RE: On The Road In The Mitsubishi Evo FQ400

RE: On The Road In The Mitsubishi Evo FQ400

Tuesday 25th August 2009

On The Road In The Mitsubishi Evo FQ400

£50k for an Evo? Ouch. We find out if it's worth it...



I hope you’re sitting down. I have just driven a £50k Mitsubishi Evo. This isn’t a custom-made job either, but a walk-into-the-showroom-and-tick-a-box car, the Mitsubishi Evo X FQ400.

On first glance it appears to have had an accident with the Halford’s parts department and come out with lots of garish plastic add-ons. On second glance you’ll notice wings on wings, carbonfibre front spoilers and a centrally mounted rectangular exhaust. This is not a car that blends into everyday traffic.

Inside the FQ400 there is less of the add-on garishness, though the bass box of the Rockford Fosgate sound system in the boot is carried over from the other highly specced Evo X models. But analysing the looks and wincing at its appearance is not the point of this car; it is about pure A-to-B speed, and boy can it do this well.

As a massive rally fan growing up with the North York Moors and Dalby Forest as my playground I have a natural predisposition for this sort of car. But I was always one to fall on the Subaru side and, with them being the most recent factory team competing, I still stick with that bias. Off the special-stage, Subaru’s last road car that really hit the spot was the RB320 and I really loved that car. It would take something special to top that, and our old long-term FQ360 never managed to outpoint the RB320 in my rally-nutter affections.


But this car is no FQ360. Sitting behind the wheel of the FQ400 and starting the engine, you suddenly get a feel this car is something else. There’s none of the aural numbness of the 360, with a low growling exhaust note reverberating around the car. One you would expect to hear on a forest gravel stage, and with the overrun pop you would associate with a fire-breathing rally monster.

The suspension has been lowered and the track widened, livening up the chassis response and leaving you more engaged in the driving experience. The steering response feels more accurate than the FQ360’s, and this gives you more confidence to attack roundabouts (or any other non-straight bits in your way) much harder than you’d think possible. The roll that was found in other Evo Xs has been eradicated and, with highly rigid, lightweight Bilstein dampers and Eibach coil springs on each corner, the car has the predictability that lower-spec versions really could do with.

Point it in a straight line, flex the right foot and you are bounding over tarmac as quick as many supercars. Hitting 60mph in 3.8 seconds feels quicker with the accompanying soundtrack from the four-cylinder, turbocharged 2.0-litre lump. Add to it the lower ride and some sticky Toyo Proxes R1Rs and this has to be one of the quickest vehicles over UK’s miles of B-roads.


The surprise with the FQ400 comes in the form of fuel efficiency. Despite being eye-wateringly quick and leaving your insides pushed firmly against your rib cage while cornering, it has good fuel economy. Well, that is relative, but compared with the slightly less muscled FQ360 it averages a good 2mpg better when gunning across country. Though Mitsubishi have purposely tuned the engine to deliver improved emissions and be a little less thirsty while adding the extra 40bhp, so maybe it should be expected.

It may save you money on fuel but the initial outlay won’t do. I always equate cars to their potential purchase if my lottery numbers ever appear. This car is one I would have to shortlist for a first trip to the dealers when the cheque arrives, but – and this is a big one – I think I would have to have multi-millions to justify spending £50,000 on an Evo X with bits cut out. In my non-lottery garage I would still choose the Impreza RB320.



 

Author
Discussion

MrKipling43

Original Poster:

5,788 posts

216 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
You'd have to MENTAL to buy this car when you can have the Beemer for as-near-as-makes-no-difference money.

steebo888

784 posts

198 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
50K for an evo 400 is insane. I would rather but an evo6 for 7-8k and tune it up for alot less money

mrmr96

13,736 posts

204 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
MrKipling43 said:
You'd have to MENTAL to buy this car when you can have the Beemer for as-near-as-makes-no-difference money.
It's not a BMW. They are different cars designed for different purposes. The Evo is still expensive for what it is, though. I agree with the chap above who would buy a lesser model and modify it.

However, the range topping FQ400 will always be something special, but might only be bought by mega enthusiasts who desire the 'purity' of a factory spec car over one that performs the same and is cheaper but requires aftermarket fettling to do so.

Garlick

40,601 posts

240 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
I didn't even drive this car when it came in to the office as it really didn't appeal to me in any way.

One mans meat etc......



Apologies, this comment adds nothing to the thread

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

218 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
What is all of this Halfords nonsense? It was never used previously and has now become some arrogant and ignorrant slur. It looks like a race car and the parts have been developed that way. If you think it looks like its been through Halfords you have obviously never watched a race series nor understand anything about aerodynamics. (thats not a direct comment just a generalisation)

If I had 50K to spend it would be fairly hi up on my list. Its as fast as pretty much everything in its price range. Especially round the track, IMO that is what makes it worth the 50K asking price.

HellDiver

5,708 posts

182 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
MrKipling43 said:
You'd have to MENTAL to buy this car when you can have the Beemer for as-near-as-makes-no-difference money.
Somehow I think if you wanted a quick saloon you'd be mental to pay £50k for a BMW that doesn't even have 4WD.


Fidgits

17,202 posts

229 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
hmmm...

i love the fact they have made this car... but i'd never, ever buy one.

soad

32,877 posts

176 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
Wouldn't buy one (it's ugly); still it's a very fast car.

thiscocks

3,127 posts

195 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
Prefer the styling of the MK1 400

adycav

7,615 posts

217 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
It seems to me that they've had their day now, these super fast rally reps. Which I suppose is a shame, but I've never really liked them.

Evos & Scoobys have always seemed a bit one dimensional form me, but each to their own.

Twincharged

1,851 posts

205 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
As well as being M3 money, it's a lot more expensive than a close rival- the Litchfield Type 20 which is £37,995 and has just under 400bhp.

BBS-LM

3,972 posts

224 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
£50k eeklaughrofl

If I had £50K to spend on a car, I would try and save up the extra money, £16K and get a second hand GT3 997. Worth every penny.

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1208543.htm

Edited by BBS-LM on Tuesday 25th August 12:12

CypherP

4,387 posts

192 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
I totally agree with the final comment about the RB320. I'd have the impreza any day, over one of these. I just don't see what you could possibly gain from spending £50k on an Evo, when in theory, there are so many other cars to be had out there for the same price.

Yes, they might not all be 4WD or quite as technical, but i could still find a dozen cars at least that would be equally as good fun, and probably a lot more for a £50k pricetag.

Stuart

11,635 posts

251 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
I drove it. Really, really liked it. Particularly compared to our FQ360 which felt far more highly strung and less well mannered by comparison. The external fripperies aren't my cup of tea, but you just have to drive around trying to pretend that they aren't all attached, I suppose.

However the Woolly Mammoth in the room, stamping and grunting and looking alarmingly like it'll charge at any moment, is the money. I suppose that if you could convince someone to buy it, barely use it and take the presumably enormous hit on residuals it might be worth it. Even then though you'd have a long, long list of other stuff that it'd need to work hard to argue against. A shame really, because I thought that it was an extremely accomplished thing by itself.

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

208 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
I would love to have a go on it, and im interested in them new Toyo R1R tyres!

But with my own money I would buy a evo 7-9 and mod.

sosidge

686 posts

215 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
vz-r_dave said:
What is all of this Halfords nonsense? It was never used previously and has now become some arrogant and ignorrant slur. It looks like a race car and the parts have been developed that way. If you think it looks like its been through Halfords you have obviously never watched a race series nor understand anything about aerodynamics. (thats not a direct comment just a generalisation)

If I had 50K to spend it would be fairly hi up on my list. Its as fast as pretty much everything in its price range. Especially round the track, IMO that is what makes it worth the 50K asking price.
But it hasn't - that's the problem with the Evo now.

Mitsubishi have no presence in the serious part of the WRC, just supplying a few production cars, which have most of the specialised electronics and engine tweaks removed.

It's long-time rival the Subaru Impreza is a pale shadow of what it was... they really dropped the ball with the hatchback, I bet the dealers are weeping into their spreadsheets.

I still respect the Evo as a car, but it's a relic of a past era.

zakelwe

4,449 posts

198 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
Garlick said:
I didn't even drive this car when it came in to the office as it really didn't appeal to me in any way.

One mans meat etc......

Apologies, this comment adds nothing to the thread
I really am in the wrong job smile

Regards
Andy

v8will

3,301 posts

196 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
I'd try very hard to find another 5 grand and pick up a new GTR instead. Assuming I wanted a turbo nutter 4WD Jap car.

collateral

7,238 posts

218 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
Have to wonder how reliable it's going to be chucking out 200hp/L

Didn't the old one have a bit of a reputation for breaking drive shafts?

Ralf Rockefeller

1,581 posts

177 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
BBS-LM said:
£50k eeklaughrofl

If I had £50K to spend on a car, I would try and save up the extra money, £16K and get a second hand GT3 997. Worth every penny.

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1208543.htm

Edited by BBS-LM on Tuesday 25th August 12:12
Thats brilliant, until you had to use for family things, like back seats for kids.

And if you say you have no kids- then why would you be looking at a 4 door fast car in the first place?

Pointless.