RE: Tamora Demo

Thursday 25th October 2001

TVR Tamora

We get our grubby mits on the newest TVR


Author
Discussion

leatheradams

Original Poster:

3,161 posts

273 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
I am interested in how the engine responded as it's the new 3.6 (?) that's in the new Tuscan.

Did it feel more civilised than the old 4.0 Ted?

>>> Edited by leatheradams on Wednesday 24th October 19:56

thom

2,745 posts

273 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
Great words.TVR has struck again!!
It's now really the time porsche & ferrari get a serious kick in their a**es!!!

marki

15,763 posts

270 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
TVR will never pass Porsche or Ferrari for Thechy stuff ,,But TVR are a big bang for the buck

thom

2,745 posts

273 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
marki
the point is not "thechy stuff" with TVRs but Soul!

thom

2,745 posts

273 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
What I would also add is that ferrari have bought their reputation with the soul of their cars in the fifties: they were nothing but an engine (which recquired tuning each 200 miles by the way) with cheesy-like chassis and their road holding was at the time much worse than the contemporary Maseratis
Now what I mean is that TVR deserves to outsell ferrari which are nothing to my eyes but symbols of social status: does anyone out here with a ferrari drive it like TVRs are driven? No of course because 99% of ferrari owners don't drive their cars, they leave it in the garage beside their S-class.
ferrari is no more than the shop window of Fiat
in one word f*ck ferrari

PetrolTed

34,425 posts

303 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
quote:
I am interested in how the engine responded as it's the new 3.6 (?) that's in the new Tuscan.

Did it feel more civilised than the old 4.0 Ted?



Couldn't tell as I could only take it 4,000 rpm. Felt more than 'adequate' from what I could tell

nubbin

6,809 posts

278 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
What's "thechy stuff"?



Edited by nubbin on Wednesday 24th October 22:32

gb61390

1,879 posts

282 months

Wednesday 24th October 2001
quotequote all
Brilliant! My dealer reckons I'll get mine early December, I can't wait. I've been waiting since Day 1 of last year's Motor Show and the car's got better and better every time TVR have 'made a change'.
At least this means the Dealers are getting their cars so us customers are getting very close........

alexah

3 posts

284 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
thom, I agree 100%!!!

Greetings from GerMoney
Andreas

Harey

271 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
The word you are looking for to describe the rear is 'pert'. Although your opinion usually loads equal gravity to Bin Ladens preachings, I think the outside is sex on steroids but the interior a let down after the artwork in the Tusc.

rev-erend

21,408 posts

284 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
Sorry but that rear end ... don't think so. Perhaps the engine cover should never have made production.

r-bin

135 posts

276 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
Lets just stop the arguing about the back of the Tamora, i think it looks great and (again) TVR has made a original looking car!
I also have to agree with thom that TVR rules and not ferrari, if i had to choose between a brand new ferrari F355 or a TVR tamora i had taken the TVR...

bryanlister

4,469 posts

281 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
Once again, an excellent write up Ted. I look forward to driving a Tamora once the demonstrator arrives. Styling wise - I feel that I can comment. No, I don't like that back end. It looks like they used a Victoria bath tub as a mould, popped it out and turned it upside down - voila, one back end. It also takes some styling cues from the Elise. The car also looks very small compared to the likes of Griffs and Chimps - but I confess to never having seen one yet in the GRP. The lack of front and rear overhang perhaps give this impression - or are we looking at something the size of an MGF? Can someone who has seen one comment?

I am looking to change my car for another TVR and it has taken me some time to learn to like the Tuscan - but I am just about there now. With the Tamora, I think that it will be an acquired taste stylewise - but if it drives well then I expect it will convert previous TVR owners. Pricewise, it is not significantly less than a Tuscan with only a £3-4000 difference. Given that the Tuscan has been with us for sometime and they have had the opportunity to iron out faults - I feel that TVR will find the Tamora a more difficult car to market - especially as they are after the quality and style conscious SLK/Boxster buyers who may not tolerate teething troubles so well. Time will tell - but good luck Mr Wheeler and thank you for bringing us another new TVR.

bling

60 posts

276 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
I think its a good thing that tvr have tried to move on in the design of thier cars ( make no mistake the griff, chim and cerb rules0, but times have to move on (not like marcos or morgan's). The rear end will grow on most people. The thing with the tamora, its it looks a little bit to cute for a tvr, I think its a bit to small, sort of like an mg.
Tvr are tring to target a wider public with this car (hairdressers anyone ?)
only time will tell. I personally do like it, but I don't think I will be ordering one.....

nubbin

6,809 posts

278 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
It is a small car - quite a bit shorter than my Chimp. It looks tiny compared to the Griff, even, but it's a lot bigger than the Elise, which will make it user-friendly. It isn't a go-kart like the Elise and VX220 - the rear end is less than perfect, but so is the nasty front end of the Tuscan. To me, there are two VERY important changes - the first is that the Tamora actually seems to handle as well as it goes. I love my Chimp, but I don't like the skippy feeling the back end has round fast bumpy corners, which makes it a bit point and squirt, rather than flowing through a series of bends.

Secondly, the build quality is way ahead of my Chimp. I was amazed at the pre-production car's solid interior looks and feel, and the way everything hangs together very simply and neatly. I think we should give TVR credit for raising their production values.

I am not too worried aboout engine problems either - this is a tested engine now, and if its true that the majority of Tuscan engine problems have been camshaft wear, then the more relaxed 3.6 engine will have different cams, hopefully from a more rliable supplier, and TVR will have learnt their lesson. The S6 has been around for a few years now, and is probably well sorted by now. And, there's a 2 year warranty on the engine!!

I can't wait to get mine, because I know it will be a fantastic, driveable car - that's what I personally want. I'm prepared to compromise on the styling, because in the end, a sports car is defined far more on it's speed, handling and general dynamics, as well as looks, and the Tamora is, by general consenus, the BEST handling car in it's class. That makes it more fun and safer, too. If you don't like the car, don't buy it, but don't criticise TVR for not building the car you want - let's stop navel gazing about the shortcomings of the Tamora, and take a more balanced overall view of a new car, setting a new, higher standard for TVR - It seems that this car is BETTER than a Boxster in most of the vital sports car attributes - I do not commute into the City, so I couldn't care less about clutch weight in town traffic, sat-nav, overall "packaging"etc: Give me 350bhp, class leading dynamics, gorgeous noise, looks to be noticed, that'll do for me!!

PetrolTed

34,425 posts

303 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
quote:
The thing with the tamora, its it looks a little bit to cute for a tvr, I think its a bit to small, sort of like an mg.


Stand behind it and it looks anything but cute. The flared arches give it a very aggressive stance.

PetrolTed

34,425 posts

303 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
Oh and one of the silly little things that actually pleased me was that the windows wind up and down really quickly and without any stupid twirly Tuscan knobs.

I'll get me anorak...

nubbin

6,809 posts

278 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
Music to my ears, Ted - any more little gems like that?

Graham B

1,359 posts

283 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
Ted, what's the steering column from? How come there isn't any nice alloy indicator stalks? Also what's that big alloy button to the right of the steering column?

I like the interior on the whole though. Less fussy than the Tuscan.

Cheers,

Graham

dubbs

1,588 posts

284 months

Thursday 25th October 2001
quotequote all
The front is nice, the interior is better than the Tuscan's and nearer the the acknowledged "king of interiors" the cerbie. The rear end is awful and the reason that if I was in the market for a TVR again I would not buy it. That along with the Tuscan S makes me wonder what's going on with TVR's designers as they have obviously lost the plot with how to design the rear of a car.