RE: BMW 630i

RE: BMW 630i

Tuesday 1st March 2005

BMW 630i

Nick Hall checks out the smaller-engined of BMW's luxury coupés


Less is more is a phrase that has been commandeered by two-bit snake oil salesman trying to shift a cruddy product on the unsuspecting public, government officials about to screw us out of yet another civil liberty or evangelists trying to part us from our life savings. Just sometimes, though, it really is true and the BMW 630i is one such case.

At £45,255 it’s £5,200 cheaper than the range-topping V8 645Ci, which is a substantial amount of cash, and this smaller engine is no afterthought. It’s an all-new unit with a number of tricks that combine to make this the lightest six-cylinder production petrol engine in the world.

High-tech items like a composite aluminium and magnesium crankcase, which is apparently 43 per cent lighter than a traditional cast iron unit, together with a magnesium cylinder head cover and an exhaust manifold that is 2mm thick, compared to 12mm, contributed to the weight savings on the old 3-litre engine and the new powerplant tips the scales at 121kg. This all means the 630i weighs in at 1485kg, 130kg less than the 645Ci. And BMW has backed this up with front suspension constructed almost entirely from aluminium to further reduce the pounds on the front end.

The range topping V8 is a great car, but it’s a point-and-squirt machine, you need to go in slow and wait for the car to get out of a corner before putting the hammer down to keep that extra weight from dragging the car wide. If you don’t, the electronics take over anyway assuming you don’t have the skills to keep it out of the hedge and pillage the power as you head for the apex. The 645Ci is so technologically advanced that it has developed the will to live, and demands that you take care of it in the twisty bits. The end result is a slightly dull driving experience, it’s fast but in no way exhilarating as there’s too much happening between the input in the cockpit and the action at the wheels.

Now the 630i isn’t a radically different car, and has all the same computerised gubbins, but that little less weight on the front end has transformed its ability to cut into corners and changed the entire attitude of the car. This machine carries momentum into each bend more comfortably and, as the front end doesn’t start to slip until it’s pushed much harder, the electronics stay out of things and let the driver maintain control.

There are two levels of traction control, nanny state and Dynamic Traction Control, which permits a little slip before the car’s Deep Blue-style computer kicks in, applies the brakes to individual wheels and limits the power. Truth is, though, the slavish devotion to equal weight distribution that has long been a BMW trademark, together with a myriad of body roll-resisting innovations, means that the car is easily controlled with everything turned off. Be ready with the slightest twist of opposite lock and this machine dances round bends, while the V8 lags behind like a bodybuilder in a marathon.

With 258bhp on tap, it could be a little disappointing in a straight line, but it really isn’t. BMW has reworked its technology to give 200lb-ft of torque from 1,500rpm and have raised the three-litre's rev limit to 7,000rpm, to give it enough oomph to keep things entertaining. Peak torque remains at 221lb-ft and that comes at 6,600rpm, but some people will always enjoy wringing the last few revs if only for the fun of it.

The 630i hits 60mph in 6.5s in manual format and the Steptronic automatic is just 0.2s behind it. The engine is so free revving and involving that you’ll want the freedom of the manual box, though, or at the very least the SMG that we didn’t get to try on this test.

Whichever option you take will have more than enough performance for the public road and few of the hacks on our test run emerged without a slightly surprised smile and a nod of the head that suggested the performance of BMW’s latest 3-litre unit had surpassed all expectations. It doesn’t feel laboured, even when joining the motorway and powering up to illegal speeds, despite having to lug a substantial load and BMW’s combination of VANOS and Valvetronic for the first time can take much of the credit here.

There are obvious advantages with the reduced engine capacity, too, as the combined fuel consumption of this model is 31.4mpg. With a tank of petrol costing just less than a studio flat in the Midlands, it’s a serious consideration these days and that five extra miles per gallon will make a big difference to the cost of motoring. Carbon dioxide emissions are significantly less, too, so buying this car will mean the taxman loses out.

The noise is still sensational: the engineers have clearly spent time tuning the acoustics to ape the larger engine as closely as possible as the 630i is fitted with round exhaust exit pipes compared to big brother’s oval units. These, a de-chromed front grille, star-pattern alloys and of course the badge are the only styling differences between this car and the V8.

And the interior is identical. BMW’s clutter free cockpit reinforces its reputation as a driver’s car first and foremost when compared to the lavish environment of, say, the equivalent Mercedes. But that’s no bad thing, everything is where it should be and there’s little to distract the driver – apart from that iDrive abortion. Yes it’s clever, but it’s also confusing and about as intuitive as flatpack furniture.

It should be a matter of personal preference, but hardly anybody that’s used this system truly likes it and most have simply learnt to deal with it. Still, if that’s the only real criticism then you can take it as read you’re in the presence of something rather special.

And that exterior styling appears to have grown on the world. Chris Bangle was held up as the anti-Christ when his cars were revealed to the world, but this was largely due to love for the old car and the general reluctance to accept change. Now they’ve been around for a while, not so many people are slating these cars and the 6-series isn’t ugly. It’s perhaps stuck between the GT and saloon, but in fact it’s only slightly longer than a 911 and the upcoming M6 should sit firmly in the supercar category.

I tested the Coupé and Cabriolet, which comes with a £5,400 premium attached and lacks the style of the hard-top, on the winding roads of Southern Spain, while Formula One cars screamed round the nearby test track at Jerez de la Frontera. And while there will be no poor analogies and comparisons on that front from me, there was absolutely no doubt that the three-litre feels more of a sportscar than its more powerful sibling. Stripping two cylinders has created a more cohesive package and this is the pick of the 6-series range.

If you want to drive on motorways and only motorways, or want to show the neighbours just how well you’re doing, then you might still want to buy the 645. If you’re a real Pistonheader, though, and actually enjoy the art of driving, stick the extra £5k back into your pocket and get a lot more for a little less.

Author
Discussion

orisha-oko

Original Poster:

15 posts

256 months

Monday 28th February 2005
quotequote all
gold fish face And weird tail? and still is a great savings but ummm im not a big fun of this 6 series! but quite fast for a six and nice interior! for that amount of money i can still buy a used 2002 viper for around US42000 and rest for the gas im going to spend on it in a year! he heh

FestivAli

1,088 posts

238 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Aww. It's strange, because I believe that the purest 5 in my sense has a six cylinder engine, yet because of the coupe 2+2 format of the 6 series, (ie: its a GT) I believe it should have a v8. Damned premonitions. Sounds like quite a nice drive though, but what about saving the dollars and buying the upcoming 330Ci?

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

242 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Not much of a fan of that rear end, especially in silver, looks like an old Porsche 911 that's been on a McDonalds only diet for the past 40 years.

Still I think the V8 models have always been aimed more to the American market, even the old 540i's had to ditch the rack and pinion steering for a recirulationg ball type. I've always thought the E39 530i was an excellent everday car, good balance of performance, economy and practicality. The 330Ci is also good, sort of a cut price or more anonymous M3.

If BMW does anything well it's make a sublime Inline 6. Hopefully they won't cave in and make V6 like everyone else.

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

242 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Not much of a fan of that rear end, especially in silver, looks like an old Porsche 911 that's been on a McDonalds only diet for the past 40 years.

Still I think the V8 models have always been aimed more to the American market, even the old 540i's had to ditch the rack and pinion steering for a recirulationg ball type. I've always thought the E39 530i was an excellent everday car, good balance of performance, economy and practicality. The 330Ci is also good, sort of a cut price or more anonymous M3.

If BMW does anything well it's make a sublime Inline 6. Hopefully they won't cave in and make V6 like everyone else.

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

242 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Not much of a fan of that rear end, especially in silver, looks like an old Porsche 911 that's been on a McDonalds only diet for the past 40 years.

Still I think the V8 models have always been aimed more to the American market, even the old 540i's had to ditch the rack and pinion steering for a recirulationg ball type. I've always thought the E39 530i was an excellent everday car, good balance of performance, economy and practicality. The 330Ci is also good, sort of a cut price or more anonymous M3.

If BMW does anything well it's make a sublime Inline 6. Hopefully they won't cave in and make V6 like everyone else.

v8thunder

27,646 posts

258 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
I like it. Seriously, to me, it looks like a bargain, it's more usable, more economical and has all the power you'll ever need. Saying it's useless in the model line-up is forgetting a vital aspect of BMW GT cars. Think about it - 2800CS, 3.0CSL, 635CSi - they all had straight-sixes!

Roger645

1,728 posts

247 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Think I'll stick with my V8, but how long before the 3.5 Diesel version?


Roger

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Nice car. Very nice.

Tried the V8 and liked it lots. Styling is a grower too, distinctive and elegant IMO.

The 645 I tried also had a glass roof which covered the entire roof area, which was a terrific feature.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Nice car. Very nice.

Tried the V8 and liked it lots. Styling is a grower too, distinctive and elegant IMO.

The 645 I tried also had a glass roof which covered the entire roof area, which was a terrific feature.

xm5er

5,091 posts

248 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
What a well written article, well done Nick.

Interesting car too, the 6 has grown on me as has the 5. It is remarkably light weight, over 100kg lighter than my wifes 330d touring, glad to see at least one manufacturer making progress on this front.

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
its still ugly!

FesterNath

652 posts

236 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
xm5er said:
What a well written article, well done Nick.


I'll second that.

xm5er said:

Interesting car too, the 6 has grown on me as has the 5. It is remarkably light weight, over 100kg lighter than my wifes 330d touring, glad to see at least one manufacturer making progress on this front.


That's interesting - am I right in thinking that it must weigh about the same as a 330i then?

xm5er

5,091 posts

248 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
FesterNath said:



That's interesting - am I right in thinking that it must weigh about the same as a 330i then?


According to the bible (evo's The Knowledge) the 330Ci weighs in at 1522kg and the 630 at 1485kg.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
Am I being stupid bit is 12mm thicknes usual for an exhaust manifold?

Cudos on the engine tho , very nice light 6.

bor

4,702 posts

255 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
That refers to the flange itself, Rob. A conventional cast iron or fabricated steel manifold needs about 12mm to resist distorting and then leaking. The manifold on this engine seals each pipe radially with individual sealing rings, motorbike style. The 2mm plate is only there to locate the pipes in position. There are some folds in it, so it is fairly rigid.

dinkel

26,938 posts

258 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
A joy to read. A joy to drive I'm sure.

I like the styling, a bit dull in grey . . . Metallic greyish light blue to add a litle transparency.

The 6-series is the best looker although I haven't seen the new 3 in the flesh. Fiver in touring version for me.

I'm a huge fan of Beemers 6-in-liners. The new 6pot sounds like the perfect fit for the roadster or even a BMW 'MR2' . . . In the Morgan maybe . . .

Will the new engine grew smaller for the 5 an 3?

alaws

77 posts

254 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I think it looks like a Daimler DS420 limousine at the back with that square raised hump on the back. Does anybody see what I mean?

See: www.myds420.info/pressphotos/224051.l.html

for Daimler DS420 comparisons!

topwelshman

2,093 posts

243 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
I spent a day in my old man's 645 yesterday & covered around 450 miles of motorway & welsh countryside. It's a great engine but coming from a 330ci it left me a bit cold. It was just too easy, too soft & that auto just sapped the power, just a tad boring overall. It rides really well on 19's & with the extra weight loss from the new 3.0 & a manual or SMG box this could be the answer. The idrive is a great idea but the software was frustratingly slow & it's not a patch on the old stuff, sometimes newer is does not mean progress!

Benito Cellini

1 posts

226 months

Monday 27th June 2005
quotequote all
I drive a 2001 330ci in and around Washington D.C. The only thing that could pry me out of it would be a 630ci. I'm not even slightly interested in the overpriced, thirsty 645.

If BMW doesn't have the sense to bring the six-cylinder 6-series coupe to the U.S. by the Summer of 2006, many of us BMW-loyalists will either stay with what we have or switch to the new 2007 Jaguar coupe (and I'd prefer six cylinders in the Jag too).