RE: Koenigsegg 'ring crash - why it happened

RE: Koenigsegg 'ring crash - why it happened

Saturday 23rd July 2016

Koenigsegg 'ring crash - why it happened

Credit to Koenigsegg for sharing the reasons for the One:1's dramatic testing crash at the Nordschleife



After crashing a car so publicly during Industry Pool testing at the 'ring most manufacturers would probably sweep up the bits, throw a sheet over the remains and swiftly retire to a nearby industrial estate to shout, swear and kick things around the workshop. And never speak of it again.

Fair play to Koenigsegg then. After the One:1 crashed so spectacularly at the 'ring during testing on Monday it's put up a detailed public statement explaining what happened. And, no, it wasn't a mystery patch of diesel...


As our spy snappers noted, from the two black lines leading to the scene of the accident the One:1 appeared to have suffered some manner of lock-up before jumping the barrier at Adenauer Forst and rotating through 180 degrees as it flew for over 20 metres. Koenigsegg notes that all safety systems, from airbags to safety cell and automatic fuel shut-off, operated as they should and a small fire at the back of the car from where the bodywork came into contact with hot exhausts was extinguished by the driver.

From examining the car and attempting to replicate the circumstances Koenigsegg has attributed the crash to the failure of the left front ABS sensor, causing the lock-up and loss of control. It points out a warning light would have appeared on the dash when this occurred but accepts a driver flat out through Fuchsrore in a One:1 might be forgiven for missing that. And in normal circumstances the car would remain driveable, unless you were driving to a level where you were leaning against ABS intervention to slow the car down. As a test driver going for a time might.


In response to this incident Koenigsegg will now include ABS in its Active Systems Warning management, which puts the car into a 60mph limp mode if active features like the adjustable aero, ride height or damping fail. Lesson learned, though they probably wish it had been in slightly less spectacular circumstances.

The full statement is commendably frank and makes interesting reading, with credit to Jalopnik for bringing it to our attention. Will the One:1 return to the 'ring? Koenigsegg says it is "hard to say at this moment, but we won't say a definite 'no'" while offering thanks for the "heartwarming" level of public support that followed the crash.

See below for the statement in full.


Statement issued by Koenigsegg following Nurburgring testing crash, reproduced verbatim as published on the company website 21/7/16

A Koenigsegg One:1 endured a severe crash at the Nürburgring Circuit in Germany last Monday, 18th July. The accident occurred at approximately 16:30 hours, some 3.5 hours into a session of Industry Pool testing that began at 13:00 hours.

The vehicle has since returned to Ängelholm and upon examination of both the car and the on-board telemetry, we have been able to deduce the following:

The One:1 experienced front axle brake lock-up at approximately 170 km/h on a section of the track known as Fuchsröhre before hitting the fence at Adenauer Forst at approximately 110 km/h. The impact with the fence launched the car into the air for an estimated 22 meters while it turned 180 degrees before it landed on its left rear wheel and pivoted to land parallel with the fence. The airbags, fuel shut-off and other safety systems all deployed as they were designed to do.

There was a small fire in the rear section of the car due to contact between the carbonfibre rear panels and the exhaust upon landing. This fire was extinguished by the driver using a fire extinguisher that was located inside the car.

The accident has been traced to a fault with the front left ABS wheel sensor signal.

Data analysis shows that the dashboard ABS warning light was triggered as soon as the ABS wheel sensor malfunction occurred. The small yellow ABS warning light is located centrally in the dashboard but may be difficult for the driver to see when he is wearing a helmet and concentrating on high-speed driving around the circuit. The driver may not necessarily notice any difference in the braking feel as long as he is not near the ABS braking zone, i.e. braking hard enough that it would have triggered the ABS system.

Whilst the ABS warning was activated well in advance of lock-up, data analysis shows that the driver's brake application at Fuchsröhre was the first brake application in the ABS zone. Hence, it was the first opportunity for the driver to notice the ABS fault through the brake pedal.

Our ABS system, like most, includes a back-up feature where the rear wheels are allowed to continue rotating in the event of an ABS fault that results in the front wheels locking up. Letting the rear wheels rotate instead of locking up together with the front wheels prevents the car from rotating. Instead, the car will continue in a straight line. The system worked to specification, as can be seen by the straight skid marks left by the front tires on the track prior to the car colliding with the fence.

Our engineers spent several hours on Wednesday, July 20th, replicating the fault using a similar car at our factory test track. The left front wheel ABS sensor was disconnected and ABS-level braking force was applied. We found results that were entirely consistent with those experienced by the One:1 at the Nürburgring.

If an ABS fault is triggered in the normal course of driving, the customer would normally take heed of the warning light, stop the car and have the fault attended to. As long as heavy ABS braking is not needed the car will stay fully drivable and most people would drive it to the nearest service facility to have them examine the system. It was our severe misfortune that this fault occurred just prior to the first instance of ABS-braking into a corner during high-speed testing on the world's most demanding test track.

While the One:1 sustained severe damage to its exterior panels and sub-frames (front and rear), the carbon monocoque chassis and airbag restraint system performed according to design specifications and protected the driver well. Examination of the vehicle at our factory in Ängelholm shows that there were no fuel leaks, no oil leaks and no hydraulic fluid leaks whatsoever, which is positively reassuring, given the force of the impact.

The carbon monocoque chassis has been examined at our factory in Ängelholm (photographed today, above). The monocoque is intact and will form the basis for the rebuild of the car in the near future, together with the engine, gearbox and many other systems. Both doors were fully operational, opening and closing in their original positions. The removable roof is fully intact and properly aligned.

Given this unfortunate and unlikely situation and given that we have the tools to further enhance our cars' safety in this regard, we will implement software changes that will be rolled out to all applicable vehicles in the near future.

Modern Koenigseggs already have an Active Systems Warning regime in place. This is a system that is well above all legal requirements. The Active System Warning monitors all active systems in the car - the front aero flaps underneath the bumper, active ride height system, active rear wing and our active rebound dampening. If a fault is triggered in any of these active systems, a flashing light appears on the dashboard along with an ACTIVE SYSTEMS WARNING light. The car is then restricted to 100 km/h until the fault is fixed and cleared in the system. We will act immediately to include the ABS system in this Active Warning System regime. This will have the dual effect of heightening driver awareness of the fault and restricting vehicle output until the fault is fixed.

This incident will not stop us from continuing our intensive testing at the Nürburgring, but it will halt it for some time as the team behind the effort will focus on rebuilding this car before going back again. Today it is a bit hard to say exactly how long that will take but we will do it as efficiently as possible. Will we be back this year? That is also hard to say at this point, but we won't say a definite 'no'.

Koenigsegg Automotive AB is committed to building the world's best performance cars. The world of high performance is inherently dangerous but a critical part of our commitment is making the cars as safe to drive as such cars can be. As is customary with severe Nürburgring accidents, our professional driver was taken to hospital for routine tests. Encouragingly, he was released later the same afternoon. We thank him for his alertness in putting out the fire directly after the impact.

We are also extremely grateful for the level of public support we have received since this incident. It is truly heartwarming.

Stay Tuned!

[Sources: Jalopnik, Koenigsegg]

[Spyshots: S. Baldauf/SB-Medien]

Author
Discussion

pfsv427sc01

Original Poster:

84 posts

148 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Great to get such a response and interesting technical detail from an open and upfront company. Glad it worked out well in the end.

SirSquidalot

4,041 posts

165 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Love Koenigsegg, they just say it how it is. None of this smoke and mirrors, imagine if Mclaren had this happen with a P1...

roygarth

2,673 posts

248 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Would love to know its speed through Foxhole!

essayer

9,064 posts

194 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
I wonder if the rear wheels had been allowed to lock whether the car would still have crashed.

(Appreciate why the design of a road car makes it much safer to leave the rears turning)


AyBee

10,533 posts

202 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Bravo Koenigsegg clap Refreshing in this day and age for them to explain to their potential customers what went wrong, why it went wrong and what they're going to do about it to stop it going wrong in the future. I love how the car is already stripped down smile

Steven_RW

1,729 posts

202 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
essayer said:
I wonder if the rear wheels had been allowed to lock whether the car would still have crashed.

(Appreciate why the design of a road car makes it much safer to leave the rears turning)
Are you assuming they didn't brake the rears at all or reduced the braking to the rear?

Or do you mean that having locked up rears may have allowed more control or more braking effort thus reducing speed?


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
SirSquidalot said:
Love Koenigsegg, they just say it how it is. None of this smoke and mirrors, imagine if Mclaren had this happen with a P1...
Thing is, this isn't really "news" now is it? I mean the headline "car crashes at race track" isn't entirely unexpected! Trust me, during vehicle development programs, both high performance ones and more "cooking" ones dev/test cars are getting crashed. Generally on purpose, but often not. And the general public simply doesn't get to hear about those incidents nor are they interested in them.

In this case, with 'egg chasing the N/ring hypercar record, then sure, there was a bit more focus on what was happening, but it still wasn't un-expected that a crash or incident might occur.

drmark

4,836 posts

186 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
A masterclass in PR. Candid, and turns a set back into an opportunity.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
SirSquidalot said:
Love Koenigsegg, they just say it how it is. None of this smoke and mirrors, imagine if Mclaren had this happen with a P1...
Thing is, this isn't really "news" now is it? I mean the headline "car crashes at race track" isn't entirely unexpected! Trust me, during vehicle development programs, both high performance ones and more "cooking" ones dev/test cars are getting crashed. Generally on purpose, but often not. And the general public simply doesn't get to hear about those incidents nor are they interested in them.

In this case, with 'egg chasing the N/ring hypercar record, then sure, there was a bit more focus on what was happening, but it still wasn't un-expected that a crash or incident might occur.
Not really news, but it's nice of them to end the guesswork from joe public about how it happened. It keeps the nerds involved, and cements them as being a company that shares a bit more technical nerdery than Ferrari (for example).

StottyEvo

6,860 posts

163 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
drmark said:
A masterclass in PR. Candid, and turns a set back into an opportunity.
yes For all the right reasons, Koenigsegg seem genuine in their honesty.

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
drmark said:
A masterclass in PR. Candid, and turns a set back into an opportunity.
yes For all the right reasons, Koenigsegg seem genuine in their honesty.
Agreed, I can't fault their response at all, very honest and thorough.

Turbobanana

6,263 posts

201 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
That's how it's done, although I can't help thinking the ABS should have been included in the regime from the start.

As someone has already said, McLaren's version would probably have started "Unexpected contact between high-speed sub-optimally operating personal transportation apparatus and permanently installed vehicular retardation system".

rtz62

3,366 posts

155 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
I love the part that starts "Modern Koenigseggs already have an Active Systems Warning regime in place. This is a system that is well above all legal requirements. "
Modern. As the first car they made, the CC8S was delivered in 2002, they are hardly an antediluvian car manufacturer by any stretch of the imagination.
Kudos to them then, that they acknowledge a problem, explain why it happened, and then seek to immediately remedy said fault.
Perhaps a certain manufacturer whose mpv's burst into flames due to a well-known fault should take note; take a story and turn it into a non-story by honed (or clever) PR.
Well done Koeniggggsenisseggsegnignigsegigisegccx2 as Top Gear called them!

Bobhon

1,057 posts

179 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
For me the quite stunning point in all of this is that the monocoque is even capable of being rebuilt to go back out testing again. If that were most cars in that crash then with the best will in the world the remains would only have been fit for the scrap man.

Unless it is like some of the classic racing cars that have crashed time after time which are more Trigger's broom than original car.

On second thoughts the fact that the driver was still alive and able to get out and put out the small fire is probably equally impressive.

Leins

9,462 posts

148 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
There seems to be a back-up feature that prevents the company from indulging in spin too. Bravo Koenigsegg! clap

loudlashadjuster

5,118 posts

184 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Ultimate respect for the clarity and apprent transparency of that incident report from Koenigsegg, and for the speed at which it was produced.

Other manufacturers take note; this is how you do it.

Funk

26,270 posts

209 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
Yep, very refreshing.

Glad the driver was OK as well, must've been a brown-pants moment...

James Drake

2,670 posts

117 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
FN2TypeR said:
StottyEvo said:
drmark said:
A masterclass in PR. Candid, and turns a set back into an opportunity.
yes For all the right reasons, Koenigsegg seem genuine in their honesty.
Agreed, I can't fault their response at all, very honest and thorough.
Sadly I'm not in the market to buy a car like this (!) but if I were, their honest appraisal and explanation would more than ease any concerns or doubts I might have had following the crash.

PunterCam

1,069 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
James Drake said:
FN2TypeR said:
StottyEvo said:
drmark said:
A masterclass in PR. Candid, and turns a set back into an opportunity.
yes For all the right reasons, Koenigsegg seem genuine in their honesty.
Agreed, I can't fault their response at all, very honest and thorough.
Sadly I'm not in the market to buy a car like this (!) but if I were, their honest appraisal and explanation would more than ease any concerns or doubts I might have had following the crash.
A company trying to develop cars on a shoe string. Call me cynical, but i just see panic from a company which must be existing sale to sale.

I know st happens to every manufacturer, but to be perfectly honest, this car has been on sale in some shape or form for what, 10 years? And they're still faffing around with basic electronic systems? It's like the TVR development arc is still in full flow..

R8Steve

4,150 posts

175 months

Thursday 21st July 2016
quotequote all
PunterCam said:
A company trying to develop cars on a shoe string. Call me cynical, but i just see panic from a company which must be existing sale to sale.

I know st happens to every manufacturer, but to be perfectly honest, this car has been on sale in some shape or form for what, 10 years? And they're still faffing around with basic electronic systems? It's like the TVR development arc is still in full flow..
Not sure what your point is here?

Every manufacturer has issues with things that would seem basic at some point.

Toyota for example, a company that has been around for about 80 years and is renowned for reliability, couldn't get a simple accelerator pedal right.

I think it's refreshing to see them release what actually happened instead of taking the easy way out, lying and saying it was driver error.