RE: Honda CRX 1.6i-16: Spotted

RE: Honda CRX 1.6i-16: Spotted

Thursday 24th November 2016

Honda CRX 1.6i-16: Spotted

Always fancied a CR-X? You'd best catch one while you can...



You'll have noticed with increasing incredulity the not-so-slow and steady rise of prices of ... well, just about anything of noteworthy performance or geek appeal from the late 1980s or early 1990s. Like us, you'll probably have thrown your hands up, tutted and muttered under your breath something about the world going mad when you clocked the £200,000Ford Sierra we wrote about the other day.


Isn't it nice, then, to find something fast-ish and fun from that era which has a hint of sanity about its price? The Honda CR-X 1.6i-16 we've unearthed here, for example. Granted, these were once 10-a-penny and available for little more than a few bob, so the £5,495 price tag initially raises a harrumph. But this 52,000-miler is the cheapest in the classifieds, and next to the £7,500 77K example elsewhere, looks a snip.

Pretty, too. Part hot hatch, part coupe, the CR-X presaged the trend for dinky two-doors like the Ford Puma by 15 years. This second-generation version rounded off the original's idiosyncratic angles, and added a funky split rear window, referenced in recent HondaCivics. Squat, hunched and endowed with a chin spoiler of Jimmy Hill proportions, it still looks great today.

But there's substance here, too. The revvy engine doesn't have VTEC - that honour fell to the hotter 1.6iVT version - but it still pushes out 131hp, enough to keep a Peugeot 205 GTI honest. And, as with many small-ish Japanese 16v engines of the time, it sounds fantastic too.


And the CR-X is a lot of fun too. Really push it and it'll start to slip its nose wide - and there isn't the same throttle adjustability that you get in the best hot hatches of the time - but drive more calmly and the CR-X's fundamentally stable, well-sorted chassis shines through. Let's not forget the beautifully screwed-together interior, with its shiny but hard-wearing plastics, or indeed the fact it's a Honda, so with careful maintenance, it'll probably go on forever, no matter how much abuse you throw its way.

There's nothing in the advert to suggest that there's a reason this one's so comparatively cheap. Everything's original, the handbooks are there, and the panels all look pretty straight in the pictures. Of course, your correspondent has been here before with red Japanese sports cars and still carry the emotional scars - so a thorough inspection for rust is imperative before handing over the readies.

If all passed muster, though, we'd jump at the chance to own this little gem. It's a perfect example of that fantastic era of cheap, fun little cars, at a reasonable price and from a manufacturer known for reliability and longevity. What's not to like?


HONDA CR-X 1.6I-16
Engine
: 1,590cc 16v petrol
Transmission: five-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 131@6,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 105@5,700rpm
MPG: 35 (Official average)
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1990
Recorded mileage: 52,000
Price new: £11,650
Yours for: £5,495

See the original advert here

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

Pistachio

Original Poster:

1,116 posts

191 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Yeah its great although I spotted one issue
The front lights are not the same year as the rear lights. The rear lights are from the facelift car that came later
small detail but wonder why


graham22

3,295 posts

206 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
I think it is a facelift, the rubbing strips are not as high but stick out more too, rounded top clock binicle plus it hasn't got the 2 light units in the headlights of the earlier model.

I had a '88 CRX 16i-16 and a '91 16iVT, seat material aside this one is more like my VTEC


But the front wheels on the wrong side .. arrggh.

Edited by graham22 on Thursday 24th November 10:45

Butter Face

30,353 posts

161 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
£5495. Wow.

I mean they're great cars, but no B16 = Not value for money IMO.

The D16 isn't a bad engine, but it's just not got 'it' like the B series!

mp3manager

4,254 posts

197 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
As per usual with the Mk2's, the front wheels are on back to front! nerd

MDMA .

8,910 posts

102 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Pistachio said:
Yeah its great although I spotted one issue
biggest issue would be where it's from. AKA Keighly trade sales etc smile

brrapp

3,701 posts

163 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Back in 1983, one of my friends graduated from Uni and got a job in Silicon Valley in the US. He wanted to take his beloved Mini over but they didn't meet American standards so he did the next best thing and bought one of the first CRXs in the US. I visited soon after and loved to scoot this wee car in and out of the lumbering homegrown American traffic. The Americans just didn't know what to make of it as this tiny(by their standards) car with an engine a third of the size of the average American hurtled it's way round them. Loved it.

Rob175kks

169 posts

153 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
I've had two of these non-vtec CRXs, I really had no mechanical sympathy at the time and neither car ever missed a beat. If i had the money I'd pay £5-6K for a good one now.

I like the non-vtec because its fast enough to be fun (literally drive flat out) and not get into license losing territory.........although they would top out at an indicated 130mph on that long road in mexico we all love using.

JeffC

1,690 posts

213 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
I have a pair of Crx"s , one is a well sorted K20 Cammed on itbs Race car which is unreal and I now have a mint road car which is good fun !

link to the thread here http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

all about the revs !






jamoor

14,506 posts

216 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Wow this dealer is famous for being very very dodgy.


KarlMac

4,480 posts

142 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Its absolutely disgusting that the vendor is still allowed to advertise on PH and receive the additional publicity of this article

kayzee

2,823 posts

182 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
I had one of these years ago. Lovely thing really, enjoyed it a lot! It was my second car after owning a 55bhp Corsa so it felt like it was flying!

The handling in the wet was terrible though (span it out on a roundabout) and the standard brakes were awful. Eventually sold mine for £850 frown

j90gta

563 posts

135 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Allegedly dodgy dealers aside, compared to a hot hatch of the same era this seems to be incredible value. Had a 1.6 205 GTI and followed it with a standard CRX. The Honda was better in every respect.

willfinch36

599 posts

159 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
GF had one when she was 17.

Good value for £1200 and pretty bulletproof - Got so many compliments.


Fastchas

2,650 posts

122 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
kayzee said:
I had one of these years ago. Lovely thing really, enjoyed it a lot! It was my second car after owning a 55bhp Corsa so it felt like it was flying!

The handling in the wet was terrible though (span it out on a roundabout) and the standard brakes were awful. Eventually sold mine for £850 frown
Something wrong with yours, fella... I had three, a '89 model, then a V'Tec '93 (still same shape, not that awful Del Sol) then another '89 model. Brakes were fine, handling great IMO.
Did you 'lift off' in the wet? laugh

R8Steve

4,150 posts

176 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
I had one of these when i was 18, if i'm honest it wasn't that great even back then.

Yazza54

18,561 posts

182 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
I wouldn't buy anything from Motorhub

This is one of many threads online

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=2&a...

Back to the sentiment of the OP - I quite like these, and it would be pretty easy to drop a VTEC B18C4/6 or B16A/B in.

Edited by Yazza54 on Thursday 24th November 16:02

Richard-390a0

2,260 posts

92 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
The decimal point is in the wrong place to my mind but seeing the prices other 80's - 90's (fairly average to my mind) cars are going for why wouldn't you try & sell high!?!.

Toyoda

1,557 posts

101 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
KarlMac said:
Its absolutely disgusting that the vendor is still allowed to advertise on PH and receive the additional publicity of this article
Agreed. PH eds should be screening out this sort of stuff.

joemaxi

21 posts

182 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
last three digits of the regy sum it up for me at that money and no VTEC.

ali_XFR

385 posts

172 months

Thursday 24th November 2016
quotequote all
Had this engine in a Rover 416 GTI back in the day when I first started driving. Would love to have a revvy NASP 4 pot for round town duties now. Remember when I was about 17 a bloke at work had a turquoise VTEC CRX- by heck that thing could shift.