RE: The Big Healey

Monday 19th June 2006

The Big Healey

With two new Healeys being mooted, Graham Bell drives the original.


Austin-Healey 3000
Austin-Healey 3000

Undoubtedly one of the most iconic sports cars, the ‘Big Healey’ was the brainchild of Cornishman Donald Healey, a man who combined technical know-how with driving ability.

Stylish and fast

Stylish 100mph Healey 100 (above). Austin-Healey 3000 (below)
Stylish 100mph Healey 100 (above). Austin-Healey 3000 (below)
none
none
none
none
none
none

Winner of the first ever RAC rally (in a Triumph) Healey subsequently joined Invicta where he both helped to develop new models and gave it several rally victories, including the 1931 Monte. From there he had a spell with Riley and became technical director at Triumph before setting up the Healey Motor Company in Warwick in 1945.

Healey’s cars were stylish and performed well, the 110mph Elliot model being the world’s fastest four-seater saloon at the time, while his Nash-engined roadster finished a creditable fourth overall at Le Mans in 1950. However, his tiny company could only make cars in small numbers and at a price that made them look expensive against the faster Jaguar XK120.

Jaguar, like MG, was enjoying huge sales success in the US at the time, and Healey knew the only way he could achieve the quantity and price needed to cash in on this lucrative market was in partnership with a big manufacturer. Consequently he approached Austin, who agreed to supply him with the running gear for a new Healey sports car.

Working in secrecy with a small team including his son Geoffrey and stylist Gerry Coker, Healey had his new car ready to debut at the 1952 Earl’s Court Motor Show.

Healey 100

Dubbed the Healey 100 after its target top speed, it was generally unremarkable mechanically, the three-speed with overdrive gearbox (later changed to four-speed with overdrive) and 2,660cc four-cylinder pushrod engine both being sourced from Austin’s A90. The chassis was a box section ladderframe with extra strength provided by integral floorpan and braced bulkhead, while suspension consisted of coils and wishbones front and leaf sprung live axle with Panhard rod at the rear, with drum brakes all round.

What really set the 100 apart was its styling, the low, sleek, modern-looking body with fold-back windsceen making the car look fast even when it was standing still, and the car’s debut caused such a sensation it was literally mobbed as people clamoured to see it.

Seeing an obvious sales winner - and no doubt with thoughts of many Dollars heading his way - Austin boss Leonard Lord struck a deal with Donald Healey that saw the car renamed (and re-badged!) the Austin Healey 100 on the very first day of the show.

The first 20 examples were built in Warwick, after which Austin was ready to start production at its Longbridge factory, and road testers of the day soon discovered that the 100 drove as well as it looked.

Roadholding and handling were regarded as far superior to most cars of the day, with mild understeer progressing to neutral drift under normal circumstances, though the 90bhp from the twin-SU Austin engine was sufficient to get the back out if provoked. It was also sufficient to propel the 940kg roadster to 60mph in just over 11 seconds and on to a top speed slightly in excess of its 100mph target - heady performance back then.

Racing

With Austin dealing with production, Healey and his team were free to concentrate on development and racing, producing special tuned versions that finished well in class at Le Mans in 1953 and gave Sterling Moss 3rd overall at the Sebring 12 hour in 1954.

As a direct result of this, two high performance versions dubbed the 100M and the 100S were produced.

The 100M was essentially a production version of the Le Mans cars offered as a higher performance option alongside the standard model, with anti-roll bars to improve handling and larger SUs and a hotter camshaft raising power to 110bhp. It was visually distinguished from the standard model by a louvred bonnet and – usually - a two-tone paint scheme.

The 100S was more specialised, with aluminium body and sub-structures, Dunlop disc brakes all round and an engine with a special aluminium ‘crossflow’ type head that gave 132bhp and 134mph. Just 55 of these cars were made in 1955, and today they’re worth a small fortune.

1956 saw Donald Healey driving versions of his car in a series of publicity generating record breaking runs, peaking with a 203mph flying mile at Bonneville in a Healey with streamlined bodywork and supercharged engine.

It subsequently transpired that these cars were in fact modified prototypes of the Austin Healey 100-6 launched later that year, which featured a new oval grille and a 2,696cc C-series straight six engine in place of the just discontinued A90 unit.

However, while Healey’s record breaking exploits hinted at great things, the actual production version of the new six-cylinder car proved to be something of a let down.

Not only was it less powerful than the 100M at 102bhp, it was also around 135kg heavier, partly due to the bigger engine and partly due to a two-inch increase in wheelbase to accommodate a couple of ‘occasional’ rear seats. Naturally this did nothing for the performance, the car still capable of topping the ton but taking around three seconds longer to reach 60mph.

In 1957 Healey production was moved from Longbridge to Abingdon and the asthmatic engine benefited from a new cylinder head and other breathing improvements that upped power to 117bhp, bringing a welcome improvement in performance. Abingdon production also saw the re-introduction of the two-seater Healey, the ‘BN6’ being produced alongside the 2+2 ‘BN4’ that sold in slightly larger quantities.

The Big Healey

Then in 1959 came a capacity hike to 2,912cc that led to the arrival of the definitive ‘Big Healey’ - the 3000.

The MkI 3000 produced 124bhp and 167lb ft, did 0-60 in 11.4 seconds and 114mph, saw the introduction of disc brakes on the front and provided the British Motor Corporation with the basis for a formidable if seemingly unlikely rally weapon.

It first grabbed the rally world’s attention in 1960 when Pat Moss (Sterling’s sister) and Anne Wisdom won the notoriously tough Liege-Rome-Liege event and it went on remain a rally frontrunner into the mid-sixties. Towards the end the works cars were producing over 200bhp, which on what were effectively normal 1960s road tyres must have made driving along snow-covered special stages in the dark a rather focusing experience!

The road cars too continued to develop, and with the MkII launched in 1961 the Healey gained the luxury of wind-up windows and a new folding hood that could be erected in seconds rather than minutes. The MkII also saw the end of the two-seater big Healey, with only 355 MkII BN7s produced.

For the final MkIII version launched in 1964 power was up to 148bhp, producing 0-60mph in 9.8 seconds and 122mph despite weight having grown to 23cwt (1,168kg). By that time, although the Austin Healey’s looks were as attractive as ever, its once outstanding chassis dynamics were looking decidedly outdated against newer sports cars like the E-Type and Elan.

The Austin Healey was killed off by British Leyland in 1968 after around 72,000 had been made (95 per cent going abroad, mostly to the USA) but the Healey legend lives on and these days it’s probably the most coveted classic British sports car after the Cobra and E-Type.

And it’s easy to see why when you drive one.

Driving the 3000

Admittedly the brakes are poor by modern standards and the cam and peg steering feels vague compared to rack and pinion, but the archaic suspension gives impressively flat cornering while the torquey long-stroke six still provides enough grunt to overtake A-road traffic and produces a wonderful roar under load.

A modern two-litre saloon might be capable of getting you from A to B just as quickly and in greater comfort, but on a sunny day in a Healey with the top down you’ll get there in more style – and with a smile on your face.

So what about a ‘new Healey’ that combines the charisma of the original with modern sports car dynamics?

Well, it’s been done once already. There was an attempt in the mid-eighties to revive the Healey Motor Company and its most famous car with the involvement of Geoffrey Healey. Unfortunately he died before things could be finalised so the new ‘Big Healey’ was made without official Healey involvement under the banner of HMC.

Dubbed the MkIV, the HMC reproduced the Healey’s classic styling in GRP, but underneath it was all new, with a TVR-style tubular backbone chassis, all-round independent suspension with disc brakes and a fuel injected Rover V8. As with the Austin Healey, most went abroad (it was sold exclusively in Germany until 1995) with production only ending quite recently when HMC went out of business.

So how will the two cars currently being touted fare? Obviously only time will tell, but the prospect of a ‘new Healey’ is something to be welcomed by any sports car enthusiast.

Thanks to The Open Road classic car hire for the use of its Austin Healey 3000 MkIIA.

Links

Related stories:

© Copyright Graham Bell 2006

Author
Discussion

dinkel

Original Poster:

26,947 posts

258 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Nice one Graham

3000






100




Classic shape . . . recently a 3000 couldn't keep up with our TR4

DJC

23,563 posts

236 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Mmmmm a 100S.

I cant be the only person on here who lusts after an S ?
What's with this "archaic" suspension lark aswell? It's called ride quality, something modern cars have forgotten about.

scaryx50

78 posts

219 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
I've just got back from a 650 mile roundtrip to Le Mans in my Mk111 3000 and it is soooo much fun. I think quite a few moderns were suitably impressed, especially as I have the "continental performance pack" (it's a left hooker!)

jagdpanther

19,633 posts

219 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Hmmmm one of my all time faves

Pigeon

18,535 posts

246 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
I think they're great, they've got all the right ingredients - simple sturdy British construction, weight inside the wheelbase, straight sixes (after a bit), two seats, no roof, driver's arse just ahead of the rear axle. And lighter than you might expect. I do find myself somewhat disappointed by the woefully "cooking" state of tune of the engines, straight out of the big Austin saloons - but that's a bit niggly, and it's easily rectified.
DJC said:
What's with this "archaic" suspension lark aswell? It's called ride quality, something modern cars have forgotten about.

Yes, calling down a double-wishbone front end seems distinctly daft to me. Even the live rear axle gets plus marks for having a Panhard rod.

(Though they do often look as if the rear springs have broken and the engine has been taken out )

dinkel

Original Poster:

26,947 posts

258 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Yeah, what about that 'new' Healey?

FestivAli

1,088 posts

238 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
3000 used a truck engine, which explains it robustness and nice torque. Low exhaust that would scrape on speed bumps or under hard accelleration? Fantastic looking car (the 3000, not so keen on the windscreen of the 100) appreciating in value. Would love to drive one in good nick.

Ali.

AJAX50

418 posts

240 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
I've just done the Le Mans trip in my 1965 3000Mk2. It has the last works rally spec. (205 bhp) engine, I have to say 2litre modern cars were despatched with ease, they do weigh only a tonne. Breaking is first class, very large front discs and big drums on the rear, provided the suspension has been maintained they stop well in a straight line. Great cars, if properly looked after they can still be driven hard and safely. Problem is a lot of cars have had 10 years of care and 30 years of neglect, also many are kept just for looks not for use.

shadowfax

1,103 posts

241 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Thought the text was unrelated to the title. Lots of cut & paste with two paras near the end about the driving experince.

vts_saxo

260 posts

215 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
I think the healey is one of the best looking british sports cars.

Edited by deuchars on Tuesday 30th May 21:11

grahambell

2,718 posts

275 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
shadowfax said:
Lots of cut & paste.


I'm not standing for that. Every paragraph in that piece was written by me, so I reckon you owe me an apology.

Agree the title doesn't match but that seems to have got changed somewhere along the line. Was originally 'looks at the original' rather than 'drives' as it's clearly about the model's history.

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

248 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
I have to say that if we didn't have a Griff, I'd be tempted by the Sebrings' take on the Big Healey.

shadowfax

1,103 posts

241 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
grahambell said:
shadowfax said:
Lots of cut & paste.


I'm not standing for that. Every paragraph in that piece was written by me, so I reckon you owe me an apology.

Agree the title doesn't match but that seems to have got changed somewhere along the line. Was originally 'looks at the original' rather than 'drives' as it's clearly about the model's history.



Graham, please accept my apologies. Nice read. Always loved the look of that car, though I've yet to even hear one, yet alone drive.

Please cut 'cut & paste' & insert 'general information'. So, it's Ted or the sub editor's fault for the misleading title?!

richb

51,573 posts

284 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
My brother's example...

grahambell

2,718 posts

275 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
shadowfax. said:


Graham, please accept my apologies.



Apology accepted sir.

dinkel

Original Poster:

26,947 posts

258 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
grahambell said:
The Austin Healey was killed off by British Leyland in 1968 after around 72,000 had been made (95 per cent going abroad, mostly to the USA) but the Healey legend lives on and these days it’s probably the most coveted classic British sports car after the Cobra and E-Type.


TR6 / TR250?

Cobra and E are in a different price-bracket . . . although a well-sorted H does pretty well these days.

tvrgaas

1,460 posts

270 months

Friday 23rd June 2006
quotequote all
I thought Jensen built the bodies, not Austin of England.

summit7

652 posts

229 months

Sunday 25th June 2006
quotequote all
Had some time in Pat Moss's Alpine car - truly assalted the senses on noise/smell/vibration/heat and some stunning straight line speed for an older car. Great looking car before too much chrome was put on it on the mk3. Massive torque the very antithesis of modern sportscars ala Honda but so ballsy. Different class to TR's as quoted in previous comments. Would definately have a place in my ultimate garage. A design classic ranked up there with early E type coupe and Ace before the Yanks bastardised the shape into the Cobra.

grahamw48

9,944 posts

238 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all

I so much wanted one as a schoolboy, and they still look gorgeous.