RE: BMW Z4M Roadster

RE: BMW Z4M Roadster

Thursday 6th July 2006

BMW Z4M Roadster

Is the Z4M Roadster better than its predecessor? Nick Hall reports on the muscular rag-top.


BMW Z4M Roadster
BMW Z4M Roadster

The Z4 was a welcome injection of masculinity after the androgynous Z3, and personally the M version of the hardcore roadster was one of those cars I have been gagging for ever since a 2,000-mile jaunt round Germany in the 3-litre two years ago.

The opportunity to jump behind the driver’s seat of the drop top finally came at Millbrook Proving Ground, thanks to an invite from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT). Was it worth the wait? Hell yeah...

Z4M: an animal

none
none
none

Now this muscular roadster was always at the sporting end of the scale: sacrificing comfort for cornering speed, so to justify the extra cost and mark itself far enough apart from the muscular Z4, the M Roadster had to be an animal.

And it is, which comes as no surprise when you consider how much of the great M3 has given itself to the cause, in a final package that weighs even less.

There’s not much room inside, but there’s enough, the seats are comfortable, boot space huge and the roof raises at the touch of a button to cope with the changeable British weather. If there aren’t any kids to consider this could be a stylish daily driver.

The 338bhp engine gets the 1485kg M Roadster to 60 mph in around five seconds. Torque peaks at 269lb-ft at 4,900 rpm, but the engine is already making 80 per cent of that by 2,000 rpm, and it's one of the finest engines in the civilised world.

Aggressive wasp

This is the swansong for this 3.2-litre in-line six, as the next generation M3 will have a bigger V8. While it will certainly have more power, it’s hard to see how the new powerplant will top this one for pure character.

It responds to high revs and comes alive as the red rev counter homes in on the 8,000rpm redline. It’s an aggressive buzzing wasp of an engine compared to a lazier, unstressed bumblebee V8, and will it’s one of those cars that’s just begging to be driven hard.

The stressed, angry exhaust note sounds fantastic in an M3’s closed body. Here, with the roof off and nothing but wind between ears and those four exit pipes,, the noise is  borderline sexual.

It’s all controlled thanks to the M3’s differential and reworked ZF Manual box that requires just the right amount of shove to snick into the next gear.

There is no SMG option and that’s somehow fitting, the Z4M feels like a brutal, old school muscle car and there’s no place for the semi-automatic technology here.

Visceral pleasure

There’s a visceral pleasure in shoving the clutch, and unleashing the next wave of acceleration as part of a fluid mechanical process. This is an involving drive in a way the higher tech M cars can’t hope to match.

At pretty much every given opportunity, the Z4M proudly takes the driver’s option, from rock solid suspension, to instantaneous throttle response, to loud yet devastatingly effective brakes.

Even the base car took a kicking for its solid ride, and as this one sits 10mm lower on stiffer springs it won’t be for everyone. It relates every ripple and piece of paint on the road, but if you can live with that constant interaction then the rewards will far outweigh the pain.

It does seem too solid for broken roads, and given a chance it could literally shake itself offline, but then that’s where diligence and self-preservation kick in and you slow down. And we have all lived with cars that are even more reticent in the wrong conditions to soak up those moments when the right ribbon of tarmac unravelled before our eyes.

The Z4M wasn’t designed for British B-roads, either, although it copes with them perfectly well. It was designed for glass-smooth highways and high-speed sweeping bend, where its balance and composure are impeccable. This was a sports car designed for German and American roads, which don’t seem to suffer from potholes the size of small villages. That’s our problem, not theirs.

In the twisties, this car is nose heavy, and so will slip into gentle understeer at the first sign of trouble, And that is a good thing when the limit comes all of a sudden in the middle of a tightening right-hander. With two levels of traction control, it will also solve the problem before it becomes one by applying the brakes to individual wheels.

Switch all the electronics off and it can be muscled through corners, the natural understeer is easily balanced out with a quick slide of the tail and you can lean on the M3-sourced differential to hold the Z4M at a lurid angle – if you’re that way inclined.

A manly experience

Now the Z4M doesn’t have the composure or even outright cornering speed of its nearest competition, Porsche’s Boxster S, but it’s more fun and a much more manly experience.

In fact both cars are diametrically opposed. The Porsche is all about momentum and apex speed, this car is slow in, and fast out. It’s at its best powering through the corner at an angle with a whiff of smoke from those rear ContiSportContacts.

To drive a car well over the ragged edge into the realms over oversteer, car needs to be keyed into asphalt, and the BMW isn’t completely without fault here. Yes it hugs the tarmac in obsessive fashion, but you don’t want to turn in hard on the stoppers, which can limit truly fast progress on an unfamiliar road, as it can pitch into the bend leaving the electronics to sort out a significant mess.

And the steering lacks that nth degree of feel on offer in the Porsche, too. But if you’ve got the car slowed before the bend then you can lean on the electronics, diff and nose heavy stance all the way through the corner at any number of angles. This is a natural show-offs car and has been built for entertainment value as much as speed on the stopwatch.

As for the brakes, the discs and pads themselves are devastatingly effective. They’re loud and hardcore, but they’re unlikely to fade during even the hardest road use, as they were initially designed for the CSL that still gets talked about in such reverential tones.

Tyre smoke

BMW could have been forgiven for producing a softer Z4M to build on the sale success of the last roadster. Instead it has given us a lesson in brutality and tyre smoke, and they should be applauded for that.

It’s a completely different driving experience to the Porsche Boxster S, and £4,000 more expensive. But it you like your thrills on the visceral side, this is the one you have to get.

Author
Discussion

r988

Original Poster:

7,495 posts

229 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
I was under the impression the CSL brakes weren't all that great and in fact were probably the biggest weakpoint of the car.

ghiblicup

605 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
They are good brakes for road use, stopping the CSL at 100mph in 3.95 sec! Its on the track (what the CSL was built for) that they are lacking. Fading and grumbling all over the place.









Dr S

4,997 posts

226 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
thanks BMW for building a car for drivers and not only for posers. A little madness a day keeps the psychatrist away...


Edited by Dr S on Thursday 6th July 14:19

zoe

44 posts

230 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
Off topic slightly - did Nick Hall used to write for CCC magazine (I think it had a name change since?)

Z

r988

Original Poster:

7,495 posts

229 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
zoe said:
Off topic slightly - did Nick Hall used to write for CCC magazine (I think it had a name change since?)

Z


Check his website
www.nickhall.net/

trackdemon

12,185 posts

261 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
Had the pleasure of piloting an M roadster on Sunday and it was great fun - a little too much understeer initially but turn in on the brakes and hard on the gas gets the tail sliding into huge, lurid - and highly controllable - smoky powerslides. Excellent!! Didn't actually feel terribly quick beyond 130mph though...

munky

5,328 posts

248 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
r988 said:
zoe said:
Off topic slightly - did Nick Hall used to write for CCC magazine (I think it had a name change since?)

Z


Check his website
www.nickhall.net/


website said:

I enjoy a strong relationship with manufacturers

Is that another way of saying he'll never say a car is rubbish, even if it is?

broccers

3,236 posts

253 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
Must say I wasnt impressed with the loan of one for 24 hours.

Nice noise thats about it.

dinkel

26,942 posts

258 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
Z4M is the man, Boxter is the woman . . . love that car.

Putting a V8 in the next gen is stupid.

DoctorD

1,542 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th July 2006
quotequote all
trackdemon said:
Had the pleasure of piloting an M roadster on Sunday and it was great fun - a little too much understeer initially but turn in on the brakes and hard on the gas gets the tail sliding into huge, lurid - and highly controllable - smoky powerslides. Excellent!! Didn't actually feel terribly quick beyond 130mph though...


When we drove the Z4M against the Boxster S (in EVO 091) I had the Z4M up to just under 170mph along the main straight at the Nurburgring. It seemed plenty quick enough (particularly since there was ice lining the circuit at the time...). Brakes were actually not bad on the circuit, certainly better than they were on my CSL so perhaps they have updated the pad material used. CSL brakes with Pagid RS19s are in a whole different ball park from the ones BMW fit as standard.

p.s. I had the pleasure of driving the Z4M Coupe last week (and then buying one) and it's a decent step forward in dynamics and fun from the Roadster (which is more of the GT car by comparison). Much better turn-in and greater agility and security when pressing on. The steering rack is higher geared, the diff is reprogrammed to increase turn-in and the chassis is set-up for the more experience driver.

Edited by DoctorD on Thursday 6th July 20:28

Harry Flashman

19,349 posts

242 months

Friday 7th July 2006
quotequote all
My friend has one, and it is awesome. It's a brute of a car that, frankly, seems to struggle with its weight and inherent understeer; it just doesn't change direction like a Boxster (even the old one) - but I would far rather have the Z4M. It just seems built for showboating - it's sort of like a big engined TVR without the flimsiness and murderous on-limit handling traits. I'd have one over pretty much anything else out there at the price point - it was just so much fun!

jvaughan

6,025 posts

283 months

Friday 7th July 2006
quotequote all
dinkel said:
Z4M is the man, Boxter is the woman . . . love that car.

Putting a V8 in the next gen is stupid.


isnt that what TVR did ?

Take a plainold sports car and whack a V8 in it

Richards 7

124 posts

214 months

Friday 7th July 2006
quotequote all
Handling not as good as the Porker, quite expensive and looks like a hairdressers car. Yuk!!! I'd rather walk.

There thats the cat released where are the pigeons???

targarama

14,635 posts

283 months

Saturday 8th July 2006
quotequote all
Why oh why didn't BMW provide a bit more cabin space? Even after making this mistake with the Z3. Germans are a big bunch so they must be missing a big chunk of potential buyers. I don't fit. Pity as Sytner Wycombe have 3-4 Convertibles on the forecourt and I'd be driving one by now if there was enough leg room.

225

1,331 posts

226 months

Saturday 8th July 2006
quotequote all
Had a good nose round one today and got myself settled in the driving seat for a while, nice place to be.

gwatson

2,503 posts

241 months

Saturday 8th July 2006
quotequote all
targarama,

The Z4 is much bigger inside than the Z3, in fact the whole car is much bigger. Now a S2000 or MX5 has a small cabin.

G

ghiblicup

605 posts

214 months

Saturday 8th July 2006
quotequote all
I'm 6'3 and fit in a z4 fine not cramped at all

richycsl

3,739 posts

217 months

Saturday 8th July 2006
quotequote all
It must be nice roof down being able to hear that engine, specially if there was some kind of sport exhaust fitted to it.

DoctorD

1,542 posts

256 months

Sunday 9th July 2006
quotequote all
richycsl said:
It must be nice roof down being able to hear that engine, specially if there was some kind of sport exhaust fitted to it.


My Alpina Roadster that I will be selling (hint, hint) sounds exactly like a Porsche 911 from outside, so with the top down it sounds even better. Shame I'm not really a roadster type of person otherwise I wouldn't be changing it.

The Z4M sounds comparatively boomy at low revs (so the Alpina sounds purer and more appealing) but the Z4M sounds great once it revs up with an energetic fizzy rasp. It sounds nothing like an M3, so no 'chainsaw' sound and also makes a deeper noise.

One of the surprising sensations when driving a Z4M for anyone that has any experience of the E46 M3, is how BMW made it sound so much better and yet smoother when fitted to the Z4.

Edited by DoctorD on Sunday 9th July 16:15

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

252 months

Sunday 9th July 2006
quotequote all
ghiblicup said:
I'm 6'3 and fit in a z4 fine not cramped at all


I'm 6ft6 and find LOADS of room in the Z4.....couldnt even get in a Z3 let alone drive it!