RE: Abarth 124 Spider: Driven

RE: Abarth 124 Spider: Driven

Sunday 2nd October 2016

Abarth 124 Spider: Driven

We liked the standard Fiat 124 Spider as a road car - can the Abarth version cut the mustard on track?



MX-5 or 124? A quick straw poll reveals that most people seem to like the look of the Fiat 124 Spider but prefer the way the naturally-aspirated Mazda MX-5 drives. But what's the score if you have more power on offer?

We've just posted our video review demonstrating how effective an MX-5 with a bit of a power boost from tuner BBR can be. Now it's the turn of the power-enriched, sharper-handling Abarth 124 Spider. For pretty much the same money as the BBR - £29,565 - it's an interesting comparison.

The Abarth starts with a power disadvantage: at 170hp, it's some 30hp shy of the BBR. But then it is making do with a boggo 1.4 MultiAir turbo engine from the Alfa Mito/Giulietta. 170hp isn't even as much as the older 180hp 1.4 T-Jet engine in the 595 Competizione but in the Abarth line-up the Spider ranks beneath the 595. So much for the internal politics; it's now approaching the power levels we've been craving. Does it make use of it properly on the track?


Pushing boundaries
On the outskirts of Turin is a little-known Fiat facility called Orbassano. These days, it's Fiat's safety testing centre but they've opened up the track for us to have a play in the new Abarth 124 Spider. Turns out sleepy Orbassano isn't used much these days. The banked oval has a gritty, gnarly surface that's peppered with bumps. Unnervingly, a pair of nesting herons is disturbed as we approach. A nervous-looking PR man says something about keeping our speed down. This isn't looking promising.

Then Maurizio, the man who looks after Abarth's historic car collection, turns up in Verini's 1975 title-winning Fiat 124 Abarth Rally and starts doing doughnuts. I think we'll be alright.

Stick-on graphics on our car (painted 'Costa Brava 1972 Red' with a matt black bonnet and boot lid) declare it to be a prototype but we're assured it's production-spec in every way.

Having just been to the Abarth factory at nearby Mirafiori, it's been forced home just how much 124 DNA comes from the Mazda MX-5. The base structure is shipped in direct from Hiroshima, before being clothed in Abarth panels in Italy, as well as receiving engine, gearbox, steering, suspension and trim. Sit inside the car and it feels almost pure Mazda, except for the unique seats (rather lovely, if a little unsupportive for track use) and some swathes of Alcantara.


For the record
As soon as I fire the Abarth up, it's clear some genuine petrolheads have been at it. The Record Monza exhaust sounds fantastic - so much more charismatic than the Fiat 124's - and that's just at idle. As the revs rise, so does its fruitiness, while on each gearchange scintillating pops fire out of the back. Few four-cylinder sports cars sound this good.

One really big difference over the MX-5 is the power delivery from the turbo engine. If you're a high-rev fiend, you may well be disappointed, though. The redline is set at 6,600rpm but there's little point in exploring the upper reaches, since most of the torque is well down the rev range. On the road, the performance is diesel car accessible but on track I find myself missing the raw thrill of extracting the max out of the rev range. It's not as if turbo lag is absent, either. Drop much below 2,500rpm and it takes some time for the turbo to spool up again. Carrying speed around the track is a challenge of holding it in the sweet spot of the rev range: not too high, not too low.

For the record, the 170hp and 184b ft figures enable Abarth to claim a top speed of 145mph and 0-62mph in 6.8 seconds. As for the six-speed manual gearbox (don't even think about choosing automatic), it has a superbly sited lever with short shifts, a crisp action and an excellent choice of ratios.


Twist in the tail
It's not just the engine and gearbox ratios that are specific to the Abarth. Compared to the Fiat 124 Spider, the Abarth has tauter Bilstein dampers, stiffer springs, firmer anti-roll bars and extra bracing, as well as unique steering settings and Brembo brakes.

Not that the Abarth feels dramatically different to begin with, even when you flick the Sport toggle in the centre console (the Fiat lacks this button). Sport mode opens up a valve in the exhaust to give it an even fruitier sound, sharpens the throttle response, relaxes the stability control and adds weight to the electric steering. Speaking of which, this is one of the better electric systems we've encountered, being well weighted and progressive in feel.

The real difference is felt when you attack some bends. In contrast to the Fiat 124 Spiderwith its open diff, the Abarth's mechanical differential makes it much feistier on the throttle in corners, enabling you to exploit its extra power as you hit each apex.

My first attempt at provoking the rear end to step sideways does, well, nothing. The front end digs in and the traction control engages understeer mode. I try a bit harder and the rear end starts to break away in a predictable manner, but only when you disengage the traction control do you really get the benefits of the 50/50 weight distribution. Now the 205/45 R17 Bridgestone Potenzas break traction very easily, with slides that are equally straightforward to correct.

The Abarth distinguishes itself from the MX-5 in another area, too: the brakes. Red Brembo four-pot calipers certainly look the part, with the 280mm vented front discs and solid rears working extremely well in such a lightweight car.


Verdict
An extra seven grand on top of a similar-spec Fiat 124 Spider might seem a lot to pay for an extra 30hp. But the Abarth is so much more than a mere power boost: it looks better, sounds better and has by far the best cabin of the MX-5/124 family.

As a track car, the Abarth is certainly loads more fun than the Fiat, thanks to its extra power, firmer suspension and that entertaining limited-slip diff. But in truth, its natural role is not as a circuit tool; while the Fiat 124's body roll has been reined in, there's insufficient power to exploit things to the max. The Abarth feels like it's more suited to tussling with German grand tourers like the Audi TT, BMW Z4 and Mercedes SLC.

Just how well does it compare with these machines and its Mazda twin on UK roads, though? We'll be finding out soon enough...


ABARTH 124 SPIDER
Engine
: 1,368cc, 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 170@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 184@2,500rpm
0-62mph: 6.8sec
Top speed: 144mph
Weight: 1,060kg
MPG: 44.1 (official figure, NEDC combined)
CO2: 148g/km (official figure)
Price: £29,565 (before options)

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,475 posts

218 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Saw one of these for the first time (a non-Abarth) yesterday - they're not the prettiest thing in the metal. Nevertheless this Abarth definitely sounds interesting...

Vroom101

828 posts

133 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Hmmm...this versus the Mazda BBR200? I think my money would be going to BBR. An N/A engine just seems to suit the idea of a sports car/roadster (depending on your definition) so much more than a force induction motor.

ecsrobin

17,117 posts

165 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
I prefer the more aggressive looks compared to an mx5 however having picked up an Abarth 595 yesterday it's slightly puzzling that I have more power and a better 0-60 why they didn't fit that I'm not so sure, however numerous companies do a piggyback ECU so should be a similar fit which for £350 should bring it to around the 200bhp mark.

Conscript

1,378 posts

121 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
Saw one of these for the first time (a non-Abarth) yesterday - they're not the prettiest thing in the metal. Nevertheless this Abarth definitely sounds interesting...
Funnily enough so did I and I thought the opposite; looked better in the flesh than it did in pictures.

Mikeado

8 posts

128 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Realistically, how hard/costly would it be to get the engine up to the 190hp spec seen in the 695 Biposto?

will-w

252 posts

201 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Same engine and turbo as used in the now ex-Abarth Punto Evo and that was 180ps

The Evo was extremely difficult to tune; without swapping the turbo you could expect to achieve 190ps-200ps but no more, certainly not reliably anyway.

I hope this one isn't plagued with the numerous Multiair unit failures that the engine suffered from, in all markets... It is supposed to have the 'Multiair 2' engine which is more reliable, which is baffling as when you get part numbers they are largely the same!

Time will tell :-)

will-w

252 posts

201 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Incidentally; I was lucky enough to test drive one of these on Saturday (Thanks Thames Abarth!) and found it a bit of a letdown..

My car had 24 miles on the clock before I set off, so maybe it needs some extra mileage before it 'comes alive'?

irocfan

40,429 posts

190 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
really like the look - however not at all convinced by the diddy engine and lack of oomph... In all honesty I'd rather have the original yellow and red 124 shown accompanying its younger cousin in the pics above.

Pooh

3,692 posts

253 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
will-w said:
My car had 24 miles on the clock before I set off, so maybe it needs some extra mileage before it 'comes alive'?
The 170 Multiair needs a lot of miles and Shell Vpower to give its best, they are pretty rubbish when new but by 50k miles the engine in my Giulietta was brilliant, smooth, free revving and it pulled hard all the way from sub 2k revs to the red line.
It is a pity that so many road tests will not give a true representation of this engine due to the fact that they have done very low miles.
I would definitely have one of these in preference to the Mazda and I normally prefer n/a engines.

TaylotS2K

1,964 posts

207 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Not a fan of it. In Abarth guise either. Looks like a council estate DIY black bonnet and boot job to me.

Pooh

3,692 posts

253 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
TaylotS2K said:
Not a fan of it. In Abarth guise either. Looks like a council estate DIY black bonnet and boot job to me.
That is optional and harks back to the old 124 rally cars.

Esceptico

7,463 posts

109 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Why bring along an original Abarth Rally? So much better looking than the new car. I strongly suspect it would be more fun to drive too.

Mafioso

2,349 posts

214 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Think I'll stick to my MX5 thanks.

Trap

173 posts

185 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
I prefer the more aggressive looks compared to an mx5 however having picked up an Abarth 595 yesterday it's slightly puzzling that I have more power and a better 0-60 why they didn't fit that I'm not so sure, however numerous companies do a piggyback ECU so should be a similar fit which for £350 should bring it to around the 200bhp mark.
My guess is so they can charge more for a 190bhp essesse version and then even more later on in the cars life cycle for a 200+bhp Biposto with a load of carbon thrown at it. A Biposto version of one of these would be lovely, way more than I'd ever want to spend on it but still lovely.

ecsrobin

17,117 posts

165 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Pooh said:
TaylotS2K said:
Not a fan of it. In Abarth guise either. Looks like a council estate DIY black bonnet and boot job to me.
That is optional and harks back to the old 124 rally cars.
It's for anti glare from the rally days, but agreed it doesn't look great.

BFleming

3,605 posts

143 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Conscript said:
sidesauce said:
Saw one of these for the first time (a non-Abarth) yesterday - they're not the prettiest thing in the metal. Nevertheless this Abarth definitely sounds interesting...
Funnily enough so did I and I thought the opposite; looked better in the flesh than it did in pictures.
I saw a non-Abarth one at Lake Garda 7 weeks ago, and front-on, from distance I was saying 'F-Type?'. Then it got closer & the penny dropped. I'm a huge Fiat fan, but from every angle other than the front, this still screams MX5. So it makes me wonder what sort of reclad it is when they seem to have put all their resources into the front, and looked at the Mazda brochure (or deeper in the delivery crate) for the rest.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

183 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Reminds me of a shrunken one of these for some reason;


Pereldh

540 posts

112 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Looks so much better than that dreaded MX5.

Plus - with a turbo engine there's always the option of simple, cheap power hikes. Fiat engines usually takes lots of beating too.

BVB

1,102 posts

153 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Very nice looking car. Saw one in white with black bonnet and boot yesterday. It was turning plenty of heads.

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
It's certainly growing on me. I struggle with the design of the MX5. I thought the Mk3 was a real step in the right direction but the new one doesn't gel with its small proportions but angular panels..