Website Q: Stretch across screen?
Discussion
Hey there,
I'm looking to increase the amount of PC repairs I do, so have thrown together a WP site. However, the theme only takes up a small part of the screen. Images are fixed width, so is it just down to me running at a huge resolution?
The website in question is: http://www.northwestpcrepair.co.uk/ which is running Wordpress as I'm nice and lazy
.
This isn't the ideal theme, I had one called MistyLook however whenever I replaced the header image it would mess up dimensions etc. If anyone would like to knock me up a quick logo for a few quid, let me know.
I'm looking to increase the amount of PC repairs I do, so have thrown together a WP site. However, the theme only takes up a small part of the screen. Images are fixed width, so is it just down to me running at a huge resolution?
The website in question is: http://www.northwestpcrepair.co.uk/ which is running Wordpress as I'm nice and lazy
.This isn't the ideal theme, I had one called MistyLook however whenever I replaced the header image it would mess up dimensions etc. If anyone would like to knock me up a quick logo for a few quid, let me know.
Edited by Taita on Friday 3rd October 11:32
Taita said:
I don't know why but when you upload an image for the header it wants it to be 809 X 190px but then crops and squashes the image. Any ideas?
The CSS acting on the image sets it to 200px high and then applies a 10px top and bottom margin. The different ways that browsers interpret the border box model means that the outcome won't necessarily look the same in IE vs Firefox. That said, it looks ok to me in IE7 and FF3. miniman said:
Taita said:
I don't know why but when you upload an image for the header it wants it to be 809 X 190px but then crops and squashes the image. Any ideas?
The CSS acting on the image sets it to 200px high and then applies a 10px top and bottom margin. The different ways that browsers interpret the border box model means that the outcome won't necessarily look the same in IE vs Firefox. That said, it looks ok to me in IE7 and FF3.
kup 
Thanks for your help.
Its this one
http://img229.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nwpcrfz1....
Its on the site now. Created in Paint.Net where it looks fine. As soon as you upload it thru the theme config it looks s
te.
Would like a logo knocking up too, using part of an image like these:
http://www.sdragons.com/Fractals/Blue%20Bennie%20a...
http://www.tcpmusic.com/fractal/Blue_Horizon%20128...
http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s69/AllstarEnte...
so if any designers wander past.
http://img229.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nwpcrfz1....
Its on the site now. Created in Paint.Net where it looks fine. As soon as you upload it thru the theme config it looks s
te.Would like a logo knocking up too, using part of an image like these:
http://www.sdragons.com/Fractals/Blue%20Bennie%20a...
http://www.tcpmusic.com/fractal/Blue_Horizon%20128...
http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s69/AllstarEnte...
so if any designers wander past.
Try this version:
http://www.binaryimage.net/ph/nwpcr.jpg
ETA - do Rockstar like what you've done with their font?
http://www.binaryimage.net/ph/nwpcr.jpg
ETA - do Rockstar like what you've done with their font?

Edited by miniman on Friday 3rd October 13:29
miniman said:
Try this version:
http://www.binaryimage.net/ph/nwpcr.jpg
ETA - do Rockstar like what you've done with their font?
http://www.binaryimage.net/ph/nwpcr.jpg
ETA - do Rockstar like what you've done with their font?

Edited by miniman on Friday 3rd October 13:29
I knew I recognised it, I nicked it off DaFont.com. I think I might get one of the 90 artists in this building to knock me up a logo
. Could you recommend an alternative font that would suit, as I am aware of the possibility of Rockstar throwing their toys out the pram.
See, I created an image with the same dimensions as http://www.binaryimage.net/ph/nwpcr.jpg which is at http://img58.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nwpcr1ln3....
but when I upload it, it makes it weird.
but when I upload it, it makes it weird.
Bah, I think I'll use minimans version www.northwestpcrepair.co.uk.
Header image just looks... grainy?
Header image just looks... grainy?
It looks greats.
Wordpress is a super platform for a cheap and easy content managed site, like yours.
I'm not a massive fan of the logo - do you really need your company name twice, once in the header and again in the image.
For something that looks "cool" try slicing a section out of a larger imagine, a bit like this:
http://searchengineoptimisation.yourspaced.com/
Wordpress is a super platform for a cheap and easy content managed site, like yours.
I'm not a massive fan of the logo - do you really need your company name twice, once in the header and again in the image.
For something that looks "cool" try slicing a section out of a larger imagine, a bit like this:
http://searchengineoptimisation.yourspaced.com/
CzechItOut said:
It looks greats.
Wordpress is a super platform for a cheap and easy content managed site, like yours.
I'm not a massive fan of the logo - do you really need your company name twice, once in the header and again in the image.
For something that looks "cool" try slicing a section out of a larger imagine, a bit like this:
http://searchengineoptimisation.yourspaced.com/
Thats actually a bloody good point. Ideally I'd like to thin down the image, so it isn't so thick too.. HmmWordpress is a super platform for a cheap and easy content managed site, like yours.
I'm not a massive fan of the logo - do you really need your company name twice, once in the header and again in the image.
For something that looks "cool" try slicing a section out of a larger imagine, a bit like this:
http://searchengineoptimisation.yourspaced.com/
Gassing Station | Computers, Gadgets & Stuff | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





