Which one?
Author
Discussion

MoreSteam

Original Poster:

698 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th November 2009
quotequote all
OK. I know it's been done to death and I don't want to start any fights. I'm considering changing car, but I'm not sure which one to go for. Something a bit more modern.

A Saggy is out due to price.

I think first choice would be a Tuscan II. The styling and performance do it for me. The only thing is the handling. I have heard horror stories about Tuscan handling. Was this improved with the Mk2?

I love the T350, but it's not a convertible. This isn't a big deal, but something I'd like to bear in mind. The smaller engine could be a bit of a turn off. I know it's a lot over my Chim, but am I going to get fed up with the power quickly?

Also the Tamora. Apparently the best handling apart from the Saggy. The only turn off again is the 3.6L engine.

I'm willing to bet I'll be even more confused once everyone has posted. wink

Cheers

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

31,909 posts

261 months

Thursday 19th November 2009
quotequote all
Best choice by miles...






































MoreSteam

Original Poster:

698 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th November 2009
quotequote all
smile It is a good car. Thats why I'm thinking of another TVR.

geoffphead

637 posts

227 months

Thursday 19th November 2009
quotequote all
I went from T350t back to a chim 450 , hated it hated it. Dont be put off by it being a smaller engine imho speed6 is a fantastic power plant get out there and drive as many as you can.

have fun trying them
Geoff

The Surveyor

7,623 posts

263 months

Thursday 19th November 2009
quotequote all
I went from a Chimaera to a Tuscan Convertible.

The Mk 2 chassis is apparently much more forgiving than the Mk 1 although i've never driven an early one. The speed 6 is totally addictive and IMHO the Tuscan 2 convertible is a great step from the Griffith / Chimaera. The Tuscan 2 s could be considered as a modern Griffith in character, with the 'touring' non-S spec 4.0l (like mine) being nicely complient on most roads whilst still being bloody quick..

Paul

crimbo

1,308 posts

254 months

Thursday 19th November 2009
quotequote all
From what I have read the 3.6 is great fun and wants to rev more than a 4.0l although I don’t know from experience. How about a t350t where the roof panels come off.

TVR653X

1,042 posts

201 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Supercharge the Chim. Cheaper, more reliable, faster, more practical.

Don1

16,630 posts

234 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Out of the choises, Tuscan 2 for me (having never driven one, but compared between my well set up Chim and the Sag - no contest).

Sytling is amazing, convertible, rarer than the Sagaris, and should be a fully sorted engine (for the next few years, and then you can torment yourself over the 4.3, FFF, or both supercharged).

Arrrr, gowarn!

tobeee

1,436 posts

294 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
MoreSteam said:
OK. I know it's been done to death and I don't want to start any fights. I'm considering changing car, but I'm not sure which one to go for. Something a bit more modern.

A Saggy is out due to price.

I think first choice would be a Tuscan II. The styling and performance do it for me. The only thing is the handling. I have heard horror stories about Tuscan handling. Was this improved with the Mk2?

I love the T350, but it's not a convertible. This isn't a big deal, but something I'd like to bear in mind. The smaller engine could be a bit of a turn off. I know it's a lot over my Chim, but am I going to get fed up with the power quickly?

Also the Tamora. Apparently the best handling apart from the Saggy. The only turn off again is the 3.6L engine.

I'm willing to bet I'll be even more confused once everyone has posted. wink

Cheers
Buy a T350. Buy my T350. It looks good and goes very very fast (even if the engine is titchy).

Blues

8,546 posts

245 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
TVR653X said:
Supercharge the Chim. Cheaper, more reliable, faster, more practical.
yes ... then buy a Tuscan as well paperbag

lazyitus

19,931 posts

292 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
How about a nice, late Griffith 500 with a well set up underside ? Future classic for sure and still looks lovely today IMO.

They're bloody quick too if you get a good one. If it's not quick enough, tons of upgrades are available including a supercharger. lick

MoreSteam

Original Poster:

698 posts

216 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Blues said:
TVR653X said:
Supercharge the Chim. Cheaper, more reliable, faster, more practical.
yes ... then buy a Tuscan as well paperbag
If only........

Supercharging the Chim is always an option. Do you really think a supercharged 400 could outrun a Tuscan?

Blues

8,546 posts

245 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
MoreSteam said:
Blues said:
TVR653X said:
Supercharge the Chim. Cheaper, more reliable, faster, more practical.
yes ... then buy a Tuscan as well paperbag
If only........

Supercharging the Chim is always an option. Do you really think a supercharged 400 could outrun a Tuscan?
My SC 450 Chim is definitely more spritely than my standard Tuscan. But so it should be with 425 bhp. However i expect that from 120 mph the Tuscan would just reel in the Chim, and carry on going.

Now... a supercharged Tuscan evil

Zippee

14,062 posts

260 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
MoreSteam said:
Blues said:
TVR653X said:
Supercharge the Chim. Cheaper, more reliable, faster, more practical.
yes ... then buy a Tuscan as well paperbag
If only........

Supercharging the Chim is always an option. Do you really think a supercharged 400 could outrun a Tuscan?
I thought long and hard about putting an SC on my old Chim 400 - I knew it was a very well sorted car and I yearned for more power.
However, a supercharged Chim is in fact just a faster Chimaera, the T350 is so much more than that.

It's leagues above the Chimaera in the handling department, my Chim was on uprated shocks, polybushes and full geo so was fully sorted in that respect. My T350 on standard shocks is way better than the Chim was and I can't wait to see the difference when I put Nitrons on next year.
The Chim is more of a comfy GT whereas the 350 is more of a balls out sportscar, it's not quite as practical as the Chim but will still take weekend bags with ease. The build quality is also several steps up from the Chim.

The 3.6 is very free revving and I've held my own against a 4.0 red rose Tuscan so it's certainly no slouch. The 4.0 is faster but TBH until you get into really stupid speeds you'd never notice. The only thing I do miss on the RV8 is the low down torque, the S6 doesn't really come alive until you get over 3000rpm.

My advice - try one and see what you think rather than rely on biaised (including myself) advice on the internet smile

greenm

473 posts

226 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
You are all wrong and confusing the poor guy just get a Cerb with a 4.5 V8

Mr M

1,276 posts

228 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
greenm said:
You are all wrong and confusing the poor guy just get a Cerb with a 4.5 V8
coffee ;-)

Edited by Mr M on Friday 20th November 14:43

TVR653X

1,042 posts

201 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Ok, Supercharge the Chim, then fit a new 6 speed gearbox so it can really stretch its legs. That should be good for about 180mph. Plus it sounds better than a Tuscan, more deep and ballsy (not that a Tuscan sounds bad, just V8s rule!).

MoreSteam

Original Poster:

698 posts

216 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Has anyone gone from a Mk1 to a Mk2 Tuscan? It would be interesting to know what the difference is other than cosmetics.

WorAl

10,877 posts

214 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
I went from a Chimaera to a Tuscan Convertible.

The Mk 2 chassis is apparently much more forgiving than the Mk 1 although i've never driven an early one. The speed 6 is totally addictive and IMHO the Tuscan 2 convertible is a great step from the Griffith / Chimaera. The Tuscan 2 s could be considered as a modern Griffith in character, with the 'touring' non-S spec 4.0l (like mine) being nicely complient on most roads whilst still being bloody quick..

Paul
What would you know about driving quick? hehewink

Uncle Fester

3,114 posts

234 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
I went around Rockingham as a passenger in the TVR Power demonstrator SC500 (with a proper race driver) we were slightly faster than the SP6 drivers.

But that's with a smooth driver and a smooth track. On the road I would expect the SP6 to cope with the poorer surfaces better and be quite a bit quicker.