RE: Shed of the Week: Jaguar X-Type V6

RE: Shed of the Week: Jaguar X-Type V6

Friday 10th June 2016

Shed of the Week: Jaguar X-Type V6

Why your jokes really aren't appropriate for the old junior Jag



Imagine if Rolls-Royce built a 3 Series sized car. The idea of a pocket Rolls certainly has something going for it, even if the showroom result had a reassuringly expensive price tag. Which it certainly would have.

Now imagine Jaguar building a 3 Series sized car. Luckily you don't have to imagine it because they have been doing just that, or the equivalent thereof, since the first Mk I rolled through the Browns Lane gates over 60 years ago.

Classic colour combo still looks good
Classic colour combo still looks good
Both Rolls and Jaguar offer sporting luxury. The difference with Jaguar of course is that their version of it has always been affordable for the common man or, in Mrs Shed's case, the (very) common woman.

A few years back, Shed took in a used X-Type 3.0-litre SE AWD as a part-ex for a sit-upon gang mower that had been quietly rusting in his yard. The X-Type owner had to add cash to the deal because, as just about no-one will tire of telling you, the Jag was basically a Mondeo and therefore worth Nothing. This is an interesting one as a few small bits of the X-Type like the engine, body, suspension, cabin, drivetrain had very little connection with Ford.

Anyway, Shed gave the Jag to his missus. She proudly ran it for four years with minimal hassle until the Irish navvy she was seeing on the side accidentally put an indelible bootprint on the nearside rear door card. It had to go after that.

Have a look at this week's rather lovely 2.5-litre X and see if you still think that this much-maligned mini-Jag is a worthless Ford.

As always, check that dash for warning lights
As always, check that dash for warning lights
Forget any pre-conceptions you may have and just look at it for what it is: a refined 2.5 V6 luxury saloon with nearly 200hp, all-wheel drive, a good chassis, a seven-second 0-60 time and a typically fulsome Jaguar spec.

Many long term X-Type owners swear they are not only a better drive than the Mondeo (more planted, and yet also lighter on its feet) but also than the equivalent 3 Series, offering more space than the German car and naturally none of its rear-wheel drive issues in snow and ice.

Our Shed comes in a fantastic colour, with apparently lovely leather, very handsome 18in Aruba wheels and a low mileage. There's a bleb on the bonnet that looks eminently fixable or forgettable. Otherwise, what's there to be afraid of?

Early AWD cars suffered from weak bearing in the transfer box but they'll have all been sorted by now. The box itself needs careful checking of its fluids as it doesn't hold a lot and leaks can quickly develop into a serious problem. ABS rings were known for popping off the rear driveshafts. Ultimately not a difficult one to fix, but something that would often trigger a Blackpool Prom's worth of warning lights, causing much angst.

Bad pics, but it sounds like a very good car!
Bad pics, but it sounds like a very good car!
Wheel alignment is critical on a car like this. If it's out you can easily rip through a set of tyres in less than 5,000 miles. Driver's seats rock on their mountings. Water pumps can fail, as can the rear parking sensors. Plug changing is a bit of a faff as the manifold has to come off first. Boot and door locks suffer from water attack. In many cases the Ford connection means that ancillary parts are relatively cheap.

As we go to press, Dan is driving an F-Type SVR. Chances are that it's going to be quite a machine. Our humble X-Type may not quite compete with that but the heritage is the same and there really is nothing like a Jag. Even if it is only a lickle one.

Amazingly, there hasn't been an X-Type in SOTW in getting on for four years, and possibly even longer than that: Shed's pre-October 2012 records were unfortunately destroyed in a mysterious but quite profitable fire. So, it's a long overdue appearance for the X-Type here, and maybe on your driveway. If you don't have a driveway, get one. It's all part of being a Jaguar owner.

Here's the ad.

REG NO:LA53AWH. AS WE ARE AN AA CARS DEALER THIS VEHICLE COMES WITH A FULL AA HISTORY CHECK AND ALSO 12 MONTHS FREE BREAKDOWN COVER, Upgrades - Leather Sport Upholstery, Navigation System, Beige Full leather interior, Four wheel-drive, Standard Features - Air-Conditioning, Automatic Climate Control, 7x17 X-Sport Alloy Wheels, Alarm, Alloy Wheels - 18in Aruba (ilo 16in), Alloy Wheels 17in Andros, Electric Windows (Front), In Car Entertainment (Radio/Cassette), Remote central locking, Power steering, Lumbar support, Immobiliser. 5 seats, Metallic Green, Please See our Website for more Pictures of this car,www.richmondcarsales.co.uk Satellite Navigation, Air Conditioning, 17'' Alloy Wheels, Anti-Lock Brakes, Passenger Airbag, Power Assisted Steering, Driver's Airbag, Electric Windows, Remote Central Locking,

 

Author
Discussion

Valgar

Original Poster:

850 posts

135 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Always fancied one of these (or the 3.0) an absolute bargain.

Jprallen1

29 posts

184 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Worth checking the steering - front wheel looks like it met with a big curb at speed....

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
The 3.0 was always the one to go for, the 2.5 uses just as much fuel and needs to be worked hard to get good performance. A manual 3.0 would be a brisk car even now. Still, at shed prices you can't be fussy.

These suffer horrendous rust under the plastic sill covers (as do S-Types) so that's an area to check thoroughly.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Nice-riding cars these, very comfy with a good balance to handling as well (so it's not a blancmange at the first roundabout). Nice interiors too, although the passenger footwell is surprisingly shallow.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I used to have one of these & thought it was very good although a bit thirsty. Comfy car to do a long distance in & it sounded fantastic.

The Don of Croy

5,998 posts

159 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I followed an estate in this colour earlier this week and admired it - good proportions, almost elegant, worth buttons...

Never been in one but I'm thinking £995 would be great value for money. Cassette player too.

stevesuk

1,346 posts

182 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Jprallen1 said:
Worth checking the steering - front wheel looks like it met with a big curb at speed....
It failed its MOT earlier in the week for that, and presumably after some fettling it became an advisory on the re-test smile (see https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/ ). Rusty brake pipes too by the looks of things.

silentbrown

8,831 posts

116 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
You need the 3.0 to get a 7-second 0-60. As mentioned, the 2.5 gives you all the fuel consumption with none of the power!

Also, beware the 18" Aruba wheels. They're made of cheese, and one large pothole can put them well off-round.

I ran a 3.0 estate for about 4 years: Black leather with piano black dash gives a very different 'ambiance' compared to this one.

STiG911

1,210 posts

167 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
Also, beware the 18" Aruba wheels. They're made of cheese, and one large pothole can put them well off-round.
"7x17 X-Sport Alloy Wheels, Alarm, Alloy Wheels - 18in Aruba (ilo 16in), Alloy Wheels 17in Andros"
I wouldn't worry - looks like it comes with a set of wheels for each day of the week.

tedman

368 posts

104 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Was stuck alongside one of these in traffic the other day. Sounded like the big end was about to pop... either that or the engine contains gerbils with tiny hammers. It was so loud that for a minute I thought it was MY car that had lunched its engine!

andy-xr

13,204 posts

204 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I perhaps had my closest near death experience on the roads in an X Type, and I think some of the trickery in the AWD and ABS saved me from certain death. Some crack smoking eejit decided to do a U turn from a layby on the A57 at night while I was hurtling towards them at 50'ishmph. Luckily the stopped in the middle of the road to change (I assume) into first which gave me just enough room to brake, turn really sharply to the right of them, up onto the roadside on the opposite carriageway and come to a stop at the end of the layby they were in for a change of pants.

I think a combination of AWD, reasonably good tyres and ABS with probably instinct saved me from a head-on. They just drove off seemingly oblivious

The problems I had with the X Type were fuel consumption (it's a 3.0V6 though), slightly short driving position (my shins would catch/knock the plastic under the steering wheel) and there wasnt a massive amount of rear legroom. BOOT OPEN used to flash up every so often, until I undid all the tape on the wiring loom in the bonnet hinge and re-soldered the wire back together that was causing the problem. The way the boot hinges, it stretches the wires (same in the S Type) but it's simple enough to fix.

On the upside, the engine had a lot of torque (3.0 in mine) so you could pottle around in 3rd most of the time at low to medium revs. It was quiet on the road, little noise other than tyres at motorway speeds, enough that you could have a normal conversation with a passenger, and it was comfy to sit in for hours, as long as you could afford to refuel it.

Engine wise, there's very little room to do much. They tend not to need that much doing though.

Edited by andy-xr on Friday 10th June 09:54

court

1,487 posts

216 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
KimJongHealthy said:
AWD, V6, sat nav, luxury brand and... a casette player. In 2004. Is it some kind of a joke? Even Mondeo had CD player as standard back then.
I think that normally means it has a 6-disc changer. Audis of similar vintage were the same.

carlingofblack

363 posts

164 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I had a 3.0V6 too .... Terrible auto box but that was my fault for buying that version. Engine, build and the amount of gadgets (on the rare Sovereign model, no less) was great!

Johnspex

4,342 posts

184 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
It's not the best looking car, is it? The estate is a much prettier choice (IMHO and all that crap).

Lotusgone

1,188 posts

127 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Tried a 3.0 some years ago, wasn't as impressed as I hoped to be. But I've run a 2.2D for the last 4 years and it does everything needed from an everyday mile-muncher. Cream leather is better, otherwise X-types feel a bit claustrophobic.

molineux1980

1,200 posts

219 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I think I quite like this, and i'm not sure why....

silentbrown

8,831 posts

116 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
court said:
KimJongHealthy said:
AWD, V6, sat nav, luxury brand and... a casette player. In 2004. Is it some kind of a joke? Even Mondeo had CD player as standard back then.
I think that normally means it has a 6-disc changer. Audis of similar vintage were the same.
No, that one has a proper cassette player in the dash. There's even a button labelled "tape". CD Changer in boot was an option. In-dash CD became standard in 2004, I think.

Despite having no CD, it does have the mega-expensive (at the time) satnav option.


VolvoT5

4,155 posts

174 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
A SOTW I've actually had. They are nice enough cars, definitely don't buy the 'mondeo in drag' bullst. The downside is the auto gearbox is poor, even by standards 10-15 years ago as it is never really sure what gear it wants and then takes an age to sludge into action if you ask it to kick down.

The auto box combined with the weight of the 4x4 it means the car doesn't feel that fast and really like a drink, think MPG of high teens around town and low to mid 20s on a run. They do drive/handle well IMO, though I swapped off the 18" alloys as they make the ride a bit harsh and are known to crack easily.

There are loads and loads available for around this kind of money now (or perhaps stretching the budget slightly). I would always hang on for the 3.0 because the 2.1 and 2.5 are just as juicy but lack the performance that justifies it.



Edited by VolvoT5 on Friday 10th June 10:29

EnglishTony

2,552 posts

99 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I would take one of these over and above an equivalent 3 Series, A4 or C Class.

Not sure whether I would like one over a 156 though.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Forgetting the mechanicals for a moment, which is not advisory for shed buying I admit, but I think the shape with the 4 headlights is aging really well and looks great in that colour.

The interior for something so beige is quite nice too.

I've always wondered whether one of these would make a good cheap track day car where you just bunged it around until it popped, blaming the lack of pace on the car not the driver. But then you start looking at cheap X series with 6 cyls and then progress to S series with 8 for same principle, this ones sold but 400bhp for less than £4k

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2016...

I never buy one of course. Just keep dreaming the dream on a Friday whilst munching on some crisps and drinking cheap ale.