RE: The new BMW M3

RE: The new BMW M3

Friday 6th July 2007

2007 BMW M3 (E92) | Review

The new V8 powered M3 is here. Adam Towler is one of the first journalists to drive it. Is it worthy of the badge?



An all-new BMW M3; it doesn’t happen very often - around every seven years or so. And with the arrival comes expectation, and lots of it. This is the car that has repeatedly redefined what a ‘small’ sports saloon should be. But this time it’s different again. Not least, the switch to V8 power after two generations of the wonderful straight ‘six’ and a big increase in price – up to £50,695 in the UK. And there're talented rivals too - the Audi RS4 for example, not to mention the forthcoming C63 AMG.

Still, you could wedge a RAF hangar door open with the BMW press pack handed out on the launch. The book devoted purely to the engine is a reference tome in itself, but then technology and lots of it is one of the new car’s principal weapons.

Of course, there’s that new hi-tech all-alloy 4.0 litre V8 featuring double-VANOS, individual throttle butterflies and producing 420hp with 295lb ft of torque at 3,900rpm. That’s a huge increase over the old ‘six’ and BMW are quick to point out that it weighs 15kg less than the old engine too.


Elsewhere there’s a carbon fibre roof, lightweight suspension, MDrive facility with different setting programmable into an M button on the steering wheel (a la M5) and (optional) electronic dampers with three different settings. For now, a six speed manual gearbox is the only transmission available although some form of semi-auto ‘box will follow. Despite their best efforts, the M guys admit the new car weighs slightly more than the old one. As for the looks, well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

‘Is it any good though’, you’re thinking. The answer is yes, but not quite in the way you might be expecting.

Unsurprisingly, the new car is dominated by its engine. Even when you first sit in the car, you’re immediately struck by the ‘powerdome’ bonnet that seems much more prominent from behind the ‘wheel. The V8 starts with a cultured growl and settles to a respectable idle. Around town it is well-behaved, and apart from the sometime clunkiness of the transmission at low speed it’s all very effortless to drive. The ride seems very composed too, certainly more comfortable than the old car, although we won’t really know until we’ve driven it in the UK.


As soon as you press the accelerator a bit more however you can hear the voice of the new engine: a tight, V8 chord with a hint of muscle car from low to middling revs. Extend it further and it howls like a modern race car: a single, focused note that sadly doesn’t alter much in tone but just heightens in pitch. At this point, you’ve still got 3,000 rpm to go…

The final charge of the V8 towards its 8,300rpm is really quite a remarkable thing. This is where the power is truly ferocious. Up until now, the M3 can feel slightly constrained by its weight and what feels like a longish set of gear ratios, but once you’ve tapped into that final band you’re really flying and the noise the thing makes as it falls into the soft limiter is unforgettable.

So why is it that I miss the old straight ‘six’ – even though it was incapable of such powermeister heroics? Thing is, the V8 is just so, well, sensible.  It doesn’t rattle like the old straight six did at times; it doesn’t spit and crackle and sound as if it’s digesting its own internals on occasion, because frankly, it isn’t. It’s a new engine, operating with micro-millimetre precision against a strict computer leash, and no doubt in this original iteration well within its own limits, unlike the old stager. The outright anger inherent in the old car has vanished, and with it some of the urgency of purpose, the sharpness of throttle response – even with the new car in its most aggressive setting. It’s a question of character.


We hack across the mountains of southern Spain, making our way from the launch resort towards the Ascari Race track inland. On these roads the new M3 is punishingly, absorbingly, illegally fast. Imagine the old Spa circuit without the rain and you’re about there: long, gently curving downhill straights that stretch out into the distance followed by sweeping, plunging and rising compound curves. It’s mainly third and fourth gear stuff in this car and it’s in its element. The chassis feels poised and secure, and there always seems to be more revs to play with, and consequently more power.

It’s when the road changes on the other side of the mountain that things aren’t quite so impressive. The road is tighter now, with more corners that are less predictable in their curvature and often blind. It exposes the new cars biggest flaw - the steering, something that was never the strong point of the previous car either. It’s light (even in ‘sport’ setting let alone ‘normal’) and after a numb region around the straight-ahead becomes very quick without building any reassuring weight. Most of all though it’s remote from what the wheels are doing. Consequently, on a twisting road such as this, you’re always circumspect about your turn-in speed and often find yourself steering in two chunks on the entry to a corner to try and inform yourself of what’s going on down at the tyres. Bottom line: it’s competent and quick, but you just know in a Porsche Cayman you’d have a huge grin plastered all over your face on a road like this, and in the new M3, you just don’t…

It’s hard to comment too much on the brakes – it was said that every press car on the launch had upgraded brake pads, ostensibly to cope with the circuit work at the Ascari track – but they hauled the M3 down from big speeds on the road without drama.


Two positives stand out at the Ascari racetrack. Firstly, the straights give you the chance to extend the V8 right to the cut-out in a number of different gears and the resultant speeds are very impressive indeed. Secondly, with this much power the car can be pitched sideways and held there in a wanton drift (try that in a RS4) through a number of the slower corners – which is hilarious, although only when you’re not paying for the tyres.  However, as a tool to whittle away at your lap time, the new M3 is a little less convincing. It’s the small, subtle stuff once again: the remote steering; the LSD that feels a little slower to react than the old car; the lack of razor aggression in the engines mid range. Altogether, they slightly but decisively blunt the experience in a playground such as this.

So, the new M3 is a good car – a really good car. Its talents when viewed purely objectively make a formidable package. It’s more comfortable than the old car: rides better, has more room inside and is kitted out with the latest tech available – at a cost. Apart from a worrying thirst – test cars were returning around 11mpg according to their trip computers, although they were driven hard – the new V8 is smooth, refined and perfectly suited to everyday use, yet with crushing reserves of performance.

It seems certain that many M3 buyers will find this new car a superb companion and that any thoughts are in the distinct minority when they contain phrases about ‘steering feel’ and ‘driver feedback’. Such things increasingly have little value in a marketplace obsessed with power.


But instead of relinquishing the keys with that gripping, longing, sadness in my gut that you’d assume would be there having driven ‘the new M3’, I find myself oddly detached from it.

That there really is room for a ‘CSL’ is not in doubt and my bet is it won’t be long in coming from what was and wasn’t said on the launch. Whereas the old CSL required plenty of in-depth fettling to extract that extra edge from an already focused package, it seems the positioning of this new car leaves a much easier gap in which to place a hardcore version.

Contrived, maybe; an exciting prospect, definitely. But in the meantime, perhaps just a little of the M3 magic has been lost…



SPECIFICATION | 2007-2013 BMW M3 (E90/E92)

Engine: 3,999cc, V8
Transmission: 6-speed manual (or 7-speed DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 420@8,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295@3,900rpm
0-62mph: 4.6 secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,580kg
MPG: 22
CO2: 295g/km
On sale: 2007 - 2013




Author
Discussion

Mr Whippy

Original Poster:

29,024 posts

241 months

Friday 6th July 2007
quotequote all
3dr E39 M5 replacement?

If I won the lottery tomorrow I still wouldn't buy one, an E46 M3 CS seems a much better 'small' fast sports saloon...

Feels from the way it's described that the E36 ethos has shown it's head again...?

I think it's the looks and E39 size that puts me off, even if everything else is spot on.

Dave

PK328

563 posts

245 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Well, based on this, Autocar's and Car's reviews, it looks like the M3 is the biggest let down in recent times. Very sad.

costanzo427

192 posts

214 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
I wonder if it will be able to fend off all of the growing competition?

belleair302

6,842 posts

207 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
It looks as if the car is designed for the US market....to help make BMW money...not the producer of the World's Ultimate Driving Machine. Bigger, thirstier, not so track focused....all for the benefit of the US. Time for the tuners to step in....Hartge where are you???

308mate

13,757 posts

222 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
belleair302 said:
It looks as if the car is designed for the US market....to help make BMW money...not the producer of the World's Ultimate Driving Machine. Bigger, thirstier, not so track focused....all for the benefit of the US. Time for the tuners to step in....Hartge where are you???
yes

An all too familiar tale. And can you imagine how expensive the next CSL will be now?

Im surprised at BMW. The company and it's ethos becomes more dilute every year it seems.

baz1985

3,598 posts

245 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
308mate said:
belleair302 said:
It looks as if the car is designed for the US market....to help make BMW money...not the producer of the World's Ultimate Driving Machine. Bigger, thirstier, not so track focused....all for the benefit of the US. Time for the tuners to step in....Hartge where are you???
yes

An all too familiar tale. And can you imagine how expensive the next CSL will be now?

Im surprised at BMW. The company and it's ethos becomes more dilute every year it seems.
they sold out in 2002 imo.

MitchT

15,850 posts

209 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
I've come to the conclusion that there now exists an opportunity for a new car company to emerge, building the type of cars that BMW used to build. 'M' used to stand for 'Motorsport'. It appears from that review that it now stands for 'Motorway'. For the first time in my life a new M3 has come out and I'm not disappointed that I can't afford it.

[OcUK]Gibbo

3,541 posts

207 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Hi there

There are two current BMW's worth having in my oppinion and those are the Z4M Coupe and M3 CSL. All the other current M Cars just fail to give you that grinn. Obviously the older E30 M3's were truly amazing.

Also how come BMW can only managed 295Lb-Fb from a V8 and still only get 11MPG when driven hard?

I've got a Mustang with over 500 horses and 500Lb-FT. The car can still see 30MPG on the motorway and spirited driving still returns 14-16MPG.

So considering that BMW are bigging their engine up so much and have thrown so much technology at it which obviously cost a fortune why does it still have poor torque and MPG. Only good thing is the 8300rpm redline!

If I go BMW I am gonna be looking at an M3 CSL or a Z4M Coupe as those are the only BMW's left that make me smile.

Olf

11,974 posts

218 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Two statements in this review are just damn silly:

"you just know in a Porsche Cayman you’d have a huge grin plastered all over your face on a road like this, and in the new M3, you just don’t…"

And...

"Apart from a worrying thirst – test cars were returning around 11mpg according to their trip computers, although they were driven hard.."

Hard? Ragging it around a track? Hard... You could say that.

Are far as reviews go this one left me quite numb. Didn't really get a feel for the package at all. I think I'll reserve judgement.

Didn't they say the M3 CSL was a let down when it first came out?

Ravell

1,181 posts

212 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Very disappointing. Marketing men seem to have gotten their way again at BMW. It's pretty clear they got their target matket just right and loads of reps will be buying it for the M badge and just waft along. I'm sure they'll sell shedloads of them, but it's sad that now BMW doesn't seem to have any drivers cars left. frown

Looks power and prestige is all that counts. True entertainment for the people that really appriciate is is lost.

Edited by Ravell on Saturday 7th July 11:14

flattotheboards

6,681 posts

206 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
shame. but at leat there is room for the cs and csl model to have a bigger impact though. on reading this i would rather have an rs4.

aerospoke

364 posts

230 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
So let`s hope for a M1 coupe. That should be the true new M-car.

Wolvreen

65 posts

225 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Weighs a little more?
Hmm. Where is the stats?

Mafioso

2,349 posts

214 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Nice to see that they haven' put silly big wheels on it this time (unlike the CSL). I still quite like to see a bit of a tyre wall and it seems to work on this model.

Valentin

3,139 posts

215 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Why did they gave the press a red one?? with tan interior. The E46 M3 looked rather good in red, but the new one has to be in black or dark grey with black interior to look good, imho.

DoctorD

1,542 posts

256 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
PK328 said:
Well, based on this, Autocar's and Car's reviews, it looks like the M3 is the biggest let down in recent times. Very sad.
I really find this whole interweb doom mongering quite absurd. If you had driven the car there is absolutely no way you could conclude that.

A few of the journos who visited Marbella last week really need to pause and consider just what it was they were expecting the new M3 to be like. A little more considered reflection seems necessary IMO.

There will be the chance for a 'proper' test later next month, driving it on UK roads so I would recommend you hold fire on the doom mongering until after then.

Mr Whippy

Original Poster:

29,024 posts

241 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
DoctorD said:
PK328 said:
Well, based on this, Autocar's and Car's reviews, it looks like the M3 is the biggest let down in recent times. Very sad.
I really find this whole interweb doom mongering quite absurd. If you had driven the car there is absolutely no way you could conclude that.

A few of the journos who visited Marbella last week really need to pause and consider just what it was they were expecting the new M3 to be like. A little more considered reflection seems necessary IMO.

There will be the chance for a 'proper' test later next month, driving it on UK roads so I would recommend you hold fire on the doom mongering until after then.
It's heavy though. No matter how good it is, it's heavy. It'll never be anywhere like the old M3, and even as a CSL it'll probably be just as heavy as the E46 CS standard, so only benefit from more power and luxuries and not much more.

Can't wait for the next M3. 1800kg and 500bhp, oh hang on, thats the M5 we've just had.

This is basically to replace the old E39 M5. The M1 is the car you want to be looking out for to find anything resembling the older M3's!

Dave

Stu R

21,410 posts

215 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
Overcomplicated fat ugly mess summed my thoughts about the new M3 up having glanced at the previous pictures. Sadly I still feel the same.
As much as I wanted to like it, having loved it's previous incarnations, I don't. Utter bilge.

syko

5,006 posts

222 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
I just don't like the aesthetic look of the new 3 series range. Looking more like a slightly melted Audi. boxedin

Edited by syko on Saturday 7th July 17:00

Boulder

167 posts

203 months

Saturday 7th July 2007
quotequote all
after reading a couple of reviews i think i may stick with my E39 M5.

C63 will level the m3 by the look of things or mabe beat it!!