RE: PH Zeroes: Volkswagen Beetle
RE: PH Zeroes: Volkswagen Beetle
Thursday 16th July 2009

PH Zeroes: Volkswagen Beetle

PH dons its tin hat and spills out of the trenches for a tongue-in-cheek pop at a German icon...


What are your three creepiest insects? Here are mine: spider, beetle, cockroach. Though it seems unlikely that we’ll see a Cockroach on our roads, the motoring world has welcomed a shedload of Spiders – and a veritable infestation of Beetles. 21 million of them, to be exact-ish.


Ever wondered why motoring adopted such nasty beasts? No? Well, I’ll tell you anyway.

According to my grand-dad, who is dead, the Spider connection comes from the delicate roof construction of Edwardian horse-drawn carriages. As for the Beetle, some say that English schoolboys first made the insect association in the early '50s. That’s arguable, as is the origin of the Beetle itself. Some, who may have been Nazis, say that Hitler drew the shape on a napkin while masterfully pointing out the aerodynamic superiority of the beetle to that well-known idiot Ferdinand Porsche.

The most likely explanation however is that the Beetle’s design was nicked from Czech rear-engine gurus Tatra. Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia put the mockers on Tatra’s legal action against Volkswagen, but the case was reopened after the war and Tatra allegedly received a bung of 3m Deutschmarks from Volkswagen in 1961. Make of that what you will.


Either way, the Beetle is one of the best-named and most successful products in history. Not bad for something that didn’t even get its name from its manufacturer, and which was, frankly, crap.

Beetle fans will point to its 65-year production run and say ‘if that’s a failure then show me a success, you git’. But its sales success was almost entirely down to dull attributes like build quality, affordability and reliability – things we take for granted now, but which were conspicuous by their absence among mainstream manufacturers during the Beetle’s heyday.


The Beetle also benefited from a brilliant ad campaign through the '60s and '70s by New York ad agency Doyle Dane Bernbach. The creative revolution DDB spawned with classic print ads like ‘Lemon’ and ‘Think Small’ was fantastically effective in extending the Beetle’s lifespan way beyond its true sell-by date.

By any dynamic yardstick, though, the Beetle sucked. Unlike the 2CV, which punched well above its proletarian aspirations with removable seating, a full-length sunshine roof, comfy ride and acceptable handling, the Beetle provided no ‘surprise and delight’ features.


Instead, it offered rotten handling, feeble performance and terrible packaging. Front seat passengers were confronted by a vertical tin wall containing a speedometer and a couple of knobs. That may seem cool now, but forty years ago it was simply an unwelcome reminder of how skint you were.

And woe betide the poor sods who had to fold themselves into the back of a Beetle. Today’s ad copywriters would of course be praising the ‘iconic coupé-like lines’, but back then only masochists enjoyed its iron maiden accommodations. The Mk1 Mini had far more usable space.


Think yourself lucky that today’s motor car is largely impervious to sidewinds, because crosswind stability – or the lack of it – was a serious issue for Beetle drivers. The lawnmower engine characteristics of the thudding flat-four meant you could drone along all day at your maximum speed, which might just about begin with an '8'. That wasn’t quite fast enough to hog the outside lane. Instead, you spent your time straining past lorries and clenching every orifice as their bow-waves tried to force you off the road.

The Beetle’s mid-1930s air-cooled motor wasn’t really a car engine. It was a generator engine. Many years ago I bought a Type 2 campervan with the hopeful idea of picking up


hundreds of gorgeous Scandinavian hitchhikers. The 1600 lump lurking in a hole at the back seemed incapable of moving the thing along at much above walking pace, so I asked my local grease monkey to stick a new/recon one in. That had a nice shiny look about it, but performance seemed unimproved. Worse still, fuel consumption rose to a regal 18mpg. Outraged, I screamed the van all the way back to the garage at its top speed of 43mph to report my dissatisfaction. ‘18mpg?’, said the man, with an odd faraway look. ‘Wow… that’s really good.’ He meant it, too. It was first-hand proof of the fact that high weight + low horsepower = rubbish.


For a very long time Volkswagen seemed embarrassed by the Beetle, po-facedly referring to it as the Volkswagen 1200, 1300 (or whatever the engine capacity was) right up until 1967, when ‘Der Käfer’ finally crept rather shame-facedly onto the brochures. You can see why. Unless you value a car’s ability to float, or its refusal to let you shut the doors without lowering the windows, the Type 1 Beetle’s only saving graces are its doggedness (which, if you hated driving the thing, was actually a negative) and its build quality (which only boosted the doggedness). Volkswagen had traded in its original ‘peoples’ car’ mission statement for more premium positioning, and the Beetle just didn’t fit in.

None of the replacements that were meant to succeed the Beetle (411, Variant, K70) did, so Volkswagen shrugged its corporate shoulders and went with the flow. With the tooling costs long since amortised, it made some sort of sense to build a few thousand more Beetles in the slightly less particular and, shall we say, more Germanophile countries of central and south America. The Beetle became a popular taxi in Mexico until the government there decreed (not unreasonably) that female passengers were entitled to feel that they could get out without needing the driver’s permission.


That was the last straw: Mexican Beetle production stopped in 2003. You could buy new, fuel-injected Type 1s in the UK right up to that point for around £10k. Last year I was tempted to test drive a late model Mexibug that I found on ebay and was somewhat horrified by the experience. Apart from the coalhole ambience and weird pedal layout, the steering had no self-centring. That is a very peculiar feeling.

Interestingly, the disingenuously named ‘New Beetle’ still carries no Beetle badging. And is it a coincidence that Volkswagen’s British website crashes when you ask it to tell you about this particular model? Even now you get the impression that Volkswagen is only selling the Beetle under sufferance, under accountants’ orders, or perhaps in the vain hope that it may yet achieve Mini or Fiat 500-style cool. Somebody should tell them that flares will never come back.

Author
Discussion

bencollins

Original Poster:

3,558 posts

231 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Good read mister, though it helps the content mirrors my own opinions.
Good car to own yonks ago as it worked, when most did not for long.
Design wise, crap.

DJC

23,563 posts

262 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Agree entirely with that. Foul little car.

EDLT

15,421 posts

232 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Good in its day, but lived long past it's sell by date. Like the Mini.



[RUNS]

Jonny TVR

4,548 posts

307 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Remember spinning my brothers 180 degrees on a wet round about much to the annoyance of cars behind me. He blew the engine up once on the motorway and lost all of its oil but it still managed to get him the thirty odd miles home. Also remember a crowd of us travelling in it one evening to the Hacienda nightclub, the glove box lid making an excellent fold down table for skinning up on the way!

The Wookie

14,198 posts

254 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Amazing that so many people decried the fact that the new beetle was based on a Golf and was front engined... the way I see it, it fills in with it's heritage perfectly in that only the clueless imageophiles would actually stump up the cash to buy one, they're horrid to drive and somehow seems to keep going well after its sell by date.

I mean, for Christ's sake, it's based on a 2 generation old Golf with 3 generation old engines (last time I checked), I wouldn't mind but the Mark IV wasn't even a good Golf!

mat205125

17,790 posts

239 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Agree with everything that the article says.

All I wanted for my first car was a Beetle. Elder family members advised against it, and persuaded me that a Mini was the only way to go. I resisted until I was nearly of driving age, and got a hand on one on a "private industrial estate". The beetle came off of the list, and the shopping list changed from EMPIs and slopping wings, to Wellers and LCB exhausts.

Never the less, annual visits to Santa Pod for Bug Jam continually get the wallet twitching. Common sense always prevails though, as it does with the Defender itch. I've no need for one, they are slow, handle badly, and I'd never ever use it.

........ then I see a picture like this, and the pocket inferno starts again as my wallet trys to burn its way out of my jeans


Strawman

6,463 posts

233 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
One of the most popular cars ever made a zero confused They were reliable at a time when most rivals weren't and yes budget cars from the 40 & 50's were slow I don't see what the point is of decrying that.

aarondrs

649 posts

222 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Great article; you need big balls to criticise such an icon but I agree entirely. I can remember at the tender age of 17 when I got my Mini 1000 my mate having a 'Beetle' 1200. What a shed, absolutely hopeless when moving (and this it did slowly and noisily) though it did have an undeniable charm when standing still. He soon got rid (though it did hold its value!) and bought a Polo.

I could never see the attraction myself, even Herbie didn't do it for me. How did they sell 21million when our venerable Mini only managed about 5million.

Still, perhaps 20,999,999 million people know something I don't




W00DY

16,581 posts

252 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
"But its sales success was almost entirely down to dull attributes like build quality, affordability and reliability – things we take for granted now, but which were conspicuous by their absence among mainstream manufacturers during the Beetle’s heyday." Right so it was crap because it isn't as good as todays cars. Solid argument there. Volkswagen called it the type1 because thats how they named all their cars yet you right paragraphs about them being embarassed to sell it even pointing out that they never named the car beetle themselves. You complain about it still being sold in mexico but it was because it was cheap. Outdated? Yes but it suited the customers. A Tata nano is probably crap compared to a fiat 500 but does that mean they shouldn't sell them in India?

There are many issues with Beetles but none are highlighted in this article. No other vehicle in the world makes me smile as much as my beetles and iwouldn't straight swap my '65 for any car in the world. My mexi is great but lacks some of the charm and i can't afford to kee both so it'll be going soon.


Strawman

6,463 posts

233 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
aarondrs said:
How did they sell 21million when our venerable Mini only managed about 5million.

Still, perhaps 20,999,999 million people know something I don't
It helps when you market a car globally.

DrRazzle

91 posts

219 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
Agree with everything that the article says.

All I wanted for my first car was a Beetle. Elder family members advised against it, and persuaded me that a Mini was the only way to go. I resisted until I was nearly of driving age, and got a hand on one on a "private industrial estate". The beetle came off of the list, and the shopping list changed from EMPIs and slopping wings, to Wellers and LCB exhausts.

Never the less, annual visits to Santa Pod for Bug Jam continually get the wallet twitching. Common sense always prevails though, as it does with the Defender itch. I've no need for one, they are slow, handle badly, and I'd never ever use it.

........ then I see a picture like this, and the pocket inferno starts again as my wallet trys to burn its way out of my jeans

+1

GPT

2,744 posts

206 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
I largely agree with this.

I'm going to be even more controversial and say that I apply the same arguments to The Beatles. They were good at the time, I appreciate what they did, but listening to them today they sound rubbish. I don't want to take this off topic; I just thought it was a relevant comparison.

robert_raw

81 posts

218 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
I have just sold a 1973 1303s with 51,000. Alot of hard work to drive it, but the charm and noise of the air cooled 1600 engine made it worth it. Lots more heads turning than any sports car i have ever driven.

I miss mine lots, wouldn't buy another but glad i have owned one.

aarondrs

649 posts

222 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Strawman said:
aarondrs said:
How did they sell 21million when our venerable Mini only managed about 5million.

Still, perhaps 20,999,999 million people know something I don't
It helps when you market a car globally.
A fair point

Digga

47,182 posts

309 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Strawman said:
One of the most popular cars ever made a zero confused
Do not confuse popular with good.

And while I'm setting about the beetle:

Cotty

42,091 posts

310 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
I have never liked the beetle, my mate had one. It seemed cheap and slow, I much prefered my Mk1 Cortinas

DrTre

12,957 posts

258 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
It'll be ironic if the first (possibly/probably) PH Zeroes article to tacitly state it's tongue in cheek is the first one that most people actually agree with in all seriousness.

I'm with DJC on this.

Miles Brown

17 posts

215 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
oooh steady on Pistonheads - normally I agree with you reviews but I have to show my displeasure at this one...little out of order for the German equivalent of the Mini.... :-(

TehMonkey

387 posts

213 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Minis = cool drivers.

Beetles = Hitler Lovers.

RSD 25

562 posts

229 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
I agree, with about 50% of it.

yes the beetle had it's problems and yes it stayed in production longer then the whole world thought it lasted but theres something special with the beetle.

it's a tounge in cheek car itself, it was simple to maintain yes i do like them.

But then again i like the beatles too and will be getting all thair albums when they are re-released in about a months time or there abouts

Edited by RSD 25 on Thursday 16th July 13:55