RE: Honda NSX: You Know You Want To

RE: Honda NSX: You Know You Want To

Tuesday 25th October 2016

Honda NSX: You Know You Want To

Would you be brave enough to buy a cheap, leggy supercar? What about one with a Honda badge?



Miles. How many do you look for in a car? "As few as possible, of course," is the usual response, but certain seasoned PHers would beg to differ. Cars, they contend, are rather like old boots: the more you use them, the better they get.

Formula Red and manual? Perfect spec!
Formula Red and manual? Perfect spec!
The flapping soles on the feet of your humble correspondent suggest that that isn't a metaphor which works particularly well, but the point is that the commonly-held belief in fewer miles being better is not one that is universally endorsed. Low-mile cars can stagnate and fester, or so runs the logic, while their leggier brethren enjoy the benefits of more regular maintenance and frequent exercise.

Certainly, it's a line of thinking espoused by the current owner of SG54, the 250,000-mile Lamborghini Murcielago we updated you on last week. And that reminder that supercars can do big miles - sometimes - sent us scurrying off to the classifieds.

There's a fair choice of impressively-miled fodder for sale at the moment. Like this Porsche964 Carrera 2, whose mileage is in fact debatable, with two separate figures listed in the (decidedly curt) advert. Or this marvellously leggy Aston Martin DB6; "call me and ask for Parker" is the best ending to an advert for such a car it's possible to have, surely. Then there's this rather appealing Imola Red E39 M5; it's tempting to wonder exactly how much its 186,000 miles have cost its various owners in fuel bills throughout its life.

But the most eye-catching of the lot is this Honda NSX, boasting a comparatively fresh-faced 178,000 miles. Partly because such hype has been built up around the new one in recent years, but also because this classic example is on sale for £10,000 less than a similar car from the same dealer with a more reasonable mileage. Quite a saving, then.

Will you be taking it to 200,000?
Will you be taking it to 200,000?
Said seller isn't afraid of a little lyrical prose in his adverts, though at least his Soichiro Honda quotes make a refreshing change from the usual "L@@K, YOU'LL FIND NONE BETTER, FIRST TO SEE WILL BUY".

What's more, this example looks like a real bargain. Endowed with a full service history that shows a relatively recent cambelt change, it's a manual example in the "right" colour, and certainly has the appearance of a car that's been cherished. Moreover, with Honda's reputation for building cars that will go on forever, it should... well, go on forever.

What it comes down to really, then, is whether you trust that reputation to extend to the company's high-tech Ferrari rival. Given that we've heard good noises coming from several high-mile NSX owners, it seems that shouldn't be an issue. And at this price, with values climbing, it's a deal that's - probably - too good to be missed. Especially if you happen to believe a six-figure mileage is a beautiful thing.


HONDA NSX
Price:
£28,000
Why you should: It's one of the cheapest manual NSXs you'll find
Why you shouldn't: It's also one of the leggiest

See the advert here.



 

Author
Discussion

MikeGoodwin

Original Poster:

3,338 posts

117 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Got to be worth a punt for that price

V8 FOU

2,973 posts

147 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Hmmmm.

There are 2 on Ebay. A '96 low-ish miles at £32K and a really nice '92 at about £25K. No that much of a "bargain".

EFA. Both autos. So perhaps.....

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
I suspect you'd have to budget for a suspension refresh if it hasn't been done recently which would probably eat most of the savings over a lower mileage example. Not much point in owning an NSX with knackered suspension consumables.

The Don of Croy

5,993 posts

159 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
If I ever retire with any cash, that is one car I'd be looking at (rather than an annuity).

Actually any NSX under £35k sounds like a steal (as long as it's roadworthy). To me, anyhow. Although I've never driven one, sat in one, or even followed one down the road. Maybe, one day.

beerexpressman

240 posts

137 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
If it was £23K I'd be tempted...

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
When I was at Ford in the US in the 90s we had a stripped NSX for benchmarking and had the engine in bits. It was a work of art and so much better than anything else I'd seen at the time.

Having said that, they've never really done it for me and only the much later models looked right IMO.

LarJammer

2,237 posts

210 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Some of the US owners have done a lot more miles than this without major issues. Its a shame we are so anti-use when it comes to classics. My NSX is on 89k now and I already have the 100k jitters.

Type R Tom

3,861 posts

149 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Am I miss remembering or did these get as low as £15k at one point if not lower? I seem to remember them being affordable a while ago

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
That engine is still fine I bet. These motors will do more than 300,000 miles without much issue. At most it might need a top end refresh.

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Type R Tom said:
Am I miss remembering or did these get as low as £15k at one point if not lower? I seem to remember them being affordable a while ago
I don't think you could ever get a decent manual for £15k. Maybe an (imported) auto.

LotusOmega375D

7,608 posts

153 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Looks OK to me. Manual and presumably UK supplied. Says FSH too. If any supercar was expected to go on to big miles without major issues, shirley it has to be the Honda NSX?

ali_XFR

385 posts

171 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
In 2009 I had the choice between an (auto) NSX and an X350 XJ V8. Both cars were in the £12-£14k bracket. I picked the Jag. Which I ended up part ex-ing 4 years later for £4K. Boy was that a bad choice! Love them, and have thought twice about flogging the XFR and buying an NSX, but I couldn't run it as a daily.

James Junior

827 posts

157 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
If this is mechanically sound then it has the potential to be the perfect usable NSX. You would be able to drive it as often as you wanted and as Honda intended without concern, unlike a pristine investable example. I seem to recall the old V-Tec engines had a reputation for being capable of going on and on, though not had any first hand experience.

James Junior

827 posts

157 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
LarJammer said:
Some of the US owners have done a lot more miles than this without major issues. Its a shame we are so anti-use when it comes to classics. My NSX is on 89k now and I already have the 100k jitters.

I know what you mean. In the US JDM cars tend to wear much higher mileage without any concern from owners or potential buyers as far as I can see on the Facebook groups I am a member of. Well in excess of 100k for 90s Jap cars seems to be par for the course, often with differnet mileage for the engine and the chassis.

Regarding the 100k jitters, I have a pristine MR2 turbo which is also nearing that magic number - about 97k I think. I felt the (irrational) fear at first but now I am much more relaxed. Once I had resigned myself to the reality that I intent to keep mine until death or destruction I felt much better about it. I intend to drive mine as often as I feel like, mileage, stone chips and wear and tear be damned. smile

TOOMANYMS

43 posts

162 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
"Said seller" 2 articles in a day.

dinkel

26,939 posts

258 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Buy a good one and never look back.

The Boxter when there was no Boxter.

cat with a hat

1,484 posts

118 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Cheap?

They went as low as £15k a few years ago.

Agent XXX

1,248 posts

106 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
I see this one around Brighton a fair bit throughout the year. Lovely to see it being used. This one was taken in Feb this year.



and it can drive on its side too...............biggrinbiggrin

Edited by Agent XXX on Tuesday 25th October 17:44

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Yes they were £15k once, or less, but I'd wager they never will be again even if the bubble bursts on other cars. We will look back in 3 years when this is £40k and wish we had bought it.

All IMHO of course...

Liokault

2,837 posts

214 months

Tuesday 25th October 2016
quotequote all
Talking of bubbles, hight 40s for a million mile , average looking 964!