RE: Jaguar XFR

Wednesday 18th March 2009

Jaguar XFR

It may not be the ideal time to bring out 500bhp V8 super saloons but Adam Towler believes the Jag XFR makes the world a better place...



Product development cycles, future planning, and the march of technical progress being what they are in the car industry, not even the tough financial conditions facing Jaguar can delay the introduction of some tasty new variants. So while it might not seem like the best time to be launching a hot V8 XF, here we have the new Jaguar XFR, a 503bhp super saloon about to descend into one of the toughest and closely fought niches in performance motoring.

However, there are two main differences with this Jaguar assault compared to recent efforts. Firstly, there’s the base material, the XF saloon, a car that’s been drenched in plaudits since it’s launch in 2007, and rightly so. It’s a good car, and a thoroughly modern one too. And then there’s the mechanical specification of the XFR itself.


On the surface it’s ‘just’ another supercharged V8 saloon from Coventry, but when you delve deeper you realise there’s a lot more to it. Primarily, an all-new 5.0 litre V8, with the benefit of direct fuel injection and a sixth generation Roots type Eaton supercharger producing not just that headline power figure, but also 461lb ft of torque from 2,500rpm all the way through to 5,500rpm.

Jaguar fans are used to their cars fighting it out with less power than their rivals - usually for a lower price too - but no caveats are required this time: it’s toe to toe with the German competition on the ordnance front, freakish Audi RS6 excepted.

And then there’s the inclusion, for the first time, of a proper mechanical limited slip differential, with its locking capability under ‘active’ electronic control; a new, continuously adaptive suspension setup, co-developed with Bilstein, plus Jaguar’s superb installation of the ZF six-speed auto gearbox, complete with paddle shift control that blips the throttle to match crank and road speeds on a down-change.

Visual impressions mainly depend on whether you’re a fan of the XF to begin with – especially as the styling ‘enhancements’ are fairly subtle. It works better ‘in the metal’ than on paper - particularly in the way the chin mounted air intakes enliven the frontal styling – and the quad exhausts convey their own message to following traffic.

Climb inside, and the subtle mix of performance and style continues. The XF’s cabin is one of its standout features, and here in R trim, it’s even better. There is precisely stitched soft leather, a fine steering wheel and some new multi adjustable sports seats with considerable lumber and side support.


Press the start button and the drive select drum rises theatrically from the centre console and the big V8 rumbles quietly into life: select D, soothe your foot onto the accelerator pedal and the XFR pads forward with virtually all the refinement of an XJ limo.

But that’s just how life with an XFR can be if you so desire it. It’s snug, warm in atmosphere, yet unequivocally modern and cosy-cool rather than coldly technical; the stereo is great – as are the seats. It rides more firmly than the standard car, but despite the glassy roads on the Spanish launch it feels like it will be superbly composed and comfortable on poor British asphalt.


But it’s a mistake to view the XFR as simply another rapid and leather-lined British bruiser-cruiser. Depress the throttle firmly and its character morphs in an instant. Predictably, given the outputs claimed, it doesn’t matter if the engine is dozing at low revolutions; you’ve accessed a near-instant storm of howling acceleration, barely punctuated by the slick and seamless shifts from the ZF ‘box – the same ‘box that earlier had been so content to shuffle the gears politely.

Jaguar claims the XFR will get from zero to 60mph in just 4.7 seconds, with a top speed obediently limited to 155mph, but those figures sell short the remarkable savagery and flexibility of this car’s performance on the road. Fifty to seventy mph in just 1.9sec tells you far more. There’s much less supercharger whine than before, and although it could be louder still at times for these ears, the naughty crackle on the overrun is most welcome.

But what really makes this XFR a revelation is how it uses all its performance. The combination of all that torque, with a chassis that also knows how to switch from refinement to entertainment with seemingly no obvious barrier in between, means you can turn the prodigious acceleration on and off where and when you want like a tap.

Traction is amazingly good, up until the point you want to exceed the grip of the rear tyres on purpose, and the car has an agility that belies its weight and size, helped no doubt by the continuous response of those new dampers. These, and the ‘Dynamic Mode’ that retunes throttle, dampers and diff into a ‘maximum attack’ mode, could have smacked of jaguar being seduced by gimmicks – a real shame when Jags such as the old S-type R and XJR had that trademark fluidity developed by Mike Cross and his team.

No fear: the XFR has the same poise about it, but in Dynamic Mode tenses into something that you really want to drive hard. It steers with the clean and accurate response typical of modern Jags, helped by the quicker rack on the ‘R’, although there’s little weight for the first few degrees either side of the straight-ahead.


The steering on the new XKR weights up the moment you turn, but for the XFR it seems that a degree of limo-lightness has been retained: effortless, but not quite so involving.Could the XFR be a couple of more turns towards ‘angry’ on the character dial? Yes, to be honest, I think it could, although that’s not to say I feel it should.

It’s not been designed or developed to be a car that jumps down your throat the moment you sit in it. It doesn’t thrill you to the bone each and every time you begin a journey, nor does it emit the pure V8 beat of an AMG ‘63’ engine - and certainly not the furious yelp of an M5.


But rather than apply those thoughts as a criticism of the car as it is now, it’s best to see them as tantalising areas for exploitation by an even more focused XFR-S version. There’s certainly the potential, and introducing the bare-knuckle V8 bawl and steering response from the fabulous - and V8 Vantage-worrying - new XKR would be a good start. In the meantime, the XFR has to be the best super saloon all-rounder there is.

Author
Discussion

CTE

Original Poster:

1,488 posts

240 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Yeah, except it looks like a Ford Mondeo! Mind you, nearly all new cars are styled in the same wind tunnel. Soon, we will all be driving the same blobs....do you want the Mercedes or the Skoda badge today sir?

Chris71

21,536 posts

242 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
I was reading a review of the XKR last night and a thought occured to me - has Jaguar possibly got the best portfolio of any vaguely affordable mainstream car company? A genuinely credible sports GT and an apparently world-beating sports saloon in the same showroom is quite a boast. All the talk of JLR's finiancial issues seems to have smoothered the fact that they're actually producing really rather fine motor cars.

purple haze

259 posts

224 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
In value for money terms this is a real belter - it seems like it's the equivalent of when the Mk2 3.8 first came out. About time we had something to trounce the Bm's and Audi's. Jag may just have pulled it off. I hope they have!

G_T

16,160 posts

190 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
That red is absolutely awful.



paulmurr

4,203 posts

212 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
G_T said:
That red is absolutely awful.
yes They look terrific in black IMO smile

bob1179

14,107 posts

209 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
This is the car I want, I think it looks great, has an awesome engine and has a decent interior.

Just need to get the cash!

smile

Prometheus

367 posts

183 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
I just wish it didn't look like a large Mondeo.

ETA - I see someone else has put the same thing above.

Edited by Prometheus on Wednesday 18th March 14:18

rfn

4,530 posts

207 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
They look terrific in white and black IMO. Click to enlarge pictures:








Matthew_Eames

1,052 posts

204 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
I want!....but not in flat red

In about 5 or 6 years once i'm a reasonable age to be owning a Jag (nah, I would have one now in a heartbeat if I could....aged 21) this would definately be on my shortlist, none of this high revving V10 in a family saloon rubbish, nah a docile V8 is what you want....well one that can rip your face off when required

Well Done Jaguar, all needs to be done now is remove those silly orange indicator parts on the headlights (thought these went out in the mid 90's....yes I know it's for the american market)

Edited by Matthew_Eames on Wednesday 18th March 21:20

Ephraim

299 posts

189 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Having driven this car at one of the recent Jag experience days, I have to ssay that it's an incredible machine. Sure, if you don't like the styling in the first place, then you might not like the slightly more agressive version either; but I think that the XFR has just the right balance of stock look and purposeful sport styling. But, it's a drivers car and is meant to be seen from inside rather than out. And to my mind, the view from the inside is particularly special, especially when you press the loud pedal with the dynamic mode engaged.

If there is any criticism of the XFR, it's that it's not quite as marvellous as the XKR, which was what I hopped into next. Now, that is the car that stopped me wanting an Aston.

Edited by Ephraim on Wednesday 18th March 14:31

minimatt1967

17,097 posts

206 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Matthew_Eames said:
I want!....but not in flat red
Agreed, i want in black and fk the chrome off to be replaced with colour coded items cloud9

I WISH

874 posts

200 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
It a fabulous machine ...... but there's still something about the front that doesn't feel quite right. Its those 'surprised to see you I've just had a facelift and my forehead is too tight' front lights i think.

The rest of the car is just what you would expect from an Ian Callum design - i.e. very nicely shaped and well resolved (and with a wonderful contemporary interior).

I'm not sure I could cope with that front view every time I left the house though.

Pity .... 'cos its obviously a stormer.

coffee

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Are there any performance stats for it? 0-100mph, 1/4 mile trap times, top speed etc.

Negative Creep

24,979 posts

227 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
Really not a fan of the looks, especially the front. Still, hope it does well

G_T

16,160 posts

190 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
paulmurr said:
G_T said:
That red is absolutely awful.
yes They look terrific in black IMO smile
Agreed! Look great in black.

I would like to see them in the traditional dark green and dark blue though.

Edited by G_T on Wednesday 18th March 16:14

EdJ

1,286 posts

195 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
I wasn't sure about the front at first, but now after seeing quite a few on the road, I think they look lovely.

Don't see the Ford Mondeo similarities at all.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
EdJ said:
Don't see the Ford Mondeo similarities at all.
how can you not? the overall shape is very similar as are some of the other features. At a distance they do look very similar.

Cerbman

565 posts

278 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
EdJ said:
I wasn't sure about the front at first, but now after seeing quite a few on the road, I think they look lovely.

Don't see the Ford Mondeo similarities at all.
Exactly how I felt and now feel.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
EdJ said:
Don't see the Ford Mondeo similarities at all.
I can sort of see it in the final shot.

Looks lovely, but I STILL hate those headlamps.

Droptheclutch

2,604 posts

225 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Are there any performance stats for it? 0-100mph, 1/4 mile trap times, top speed etc.
Apart from 50 - 70mph in 1.9sec? Damn, that's brisk!