RE: Polaris Slingshot: PH2 Review

RE: Polaris Slingshot: PH2 Review

Wednesday 21st September 2016

Polaris Slingshot: PH2 Review

Impractical, wide and very lairy - PH2 discovers what it is like to live with the oddball Polaris three wheeler...



Polaris is aiming the Slingshot at bikers who want the thrill of two wheels but in a safer package. As PH's two-wheeled correspondent, I'm certainly not ready to give up on bikes, but the Slingshot does intrigue me and so I grabbed the keys to one to see if it really is a vehicle a biker like myself could get some enjoyment from. Around £23,000 of enjoyment...

Although I own a car (of sorts - it's a 2CV) I have never driven anything like the Slingshot and at first it is an unnerving experience. As well as having to deal with it being left-hand drive, the sheer width of the car is terrifying. I can drive a long wheelbase Transit without thinking twice, but the Slingshot really took some concentration. However, once you relax and trust your instincts, the fun begins.

On bikes I like to be a bit silly, ride fast and pull the occasional wheelie. While traffic means that driving the Slingshot fast is challenging (and overtaking is hard due to the left-hand drive) it does do a trick almost as amusing as a wheelie - drifting. With traction and brake control that saves it all going wrong, you can easily drift the Slingshot out of first and second gear bends, which is hysterical. Roundabouts are taken broadside and anytime you pull away in first gear (and an audience is watching) you can leave a huge black line. Legal? Probably not. Fun? Oh yes! As much fun as a wheelie? Less skill is involved, but a good drift is equally satisfying.

Tight squeeze!
Tight squeeze!
Practicality points
Bikes aren't that practical and you aren't going to use a car like this for commuting, but it does at least need to be reasonably usable. On the plus side the Slingshot has a tank range of around 240 miles, the small screen is actually pretty effective (legally you don't need to wear a crash helmet, but I did) and the seat is quite comfortable. I took it to the supermarket and once I squeezed it into a parking spot, I found you could fit a shopping bag in the behind seat compartments. They are lockable, but to be honest, that's just a visual deterrent and could be ripped open in seconds.

Space wise it is limited, but you can easily fit a lid in the compartment so you don't have to walk around carrying it and there is a sturdier lockable glove box with a USB plug. Is it practical? As much as any open top car of this style can be. The clutch is good, turning circle decent and there is a reversing camera. It could certainly do a weekend away, as long as you packed sparingly, so it is a bit more practical than a bike. Although not as good at filtering, and getting stuck in a traffic jam in an open top car like this is a recipe for sunstroke!

How wide is the Slingshot? According to my tape measure it is 2m from wheel outer to wheel outer. My garage door, which I assume is pretty standard, is exactly 2.16m so it's a tight fit but possible. If you brave it, a lot like a cat with its whiskers, once the nose is in the rest follows! Also, as the Slingshot has no doors, you won't suffer an embarrassing 'DeLorean' incident and get trapped inside the car... So where do you park it? In America owners tend to treat Slingshots as utility vehicles and leave them outside. Polaris foresaw this and the car is designed to be jet washable - inside and out. The interior is waterproof (including the stereo) and the floor has drain holes - it's kind of an automotive snowmobile and that explains the plasticky feel of it. In the end I opted to use the tonneau cover to keep my seat free of bird poo. Bikes are considerably easier to tuck away.

One way to make an impression at a track day
One way to make an impression at a track day
Track attack
I'm no car racer, but even my very limited car knowledge (and an A-level in Physics) tells me a four-wheeled track car such as a Caterham will annihilate the Slingshot around a track. Four sticky tyres provide more grip than three, but for a car track day novice (countless bike track days, but Mallory Park was my first time on track with more wheels) such as myself the Slingshot was still fun. For a motorcyclist, the front end grip is staggering and exiting Gerard's at the top of third gear with the rear drifting was proper exciting. Did it beat the buzz of two wheels? Not really, but due to the Slingshot's three wheel design and traction control, I never felt like I was pushing to a point of spinning it where on a feisty four wheeler I could see myself exceeding my talent levels and entering a gravel trap backwards!

When you push the Slingshot too hard the rear breaks free as it has far less grip than the front, at which point it gets caught by the electronics and then it all safely works itself out. Go down the gears too quickly and I reckon it would swap ends, but this is more user error! So yes, the Slingshot is a competent track car, but certainly not the fastest or best. For novices it's fast enough, but the real fun is to be had drifting it out of bends rather than beating lap times. Certainly easier to drive fast than a bike, but not as thrilling.

Expensive, yes, but very good fun
Expensive, yes, but very good fun
Could it replace a bike in your garage?
You would have to fit the Slingshot in the garage in the first place, but even if I could do this I'd not swap for a bike. I get the Slingshot, I really do. It is hysterical to drive, turns heads like nothing else, and is more nervous passenger friendly than a bike. If I had young kids to turn into petrolheads and wanted a weekend toy to enjoy with (one of) them I could see a bike making way for the Slingshot, especially if the PCP plan was favourable. But for me, I'd need it to be right-hand drive at the very least to make it more appealing and ideally a bit narrower too. At £23,000 it is a very expensive weekend toy. But a Ducati 1299 Panigale S costs just £2,000 less and impracticality doesn't seem to have harmed its sales!


POLARIS SLINGSHOT SL
Engine
: 2,384cc 4-cyl
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive by belt
Power (hp): 175@6,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 167@4,700rpm
0-62mph: 6.0sec (est.)
Top speed: 130mph
Weight: 786kg
Price: £22,999

 

 

Author
Discussion

Arsecati

Original Poster:

2,302 posts

117 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
How could this possibly ever be aimed at bikers? It is a 3 wheeler with a steering wheel - it is clearly aimed at affluent car drivers looking for something a bit more (possibly!) exciting for their weekends, but too afraid/not allowed to go all the way to two wheels, as opposed to a biker looking for something safer to 'ride' around in!! It has as much in common with a bike as a Reliant Robin, a Messerschmitt or a Bond Bug: it may well be fun in it's own right, but it is certainly no substitute or alternative to a bike!

I love my cars, and I love my bikes - but these things with 3 wheels? Sorry, but I just don't get them! :/

Speed addicted

5,574 posts

227 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
Why does it take so long for the 0-60?
I'll keep the bike thanks, I think this would be crap for filtering and I'd still get wet in the rain. Worst of both worlds!

MDMA .

8,884 posts

101 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
Speed addicted said:
Why does it take so long for the 0-60?
I'll keep the bike thanks, I think this would be crap for filtering and I'd still get wet in the rain. Worst of both worlds!
Its only about 222bhp per tonne. Not that great really. More a reverse trike, which were slow and not that practical too. Bit of a gadget really.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
Having seen it in the Flesh a couple of times, it's a little basic. It weighs a stload as well.

Matt UK

17,688 posts

200 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
I'll take a Caterham all day long.

srob

11,588 posts

238 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
How could this possibly ever be aimed at bikers? It is a 3 wheeler with a steering wheel - it is clearly aimed at affluent car drivers looking for something a bit more (possibly!) exciting for their weekends, but too afraid/not allowed to go all the way to two wheels, as opposed to a biker looking for something safer to 'ride' around in!! It has as much in common with a bike as a Reliant Robin, a Messerschmitt or a Bond Bug: it may well be fun in it's own right, but it is certainly no substitute or alternative to a bike!

I love my cars, and I love my bikes - but these things with 3 wheels? Sorry, but I just don't get them! :/
The history of three wheelers is tied with motorcycles. Back when motorcycles were just a form of transport (instead of toys) the natural progression was motorcycle, add a sidecar when you had a family and buy a three wheeler if you could afford it.

Three wheelers still race alongside (big wheeler) sidecars in historic motorcycle racing. Head to Cadwell Park this weekend and see what a three wheeler at the hands of someone fast can do, the Tuers will no doubt be there with their Morgan that they have over 1000 wins in. It may just change your mind on how cool three wheelers are smile

Adz The Rat

14,043 posts

209 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Ive seen a few of these at the bike place next to work, always wondered how quick they were. I thought they would have been quicker than the stats suggest.

I cant imagine them being a big seller when a Caterham or Ariel will absolutely smash it.

marshall100

1,124 posts

201 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
I get the impression these are selling quite well in America....

Which explains why Polaris have shoe horned a 2.4 litre engine into it, I'm quite familiar with the Polaris range but I've no idea where they've found that engine.

Dave Hedgehog

14,549 posts

204 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
I don't get it, if you want a vehicle like this get a caterham, if you want a more stable bike get a can-am spyder RS-S



Edited by Dave Hedgehog on Thursday 22 September 09:27

smilo996

2,783 posts

170 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
I would rather pay for the extra wheel and buy an Ariel or save money by dropping the extra wheel and buy a motorbike.

No doubt people who like riding quad bikes on the road will love em. Better hurry and set up a dealer in Essex.


marshall100

1,124 posts

201 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
I would rather pay for the extra wheel and buy an Ariel or save money by dropping the extra wheel and buy a motorbike.

No doubt people who like riding quad bikes on the road will love em. Better hurry and set up a dealer in Essex.
Avid quad biker here, but even this is lost on me. Especially at that price tag.

simonrockman

6,849 posts

255 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
What's the difference between a well-dressed man in a Polaris and a badly dressed one in a Caterham?

Attire.



ZesPak

24,427 posts

196 months

Tuesday 6th June 2017
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
How could this possibly ever be aimed at bikers? It is a 3 wheeler with a steering wheel - it is clearly aimed at affluent car drivers looking for something a bit more (possibly!) exciting for their weekends, but too afraid/not allowed to go all the way to two wheels, as opposed to a biker looking for something safer to 'ride' around in!! It has as much in common with a bike as a Reliant Robin, a Messerschmitt or a Bond Bug: it may well be fun in it's own right, but it is certainly no substitute or alternative to a bike!

I love my cars, and I love my bikes - but these things with 3 wheels? Sorry, but I just don't get them! :/
Thread revival.
I'd like to chime in here.
For me, my VFR1200F was being neglected. The main reasons: family expansion and change of address.
I don't take it out for short rides, because frankly it's a hassle with gearing up, which would take me a lot longer than jumping in the car.

So I'm seriously considering this. Here you can actually register it as a car, which would negate the helmet, otherwise, just the helmet.
It's different, I like that. It also attracts about as much attention as cars 10 times the price.
I can jump in it with the kid next to me for a short distance.

For those who think this has no use, it doesn't. It's too wide, too unpractical, too expensive. But it's too much fun.
Just go for a ride. Not just that, but because of the single rear tire it's actually a ton of fun at 60.
I would compare it more to an MX5, but a lot more brutal, less car and more bike.

I know it's the worst of both worlds but I want a convertible and a bike, this'll be both. I don''t need the bike anymore for filtering. I'm still just working out the cost which is eye watering for a toy tbh.