putting that mileage up is seriously impressive.
Secondly, is it not very dear for a car with that mileage ?
I must admit, I do like these cars having become a bit of an AMG fan in the last year or so.

If, and it's a bit IF, I had this kind of money I'd certainly consider these models but 100k for a car with 100k+ on the clock. Not sure that would interest me too much.

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
It's great that the previous owner has properly used the car however that price seems a bit crazy given the mileage.

DB9VolanteDriver

2,612 posts

176 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
The green Vanquish in the background MUCH better than this.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Funny how all the above have said its overpriced.

I'm going to go opposite and say it's too cheap! (And no, I don't work for Bramley, Mercedes or the previous owner). Far too many 'garage queens' what's the point in owning it - this is well used and if I bought it would continue to be well used. It's been designed to do high miles and it's not a Ferrari so doesn't need a low mileage to sell.

I would like to see it go to 200, 300k... Hell why not 500,000 miles!

BIRMA

3,808 posts

194 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Wal555 said:
Funny how all the above have said its overpriced.

I'm going to go opposite and say it's too cheap! (And no, I don't work for Bramley, Mercedes or the previous owner). Far too many 'garage queens' what's the point in owning it - this is well used and if I bought it would continue to be well used. It's been designed to do high miles and it's not a Ferrari so doesn't need a low mileage to sell.

I would like to see it go to 200, 300k... Hell why not 500,000 miles!
It probably would do those sort of mileages no doubt that engine and auto-box are real gems.

leglessAlex

5,447 posts

141 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
This could be a really good buy if you planned on properly using the car a lot I think, especially if values continue to go up. You could add another 10-15k to that mileage and sell it for much the same price as you bought it for I would imagine, or maybe just £5-10k less. Given the depreciation on supercars that get used this would be good value, no?

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Matt Bird said:
The days of the £80K SLS have disappeared,
...with a link to an article pointing to one for sale for £88k... (so already 10% over that "£80k" figure).

Except a comment pointed out that it was actually £88k+vat - so 32% over the £80k figure. £105,600. And this one's £109k?

PHAB

73 posts

140 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Buy it.....all....day....long!!!


Then again, I may be bias...
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=115...

chiefski26

815 posts

201 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
DB9VolanteDriver said:
The green Vanquish in the background MUCH better than this.
Possibly if you're a oap.

JockySteer

1,407 posts

116 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
DB9VolanteDriver said:
The green Vanquish in the background MUCH better than this.
The only thing it's better than the SLS at is being an Aston Martin. They can't touch the SLS as a performance car.

Patrick Bateman

12,180 posts

174 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
I love seeing something like this as opposed to an F40 that's done a thousand miles in its life.