Grand Cherokee CRD - naff fuel consumption!

Grand Cherokee CRD - naff fuel consumption!

Author
Discussion

shortshift

Original Poster:

133 posts

209 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
I've recently bought an 05 Grand Cherokee CRD (I think it's a Merc engine). Pulls like and train and great to drive but can't get more than 21 mpg!? It's often as low as 17 mpg, even after a long run. It's supposed to have an average of 27.7 mpg. It had a torque converter problem which was sorted by changing the transmission fluid. I was hoping that was causing the poor consumption but it hasn't changed. Anyone got any ideas?

s2art

18,937 posts

253 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
shortshift said:
I've recently bought an 05 Grand Cherokee CRD (I think it's a Merc engine). Pulls like and train and great to drive but can't get more than 21 mpg!? It's often as low as 17 mpg, even after a long run. It's supposed to have an average of 27.7 mpg. It had a torque converter problem which was sorted by changing the transmission fluid. I was hoping that was causing the poor consumption but it hasn't changed. Anyone got any ideas?
US gallons or imperial?

jamiebae

6,245 posts

211 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure it's not a Merc engine - it's made by an Italian company called VM Motori and is shared with an LDV van. Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you want a cruddily made 4x4 with a Merc diesel engine may I point you in the direction of a Ssangyong...

Sorry, I have nothing constructive to add frown

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

177 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
jamiebae said:
I'm pretty sure it's not a Merc engine - it's made by an Italian company called VM Motori and is shared with an LDV van. Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you want a cruddily made 4x4 with a Merc diesel engine may I point you in the direction of a Ssangyong...

Sorry, I have nothing constructive to add frown
I'm pretty sure it is a Merc engine. Why would Daimler-Chrysler buy a VM engine that just happens to be and identical displacement, bore, stroke and output to their own 3.0 diesel six when they already make one. . . . . . . .

As for the OP and fuel consumption - I know people with a couple of these and they seem to give around 25mpg. Has it had a good service with all new fuel filters etc recently?

jamiebae

6,245 posts

211 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
OnTheOverrun said:
jamiebae said:
I'm pretty sure it's not a Merc engine - it's made by an Italian company called VM Motori and is shared with an LDV van. Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you want a cruddily made 4x4 with a Merc diesel engine may I point you in the direction of a Ssangyong...

Sorry, I have nothing constructive to add frown
I'm pretty sure it is a Merc engine. Why would Daimler-Chrysler buy a VM engine that just happens to be and identical displacement, bore, stroke and output to their own 3.0 diesel six when they already make one. . . . . . . .

As for the OP and fuel consumption - I know people with a couple of these and they seem to give around 25mpg. Has it had a good service with all new fuel filters etc recently?
Fair enough, I know the Cherokee and Voyager both use the 2.8 4 pot VM engine and the Grand Chreokee used VM engines too but it appears the latest one does use a MB engione smile

soxboy

6,164 posts

219 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
I had a brand new 06 Grand Cherokee CRD. It had a Merc engine and according to the computer it showed 22-23 mpg. No idea whether this was imperial or US, however it was ste.

Edited by soxboy on Thursday 1st October 00:00

Bill

52,676 posts

255 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
I had a Landcruiser auto that wouldn't change into top, oddly enough that had ste fuel economy toobiggrin Probably worth checking the gearbox is fixed.

MadmanO/T People

899 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
The old box-shaped Cherokees used the Italian built VM diesel engine. This was before the Daimler-Chrysler merger. Newer Cherokees use a Merc diesel.


Cheers,
Madman of the People

Citman

305 posts

184 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
From about 2000 till 2002, it was a 3.1 VM engine, replaced in 2002 by a Merc 2.7 - both five pots. After 2005, think it was a 3.0 Merc V6.

Mum's other half drives an 02-plate Grand Cherokee with the 2.7, has the Merc badge on a pile of components under the bonnet. His is an auto, not sure what his average consumption is, but I can ask?

Big old hunk of steel to be lugging around, though, and with an auto, I'm not sure anything much above low 20s mpg can be expected really, especially if you like to make full use of the Merc lump!


Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
as said, older ones used VM dismals (they had just been thrown out of Range Rovers at the time)

since the WJ Grand, they used first the 2.7Merc engine now the 3L in the current shape.

sad part is the old 4.7V8 petrol would average 19-21Mpg and not sound like a tractor doing it.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

178 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Those mpg figures are all done on an artificial circuit and are only useful for comparing one car against another measured over the same circuit. You'll be lucky to get within 75% of them in real life.

Try turning off the aircon, lift off the gas when going down hill, increase your tyre pressures and try to anticipate at junctions so you don't slow down to a complete stop (all where safety allows of course). All that might get you 2-3 mpg more, but unless you habitually hoon around in it you won't see much more than that by changing your driving style.

bull996

1,442 posts

209 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
V8 is the way to go.

Just over 22 running around. You dont have to drive it as hard as the diseasel.

GnuBee

1,272 posts

215 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Ran the same Jeep (05 plate) and saw the same fuel consumption figures - never got anywhere near the hugely optimistic 27.7mpg but then it's a 6 cylinder diesel in a 2 ton brick with 4wd so I wasn't expecting any better tbh

markcjd

1,411 posts

187 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
WH model (mid 2005 onwards) uses the V6 merc unit. If your MPG is taken from the digital display then disregard it completely. The onboard computer is innacurate and uses US gallons.

I have had 17 CRD WH grand cherokees and 27mpg is quite easily reachable. On Motorway running 30mpg is not unusual. If you are getting less than 25 AND are driving a fair mix of urban/extra urban roads then i'd suggest a delaer visit. Before doing so though calculate your actual economy accurately.

The killer for these engines is city running where 18-20 mpg is more realistic. Have a look at some of the aftermarket performance chips as these can add 10% to the economy depending on the driving style.

Lastly, do not skimp on servicing. These things will run like a watch if maintained regularly and correctly. Use the recommended oil (but don't buy from the dealer) and make sure it gets a good blast on occasion.

Shout if you need anything else,

Mark

BERGS2

2,801 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Have just got hold of a 2.5TD Old shape cherokee

I thought it was a renault lump? confused

not expecting great shakes in fuel consumption, but given the 4.0 would return mpg in the teens - it shouldn't be quite so thirsty...

CHN

1,796 posts

254 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
I get 18/19 out of the 4.0 Range Rover (petrol V8).

Cruising along the 50mph zone the other day and I saw 28mpg and it doesn't sound st.

Edited by CHN on Thursday 1st October 10:27

HellDiver

5,708 posts

182 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
BERGS2 said:
Have just got hold of a 2.5TD Old shape cherokee

I thought it was a renault lump? confused
No, VM. Same crap as the Range Rover Classic.

BERGS2

2,801 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
BERGS2 said:
Have just got hold of a 2.5TD Old shape cherokee

I thought it was a renault lump? confused
No, VM. Same crap as the Range Rover Classic.
Cheers! thumbup

will let you know when it breaks down wink


Beefmeister

16,482 posts

230 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
markcjd said:
I have had 17 CRD WH grand cherokees
You've owned 17 of them?

How so?

Edited by Beefmeister on Thursday 1st October 16:41

Deva Link

26,934 posts

245 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
shortshift said:
I've recently bought an 05 Grand Cherokee CRD (I think it's a Merc engine). Pulls like and train and great to drive but can't get more than 21 mpg!? It's often as low as 17 mpg, even after a long run. It's supposed to have an average of 27.7 mpg. It had a torque converter problem which was sorted by changing the transmission fluid. I was hoping that was causing the poor consumption but it hasn't changed. Anyone got any ideas?
What did you drive before?

With any diesel auto, a "press on" style of driving absolutely murders the MPG. You've got to back off the gas pedal and let the car almost ease itself along using the engine's torque.

I have a Merc C270CDi auto and I can get 50MPG on the display if I'm in the right frame of mind, but any hint of pushing and it'll be low 40's. Around town it does low 30's.

Having said that, how many miles has it done? It could have injector issues etc, and you wouldn't really notice any power drop-off.