MOTs & Linelocks (no handbrake)

MOTs & Linelocks (no handbrake)

Author
Discussion

fergus

Original Poster:

6,430 posts

276 months

Tuesday 27th December 2005
quotequote all
Quick Question. My caterham does not have a mechanical handbrake, but instead has a linelock which must first have the brake pedal depressed before being turned. This then 'locks' the back wheels. Does anyone know whether an MOT tester is likely to take issue with this? I am under the impression that the vehicle must only have a parking brake (not necesserily a 'hand'brake)?

GreenV8S

30,209 posts

285 months

Tuesday 27th December 2005
quotequote all
It should fail the MOT unless it has a mechanical handbrake; a hydraulic handbrake isn't sufficient.

DollySprintV8

93 posts

223 months

Tuesday 27th December 2005
quotequote all
Hydraulic parking brakes as a sole means of operation are not acceptable on vehicles first used on or after 1 January 1968. However, they may be used to assist the application or release of a mechanical brake.

Having a line lock is a NO NO.
It should not pass anywhere
Stick a proper handbrake on it.

steve_D

13,749 posts

259 months

Wednesday 28th December 2005
quotequote all
As far as the tester is concerned the handbrake has to work as an emergency brake in the event of the main brakes failing.
It is tested at a percentage efficiency relative to the main brakes and the required percentage goes up if you do not have dual circuit brakes.

I believe it is possible for the handbrake to be hydraulic but it must be a completely independent system.

Steve

tr7v8

7,192 posts

229 months

Thursday 29th December 2005
quotequote all
Pretty sure it has to be a mechanical system, hydraulic is a non-starter.
Used to get this prob with rally cars with hydraulic handbrakes in the 70s.
AFAIK its 25% effeciency for cars with single circuit & 16% for dual
circuit.

Jim

DollySprintV8

93 posts

223 months

Friday 6th January 2006
quotequote all
WRONG INFO.
I believe it is possible for the handbrake to be hydraulic but it must be a completely independent system.


MUST BE A MECHANICAL HANDBRAKE.

But there's nothing stopping you running a pair of cables to the rear caliper's or backplate so it look's like the cable doing the job.
But I didn't tell you that.

GreenV8S

30,209 posts

285 months

Friday 6th January 2006
quotequote all
I've heared of people running a brake cable from the hydraulic handbrake lever to the rear pads so that it looks as if it is a mechanical handbrake, and if the tester is totally brain dead and ignores all engineering common sense it might get through the test with the hydraulics doing the work and the brake cable looking like a mechanical brake. But to be honest you really don't want cars like this on the road, the law is there for a good reason and it is stupid to deliberately circumvent it.

fergus

Original Poster:

6,430 posts

276 months

Friday 6th January 2006
quotequote all
however, if you think what the handbrake is used for in *most* circumstances, it is as a parking brake, rather than as an 'emergency' brake. To the best of my knowledge, the MOT tests it as a parking brake, rather than anything else.

To say you don't want a car that hasn't got a specific mechanical h/brake on the road is a bit niaive, as a) the car runs dual circuit brakes, b) there is a gearbox, which, assuming the engine still has some degree of compression should the brakes fail (a fair assumption I think), then there is still 'engine braking' (no I don't want to restart the 10-odd page thread on heal'n'toe on the Porsche forum!)?

thanks for the replies guys. Assuming the tester doesn't like the status quo on the car, then I think the 'mock' mechanical cable based system is the best bet?

GreenV8S

30,209 posts

285 months

Saturday 7th January 2006
quotequote all
fergus said:
I think the 'mock' mechanical cable based system is the best bet?


Surely the 'best' bet would be to fit a standard production caliper with a proper mechanical handbrake? It's not as if you're short of potential donors, every other car in the country uses them ...

DollySprintV8

93 posts

223 months

Saturday 7th January 2006
quotequote all
Only thing I just thought of,

When the Tester is checking the handbrake the reading's must be applied via the handbrake lever and not via a separate lever ETC.

As stated before the best option is to put a proper Handbrake on it,





From the Manual...













The Testers Manual
3.1 Parking Brake Lever Mechanism and Associated Mountings
Information Method of Inspection Reason for rejection
Types of parking brake mechanism
In this sub-section, it is assumed that the parking brake is applied by a hand lever.
For vehicles with foot-operated parking brakes the “Method of Inspection” detailed will need to be varied for the particular mechanism. 1. Check that the vehicle has a parking brake designed to prevent
. at least two wheels from turning, or
. with a three-wheeled vehicle, at least one wheel from turning.

2. Check the method of operation.

1. The vehicle does not have a parking brake designed to prevent
. at least two wheels from turning
.with a three-wheeled vehicle, at least one wheel from turning.

Pre 1906 vehicles
Vehicles certified by the London Science Museum as being designed before 1 January 1905 and constructed before 31 December 1905 do not require a parking brake. 3. Examine the condition of the brake lever and its location.


2. For vehicles first used on or after 1 January 1968 the parking brake is not capable of being maintained in operation by direct mechanical action only.

3. The brake lever is defective or so located that it cannot be operated satisfactorily.

Hydraulic Parking Brakes
Hydraulic parking brakes as a sole means of operation are not acceptable on vehicles first used on or after 1 January 1968. However, they may be used to assist the application or release of a mechanical brake. 4. With the brake lever in the "off" position

a. Check the amount of side play in the lever pivot by moving the lever from side to side.

Note: Some vehicles have sideways movement of the parking brake lever , when new. Movement is a reason for rejection only when
. the pawl is moved clear of the ratchet, and
. the brake does not hold in the 'on' position *

b. check the security of the lever and pawl mechanism pivots, their associated mountings and the presence and effectiveness of retaining and locking devices.

Note: Items not possible to check fully from the driver's seat should be checked from beneath the vehicle.
Opening the bonnet to inspect fully the parking brake mechanism might also be necessary. 3. The brake lever is defective or so located that it cannot be operated satisfactorily.
4.
a. side play in the brake lever pivot to the extent that the pawl may inadvertently disengage

b.the lever or pawl mechanism pivots and their associated mountings are insecure or a locking or retaining device is insecure or missing.


5. Without operating the pawl mechanism, apply the parking brake slowly and check the effective operation of the pawl mechanism by listening for definite and regular clicks as the pawl moves over the ratchet teeth.

6. When the brake is fully applied

a. knock the top and each side of the lever and check that the lever stays in the "on" position

check that the lever is not at the end of its working travel and that there is no fouling of adjacent parts 5. The pawl spring is not pushing the pawl positively into the ratchet teeth or the ratchet has broken, or excessively worn, teeth.
6.
a. when knocked, the lever is not held in the "on" position

b. when the brake is fully applied there is no possibility of further travel of the lever because the lever is

. at the end of its working travel on the ratchet, or
. fouling adjacent parts of the vehicle


c. check that the lever is not impeded in its travel.


7. Check the vehicle structure around the mounting of the parking brake and associated mountings for fractures, cracks, corrosion and distortion.

Note: It may be necessary to check the parking brake lever mounting 'prescribed area' from the vehicle underside when it cannot be checked from the inside.
c. the lever is impeded in its travel.

7. Deliberate modification which significantly reduces the original strength, excessive corrosion, severe distortion, a fracture or an inadequate repair of a load bearing member or its supporting structure or supporting panelling within 30cm of the parking brake mechanism or any associated mounting(s), that is, within a 'prescribed area', see Appendix C.



>> Edited by DollySprintV8 on Saturday 7th January 07:01

350zwelgje

1,820 posts

262 months

Saturday 7th January 2006
quotequote all
What then about the new VW passat that is on sale? It has an electronically operated handbrake! Haven't seen any detailed technical explanation on how it functions, but there is no lever in the interior.... It must comply with UK regulations, and could be worth to investigate if there is a possibility. But agree, that I also thought that only mechanical systems will do, as hydraulic/electrical/magnetic systems can become less and less effective until there is on braking-effect in the end. A handbrake must be able to hold the vehicle for ever (sort of). Trucks use a different method and get a way with that: the brakes are always applied mechanically within the brake itself, and the compressed air releases the them. No airpressure - brakes are on.

Rob

DollySprintV8

93 posts

223 months

Saturday 7th January 2006
quotequote all
Renault also use the electronic brake on the Espace and Scenic range,

I'll have a chat to the VOSA man when he next call's in or we have to ring on another matter.

But the first question was or is about a Hydraulic Hanbrake which is a no no.
Unless it's a World Rally car that's brand new and doesn't need a MOT/.

Avocet

800 posts

256 months

Saturday 7th January 2006
quotequote all
The wording in the Construction and Use regs is 9I think) something along the lines of "maintained in position by purely mechanical means". I think the electric handbrakes work by using a geared electric motor driving some sort of actuator - probably via a worm drive or something with such a low gear ratio that it would be impossible to turn it backwards once the electric motor stopped. Therefore, you could still claim that although the brake was actuated electrically, it was kept in position mechanically.

CombeMarshal

2,030 posts

227 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
I hate the idea of an electric 'Hand brake' how are you suposed to use that safely if you brakes fail??

Avocet

800 posts

256 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Never driven a car with one myself but I'd have thought they would have to be progressive rather than "on" or "off" like a truck.