RE: Shed of the Week: Audi A8

RE: Shed of the Week: Audi A8

Friday 2nd September 2016

Shed of the Week: Audi A8

At the very least you'll get a year out of it but who's to say you won't want more



Mrs Shed has been pestering her hubby for a private reg plate. She's left the choice to him. All she asks is that it should somehow reflect her personality and appearance.


With the arrival of this Audi A8, Shed thinks he may have just the thing. He reckons he can fudge the first '2' of the plate into an 'E' and thus end up with something that will reflect both her personality and her weight in pounds.

As a bonus he would get the use of a fabulous motor. The A8 was a long time in the planning because it had to go up against what was (and arguably still is) the world's finest car, the Mercedes S-Class. This is a first-gen car registered in 2000, but the first A8s hit the road in 1994, an astonishing 22 years ago. 1994 was 12 years after Ferdinand Piech signed a deal with a big American aluminium company to pave the way for what would be the transformatively lightweight Audi Space Frame A8.

Audi couldn't afford to go off half-cock with the A8's specification or performance. It was the first production car to offer ESP in its 4WD cars, and (along with the A6) the first to have front and rear side airbags. Our Shed has the 'poverty spec' 2.8-litre V6, but don't be fooled: even with the standard 174hp output you're looking at a 140mph+ machine. And this one's been de-catted, remember.


Thank the aluminium. The lightest A8 you can buy today is the 1,880kg 3.0 TDI quattro. The 2000 model was 340kg lighter. That's four beefy blokes, or 1.8 Mrs Sheds. The other advantage of the 2.8 is that it will cost you less on maintenance relative to the 4.2 V8. The advantage of it not being a quattro is that you can change fewer than four tyres at once without risking the transmission.

Good aerodynamics had something to do with the A8's effortless cruising gait too. Shed remembers a visit to the aero department of a very well-known premium car manufacturer in Japan around five years ago, during which he was proudly shown the secret work they were doing to a sporty version one of their executive cars. They were especially proud of its ensmoothening bellypan sections, complete with airflow-optimising NACA-style ducts.


If the pics don't make it to this feature, you can see from the underside pics very honestly provided by the vendor that Audi was miles ahead of that Japanese outfit in the big saloon aero game. Unfortunately, we can also see from the brown bits on display that the aluminium used to create this still-fresh looking (and apparently dent-free) A8 body did not stretch to all parts of the car.

Other glitches to be wary of? Well, there's plenty of electrick in places where you really don't need it, like the boot latch. Predictably, this is a weak area. The MMI info screens are notoriously iffy too.

Still, you've got a very long MOT. Who's to say you won't get away with at least 11 months' worth of plutocratic pleasure?


Shed was tripped up by an A8 a few years back. He paid a scrapper what he thought was a bargain amount for an immaculate set of leather seats from a 4.2, greedily thinking he was going to have a major score in selling them on.

Unfortunately that didn't happen because it transpires that A8 leather seats were built to never wear out, so there's hardly any demand for secondhand ones. Many hopeful Shed-a-likes are presumably sitting at home in a similar situation, glumly looking at their A8 seats and vainly hoping that their ship will eventually come in. Dream on lads, those seats were built to last.

When the topic is value for money, it really is difficult to argue against a facelifted A8 at a squeak over 600 quid. Just look at the paint, the shut lines, the cabin materials, the fit of the glass. This low-owner, low-mileage A8 may be many things, but VILe it most certainly is not.

Here's the ad.

Long MOT expires 25 July 2017 - I have owned this A8 since 2004 and have been very careful to always change the transmission fluid, so the new owner will enjoy smooth trouble free automatic sports performance.

De-Cat conversion adds greatly to performance and flue economy (original cat’s in very good condition saved for MOT).

 

 

 

 


Author
Discussion

kellyt

Original Poster:

158 posts

119 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Love the car. Always loved the first A8s. Very elegant. Reminds me of Ronin, which isn't bad either. The undercarriage rust, not so delighted. Isn't that deeply non Audi?

Johnspex

4,342 posts

184 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Flue economy. Very important. You don't want to waste money buying an excessive number of flues.

Dafuq

371 posts

170 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Approved, great shed.

A few years back, a friend in the UK bought a 4.2 for about shed money only to find on his drive home it was pissing oil everywhere. Unperturbed he continued to drive it for a month and sold it to a guy in Paris who collected and drove it all the way to France.

As the article says, built to last.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Brilliant shed, looks like a bargain.

Rust on the underside is minimal for a 16 year old car that's seen a winter, bargain!

EarlOfHazard

3,603 posts

158 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
there's something on the rear of the bumper. Can't tell if for removable tow bar, or lpg?

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
A bargain to waft around in. Very nice, understated cars. Perhaps too dull and anonymous for some.

The lack of weight is surprising; I had a lovely 2002 S8 and it truly felt like a car half its considerable size. You could (if you wished) fling it around quite easily, it handled brilliantly.

Good to see the transmission fluid has been changed (along with the filters I would hope) as the gearbox on these can – but not always – be it's weak spot, at least on the ZF-boxed S8s. I think the normal ones had a different setup.

I would hesitate to use the word 'sporty' to describe these. I think it's the same 2.8 that was in a 2001 Audi Cabrio I had and it was adequate at best.

Edited by DrSteveBrule on Friday 2nd September 11:17

teacake

150 posts

191 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Johnspex said:
Flue economy. Very important. You don't want to waste money buying an excessive number of flues.
This is so true. Your car could end up smoking like a chimney.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
EarlOfHazard said:
there's something on the rear of the bumper. Can't tell if for removable tow bar, or lpg?
I'd say tow bar; all the LPG conversions I've seen on these have the fuel flap on the side on the rear bumper. I wouldn't have thought the 2.8 engine really needed LPG; more so the 3.7 and 4.2 variants.

12lee

158 posts

165 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
No MMI on D2. MMI was introduced with D3. A D3 for £600 - mmmmmmm smile

Dion20vt

252 posts

162 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
What o coincidence! There's a chap down the road from me selling his 2004 A8 LWB 4.2 for not much more than shed money (OK twice as much but still a lot of car for £2k!!! It's a sign....

Good shed!

Leins

9,468 posts

148 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Like that a lot, and would happily smoke around in it for a while

Cheapest "V8", a 3.6L, I can see currently is £5k in comparison. Although that does come with their fairly elaborate quattro set-up using two TorSen diffs

JBUK

106 posts

143 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Approved.

I had A 1998 R 4.2 V8 a year or so back, bloody brilliant and also bought for shed money.

Save for pissing oil out of the engine and anywhere transmission / power steering fluid lived it was excellent. Plus the failed ABS module and many many flashing lights.

DVLA MOT checker suggests it has gone to the scrapyard in the sky. RIP R794 UOD.

J4CKO

41,562 posts

200 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Mmm, shed goodness.

Looks remarkably fresh in that colour, wont be rapid (60 in 9.9) but a nice way to waft about all the same.

I remember working at an IT company when these first came out, one of the managers got one and thought he was Gordon Gecko, complete knob really, anyway he drove like he owned the road in it, we were all sat int he office that overlooked the "Imo" car wash and in he swung like the captain of industry he truly believed he was, despite the car wash being obviously closed, and he hit the chain and the stanchion holding the chain in the middle of the in and out lanes, the chain tightened across the bonnet until whilst the stanchion opened the side of the car up like a can opener, the car was a ruin, both front wings, bonnet, windscreen, both off side doors and the B pillar, assume it must have got repaired but we never saw it again.

We were told not to mention it, ego too Fragile to cope with any stick, one lad wound him up asking how his new car was and just got told it was fine biggrin




anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Creamy waftyness for a bargain? Im in....

djbobbins

101 posts

176 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
It's a lot of waft for the money and shouldn't suffer from tinworm on the body (so compares very favourably to e.g. the MX5 from a few weeks ago). A brief look at the photos shows all the panels in good order and the "moo" upholstery is also - as noted by Shed - in very good order.

Personally it looks like a hit but I'd be concerned that it's currently SORN-ed and it's only done about 1600 miles in the last 6 years based on MOT history. (mileage in September 2011 was 95,621 and it is currently showing 97,200). Cars not made for being parked up etc etc so I'd be a bit nervous about things seizing up and perished hoses.

J4CKO

41,562 posts

200 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Reminds me of a posher version of the Audi 100 I had in the early 90s a H reg 2.0 SE, god I loved that car, looks like it only lasted until 2002.

Felt like a proper grown ups car after a MK1 Golf GTI.

This shed could be a hell of a lot of car for the money, as long as you can do some general stuff yourself, most of the bits are available secondhand and the consumables are cheap, it isnt that complex being the 2.8 and FWD.




s m

23,226 posts

203 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
This should be 193bhp not 174? Upgraded to 30 valve prior to 2000MY


http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=123...

Coventrykid

2 posts

97 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
One of the best sheds, I speak from experience I own a 2002 4.2 Quattro in black with cream, 75000 miles, FSH, great condition, yours sir for £1500. Everybody knows the gearboxes are a weak spot, the other thing that Ive had to deal with is water dripping into both footwells. Its a common fault the AC evaporator drains get blocked, its not the easiest of jobs but ignore at your peril, water can drip onto the electrics including the ECU and it can kill the car instantly, literally. So make sure the gearbox is ok and that your A8 doesnt give your shoes an internal shine and you have a car that is well worthy of shed status any day of the week.

MadDog1962

890 posts

162 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Now this is what I read SOTW for.

What a wonderful car for just £620!

I love it.

rtz62

3,369 posts

155 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
A friend of mine has had a couple of A8's, the the 3.7 and 4.2.
He always raves about how good they are (indeed, he rated them above the LS400, of which he's owned half a dozen or so.
However, the gearboxes seem to be made of cheese, as not only did his exhibit potentially wallet-busting faults, but every one I enquired about seemed to be being moved on with, ahem, a 'slight gearbox issue, probably needs the gearbox oil changing mate'.
The gearbox oil and filter should be changed every 40k, or thereabouts, as this seems to prevent a lot of the maladies that manifest themselves otherwise.
Sadly, the only way to do it, iirc,, is to get the car up on ramps and remove ththe sump (which holds circa 1.5l of ATF, even when the oil has been drained). Not sure if the subframe has to be removed on poverty models but pretty sure it has to come off on the S8.
Nice shed, but I'm not sure if I would want anything other than a Quattro model to be honest..
Anyhoo, any chance of a pic of Mrs Shed? Appreciate that it may have to be taken by a low-orbit satellite to get all of her voluminous shape on film, or perhaps you could piggy-back 'Google Earth' so we can see, if, in the words of 'The National Express' by The Divine Comedy, (and I paraphrase) 'her arse is the size of a small countryyyyyy' ??