That plane/conveyor problem - filmed solution

That plane/conveyor problem - filmed solution

Author
Discussion

GingerNinja

Original Poster:

3,961 posts

258 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all

For those who still can't see that the plane will take off, someone's made a film to prove the point that it would......

http://videos.streetfire.net/player.a

Apologies if this was shown before.

MTv Dave

2,101 posts

256 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
How's that prove it would take off?

bigjimmy

3,123 posts

240 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
All I'm getting is a gray screen.

ahonen

5,016 posts

279 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
MTv Dave said:
How's that prove it would take off?


Dear god, please, not again. banghead

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

216 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
hehe

I hope someone comes and links to the last mass discussion on this.

Lurking Lawyer

4,534 posts

225 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Can someone please take off and nuke from orbit the server containing that linked video please? It's the only way to be sure.

beyond rational

3,524 posts

215 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
I much prefered the science in this explanation:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZGdUAiMcPs

Repost i know.

Brink

1,505 posts

208 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Sorry, but that is just pure bollux.

3200gt

2,727 posts

224 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Flight is to do with airspeed over/under the wing and nowt to do with relative ground speed. So that is as you say pure bol**x.

MTv Dave

2,101 posts

256 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
ahonen said:
MTv Dave said:
How's that prove it would take off?


Dear god, please, not again. banghead


Please don't blame me, I thought it'd be locked already!

Brink

1,505 posts

208 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
After some thought, I reckon GingerNinja must really be pulling our legs. Sure he doesn't really believe that bollux?

Do you?

dilbert

7,741 posts

231 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Come on people everybody knows that the purest source of bollux is the great TB. That wasn't TB, so I'm 52% sure that that video wasn't pure bollux.

hehe

mark r skinner

16,744 posts

217 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Brink said:
Sorry, but that is just pure bollux.
confused The video ? The post ? The plane/conveyor interface ?

ehyouwhat

4,606 posts

218 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

We all know the plane would take off anyway

paulie-mafia

3,321 posts

223 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
That skateboard / fan set-up bears no relation to the plane scenario. The skateboard doesn't have wings or anything to give it lift and the guy tugging the paper from underneath it is doing so in an inacurate manner that doesn't exactly match the opposing force of the fan / skateboard as it needs to.

teacher

GingerNinja

Original Poster:

3,961 posts

258 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
paulie-mafia said:
That skateboard / fan set-up bears no relation to the plane scenario. The skateboard doesn't have wings or anything to give it lift and the guy tugging the paper from underneath it is doing so in an inacurate manner that doesn't exactly match the opposing force of the fan / skateboard as it needs to.

teacher


Must......resist........urge......to.......respond

mini_ralf

7,035 posts

217 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
It'll never work. I was always told that it's airspeed over the wings that generates lift.. Simply moving something rapidly under the plane won't make the air move faster over the wings... Or have I really got the wrong end of the stick?
confused

Graham@Reading

26,553 posts

225 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Oh ....

Davi

17,153 posts

220 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
oh dear, was that my will to live that just fell out my nose?

bobthemonkey

3,837 posts

216 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
mini_ralf said:
It'll never work. I was always told that it's airspeed over the wings that generates lift.. Simply moving something rapidly under the plane won't make the air move faster over the wings... Or have I really got the wrong end of the stick?
confused


A lot depends (we think-Asked hung-over engineers and physicists) on t/w ratio's. if the t/w>1 then the plane should ake off without an lift, at t/w<1 lift is needed to achieve flight. Look at it like this two identical planes A (t/w>1) and B(t/w>1). Point them so they are facing vertically upwards. A will go up, B will not. Assuming (and its a big assuption) the conveyer belt acts in a way to prevent air moving over the wing (ie the plane is stationary) A will take off, B will not. nerd