Shed of the Week: Mazda MX-6
If the MX-5 is the Answer to Everything then an MX-6 must be the Answer to Something, right?
Adenoidally, history nerds will add that Flat Rock was also responsible for turning out the Ford Probe back in the 90s. Built on the Mazda GE platform, the blobby Probe was a good deal less handsome than the MX-6 that Mazda managed to conjure up on their drawing boards in 1991.
It didn't matter. The contemporary motoring press tore both of them new ones for their flabbiness and languid performance.
Luckily, motoring perceptions and expectations change over time. Despite squillions spent on R&D over the last 20 years or so, the differences on the road between then and now aren't as massive as you might expect. That's partly because, like for like, cars are a lot bigger now than they were in the 90s. Heavier, too. That new Mustang weighs in at around 1,650kg for the weediest 2.3-litre four-pot version. In 1991, the 2.5 V6-powered MX-6 was perceived as positively lardmungous at 1,250kg.
Naturally, engines have moved on considerably to make up for the weight penalty. Even that milk toast 2.3 'Stang claims 317hp. But the Mazda needed only half that amount of horsepower to reach its top speed of 138mph, just 7mph down on the 2016 Ford. Eeeh, them were the days, sort of.
Admittedly, the Mazda's 0-60 time is about three seconds longer than the Ford's, which in this context (if not so much in reality) is an age, but the Shedman will correctly argue that an eight-second squirt of creamy twin-cam 24-valve V6 trumps five seconds of Identikit turbo four drone any day.
It's a decent engine, this, with a good rep for reliability. Distributors can fail, giving you the cranking but not the starting that you'd ideally like. Valve cover gaskets leak, spark plugs short, and lumpy running probably means a split in the pipe between the MAF sensor and the throttle body.
Generally speaking though, you have little to fear. The MX-6's unstressed state of tune bodes well for high miles, as our Shed is already demonstrating. It's a manual too, which allows you to hang on to the gears in search of that magical top end rush. Like the golden Euromillions envelope, this is something that will never arrive, but dreaming is free.
Front-wheel drive means safe rather than spectacular handling, but it also means that the drift boys never targeted MX-6s for enskidment. The 6's stair lift image has also saved it from the horrors of Halfordisation.
This example from the last year of production certainly looks honest enough with its sales-boosting run-out accoutrements like the cushy piped leather cabin and smart alloys. Dark blue is a better colour for these than the fading red. Rust is neither mentioned nor immediately obvious on the pics, but check the carpets for dampness as the air-con can leak into the passenger footwell. Windows and sunroofs can suffer from lazy electricity.
The MX-6 is a cruiser rather than a bruiser, but it's a comfy old shoe and you can squeeze four golf bags into the back if you're into that type of thing.
Remember too that there's a 12-month waiting list for a Mustang. The wait for this chap is as long as it takes you to get to Bedfordshire. And it's thirty times cheaper.
Dark Blue Mazda MX-6 2.5 V6. Drives well, clean in and out. Common wear and tear for age, come and see for yourself! MOT untill december. Surprisingly quick! No extra mods or anything. Perfect car for someone looking to project, or tune and upgrade!
Advisory notice item(s)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
fuel tank straps rusty
inner sills corroding
suspension components corroding
fuel breather pipe rusty
Rarely see them these days sadly, but I would certainly have another one if only for the fact they are simple but rare cars.
Advisory notice item(s)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
fuel tank straps rusty
inner sills corroding
suspension components corroding
fuel breather pipe rusty
Back in their day (makes me feel old) these were considered pretty cool cars. 0 - 60 mph in less than 9 seconds won't feel slow either.
Quite a good find. 7 out of 10 Mr Shed. Not a classic, but definitely a bit of style that should be reliable transport for 8 months.
I wonder what the insurance is going to be like?
However, the car itself (at least in UK tune) does absolutely nothing for me. At least the Probe had pop-up headlights, the MX-6 is a bit of a jelly mould - nothing offensive or horribly styled, just quite boring. Plus having experienced Mazda's of this era through the other half's 323, the rust is ridiculous once it takes hold. The MX-6 may not be quite as bad but hearing and seeing horror stories of similar age MX-5s and the like, I'd be seriously wary.
Know it came after (in design terms) but I'd be happier in an equivalent NA Fiat Coupe and indeed was. It had it's issues but that in-line 5 would always make me smile and behind that Pininfarina dash, it always felt special even if it didn't drive brilliantly with the terrible brakes and needing-to-be-refreshed suspension. I'd always look back at that car when I'd parked up, I don't think I'd do that as often with one of these...
There was some kind of progress within the american car industry, during the last 20 years. To discover it pistonheads might have to look far more west to California instead of under a flat rock, though.
-> hint, hint, hint.
This day is nearing noon and you are either actively ignoring or at least missing the biggest automotive news of the year.
more hint -> http://electrek.co/2016/03/31/tesla-model-3-in-sto...
If 130.000 people stand in line for it there might be even some more who would want to read about it.
Martin
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/ford/mustang-c...
The MX6 is a nice enough barge, if the 626 I drove with the same engine is any measure. Decent oomph, likes a drink, sounds good-ish (and better than the 2.3 ltr 4 pot in the 'stang).
Decent value for money. Good shedding.
Perfectly reliable, really comfortable and just great to own.
Don't get all the comments re the looks - I always thought it was a great looking car and still do. I got stopped several times by people admiring it - in traffic, at the petrol station... The probe looks awful to be, a styling disaster.
The only weak point was the back box which kept rusting through. I got a Scorpion stainless job which sounded brilliant. For me the engine was a real star. Almost completely silent at tickover and fabulously howley at revs.
Mazda had a great range at the time - MX-3, MX-5, MX-6, Xedos 6 and 9 - all interesting and good looking cars.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff